Search (58 results, page 3 of 3)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[1970 TO 1980}
  1. Library of Congress Subject Headings : review and forecast (1972) 0.01 
    0.0054969285 = product of:
  0.010993857 = sum of:
    0.010993857 = product of:
      0.021987714 = sum of:
        0.021987714 = weight(_text_:d in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021987714 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Editor
    Angell, D.
  2. Austin, D.: ¬The role of indexing in subject retrieval (1976) 0.01 
    0.0054969285 = product of:
  0.010993857 = sum of:
    0.010993857 = product of:
      0.021987714 = sum of:
        0.021987714 = weight(_text_:d in 1574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021987714 = score(doc=1574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 1574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1574)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. Schabas, A.H.: ¬A comparative evaluation of the retrieval effectiveness of titles, Library of Congress Subject Headings and PRECIS strings for computer searching of UK MARC data (1979) 0.01 
    0.0054969285 = product of:
  0.010993857 = sum of:
    0.010993857 = product of:
      0.021987714 = sum of:
        0.021987714 = weight(_text_:d in 5277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021987714 = score(doc=5277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 5277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5277)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    d
  4. Austin, D.: Citation order and linguistic structure (1976) 0.01 
    0.0054969285 = product of:
  0.010993857 = sum of:
    0.010993857 = product of:
      0.021987714 = sum of:
        0.021987714 = weight(_text_:d in 2804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021987714 = score(doc=2804,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 2804, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2804)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  5. ¬The PRECIS system for computer-generated indexes and its use in the British National Bibliography (1972) 0.00 
    0.004580774 = product of:
  0.009161548 = sum of:
    0.009161548 = product of:
      0.018323096 = sum of:
        0.018323096 = weight(_text_:d in 1268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018323096 = score(doc=1268,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 1268, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1268)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Editor
    Austin, D.
  6. Tahani, V.: ¬A general conceptual framework for information retrieval systems (1972) 0.00 
    0.004580774 = product of:
  0.009161548 = sum of:
    0.009161548 = product of:
      0.018323096 = sum of:
        0.018323096 = weight(_text_:d in 70) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018323096 = score(doc=70,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 70, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=70)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    d
  7. Austin, D.: Differences between library classifications and machine-based subject retrieval systems : some inferences drawn from research in Britain, 1963-1973 (1979) 0.00 
    0.004580774 = product of:
  0.009161548 = sum of:
    0.009161548 = product of:
      0.018323096 = sum of:
        0.018323096 = weight(_text_:d in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018323096 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Subject retrieval in the seventies: new directions : Proc. of an Int. Symp. ... College Park, 14.-15.5.1971 (1972) 0.00 
    0.0045347353 = product of:
  0.009069471 = sum of:
    0.009069471 = product of:
      0.018138941 = sum of:
        0.018138941 = weight(_text_:d in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018138941 = score(doc=289,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.2077985 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: WELLISCH, H.H.: Subject retrieval in the seventies: methods, problems, prospects; GROLIER, E. de: Recent research trends in the field of information retrieval languages; SOERGEL, D.: A general model for indexing languages: the basis for compatibility and integration; WILSON, T.D.: The work of the British Classification Research Group; AITCHISON, J.: Thesaurofacet: a new concept in subject retrieval schemes; AUSTIN, D.: The PRECIS system for computer-generated indexes and its use in the British National Bibliography; LLOYD, G.A.: The Universal Decimal Classification as an international switching language; RIGBY, M.: The UDC in mechanized subject information retrieval; ANGELL, R.S.: Library of Congress Subject Headings: review and forecast
  9. Soergel, D.: ¬The Broad System of Ordering : a critique (1979) 0.00 
    0.0036646193 = product of:
  0.0073292386 = sum of:
    0.0073292386 = product of:
      0.014658477 = sum of:
        0.014658477 = weight(_text_:d in 1864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014658477 = score(doc=1864,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 1864, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1864)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  10. Classification in the 1970s. A second look (1976) 0.00 
    0.0036646193 = product of:
  0.0073292386 = sum of:
    0.0073292386 = product of:
      0.014658477 = sum of:
        0.014658477 = weight(_text_:d in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014658477 = score(doc=3336,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: MALTBY, A.: Classification - logic, limits, levels; MILLS, J.: Bibliographic classification; GOPINATH, M.A.: Colon Classification; IMMROTH, J.P.: Library of Congress Classification; LLOYD; G.A.: Universal Decimal Classification; VICKERY, B.C.: Classificatory principles in natural language indexing systems; KEEN, E.M.: Prospects for classification suggested by evaluation tests; AUSTIN, D.: The CRG research into a freely faceted scheme; FREEMAN, R.R.: Classification in computer-based information systems of the 1970s; SPARCK JONES, K.: Automatic classification; VANN, S.K.: Dewey Decimal Classification
  11. Solla Price, D. de: Little science, big science : Von der Studierstube zur Großforschung (1974) 0.00 
    0.0036646193 = product of:
  0.0073292386 = sum of:
    0.0073292386 = product of:
      0.014658477 = sum of:
        0.014658477 = weight(_text_:d in 272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014658477 = score(doc=272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=272)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  12. Bliss Bibliographic Classification : Class A/AL: Philosophy and logic. 2nd ed. 1992. - Class AM/AX: Mathematics, probability and statistics. 1993. - Class AY/B: science and technology and physics. 2000. - Class D: Astronomy & space. i.V. - Class H: Anthropology, human biology, health sciences. 1980. - Class I: Psychology & psychiatry. 1978. - Class J: Education (by D.J. Foskett u. J. Foskett). 2nd rev. ed. 1990. - Class K: Society. 1984. - Class S: Law. 1994. - Class P: Religion, the occult, morals and ethics. 1977. - Class Q: Social welfare. 1977. - Class R: Politics and public administration. 1996. - Class S: Law. 1992. - Class T: Economics, management of economic enterprises. 1986. - Class W: Fine arts and music. i.V. (1977-) 0.00 
    0.0032065418 = product of:
  0.0064130835 = sum of:
    0.0064130835 = product of:
      0.012826167 = sum of:
        0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012826167 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  13. Austin, D.; Sørensen, J.: PRECIS in a multilingual context : Pt.3: Multilingual experiments, proposed codes, and procedures for the Germanic languages. (1976) 0.00 
    0.0032065418 = product of:
  0.0064130835 = sum of:
    0.0064130835 = product of:
      0.012826167 = sum of:
        0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012826167 = score(doc=974,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 974, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=974)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  14. Austin, D.: PRECIS in a multilingual context : Pt.1: PRECIS: an overview (1976) 0.00 
    0.0032065418 = product of:
  0.0064130835 = sum of:
    0.0064130835 = product of:
      0.012826167 = sum of:
        0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012826167 = score(doc=983,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 983, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=983)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  15. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (1975) 0.00 
    0.0027484642 = product of:
  0.0054969285 = sum of:
    0.0054969285 = product of:
      0.010993857 = sum of:
        0.010993857 = weight(_text_:d in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010993857 = score(doc=2103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields
  16. Austin, D.; Sørensen, J.: PRECIS in a multilingual context : Pt.2: A linguistic and logical explanation of the syntax. (1976) 0.00 
    0.002290387 = product of:
  0.004580774 = sum of:
    0.004580774 = product of:
      0.009161548 = sum of:
        0.009161548 = weight(_text_:d in 981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009161548 = score(doc=981,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 981, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=981)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  17. Ordering systems for global information networks : Proc. of the 3rd Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Bombay, 1975 (1979) 0.00 
    0.0022673677 = product of:
  0.0045347353 = sum of:
    0.0045347353 = product of:
      0.009069471 = sum of:
        0.009069471 = weight(_text_:d in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009069471 = score(doc=3431,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.10389925 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: HENRIKSEN, T.: A linguistic description model for indexing languages; MONTGOMERY, C.A.: Toward a natural language communications inferface; SPANG-HANSSEN, H.: Are classification systems similar to natural languages; LANCASTER, F.W.: Vocabulary control for on-line interactive retrieval systems: requirements and possible approaches; DAHLBERG, I.: On the theory of the concept; GROLIER, E. de: In search of an objective basis for the organization of knowledge; BELING, G.: Towards a set theoretical foundation of classification; BHATTACHARYYA, G.: Fundamenbtal of subject indexing languages; CAVALCANTI, C.R.: Universal integrated media for information processing; DESAI, A.R.: Theory of integrative levels, general systems theory, theory of classification, theory of wvolution, and theory of pattern recognition (abstract); GOPINATH, M.A. u. S. SEETHARAMA: Interdisciplinary subjects and their classification; IMMROTH, J.P.: A lexical essay toward the developments of the theory of indexes to classification schemes; KOCHEN, M.: Organising knowledge for coping with needs; KURBAKOV, K.I. u. V.G. BOLDOV: Problem of compatibility of information classification systems and some probable methods of its solution; MAIXNER, V.: Classification systems and retrieval languages; MEINCKE, P.P.M. u. P. ATHERTON: Knowledge space: a conceptual basis for the organization of knowledge; NEELAMEGHAN, A.: Absolute syntax and structure of an indexing and switching language; NEILL, S.D. MacLuhan and classification; RICHMOND, P.A. u. N.J. WILLIAMSON: Three dimensional physical models in classification; SVENONIUS, E.: Translation between hierarchical structures: an exercise in abstract classification; BORKO, H.: Changing roles of and developments in automated classification; DREESE, M.J.: Comparison of document retrieval using UDC - notation given by UDC - expert with catch-words taken from title by clerk, stored in computer memory; GARFIELD, E., MALIN, M.V. u. H. SMALL: A system for automatic classification of scientific literature (abstract); HEAPS, H.S. u. K.V. LEuNG: Automatic document classification based on a theory of relevance; HOYLE, W.G.: A measure of overlap in classification systems; KLESZCZ: Method of information retrieval and subject index compilation for abstracting periodicals with the use of a thesaurus enlarged with machine part classification; SCHNEIDER, J.H.: AUTOCLASS: a computer system for facilitating the creation and updating of hierarchical classifications; JANOS, J.: Information systems with automated indexing based an the analysis of texts; RIGBY, M.: Advances since Elsinore in the use of automated equipment for vocabulary, classification schedule and information or data control on a universal scale; TOMAN, J.: Trend of the future: two ordering system used together? TOMAN, J. u. G.A. Lloyd: Introduction to the Subject-field Reference Code (SRC) or Broad System of Ordering (BSO) for UNISIST purposes; AUSTIN, D.: Differences between library classifications and machine-based subject retrieval systems; some inferences drawn from research in Britain, 1963-1973; JACHOWICZ, R.L.: Application of classification as basis for the formulation of thesaurus; KOFNOVEC, L. u. D. SIMANDL: Quantitative structure of world scientific and technical literature and its use for optimizing general classifications; RAJAN, T.N. u. B. GUHA: A comparative study of subject heading structuring according to POPSI and PRECIS; ROLLING, L.N.: Computer management of multi-lingual thesauri; SOKOLOV, A.V.: Compound indexing languages; VILENSKAYA, S.C.: Systems approach as a principle of thesaurus building on the basis of the subject headings language; WAHLIN, E.: Special classification systems used together with a common reference system; the AR-complex; WERSIG, G.: Experiences in compatibility research in documentary languages; WOLFF-TERROINE, M.: A macrothesaurus. Why? How? SAMUELSON, K.: Information ordering in worldwise communications; SHEPHERD, M. u. C. WATTERS: Hierarchical retrieval from structured text
  18. Bruner, J.: From communication to language (1975) 0.00 
    0.0018323096 = product of:
  0.0036646193 = sum of:
    0.0036646193 = product of:
      0.0073292386 = sum of:
        0.0073292386 = weight(_text_:d in 1635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0073292386 = score(doc=1635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 1635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1635)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Bruner war der erste Erforscher des Spracherwerbs von Kindern, der Wittgensteins Problem zu würdigen wußte und eine Antwort darauf vorschlug. Wittgensteins allgemeinem Ansatz folgend, behauptete Bruner, daß das Kind den konventionellen Gebrauch eines sprachlichen Symbols dadurch erwirbt, daß es lernt, an einer Interaktionsform (Lebensform, Szene gemeinsamer Aufmerksamkeit) teilzunehmen, die es zunächst nichtsprachlich versteht, so daß die Sprache des Erwachsenen in geteilten Erfahrungen verankert werden kann, deren soziale Bedeutung es schon begreift. Eine Schlüsselkomponente dieses Prozesses ist zunächst ein Kind, das Erwachsene als intentionale Wesen auffassen kann, so daß es in bestimmten Kontexten seine Aufmerksamkeit mit ihnen teilen kann. Eine andere Komponente ist jedoch die bereits existierende, äußere soziale Welt, in der das Kind lebt. Um Sprache zu erwerben, muß das Kind in einer Welt leben, die strukturierte soziale Tätigkeiten aufweist, die es verstehen kann, so wie unser hypothetischer Besucher Ungarns das Kaufen von Fahrkarten und das Reisen mit Zügen verstand. Für Kinder bedeutet das häufig die Wiederkehr derselben routinemäßigen, allgemeinen Aktivität, so daß sie erkennen können, wie diese Aktivität aufgebaut ist und wie die verschiedenen sozialen Rollen in ihr funktionieren. Wenn wir am Spracherwerb interessiert sind, muß der Erwachsene außerdem ein neues sprachliches Symbol auf eine solche Weise verwenden, die das Kind als relevant für die gemeinsame Tätigkeit erkennen kann (nämlich im Gegensatz zur unvermittelten Ansprache des Ungarn auf dem Bahnhof). Wenn ein Kind in eine Welt geboren werden würde, in der dieselbe Art von Ereignis nie wiederkehrte, derselbe Gegenstand nie zweimal erschiene und Erwachsene nie dieselben Ausdrücke im selben Kontext verwendeten, dann würde im allgemeinen schwer zu sehen sein, wie dieses Kind eine natürliche Sprache erwerben könnte, welche kognitiven Fähigkeiten es auch immer haben möge. Eine Reihe von Untersuchungen hat gezeigt, daß Kinder nach ersten Fortschritten beim Spracherwerb neue Wörter am besten in Szenen gemeinsamer Aufmerksamkeit lernen. Oft handelt es sich dabei um solche, die in ihrer täglichen Erfahrung wiederkehren, wie Baden, Füttern, Windelwechseln, Vorlesen und Autofahren. Diese Tätigkeiten sind in vielen Hinsichten analog zu dem Szenario des Fahrkartenkaufs auf einem Bahnhof, insofern das Kind seine eigenen und die Ziele des Erwachsenen in der jeweiligen Situation versteht, was ihm ermöglicht, die Relevanz des Sprachverhaltens des Erwachsenen für diese Ziele zu erschließen. So stellten Tomasello und Todd fest, daß Kinder, die mit ihren Müttern längere Zeit bei Tätigkeiten gemeinsamer Aufmerksamkeit im Alter zwischen zwölf und achtzehn Monaten verbrachten, mit achtzehn Monaten ein größeres Vokabular hatten. Bei der Sprachverwendung Erwachsener innerhalb dieser Szenen gemeinsamer Aufmerksamkeit fanden Tomasello und Farrar sowohl korrelative als auch experimentelle Belege für die Hypothese, daß Mütter, die Sprache beim Versuch verwendeten, der Aufmerksamkeit ihrer Kinder zu folgen (d. h. über einen Gegenstand zu sprechen, der schon im Brennpunkt des Interesses und der Aufmerksamkeit des Kindes stand), Kinder mit einem größeren Vokabular hatten als Mütter, die Sprache beim Versuch verwendeten, die Aufmerksamkeit des Kindes auf etwas Neues zu lenken.

Authors

Types

  • a 36
  • m 13
  • s 5
  • d 3
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Classifications