Search (89 results, page 1 of 5)

0.0069915573 = product of:
  0.05593246 = sum of:
    0.05593246 = product of:
      0.083898686 = sum of:
        0.042138875 = weight(_text_:29 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042138875 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
        0.04175981 = weight(_text_:22 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04175981 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Date

29. 8.2005 12:54:22

0.0036589042 = product of:
  0.014635617 = sum of:
    0.008676279 = product of:
      0.026028836 = sum of:
        0.026028836 = weight(_text_:problem in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026028836 = score(doc=592,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.19896023 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.005959337 = product of:
      0.01787801 = sum of:
        0.01787801 = weight(_text_:29 in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01787801 = score(doc=592,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.1648916 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Date

29. 3.1996 18:16:49
2.11.2007 12:29:28

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.11, S.1704 (D.E. Agosto): "Student participation in computer science (CS) has dropped significantly over the past few years in the United States. As the Computing Research Association (Vegso, 2006) recently noted, "After five years of decline, the number of new CS majors in fall 2005 was half of what it was in fall 2000 (15,958 vs. 7,952)." Many computing educators and working professionals worry that this reduced level of participation might result in slowed technological innovation in future years. Adding to the problem is especially low female participation in the computer-related disciplines. For example, Cohoon (2003) showed that the percentage of high school girls indicating intent to study CS in college dropped steadily from 1991 to 2001, from a high of 37% to a low of 20%. The National Science Foundation's most recent report on Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering (National Science Foundation, 2004) indicates that while females obtained 57% of all bachelor's degrees in 2001, they obtained just 28% of computer-related undergraduate degrees. These low percentages of female participation are reflected in the computing workforce as well. Women and Information Technology: Research on Underrepresentation provides an overview of research projects and research trends relating to gender and computing. The book takes a proactive general stance; the ultimate goal of publishing the research included in the volume is to lead to significant gains in female representation in the study and practice of the computing-related fields. ... The volume as a whole does not offer a clear-cut solution to the problem of female underrepresentation, but a number of the chapters do indicate that recruitment and retention must be dealt with jointly, as each is dependent on the other. Another recurring theme is the importance of role models from early on in girls' lives, in the form of both female faculty and female computing professionals as role models. Still another recurring theme is the importance of female mentoring before and during the college years, including both informal peer mentoring and formal faculty mentoring. Taken as a whole, this is a successful work that is probably most useful as a background reference tool. As such, it should assist students and scholars interested in continuing this undeniably important area of research."

0.0034450088 = product of:
  0.02756007 = sum of:
    0.02756007 = product of:
      0.08268021 = sum of:
        0.08268021 = weight(_text_:22 in 4698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08268021 = score(doc=4698,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 4698, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4698)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Issue

Vol.22.

Signature

78 BAHH 1089-22

0.0030916908 = product of:
  0.012366763 = sum of:
    0.00885519 = product of:
      0.02656557 = sum of:
        0.02656557 = weight(_text_:problem in 3592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02656557 = score(doc=3592,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.20306295 = fieldWeight in 3592, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3592)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.003511573 = product of:
      0.010534719 = sum of:
        0.010534719 = weight(_text_:29 in 3592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010534719 = score(doc=3592,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.097163305 = fieldWeight in 3592, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3592)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Current Research Information Systems is the focus of series of international conferences, initiated since 1991 by euroCRIS, a non-profit association. Screening the topics of the former conferences you can see that CRISs always picked up both the social challenges and the technological developments. Topics of former conferences were - establishment of research databases in single countries - standardisation and harmonisation - data exchange formats - Marketing, promotion and dissemination of research information CRIS 2002 is reflecting the real situation, influenced by social pressure an scientists to provide answers to problems of society and an transparency of research and research results in a world of unbounded (electronic) information networks. In the times of electronic networks it is not the problem to spread information, but the question is how to find the needed information at the right moment within appropriate time. Especially looking to WWW we not only have an enormous amount of information but different kinds of information systems (single systems and those em-bedded in a university research information management system), structured and non-structured information offers, data of different quality. The most exciting questions that will be discussed at CRIS 2002 are: - How can we solve the heterogeneity problem searching in distributed CRISs? - How efficient are search engines? Do we need CRISs in times of search engines like "google"? - What achieve new flexible and extensible data- and information-exchange models in addition? And last but not least: Is their any user for CRIS? Who are the users? Do they only want to find interesting information about research or do they want to use this information for analysis and evaluation of (local, regional, national, transnational) research systems and appropriate funding of research? We set our hopes an fruitful lectures and discussions and long lasting effects of CRIS 2002. This conference was organised by the University of Kassel and the Social Science Information Centre, Bonn, which give all the support needed to organise an international conference. But without funding and sponsoring of the conference by research funding institutions and by private firms of Germany the conference could not have taken place. We want to express our gratitude. We want to thank members of programme and organisation committees working for a good conference too.

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: CRIS-Cross: Research Information Systems at a Crossroads (Eric H. Zimmerman) Current Research Information as Part of Digital Libraries and the Heterogeneity Problem: Integrated searches in the context of databases with different content analyses (Jürgen Krause) CERIF: Past, Present and Future: An Overview (Anne Asserson, Keith G Jeffery, Andrei Lopatenko) Treatment of Semantic fleterogeneity using Meta-Data Extraction and Query Translation (Robert Strötgen) Proposals for a new flexible and extensible XML-model for exchange of research information (Jens Vindvad, Erlend Oeverby), Information Retrieval of Research Information in a Distributed Heterogeneous Environment (Andrei Lopatenko, Anne Asserson, Keith G Jeffery) Effectiveness of tagging laboratory data using Dublin Core in an electronic scientific notebook (Laura M. Bartolo, Cathy S. Lowe, Austin C Melton, Monica Strah, Louis Feng, Christopher J. Woolverton) Comparative Study of Metadata for Scientific Information: The place of CERIF in CRISs and Scientific Repositories (Keith G Jeffery, Andrei Lopatenko, Anne Asserson) Metasearch engine for Austrian research information (Marek Andricik) SEAL - a SEmantic portAL with content management functionality (Steffen Staab, Rudi Studer, York Sure, Raphael Volz) Discovery of patterns of scientific and technological development and knowledge transfer (Anthony FJ van Raan, Ed C. M. Noyons)

0.0030184416 = product of:
  0.012073766 = sum of:
    0.007157564 = product of:
      0.021472692 = sum of:
        0.021472692 = weight(_text_:problem in 3) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021472692 = score(doc=3,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.1641338 = fieldWeight in 3, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0049162023 = product of:
      0.014748606 = sum of:
        0.014748606 = weight(_text_:29 in 3) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014748606 = score(doc=3,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 3, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Content

The need for a universal definition of life in twenty-first-century biology -- Energy coupling -- Bioinformation as a triadic relation -- The biosemiotic approach in biology : theoretical bases and applied models -- Problem solving in the life cycles of multicellular organisms : immunology and cancer -- The informational nature of biological causality -- The self-construction of a living organism -- Plasticity and complexity in biology : topological organization, regulatory protein networks, and mechanisms of genetic expression -- Decision making in the economy of nature : value as information -- Information theory and perception : the role of constraints, and what do we maximize information about? -- Attention, information, and epistemic perception -- Biolinguistics and information -- The biology of personality

Date

29. 3.1996 18:16:49

0.002951555 = product of:
  0.02361244 = sum of:
    0.02361244 = product of:
      0.03541866 = sum of:
        0.014748606 = weight(_text_:29 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014748606 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
        0.020670053 = weight(_text_:22 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020670053 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

All the papers underwent a thorough and rigorous peer-review process. The review and selection this year was highly competitive and only papers containing significant research results, innovative methods, or novel and best practices were accepted for publication. Only 29 of 89 submissions were accepted as full papers, representing 32.5% of the total number of submissions. Additional contributions covering noteworthy and important results in special tracks or project reports were accepted, totaling 42 accepted contributions. This year's conference included two outstanding keynote speakers. Dr. Stefan Gradmann, a professor arts department of KU Leuven (Belgium) and director of university library, addressed semantic research drawing from his work with Europeana. The title of his presentation was, "Towards a Semantic Research Library: Digital Humanities Research, Europeana and the Linked Data Paradigm". Dr. Michail Salampasis, associate professor from our conference host institution, the Department of Informatics of the Alexander TEI of Thessaloniki, presented new potential, intersecting search and linked data. The title of his talk was, "Rethinking the Search Experience: What Could Professional Search Systems Do Better?"

Date

17.12.2013 12:51:22

0.002785014 = product of:
  0.011140056 = sum of:
    0.005112546 = product of:
      0.015337638 = sum of:
        0.015337638 = weight(_text_:problem in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015337638 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.11723843 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.00602751 = product of:
      0.01808253 = sum of:
        0.01808253 = weight(_text_:22 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01808253 = score(doc=150,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Classification

006.7 22

Date

7. 3.2007 19:30:22

DDC

006.7 22

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.3, S.457-458 (A.M.A. Ahmad): "The concept of the semantic web has emerged because search engines and text-based searching are no longer adequate, as these approaches involve an extensive information retrieval process. The deployed searching and retrieving descriptors arc naturally subjective and their deployment is often restricted to the specific application domain for which the descriptors were configured. The new era of information technology imposes different kinds of requirements and challenges. Automatic extracted audiovisual features are required, as these features are more objective, domain-independent, and more native to audiovisual content. This book is a useful guide for researchers, experts, students, and practitioners; it is a very valuable reference and can lead them through their exploration and research in multimedia content and the semantic web. The book is well organized, and introduces the concept of the semantic web and multimedia content analysis to the reader through a logical sequence from standards and hypotheses through system examples, presenting relevant tools and methods. But in some chapters readers will need a good technical background to understand some of the details. Readers may attain sufficient knowledge here to start projects or research related to the book's theme; recent results and articles related to the active research area of integrating multimedia with semantic web technologies are included. This book includes full descriptions of approaches to specific problem domains such as content search, indexing, and retrieval. This book will be very useful to researchers in the multimedia content analysis field who wish to explore the benefits of emerging semantic web technologies in applying multimedia content approaches. The first part of the book covers the definition of the two basic terms multimedia content and semantic web. The Moving Picture Experts Group standards MPEG7 and MPEG21 are quoted extensively. In addition, the means of multimedia content description are elaborated upon and schematically drawn. This extensive description is introduced by authors who are actively involved in those standards and have been participating in the work of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/MPEG for many years. On the other hand, this results in bias against the ad hoc or nonstandard tools for multimedia description in favor of the standard approaches. This is a general book for multimedia content; more emphasis on the general multimedia description and extraction could be provided.

0.002577759 = product of:
  0.010311036 = sum of:
    0.0061350553 = product of:
      0.018405166 = sum of:
        0.018405166 = weight(_text_:problem in 1442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018405166 = score(doc=1442,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.14068612 = fieldWeight in 1442, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1442)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.004175981 = product of:
      0.012527943 = sum of:
        0.012527943 = weight(_text_:22 in 1442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012527943 = score(doc=1442,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1442, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1442)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: 1. Wissensgesellschaft Michael NIEHAUS: Durch ein Meer von Unwägbarkeiten - Metaphorik in der Wissensgesellschaft S.3 Karsten WEBER: Aufgaben für eine (globale) Wissensgesellschaft oder "Welcome to the new IT? S.9 Katy TEUBENER: Chronos & Kairos. Inhaltsorganisation und Zeitkultur im Internet S.22 Klaus KRAEMER: Wissen und Nachhaltigkeit. Wissensasymmetrien als Problem einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung S.30 2. Lehre und Lernen Gehard BUDIN: Wissensorganisation als Gestaltungsprinzip virtuellen Lernens - epistemische, kommunikative und methodische Anforderungen S.39 Christan SWERTZ: Webdidaktik: Effiziente Inhaltsproduktion für netzbasierte Trainings S.49 Ingrid LOHMANN: Cognitive Mapping im Cyberpunk - Uber Postmoderne und die Transformation eines für so gut wie tot erklärten Literaturgenres zum Bildungstitel S.54 Rudolf W. KECK, Stefanie KOLLMANN, Christian RITZI: Pictura Paedagogica Online - Konzeption und Verwirklichung S.65 Jadranka LASIC-LASIC, Aida SLAVIC, Mihaela BANEK: Gemeinsame Ausbildung der IT Spezialisten an der Universität Zagreb: Vorteile und Probleme S.76 3. Informationsdesign und Visualisierung Maximilian EIBL, Thomas MANDL: Die Qualität von Visualisierungen: Eine Methode zum Vergleich zweidimensionaler Karten S.89 Udo L. FIGGE: Technische Anleitungen und der Erwerb kohärenten Wissens S.116 Monika WITSCH: Ästhetische Zeichenanalyse - eine Methode zur Analyse fundamentalistischer Agitation im Internet S.123 Oliver GERSTHEIMER, Christian LUPP: Systemdesign - Wissen um den Menschen: Bedürfnisorientierte Produktentwicklung im Mobile Business S.135 Philip ZERWECK: Mehrdimensionale Ordnungssysteme im virtuellen Raum anhand eines Desktops S.141

0.002483057 = product of:
  0.019864457 = sum of:
    0.019864457 = product of:
      0.05959337 = sum of:
        0.05959337 = weight(_text_:29 in 2803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05959337 = score(doc=2803,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 2803, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2803)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Issue

Vol.29.

Signature

78 BAHH 1021-29

0.002467035 = product of:
  0.00986814 = sum of:
    0.0070841527 = product of:
      0.021252457 = sum of:
        0.021252457 = weight(_text_:problem in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021252457 = score(doc=2047,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.16245036 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0027839874 = product of:
      0.008351962 = sum of:
        0.008351962 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008351962 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Date

2. 1.2004 10:35:22

Footnote

Rez. in: Knowledge organization 30(2003) no.1, S.40-42 (J.-E. Mai): "Introduction: This is a collection of papers presented at the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment held in Bangalore, India, an August 9-11 2001. The collection contains 18 papers dealing with various issues related to knowledge organization and classification theory. The issue of transferring the knowledge, traditions, and theories of bibliographic classification to the digital environment is an important one, and I was excited to learn that proceedings from this seminar were available. Many of us experience frustration an a daily basis due to poorly constructed Web search mechanisms and Web directories. As a community devoted to making information easily accessible we have something to offer the Web community and a seminar an the topic was indeed much needed. Below are brief summaries of the 18 papers presented at the seminar. The order of the summaries follows the order of the papers in the proceedings. The titles of the paper are given in parentheses after the author's name. AHUJA and WESLEY (From "Subject" to "Need": Shift in Approach to Classifying Information an the Internet/Web) argue that traditional bibliographic classification systems fall in the digital environment. One problem is that bibliographic classification systems have been developed to organize library books an shelves and as such are unidimensional and tied to the paper-based environment. Another problem is that they are "subject" oriented in the sense that they assume a relatively stable universe of knowledge containing basic and fixed compartments of knowledge that can be identified and represented. Ahuja and Wesley suggest that classification in the digital environment should be need-oriented instead of subjectoriented ("One important link that binds knowledge and human being is his societal need. ... Hence, it will be ideal to organise knowledge based upon need instead of subject." (p. 10)).
AHUJA and SATIJA (Relevance of Ranganathan's Classification Theory in the Age of Digital Libraries) note that traditional bibliographic classification systems have been applied in the digital environment with only limited success. They find that the "inherent flexibility of electronic manipulation of documents or their surrogates should allow a more organic approach to allocation of new subjects and appropriate linkages between subject hierarchies." (p. 18). Ahija and Satija also suggest that it is necessary to shift from a "subject" focus to a "need" focus when applying classification theory in the digital environment. They find Ranganathan's framework applicable in the digital environment. Although Ranganathan's focus is "subject oriented and hence emphasise the hierarchical and linear relationships" (p. 26), his framework "can be successfully adopted with certain modifications ... in the digital environment." (p. 26). SHAH and KUMAR (Model for System Unification of Geographical Schedules (Space Isolates)) report an a plan to develop a single schedule for geographical Subdivision that could be used across all classification systems. The authors argue that this is needed in order to facilitate interoperability in the digital environment. SAN SEGUNDO MANUEL (The Representation of Knowledge as a Symbolization of Productive Electronic Information) distills different approaches and definitions of the term "representation" as it relates to representation of knowledge in the library and information science literature and field. SHARADA (Linguistic and Document Classification: Paradigmatic Merger Possibilities) suggests the development of a universal indexing language. The foundation for the universal indexing language is Chomsky's Minimalist Program and Ranganathan's analytico-synthetic classification theory; Acording to the author, based an these approaches, it "should not be a problem" (p. 62) to develop a universal indexing language.

0.0024581011 = product of:
  0.01966481 = sum of:
    0.01966481 = product of:
      0.058994424 = sum of:
        0.058994424 = weight(_text_:29 in 1387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058994424 = score(doc=1387,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 1387, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1387)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Date

31. 7.1998 19:29:37

0.002435989 = product of:
  0.019487912 = sum of:
    0.019487912 = product of:
      0.058463734 = sum of:
        0.058463734 = weight(_text_:22 in 1381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058463734 = score(doc=1381,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1381, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1381)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Date

25. 3.2003 13:22:23

0.0021481325 = product of:
  0.00859253 = sum of:
    0.005112546 = product of:
      0.015337638 = sum of:
        0.015337638 = weight(_text_:problem in 6721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015337638 = score(doc=6721,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.11723843 = fieldWeight in 6721, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=6721)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0034799844 = product of:
      0.010439953 = sum of:
        0.010439953 = weight(_text_:22 in 6721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010439953 = score(doc=6721,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 6721, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=6721)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Content

MACCALL, S.L., A.D. CLEVELAND U. I.E. GIBSON: Outline and preliminary evaluation of the classical digital library model. MACCALL, S.L., A.D. CLEVELAND: A relevance-based quantitative measure for Internet information retrieval evaluation. MAI, J.-E.: A postmodern theory of knowledge organization. PATRICK, T.B., M.C. SIEVERT U. J. RIES u.a.: Clustering terms in health care terminologies. PATRICK, T.B., M.C. SIEVERT U. M. POPESCU: Text indexing of images based on graphical image content. POLE, T.: Contextual classification in the Metadata Object Manager (M.O.M.). PRISS, U., E. JACOB: Utilizing faceted structures for information systems design. RORVIG, M., M.M. SMITH U. A. UEMURA: The N-gram hypothesis applied to matched sets of visualized Japanese-English technical documents. SCHAMBER, L., J. BATEMAN: Relevance criteria uses and importance: progress in development of a measurement scale. SMIRAGLIA, R.P.: Derivative bibliographic relationships among theological works. SU, L.T., H.L. CHEN: Evaluation of Web search engines by undergraduate students. TSE, T., S. VEGH U. G. MARCHIONINI u.a.: An exploratory study of video browsing user interface designs and research methodologies: effectiveness in information seeking tasks. WANG, P.: An empirical study of knowledge structures of research topics; SCULL, C. u.a.: Envisioning the Web: user expectations about the cyber-experience; WEISS, S.C.: The seamless, Web-based library: a meta site for the 21st century; DUGDALE, C.: Cooperation, coordination and cultural change for effective information management in the hybrid academic library. PRETTYMAN, M. u.a.: Electronic publication of health information in an object oriented environment. PRITCHARD, E.E.: Retrospective conversion of journal titles to online formats: which disciplines make good choices? SHARRETTS, C.W. u.a.: Electronic theses and dissertations at the University of Virginia. HAWK, W.B. u. P. WANG: Users' interaction with the World Wide Web: Problems & problem-solving. HARRIS, C. u.a. Temporal visualization for legal case histories. MARSHALL, R.: Rhetoric and policy: how is it being used in pornography and the Internet?

Date

22. 6.2005 9:44:50

0.0021481325 = product of:
  0.00859253 = sum of:
    0.005112546 = product of:
      0.015337638 = sum of:
        0.015337638 = weight(_text_:problem in 1672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015337638 = score(doc=1672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.11723843 = fieldWeight in 1672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1672)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0034799844 = product of:
      0.010439953 = sum of:
        0.010439953 = weight(_text_:22 in 1672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010439953 = score(doc=1672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1672)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Die gesellschaftliche Verantwortung der professionellen Wissensorganisation beschäftigt die Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaften seit geraumer Zeit. In der Ausbildung an den Hochschulen werden informationstheoretische, ökonomische und ethische Fragen berücksichtigt. Angesichts der gesellschaftlichen Entwicklungen der letzten Jahre ist jedoch die verantwortliche Organisation von Wissen zu einem Problem geworden, das einer umfassenderen Berücksichtigung in Wissenschaft, Ausbildung und Praxis bedarf: Informatisierung und Kommerzialisierung von Wissensprodukten führen zu neuen Exklusionen und Kontrollmöglichkeiten im Umgang mit Wissen und wissenschaftlicher Leistung. Qualitätsmanagement und Nachhaltigkeit rücken bei Wissensgewinnung und - verbreitung stärker in den Mittelpunkt. Die 9. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissenorganisation mit dem Thema "Wissensorganisation und Verantwortung" verstand sich als Beitrag zur Weiterentwicklung der gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung der Wissensorganisation in den fachlichen Grundlagen, in der Ausbildung und der wissensorganisatorischen Praxis. In den Mittelpunkt der Tagung stand die Verzahnung verantwortlichen, praktischen Handelns mit der wissenschaftlichen Reflexion. Dabei wurden empirische, rechtliche und ökonomische Fragen ebenso relevant erachtet wie theoretischsystematische Diskurse. Der thematische Rahmen wurde mit den folgenden Fragen umrissen: - Wird in der praktischen Wissensorganisation verantwortlich gehandelt? - Wie kann das Ziel Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung in der Praxis wirksam gemacht werden? - Unterstützt Wissensorganisation den gleichen Zugang zu Informationsressourcen? - Welche Empfehlungen sind für die Ausbildung in der nachhaltigen und verantwortlichen Wissensorganisation auszusprechen? - Wie kann verantwortliches Handeln in der Wissensorganisation begründet werden? - Was bedeutet Nachhaltigkeit in der Wissensorganisation? - Wie kann Wissen und verantwortliche Wissensorganisation quantifiziert oder bewertet werden? - Welches Wissen sollte nicht erschlossen und zugänglich gemacht werden? - Sollte Wissen durch Digital-Rights-Management-Systeme geschützt werden? - Sollten ökonomische Aspekte, z.B. beim Ranking von Retrievalsystemen, berücksichtigt werden? Die Tagung richtete sich an Wissenschaftsforscher, Wissenschaftsmanager, Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaftler, sowie alle, die sich mit der gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung der Wissensorganisation und Wissensverbreitung beschäftigen. Aus dieser Tagung ist nun die vorliegende Buchveröffentlichung hervorgegangen, die erfreulicher Weise fast alle gehaltenen Beiträge - auch die per Telekonferenz geschalteten - enthält. Den Autoren sei für Ihre Mühe zur Verschriftlichung ausdrücklich gedankt. Zusätzlich konnten noch die ausgearbeiteten Ko-Referate von Gerhard Budin und Robert Fugmann aufgenommen werden. Damit enthält dieser Band 36 teils überarbeitete Beiträge, die 7 Kapiteln zugeordnet wurden und unterschiedliche Aspekte und Verständnisse von Wissensorganisation widerspiegeln. Natürlich konnten auf der Konferenz nicht alle Fragen und diese in allen Tiefen beantwortet werden; trotzdem dürfte ein interessantes Kompendium mit orientierenden und exemplarischen Beiträgen zusammengetragen worden sein. Die sehr interessante Podiumsdiskussion zu 'Wissensorganisation und gesellschaftliche Verantwortung' wurde übrigens von Thomas Sporen ad hoc auf der Tagung mitgeschnitten und ist - unter den gegeben qualitativen Bedingungen - unter http://www.knowledgebay.de/static/download/poko.mp3 abhörbar. Eine Textfassung hiervon konnte bisher leider nicht realisiert werden. Im Folgenden soll eine kurze Charakterisierung der einzelnen Beiträge dieses Tagungsbandes gegeben werden.

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: 1. Die Grundlagen der Wissensorganisation Ingetraut Dahlberg: Zur Begriffskultur in den Sozialwissenschaften. Evaluation einer Herausforderung S.2 Gerhard Budin: Begriffliche Wissensorganisation in den Sozialwissenschaften: Theorien und Methodenvielfalt S.12 Gerd Bauer: Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation S.22 Robert Fugmann: Die Nützlichkeit von semantischen Kategorien auf dern Gebiet der Informationsbereitstellung S.34 Gerhard Rahmtorf: Wege zur Ontologie S.37 2. Wissensordnung und Gesellschaft Raphael Beer: Ungleiches Wissen und demokratische Legitimation S.50 Elisabeth Wallnöfer Köstlin: Zum Charakter chiasmatischen Wissens S.66 Maik Adomßent: Konstitutive Elemente nachhaltiger Wissensgenerierung und -organisation S.70 Walther Umstätter: Knowledge Economy und die Privatisierung von Bibliotheken S.85 Peter Ohly: Bibliometrie in der Postmoderne S.103 Marthinus S. van der Walt: Ethics in Indexing and Classification S.115 Heike Winschiers, Jens Felder & Barbara Paterson: Nachhaltige Wissensorganisation durch kulturelle Synthese S122 3. Pädagogische Wissensorganisation Henry Milder: Knowledge related policy and civic literacy S.130 Christian Swertz: Globalisierung und Individualisierung als Bildungsziele S.140 Wolfgang David: Der Einfluss epistemologischer Überzeugungen auf Wissenserwerb S.147 Monika Witsch: Cyberlaw für den Jugendschutz - Eine pädagogische Bewertung von Internetzensur vor dem Hintergrund rechtsextremer Homepages S.152 Nicole Zillien: "Nächste Folie, bitte!" - Der Einsatz von Präsentationsprogrammen zur Wissensvermittlung und Wissensbewahrung S.159 Wolfgang Semar: Kollaborative Leistungsevaluation beim Einsatz von Wissensmanagementsystemen in der Ausbildung S.169

0.0021069439 = product of:
  0.01685555 = sum of:
    0.01685555 = product of:
      0.05056665 = sum of:
        0.05056665 = weight(_text_:29 in 6517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05056665 = score(doc=6517,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6517, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6517)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Date

29. 9.2001 19:00:02

0.0021069439 = product of:
  0.01685555 = sum of:
    0.01685555 = product of:
      0.05056665 = sum of:
        0.05056665 = weight(_text_:29 in 4944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05056665 = score(doc=4944,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4944, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4944)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

0.0021069439 = product of:
  0.01685555 = sum of:
    0.01685555 = product of:
      0.05056665 = sum of:
        0.05056665 = weight(_text_:29 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05056665 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108422816 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

0.0020879905 = product of:
  0.016703924 = sum of:
    0.016703924 = product of:
      0.05011177 = sum of:
        0.05011177 = weight(_text_:22 in 4606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05011177 = score(doc=4606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4606)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

0.0020879905 = product of:
  0.016703924 = sum of:
    0.016703924 = product of:
      0.05011177 = sum of:
        0.05011177 = weight(_text_:22 in 4693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05011177 = score(doc=4693,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4693, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4693)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

0.0020067974 = product of:
  0.008027189 = sum of:
    0.0040900367 = product of:
      0.01227011 = sum of:
        0.01227011 = weight(_text_:problem in 69) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01227011 = score(doc=69,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13082431 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.09379075 = fieldWeight in 69, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=69)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0039371527 = product of:
      0.011811458 = sum of:
        0.011811458 = weight(_text_:22 in 69) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011811458 = score(doc=69,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10793405 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030822188 = queryNorm
            0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 69, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=69)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Classification

327.12 22

DDC

327.12 22

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.2, S.303-305 (L. Hayden): "Part history and part call to action, Covert and Overt examines the relationship between the disciplines of intelligence service and information science. The book is significant in that it captures both the rich history of partnership between the fields, and because it demonstrates clearly the incomplete nature of our understanding of that partnership. In the post-9/11 world, such understanding is increasingly important, as we struggle with the problem of transforming information into intelligence and intelligence into effective policy. Information science has an important role to play in meeting these challenges, but the sometimesambiguous nature of the field combined with similar uncertainties over what constitutes intelligence, makes any attempt at definitive answers problematic. The book is a collection of works from different contributors, in the words of one editor "not so much a created work as an aggregation" (p. 1). More than just an edited collection of papers, the book draws from the personal experiences of several prominent information scientists who also served as intelligence professionals from World War II onward. The result is a book that feels very personal and at times impassioned. The contributors attempt to shed light on an often-closed community of practice, a discipline that depends simultaneously on access to information and on secrecy. Intelligence, like information science, is also a discipline that finds itself increasingly attracted to and dependent upon technology, and an underlying question of the book is where and how technology benefits intelligence (as opposed to only masking more fundamental problems of process and analysis and providing little or no actual value).