Search (3274 results, page 1 of 164)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Digital libraries (2000) 0.14 
    0.13908783 = product of:
  0.27817565 = sum of:
    0.27817565 = product of:
      0.5563513 = sum of:
        0.5563513 = weight(_text_:w.y in 5535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5563513 = score(doc=5535,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44668186 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047548167 = queryNorm
            1.2455202 = fieldWeight in 5535, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5535)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Editor
    Arms, W.Y.
  2. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.12 
    0.12095914 = product of:
  0.24191828 = sum of:
    0.24191828 = product of:
      0.48383656 = sum of:
        0.18879774 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18879774 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4031139 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047548167 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.29503882 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29503882 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.50392854 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047548167 = queryNorm
            0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  3. Chen, W.Y.: Observations on cataloguing and classification (1991) 0.12 
    0.11590653 = product of:
  0.23181306 = sum of:
    0.23181306 = product of:
      0.46362612 = sum of:
        0.46362612 = weight(_text_:w.y in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.46362612 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44668186 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047548167 = queryNorm
            1.0379336 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  4. He, X.; Cai, D.; Liu, H.; Ma, W.Y.: Locality preserving indexing for document representation (2004) 0.12 
    0.11590653 = product of:
  0.23181306 = sum of:
    0.23181306 = product of:
      0.46362612 = sum of:
        0.46362612 = weight(_text_:w.y in 4079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.46362612 = score(doc=4079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44668186 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047548167 = queryNorm
            1.0379336 = fieldWeight in 4079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4079)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  5. Tang, C.; Dwarkadas, S.; Xu, Z.; Ma, W.Y.: On scaling Latent semantic indexing for large peer-to peer systems (2004) 0.12 
    0.11590653 = product of:
  0.23181306 = sum of:
    0.23181306 = product of:
      0.46362612 = sum of:
        0.46362612 = weight(_text_:w.y in 4082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.46362612 = score(doc=4082,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44668186 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047548167 = queryNorm
            1.0379336 = fieldWeight in 4082, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4082)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  6. Shen, D.; Chen, Z.; Yang, Q.; Zeng, H.J.; Zhang, B.; Lu, Y.; Ma, W.Y.: Web page classification through summarization (2004) 0.12 
    0.11590653 = product of:
  0.23181306 = sum of:
    0.23181306 = product of:
      0.46362612 = sum of:
        0.46362612 = weight(_text_:w.y in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.46362612 = score(doc=4132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44668186 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047548167 = queryNorm
            1.0379336 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  7. Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993) 0.10 
    0.095208906 = sum of:
  0.043671947 = product of:
    0.17468779 = sum of:
      0.17468779 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17468779 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21676326 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.05153696 = product of:
    0.10307392 = sum of:
      0.10307392 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10307392 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16650558 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
  8. Knowledge organization for a global learning society : Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria (2006) 0.08 
    0.07920709 = product of:
  0.15841419 = sum of:
    0.15841419 = sum of:
      0.13908783 = weight(_text_:w.y in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13908783 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44668186 = queryWeight, product of:
            9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.31138006 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.019326359 = weight(_text_:22 in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019326359 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16650558 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Zins, C.: Knowledge map of information science: issues, principles, implications. - Lin, X., S. Aluker u. W. Zhu u.a.: Dynamic concept representation through a visual concept explorer. - Kohlbacher, F.: Knowledge organization(s) in Japan: empirical evidence from Japanese and western corporations. - Beghtol, C.: The global learning society and the iterative relationship between theory and practice in knowledge organization systems. - Tennis, J.T.: Function, purpose, predication, and context of information organization frameworks. - Doyle, A.: Naming and reclaiming knowledges in public intersections of landscapes and experience. - Qin, J., P. Creticos u. W.Y. Hsiao: Adaptive modeling of workforce domain knowledge. - Gnoli, C.: The meaning of facets in non-disciplinary classifications. - Loehrlein, A., E.K. Jacob u. S. Lee u.a.: Development of heuristics in a hybrid approach to faceted classification. - Thellefsen, M.: The dynamics of information representation and knowledge mediation. - LaBarre, K.: A multi faceted view: use of facet analysis in the practice of website organization and access. - Smiraglia, R.P.: Empiricism as the basis for metadata categorisation: expanding the case for instantiation with archival documents. - Bean, C.A.: Hierarchical relationships used in mapping between knowledge structures. - Friedman, A.: Concept mapping a measurable sign. - Naumis Pena, C.: Evaluation of educational thesauri. - Biagetti, M.T.: Indexing and scientific research needs. - Robert, C.A., A. Davis: Annotation and its application to information research in economic intelligence. - Mcllwaine, I.C., J.S. Mitchel: The new ecumenism: exploration of a DDC / UDC view of religion. - Hajdu Barát, A.: Usability and the user interfaces of classical information retrieval languages. - Eito Brun, R.: Uncovering hidden clues about geographic visualization in LCC. - Williamson, N.J.: Knowledge structures and the Internet progress and prospects. - Pajarillo, E.J.Y.: A classification scheme to determine medical necessity: a knowledge organization global learning application. - López-Huertas, M.J.: Thematic map of interdisciplinary domains based on their terminological representation: the gender studies. - Rodriguez Bravo, B.: The visibility of women in indexing languages. - Beall, J., D. Vizine-Goetz: Finding fiction: facilitating access to works of the imagination scattered by form and format. - Kwasnik, B.H., Y.L. Chun u. K. Crowston u.a.: Challenges in ceating a taxonomy of genres of digital documents. - Simon, J.: Interdisciplinary knowledge creation: using wikis in science. - Gabel, J.: Improving information retrieval of subjects through citation-analysis: a study. - Lee, H.L.: Navigating hierarchies vs. searching by keyword: two cultural perspectives. - Loehrlein, A., R. Martin u. E.L. Robertson: Integration of international standards in the domain of manufacturing enterprise. -
    Date
    27.12.2008 11:22:36
  9. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.08 
    0.07596568 = sum of:
  0.05663932 = product of:
    0.22655728 = sum of:
      0.22655728 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22655728 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4031139 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.019326359 = product of:
    0.038652718 = sum of:
      0.038652718 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038652718 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16650558 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  10. Arms, W.Y.; Dushay, N.; Fulker, D.; Lagoze, C.: ¬A case study in metadata harvesting : the NSDL (2003) 0.07 
    0.06954391 = product of:
  0.13908783 = sum of:
    0.13908783 = product of:
      0.27817565 = sum of:
        0.27817565 = weight(_text_:w.y in 4780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27817565 = score(doc=4780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44668186 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047548167 = queryNorm
            0.6227601 = fieldWeight in 4780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4780)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  11. Qin, J.; Creticos, P.; Hsiao, W.Y.: Adaptive modeling of workforce domain knowledge (2006) 0.07 
    0.06954391 = product of:
  0.13908783 = sum of:
    0.13908783 = product of:
      0.27817565 = sum of:
        0.27817565 = weight(_text_:w.y in 2519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27817565 = score(doc=2519,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44668186 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047548167 = queryNorm
            0.6227601 = fieldWeight in 2519, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2519)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  12. Siddiqui, M.A.: ¬A bibliometric study of authorship characteristics in four international information science journals (1997) 0.06 
    0.059441604 = sum of:
  0.040115245 = product of:
    0.16046098 = sum of:
      0.16046098 = weight(_text_:authors in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16046098 = score(doc=853,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.21676326 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.7402591 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.019326359 = product of:
    0.038652718 = sum of:
      0.038652718 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038652718 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16650558 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a bibliometric study of the authorship characteristics of articles published in 4 major information science periodicals: JASIS, Information technology and libraries, Journal of information science, and Program. The aim was to determine the details of their authors, such as: sex, occupation, affiliation, geographic distribution, and institutional affiliation. A total of 163 articles published in 1993 and written by 294 authors were analyzed. Results indicate that: men (206 or 70%) publish 3.0 times more articles than women (69 or 23,5%). Schools of library and information science contributed the most authors. The majority of authors came from the USA (148 or 50,3%), with the Midwest region claiming the largest share (110 or 25,0%). Academic libraries (110 or 37,4%) account for the major share of library publication. 12 schools of library and information science, in the USA, contributed 32 authors (50,0%) and assistant professors (25 or 39,1%) publish the most in these library schools. Male school of library and information science authors publish 1,6 times more than their female counterparts
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23
  13. Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006) 0.06 
    0.055640813 = sum of:
  0.033093393 = product of:
    0.13237357 = sum of:
      0.13237357 = weight(_text_:authors in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13237357 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.21676326 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.02254742 = product of:
    0.04509484 = sum of:
      0.04509484 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04509484 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16650558 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996) 0.06 
    0.055640813 = sum of:
  0.033093393 = product of:
    0.13237357 = sum of:
      0.13237357 = weight(_text_:authors in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13237357 = score(doc=597,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.21676326 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.02254742 = product of:
    0.04509484 = sum of:
      0.04509484 = weight(_text_:22 in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04509484 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16650558 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper considers the relevance of Charles Ami Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to the uiniverse of Internet accessible digital objects and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. The paper examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the World Wide Web. THe authors identify emerging techniques and technologies that can be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloging to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.25-42
  15. Castanha, R.C.G.; Wolfram, D.: ¬The domain of knowledge organization : a bibliometric analysis of prolific authors and their intellectual space (2018) 0.05 
    0.054706216 = sum of:
  0.038600914 = product of:
    0.15440366 = sum of:
      0.15440366 = weight(_text_:authors in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15440366 = score(doc=4150,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.21676326 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.7123147 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0161053 = product of:
    0.0322106 = sum of:
      0.0322106 = weight(_text_:22 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0322106 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16650558 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The domain of knowledge organization (KO) represents a foundational area of information science. One way to better understand the intellectual structure of the KO domain is to apply bibliometric methods to key contributors to the literature. This study analyzes the most prolific contributing authors to the journal Knowledge Organization, the sources they cite and the citations they receive for the period 1993 to 2016. The analyses were conducted using visualization outcomes of citation, co-citation and author bibliographic coupling analysis to reveal theoretical points of reference among authors and the most prominent research themes that constitute this scientific community. Birger Hjørland was the most cited author, and was situated at or near the middle of each of the maps based on different citation relationships. The proximities between authors resulting from the different citation relationships demonstrate how authors situate themselves intellectually through the citations they give and how other authors situate them through the citations received. There is a consistent core of theoretical references as well among the most productive authors. We observed a close network of scholarly communication between the authors cited in this core, which indicates the actual role of the journal Knowledge Organization as a space for knowledge construction in the area of knowledge organization.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.13-22
  16. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.05 
    0.05208032 = sum of:
  0.03275396 = product of:
    0.13101584 = sum of:
      0.13101584 = weight(_text_:authors in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13101584 = score(doc=4215,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.21676326 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.60441905 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.019326359 = product of:
    0.038652718 = sum of:
      0.038652718 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038652718 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16650558 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  17. Soergel, D.: Knowledge organization for learning (2014) 0.05 
    0.050993346 = sum of:
  0.019106477 = product of:
    0.07642591 = sum of:
      0.07642591 = weight(_text_:authors in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07642591 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21676326 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.03188687 = product of:
    0.06377374 = sum of:
      0.06377374 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06377374 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16650558 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses and illustrates through examples how meaningful or deep learning can be supported through well-structured presentation of material, through giving learners schemas they can use to organize knowledge in their minds, and through helping learners to understand knowledge organization principles they can use to construct their own schemas. It is a call to all authors, educators and information designers to pay attention to meaningful presentation that expresses the internal structure of the domain and facilitates the learner's assimilation of concepts and their relationships.
    Pages
    S.22-32
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  18. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.05 
    0.050492153 = sum of:
  0.023160549 = product of:
    0.092642196 = sum of:
      0.092642196 = weight(_text_:authors in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.092642196 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21676326 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.027331602 = product of:
    0.054663204 = sum of:
      0.054663204 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054663204 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16650558 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  19. Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996) 0.05 
    0.049568057 = sum of:
  0.027020639 = product of:
    0.108082555 = sum of:
      0.108082555 = weight(_text_:authors in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.108082555 = score(doc=6740,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21676326 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.02254742 = product of:
    0.04509484 = sum of:
      0.04509484 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04509484 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16650558 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  20. Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006) 0.05 
    0.049568057 = sum of:
  0.027020639 = product of:
    0.108082555 = sum of:
      0.108082555 = weight(_text_:authors in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.108082555 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21676326 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.02254742 = product of:
    0.04509484 = sum of:
      0.04509484 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04509484 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16650558 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047548167 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:05:39

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 2878
  • m 248
  • s 139
  • el 113
  • b 32
  • r 14
  • x 10
  • i 4
  • n 3
  • p 2
  • ag 1
  • d 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications