-
Walker, S.: Improving subject access painlessly : recent work on the Okapi online catalogue projects (1988)
0.02
0.0243019 = product of:
0.0486038 = sum of:
0.0486038 = product of:
0.0972076 = sum of:
0.0972076 = weight(_text_:22 in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0972076 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Program. 22(1988), S.21-31
-
Hug, H.; Nöthiger, R.: ETHICS: an online public access catalogue at ETH-Bibliothek, Zürich (1988)
0.02
0.0243019 = product of:
0.0486038 = sum of:
0.0486038 = product of:
0.0972076 = sum of:
0.0972076 = weight(_text_:22 in 7483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0972076 = score(doc=7483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Program. 22(1988), S.133-142
-
Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984)
0.02
0.0243019 = product of:
0.0486038 = sum of:
0.0486038 = product of:
0.0972076 = sum of:
0.0972076 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0972076 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
-
Repo, A.J.: Economics and information (1987)
0.02
0.0243019 = product of:
0.0486038 = sum of:
0.0486038 = product of:
0.0972076 = sum of:
0.0972076 = weight(_text_:22 in 11) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0972076 = score(doc=11,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 11, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=11)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.3-36
-
Carroll, J.M.; Mack, R.L.: Metaphor, computing systems and active learning (1985)
0.02
0.0243019 = product of:
0.0486038 = sum of:
0.0486038 = product of:
0.0972076 = sum of:
0.0972076 = weight(_text_:22 in 6506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0972076 = score(doc=6506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6506)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- International journal of man-machine studies. 22(1985), S.39-57
-
Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Retrieval techniques (1987)
0.02
0.0243019 = product of:
0.0486038 = sum of:
0.0486038 = product of:
0.0972076 = sum of:
0.0972076 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0972076 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145
-
Smith, L.C.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987)
0.02
0.0243019 = product of:
0.0486038 = sum of:
0.0486038 = product of:
0.0972076 = sum of:
0.0972076 = weight(_text_:22 in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0972076 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.41-77
-
Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987)
0.02
0.0243019 = product of:
0.0486038 = sum of:
0.0486038 = product of:
0.0972076 = sum of:
0.0972076 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0972076 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
-
Information brokers and reference services (1989)
0.02
0.0243019 = product of:
0.0486038 = sum of:
0.0486038 = product of:
0.0972076 = sum of:
0.0972076 = weight(_text_:22 in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0972076 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Reference librarian; no.22
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.02
0.0243019 = product of:
0.0486038 = sum of:
0.0486038 = product of:
0.0972076 = sum of:
0.0972076 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0972076 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
Ungvary, R.: Intensional splitting : an empirical examination of conceptual duality (1986)
0.02
0.02359629 = product of:
0.04719258 = sum of:
0.04719258 = product of:
0.09438516 = sum of:
0.09438516 = weight(_text_:e.g in 5219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09438516 = score(doc=5219,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.40346956 = fieldWeight in 5219, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5219)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Certain words are extremely closely connected, regarding their meanings; such word pairs can be formed, however, not only with the well-known synonyms and antonyms, but also with words of clearly different meaning (e.g. light-photon). Our studies show that, even in the case of real synonyms, there is a purely semantical - and consequently conceptual - difference between the parts/elements of the word pairs. Within the pairs there is an elementary conceptual accessibility between the parts; according to all indications this is the basis for the remarkable semantical connection. This close connection is the intensional splitting, the quantum of relation. It is assumed that is plays an important role in the semantical deep structure. Synonyms and antonyms are mere random marks of the existence of this relation on the level of the natural language
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.02
0.02225657 = product of:
0.04451314 = sum of:
0.04451314 = product of:
0.17805256 = sum of:
0.17805256 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805256 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38017118 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Sukiasyan, E.: ¬The new state standard of the USSR : Sytematization of documents. General requirements (1987)
0.02
0.021264162 = product of:
0.042528324 = sum of:
0.042528324 = product of:
0.08505665 = sum of:
0.08505665 = weight(_text_:22 in 938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08505665 = score(doc=938,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 938, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=938)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- International cataloguing. 16(1987), S.22-23
-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.02
0.021264162 = product of:
0.042528324 = sum of:
0.042528324 = product of:
0.08505665 = sum of:
0.08505665 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08505665 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
-
Subject analysis: summary report of the racism and sexism in subject analysis subcommittee to the RTSD/CCS subject analysis committee (1981)
0.02
0.021264162 = product of:
0.042528324 = sum of:
0.042528324 = product of:
0.08505665 = sum of:
0.08505665 = weight(_text_:22 in 2869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08505665 = score(doc=2869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- RTSD newsletter. 6(1981), S.21-22
-
Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989)
0.02
0.021264162 = product of:
0.042528324 = sum of:
0.042528324 = product of:
0.08505665 = sum of:
0.08505665 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08505665 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
-
Repo, A.J.: ¬The dual approach to the value of information : an appraisal of use and exchange values (1989)
0.02
0.021264162 = product of:
0.042528324 = sum of:
0.042528324 = product of:
0.08505665 = sum of:
0.08505665 = weight(_text_:22 in 5772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08505665 = score(doc=5772,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5772, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5772)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.5, S.373-383
-
Burgess, C.; Swigger, K.: ¬A graphical database interface for casual naive users (1986)
0.02
0.021264162 = product of:
0.042528324 = sum of:
0.042528324 = product of:
0.08505665 = sum of:
0.08505665 = weight(_text_:22 in 6496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08505665 = score(doc=6496,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6496, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6496)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.511-521
-
Deschâtelets, G.: ¬The three languages theory in information retrieval (1986)
0.02
0.020225393 = product of:
0.040450785 = sum of:
0.040450785 = product of:
0.08090157 = sum of:
0.08090157 = weight(_text_:e.g in 1635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08090157 = score(doc=1635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.34583107 = fieldWeight in 1635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1635)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- To an overwhelming extent, storage and retrieval systems were designed for information intermediaries who were specialists in formal, controlled documentation languages (e.g. classification systems, indexing languages) and who were then trained to utilize the query language of each retrieval system. However, with the advent of the microcomputer, there now exists, in the information retrieval industry, an obvious will to tackle both the professional and the personal information markets, as evidences by their more sophisticated yet more user-friendly systems and by the design and marketing of all sorts of interface software (front-end, gateway, intermediary). In order to make full advantage of these systems, the user must be able to master three different languages: the natural language of the discipline, the indexing language, and the system's query language. The author defines and characterizes each of these languages and identifies their issues and trends in the IR cycle and specifically in public online search services. Finally he proposes a theoretical model for the analysis of IR languages and suggests a few research avenues
-
Svenonius, E.; Baughman, B.; Molto, M.: Title page sanctity? : the distribution of access points in a sample of English language monographs (1986)
0.02
0.020225393 = product of:
0.040450785 = sum of:
0.040450785 = product of:
0.08090157 = sum of:
0.08090157 = weight(_text_:e.g in 361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08090157 = score(doc=361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.34583107 = fieldWeight in 361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=361)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The problem addressed in this paper is that of simplifying access point determination. A critique is made of the simple, mechanical rule whereby every name appearing in certain designatable locations within a publication qualifies as an access point. Then a more acceptable version of the every-name-an-access-point rule is tested empirically against a sample of 400 English language monographs. Conclusions reached concern (1) the responsibility profiles of these monographs, i.e., how many authors, editors, illustrators and emanators are typically associated with them and in what combinations, and (2) the relative productivity of different locations within them, e.g., title pages and tables of contents, as sources of access points. The study was conceived to be exploratory in nature and its findings suggest further research that could be done to provide empirical validation for rules for access point determination.
