Search (2969 results, page 2 of 149)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Zhao, G.; Wu, J.; Wang, D.; Li, T.: Entity disambiguation to Wikipedia using collective ranking (2016) 0.05 
    0.047862925 = product of:
  0.09572585 = sum of:
    0.035584353 = weight(_text_:management in 3266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035584353 = score(doc=3266,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 3266, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3266)
    0.060141496 = sum of:
      0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 3266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.021732632 = score(doc=3266,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3266, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3266)
      0.038408864 = weight(_text_:22 in 3266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038408864 = score(doc=3266,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3266, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3266)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030645731630098X.
    Date
    24.10.2016 19:22:54
    Source
    Information processing and management. 52(2016) no.6, S.1247-1257
  2. Bondarenko, O.; Janssen, R.; Driessen, S.: Requirements for the design of a personal document-management system (2010) 0.05 
    0.047853764 = product of:
  0.09570753 = sum of:
    0.08303016 = weight(_text_:management in 3430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08303016 = score(doc=3430,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.521365 = fieldWeight in 3430, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3430)
    0.01267737 = product of:
      0.02535474 = sum of:
        0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 3430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02535474 = score(doc=3430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 3430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3430)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In this article a set of requirements for the design of a personal document management system is presented, based on the results of three research studies (Bondarenko, [2006]; Bondarenko & Janssen, [2005]; Bondarenko & Janssen, [2009]). We propose a framework, based on layers of task decomposition, that helps to understand the needs of information workers with regard to personal document and task management. Relevant user processes are described and requirements for a document-management system are derived for each layer. The derived requirements are compared to related studies, and implications for system design are discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.3, S.468-482
  3. Jervis, M.; Masoodian, M.: How do people attempt to integrate the management of their paper and electronic documents? (2014) 0.05 
    0.047229916 = product of:
  0.09445983 = sum of:
    0.07845613 = weight(_text_:management in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07845613 = score(doc=1632,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.49264365 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
    0.016003694 = product of:
      0.03200739 = sum of:
        0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03200739 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to describe how people manage to integrate their use of paper and electronic documents in modern office work environments. Design/methodology/approach - An observational interview type study of 14 participants from 11 offices in eight organizations was conducted. Recorded data were analysed using a thematic analysis method. This involved reading and annotation of interview transcripts, categorizing, linking and connecting, corroborating, and producing an account of the study. Findings - The findings of the study can be categorized into four groups: the roles paper and electronic documents serve in today's offices, the ways in which these documents are managed, the problems associated with their management, and the types of fragmentation that exist in terms of their management and how these are dealt with. Practical implications - The study has identified the need for better integrated management of paper and electronic documents in present-day offices. The findings of the study have then been used to propose a set of guidelines for the development of integrated paper and electronic document management systems. Originality/value - Although similar studies of offices have been conducted in the past, almost all of these studies are prior to the widespread use of mobile and network-based shared technologies in office environments. Furthermore, previous studies have generally failed to identify and propose guidelines for integration of paper and electronic document management systems.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 66(2014) no.2, S.134-155
  4. Hangel, N.; Schmidt-Pfister, D.: Why do you publish? : on the tensions between generating scientific knowledge and publication pressure (2017) 0.05 
    0.046514682 = product of:
  0.093029365 = sum of:
    0.029653627 = weight(_text_:management in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029653627 = score(doc=4054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
    0.06337574 = sum of:
      0.031368356 = weight(_text_:science in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031368356 = score(doc=4054,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.25204095 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
      0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03200739 = score(doc=4054,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine researchers' motivations to publish by comparing different career stages (PhD students; temporarily employed postdocs/new professors; scholars with permanent employment) with regard to epistemic, pragmatic, and personal motives. Design/methodology/approach This qualitative analysis is mainly based on semi-structured narrative interviews with 91 researchers in the humanities, social, and natural sciences, based at six renowned (anonymous) universities in Germany, the UK, and the USA. These narratives contain answers to the direct question "why do you publish?" as well as remarks on motivations to publish in relation to other questions and themes. The interdisciplinary interpretation is based on both sociological science studies and philosophy of science in practice. Findings At each career stage, epistemic, pragmatic, and personal motivations to publish are weighed differently. Confirming earlier studies, the authors find that PhD students and postdoctoral researchers in temporary positions mainly feel pressured to publish for career-related reasons. However, across status groups, researchers also want to publish in order to support collective knowledge generation. Research limitations/implications The sample of interviewees may be biased toward those interested in reflecting on their day-to-day work. Social implications Continuous and collective reflection is imperative for preventing uncritical internalization of pragmatic reasons to publish. Creating occasions for reflection is a task not only of researchers themselves, but also of administrators, funders, and other stakeholders. Originality/value Most studies have illuminated how researchers publish while adapting to or growing into the contemporary publish-or-perish culture. This paper addresses the rarely asked question why researchers publish at all.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Special issue on "The reward system of science".
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.5, S.529-544
  5. Liu, D.-R.; Shih, M.-J.: Hybrid-patent classification based on patent-network analysis (2011) 0.05 
    0.046027243 = product of:
  0.09205449 = sum of:
    0.041936565 = weight(_text_:management in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041936565 = score(doc=4189,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
    0.050117917 = sum of:
      0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.018110527 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
      0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03200739 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Effective patent management is essential for organizations to maintain their competitive advantage. The classification of patents is a critical part of patent management and industrial analysis. This study proposes a hybrid-patent-classification approach that combines a novel patent-network-based classification method with three conventional classification methods to analyze query patents and predict their classes. The novel patent network contains various types of nodes that represent different features extracted from patent documents. The nodes are connected based on the relationship metrics derived from the patent metadata. The proposed classification method predicts a query patent's class by analyzing all reachable nodes in the patent network and calculating their relevance to the query patent. It then classifies the query patent with a modified k-nearest neighbor classifier. To further improve the approach, we combine it with content-based, citation-based, and metadata-based classification methods to develop a hybrid-classification approach. We evaluate the performance of the hybrid approach on a test dataset of patent documents obtained from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and compare its performance with that of the three conventional methods. The results demonstrate that the proposed patent-network-based approach yields more accurate class predictions than the patent network-based approach.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:04:21
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.246-256
  6. McCain, K.W.: Mining full-text journal articles to assess obliteration by incorporation : Herbert A. Simon's concepts of bounded rationality and satisficing in economics, management, and psychology (2015) 0.05 
    0.046027243 = product of:
  0.09205449 = sum of:
    0.041936565 = weight(_text_:management in 2260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041936565 = score(doc=2260,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 2260, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2260)
    0.050117917 = sum of:
      0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 2260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.018110527 = score(doc=2260,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2260, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2260)
      0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 2260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03200739 = score(doc=2260,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2260, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2260)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This study explores the usefulness of full-text retrieval in assessing obliteration by incorporation (OBI) by comparing patterns of OBI and citation substitution across economics, management, and psychology for two concept catch phrases-bounded rationality and satisficing. Searches using each term are conducted in JSTOR and in selected additional full-text journal sources from over the years 1987-2011. Two measures of OBI are used, one simply tallying the presence or absence of references to Simon's oeuvre (strict OBI) linked to the catch phrase and one counting only papers lacking any embedded reference as evidence of obliteration (lenient OBI). By either measure, OBI existed but varied across subject area, time period, and catch phrase. Economics had the highest strict OBI (82%) and lenient OBI (43%) for bounded rationality and the highest strict OBI (64%) for satisficing; all 3 subject areas were essentially tied for lenient OBI at about 30%. Sixty-two percent of the articles for bounded rationality-psychology were retrieved only because the catch phrase occurred in a title in the article bibliography. OBI research can benefit from full-text searching; the main tradeoff is more detailed and nuanced evidence concerning OBI existence and trends versus increased noise in the retrieval.
    Date
    15.10.2015 19:22:55
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.11, S.2187-2201
  7. Semantic applications (2018) 0.05 
    0.045373395 = product of:
  0.09074679 = sum of:
    0.07263626 = weight(_text_:management in 5204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07263626 = score(doc=5204,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.45609936 = fieldWeight in 5204, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5204)
    0.018110527 = product of:
      0.036221053 = sum of:
        0.036221053 = weight(_text_:science in 5204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036221053 = score(doc=5204,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 5204, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Introduction.- Ontology Development.- Compliance using Metadata.- Variety Management for Big Data.- Text Mining in Economics.- Generation of Natural Language Texts.- Sentiment Analysis.- Building Concise Text Corpora from Web Contents.- Ontology-Based Modelling of Web Content.- Personalized Clinical Decision Support for Cancer Care.- Applications of Temporal Conceptual Semantic Systems.- Context-Aware Documentation in the Smart Factory.- Knowledge-Based Production Planning for Industry 4.0.- Information Exchange in Jurisdiction.- Supporting Automated License Clearing.- Managing cultural assets: Implementing typical cultural heritage archive's usage scenarios via Semantic Web technologies.- Semantic Applications for Process Management.- Domain-Specific Semantic Search Applications.
    LCSH
    Computer science
    Management information systems
    Computer Science
    Management of Computing and Information Systems
    Subject
    Computer science
    Management information systems
    Computer Science
    Management of Computing and Information Systems
  8. Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.: ¬An introduction to information science (2012) 0.04 
    0.044882137 = product of:
  0.089764275 = sum of:
    0.05871119 = weight(_text_:management in 4966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05871119 = score(doc=4966,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 4966, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4966)
    0.031053087 = product of:
      0.062106173 = sum of:
        0.062106173 = weight(_text_:science in 4966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062106173 = score(doc=4966,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.49901563 = fieldWeight in 4966, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4966)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Landmark textbook taking a whole subject approach to information science as a discipline. The authors' expert narratives guides you through each of the essential components of information science, offering a concise introduction an expertly chosen readings and resources. This is the definitve science textbook for students of this subject, and of information and knowledge management, librarianship, archives and records management worldwide.
    LCSH
    Information science
    Subject
    Information science
  9. Stock, W.G.: Informational cities : analysis and construction of cities in the knowledge society (2011) 0.04 
    0.043636583 = product of:
  0.087273166 = sum of:
    0.029653627 = weight(_text_:management in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029653627 = score(doc=4452,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
    0.057619542 = sum of:
      0.025612153 = weight(_text_:science in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.025612153 = score(doc=4452,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
      0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03200739 = score(doc=4452,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Informational cities are prototypical cities of the knowledge society. If they are informational world cities, they are new centers of power. According to Manuel Castells (1989), in those cities space of flows (flows of money, power, and information) tend to override space of places. Information and communication technology infrastructures, cognitive infrastructures (as groundwork of knowledge cities and creative cities), and city-level knowledge management are of great importance. Digital libraries provide access to the global explicit knowledge. The informational city consists of creative clusters and spaces for personal contacts to stimulate sharing of implicit information. In such cities, we can observe job polarization in favor of well-trained employees. The corporate structure of informational cities is made up of financial services, knowledge-intensive high-tech industrial enterprises, companies of the information economy, and further creative and knowledge-intensive service enterprises. Weak location factors are facilities for culture, recreational activities, and consumption. Political willingness to create an informational city and e-governance activities are crucial aspects for the development of such cities. This conceptual article frames indicators which are able to mark the degree of "informativeness" of a city. Finally, based upon findings of network economy, we try to explain why certain cities master the transition to informational cities and others (lagging to relative insignificance) do not. The article connects findings of information science and of urbanistics and urban planning.
    Date
    3. 7.2011 19:22:49
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.5, S.963-986
  10. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.04 
    0.043636583 = product of:
  0.087273166 = sum of:
    0.029653627 = weight(_text_:management in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029653627 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
    0.057619542 = sum of:
      0.025612153 = weight(_text_:science in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.025612153 = score(doc=2593,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
      0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03200739 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose The four major Subject Repositories (SRs), arXiv, Research Papers in Economics (RePEc), Social Science Research Network (SSRN) and PubMed Central (PMC), are all important within their disciplines but no previous study has systematically compared how often they are cited in academic publications. In response, the purpose of this paper is to report an analysis of citations to SRs from Scopus publications, 2000-2013. Design/methodology/approach Scopus searches were used to count the number of documents citing the four SRs in each year. A random sample of 384 documents citing the four SRs was then visited to investigate the nature of the citations. Findings Each SR was most cited within its own subject area but attracted substantial citations from other subject areas, suggesting that they are open to interdisciplinary uses. The proportion of documents citing each SR is continuing to increase rapidly, and the SRs all seem to attract substantial numbers of citations from more than one discipline. Research limitations/implications Scopus does not cover all publications, and most citations to documents found in the four SRs presumably cite the published version, when one exists, rather than the repository version. Practical implications SRs are continuing to grow and do not seem to be threatened by institutional repositories and so research managers should encourage their continued use within their core disciplines, including for research that aims at an audience in other disciplines. Originality/value This is the first simultaneous analysis of Scopus citations to the four most popular SRs.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Object
    Social Science Research Network
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.6, S.614-635
  11. Costas, R.; Zahedi, Z.; Wouters, P.: ¬The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media : large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations (2015) 0.04 
    0.043636583 = product of:
  0.087273166 = sum of:
    0.029653627 = weight(_text_:management in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029653627 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
    0.057619542 = sum of:
      0.025612153 = weight(_text_:science in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.025612153 = score(doc=2598,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
      0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03200739 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze the disciplinary orientation of scientific publications that were mentioned on different social media platforms, focussing on their differences and similarities with citation counts. Design/methodology/approach - Social media metrics and readership counts, associated with 500,216 publications and their citation data from the Web of Science database, were collected from Altmetric.com and Mendeley. Results are presented through descriptive statistical analyses together with science maps generated with VOSviewer. Findings - The results confirm Mendeley as the most prevalent social media source with similar characteristics to citations in their distribution across fields and their density in average values per publication. The humanities, natural sciences, and engineering disciplines have a much lower presence of social media metrics. Twitter has a stronger focus on general medicine and social sciences. Other sources (blog, Facebook, Google+, and news media mentions) are more prominent in regards to multidisciplinary journals. Originality/value - This paper reinforces the relevance of Mendeley as a social media source for analytical purposes from a disciplinary perspective, being particularly relevant for the social sciences (together with Twitter). Key implications for the use of social media metrics on the evaluation of research performance (e.g. the concentration of some social media metrics, such as blogs, news items, etc., around multidisciplinary journals) are identified.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.3, S.260 - 288
  12. Salminen, A.; Jauhiainen, E.; Nurmeksela, R.: ¬A life cycle model of XML documents (2014) 0.04 
    0.043268 = product of:
  0.086536 = sum of:
    0.071168706 = weight(_text_:management in 1553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071168706 = score(doc=1553,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 1553, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1553)
    0.015367293 = product of:
      0.030734586 = sum of:
        0.030734586 = weight(_text_:science in 1553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030734586 = score(doc=1553,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 1553, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1553)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Electronic documents produced in business processes are valuable information resources for organizations. In many cases they have to be accessible long after the life of the business processes or information systems in connection with which they were created. To improve the management and preservation of documents, organizations are deploying Extensible Markup Language (XML) as a standardized format for documents. The goal of this paper is to increase understanding of XML document management and provide a framework to enable the analysis and description of the management of XML documents throughout their life. We followed the design science approach. We introduce a document life cycle model consisting of five phases. For each of the phases we describe the typical activities related to the management of XML documents. Furthermore, we also identify the typical actors, systems, and types of content items associated with the activities of the phases. We demonstrate the use of the model in two case studies: one concerning the State Budget Proposal of the Finnish government and the other concerning a faculty council meeting agenda at a university.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.12, S.2564-2580
  13. Ronda-Pupo, G.A.; Katz, J.S.: ¬The power-law relationship between citation-based performance and collaboration in articles in management journals : a scale-independent approach scale-independent approach (2016) 0.04 
    0.043268 = product of:
  0.086536 = sum of:
    0.071168706 = weight(_text_:management in 3127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071168706 = score(doc=3127,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 3127, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3127)
    0.015367293 = product of:
      0.030734586 = sum of:
        0.030734586 = weight(_text_:science in 3127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030734586 = score(doc=3127,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 3127, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3127)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The objective of this article is to determine if academic collaboration is associated with the citation-based performance of articles that are published in management journals. We analyzed 127,812 articles published between 1988 and 2013 in 173 journals on the ISI Web of Science in the "management" category. Collaboration occurred in approximately 60% of all articles. A power-law relationship was found between citation-based performance and journal size and collaboration patterns. The number of citations expected by collaborative articles increases 21.89 or 3.7 times when the number of collaborative articles published in a journal doubles. The number of citations expected by noncollaborative articles only increases 21.35 or 2.55 times if a journal publishes double the number of noncollaborative articles. The Matthew effect is stronger for collaborative than for noncollaborative articles. Scale-independent indicators increase the confidence in the evaluation of the impact of the articles published in management journals.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.10, S.2565-2572
  14. Squicciarini, A.C; Heng Xu, H.; Zhang, X.(L.): CoPE: enabling collaborative privacy management in online social networks (2011) 0.04 
    0.04101751 = product of:
  0.08203502 = sum of:
    0.071168706 = weight(_text_:management in 4128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071168706 = score(doc=4128,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 4128, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4128)
    0.010866316 = product of:
      0.021732632 = sum of:
        0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 4128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021732632 = score(doc=4128,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4128, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4128)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Online Social Networks (OSNs) facilitate the creation and maintenance of interpersonal online relationships. Unfortunately, the availability of personal data on social networks may unwittingly expose users to numerous privacy risks. As a result, establishing effective methods to control personal data and maintain privacy within these OSNs have become increasingly important. This research extends the current access control mechanisms employed by OSNs to protect private information shared among users of OSNs. The proposed approach presents a system of collaborative content management that relies on an extended notion of a "content stakeholder." A tool, Collaborative Privacy Management (CoPE), is implemented as an application within a popular social-networking site, facebook.com, to ensure the protection of shared images generated by users. We present a user study of our CoPE tool through a survey-based study (n=80). The results demonstrate that regardless of whether Facebook users are worried about their privacy, they like the idea of collaborative privacy management and believe that a tool such as CoPE would be useful to manage their personal information shared within a social network.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.3, S.521-534
  15. Baier Benninger, P.: Model requirements for the management of electronic records (MoReq2) : Anleitung zur Umsetzung (2011) 0.04 
    0.04101751 = product of:
  0.08203502 = sum of:
    0.071168706 = weight(_text_:management in 4343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071168706 = score(doc=4343,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 4343, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4343)
    0.010866316 = product of:
      0.021732632 = sum of:
        0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 4343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021732632 = score(doc=4343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4343)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Viele auch kleinere Unternehmen, Verwaltungen und Organisationen sind angesichts eines wachsenden Berges von digitalen Informationen mit dem Ordnen und Strukturieren ihrer Ablagen beschäftigt. In den meisten Organisationen besteht ein Konzept der Dokumentenlenkung. Records Management verfolgt vor allem in zwei Punkten einen weiterführenden Ansatz. Zum einen stellt es über den Geschäftsalltag hinaus den Kontext und den Entstehungszusammenhang ins Zentrum und zum anderen gibt es Regeln vor, wie mit ungenutzten oder inaktiven Dokumenten zu verfahren ist. Mit den «Model Requirements for the Management of Electronic Records» - MoReq - wurde von der europäischen Kommission ein Standard geschaffen, der alle Kernbereiche des Records Managements und damit den gesamten Entstehungs-, Nutzungs-, Archivierungsund Aussonderungsbereich von Dokumenten abdeckt. In der «Anleitung zur Umsetzung» wird die umfangreiche Anforderungsliste von MoReq2 (August 2008) zusammengefasst und durch erklärende Abschnitte ergänzt, mit dem Ziel, als griffiges Instrument bei der Einführung eines Record Management Systems zu dienen.
    Content
    Diese Publikation entstand im Rahmen einer Bachelor Thesis zum Abschluss Bachelor of Science (BSc) FHO in Informationswissenschaft. Vgl. unter: http://www.fh-htwchur.ch/uploads/media/CSI_44_Baier.pdf.
  16. Serenko, A.; Bontis, N.: ¬A critical evaluation of expert survey-based journal rankings : the role of personal research interests (2018) 0.04 
    0.04101751 = product of:
  0.08203502 = sum of:
    0.071168706 = weight(_text_:management in 4228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071168706 = score(doc=4228,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 4228, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4228)
    0.010866316 = product of:
      0.021732632 = sum of:
        0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 4228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021732632 = score(doc=4228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    By using the data from two recent survey-based rankings of knowledge management / intellectual capital and eHealth journals, this study tests the impact of personal research interests of journal raters on their ranking scores. The rationale is that raters assign higher scores to journals that cater to their area of expertise because they are more familiar with them. The results indicate the existence of raters' bias toward the journals focusing on their preferred areas of interest, but this bias does not uniformly apply across all research topics. In some subdomains, such as intellectual capital, this bias may be very strong, whereas in others, such as soft-side knowledge management research, it may be nonexistent. Although management eHealth researchers rate management-focused journals higher than their clinical-centered counterparts, this bias does not exist among scholars favoring clinical topics. While this limitation is not fatal, the results from expert-survey journal ranking studies should be interpreted with caution.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.5, S.749-752
  17. Hossein, M.; Philips, J.G.; Sutherland, W.; Sawyer, S.; Erickson, I.: Personalization of knowledge, personal knowledge ecology, and digital nomadism (2019) 0.04 
    0.04101751 = product of:
  0.08203502 = sum of:
    0.071168706 = weight(_text_:management in 5010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071168706 = score(doc=5010,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 5010, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5010)
    0.010866316 = product of:
      0.021732632 = sum of:
        0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 5010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021732632 = score(doc=5010,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 5010, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5010)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    We examine the concept of personal knowledge management using data drawn from our study of digital nomads. We make two contributions: an empirical and conceptual development of knowledge management as it relates to independent workers and an advancement of social informatics that builds on Gibson's ecological perspective. Digital nomads provide an empirical basis to better understand how knowledge management is shifting from organization-centric, with its concomitant emphasis on organizational information systems, to worker-centric, which relies on personal knowledge ecologies. We advance this concept as a combination of personal knowledge management activities and the digital technologies that support them. Our data make clear that individuals are the locus of personal knowledge ecologies, but these ecologies are embedded in a larger community of collaborators, clients, and peers who are often extensively mediated by digital technologies. This embedding and mediation are at the core of the sociotechnical arrangements that define the personal knowledge ecologies that we document.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.4, S.313-324
  18. Dalkir, K.: Knowledge management in theory and practice (2017) 0.04 
    0.040995855 = product of:
  0.08199171 = sum of:
    0.06630753 = weight(_text_:management in 4579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06630753 = score(doc=4579,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.41635987 = fieldWeight in 4579, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4579)
    0.015684178 = product of:
      0.031368356 = sum of:
        0.031368356 = weight(_text_:science in 4579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031368356 = score(doc=4579,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.25204095 = fieldWeight in 4579, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4579)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    A new, thoroughly updated edition of a comprehensive overview of knowledge management (KM), covering theoretical foundations, the KM process, tools, and professions. The ability to manage knowledge has become increasingly important in today's knowledge economy. Knowledge is considered a valuable commodity, embedded in products and in the tacit knowledge of highly mobile individual employees. Knowledge management (KM) represents a deliberate and systematic approach to cultivating and sharing an organization's knowledge base. This textbook and professional reference offers a comprehensive overview of the field. Drawing on ideas, tools, and techniques from such disciplines as sociology, cognitive science, organizational behavior, and information science, it describes KM theory and practice at the individual, community, and organizational levels. Chapters cover such topics as tacit and explicit knowledge, theoretical modeling of KM, the KM cycle from knowledge capture to knowledge use, KM tools, KM assessment, and KM professionals.
    LCSH
    Knowledge management
    Series
    Business / Information Science
    Subject
    Knowledge management
  19. Information and communication technologies : international conference; proceedings / ICT 2010, Kochi, Kerala, India, September 7 - 9, 2010 (2010) 0.04 
    0.04033452 = product of:
  0.08066904 = sum of:
    0.05871119 = weight(_text_:management in 4784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05871119 = score(doc=4784,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 4784, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4784)
    0.02195785 = product of:
      0.0439157 = sum of:
        0.0439157 = weight(_text_:science in 4784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0439157 = score(doc=4784,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.35285735 = fieldWeight in 4784, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4784)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    LCSH
    Computer science
    Database management
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; vol.101
    Subject
    Computer science
    Database management
  20. Chaudiron, S.; Ihadjadene, M.: Studying Web search engines from a user perspective : key concepts and main approaches (2012) 0.04 
    0.039885774 = product of:
  0.07977155 = sum of:
    0.029653627 = weight(_text_:management in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029653627 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
    0.050117917 = sum of:
      0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.018110527 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
      0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03200739 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This chapter shows that the wider use of Web search engines, reconsidering the theoretical and methodological frameworks to grasp new information practices. Beginning with an overview of the recent challenges implied by the dynamic nature of the Web, this chapter then traces the information behavior related concepts in order to present the different approaches from the user perspective. The authors pay special attention to the concept of "information practice" and other related concepts such as "use", "activity", and "behavior" largely used in the literature but not always strictly defined. The authors provide an overview of user-oriented studies that are meaningful to understand the different contexts of use of electronic information access systems, focusing on five approaches: the system-oriented approaches, the theories of information seeking, the cognitive and psychological approaches, the management science approaches, and the marketing approaches. Future directions of work are then shaped, including social searching and the ethical, cultural, and political dimensions of Web search engines. The authors conclude considering the importance of Critical theory to better understand the role of Web Search engines in our modern society.
    Date
    20. 4.2012 13:22:37

Authors

Types

  • a 2793
  • m 129
  • el 85
  • s 51
  • x 12
  • b 7
  • r 4
  • i 3
  • n 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications