-
Aqeel, S.U.; Beitzel, S.M.; Jensen, E.C.; Grossman, D.; Frieder, O.: On the development of name search techniques for Arabic (2006)
0.17
0.17204478 = product of:
0.34408957 = sum of:
0.34408957 = sum of:
0.30586052 = weight(_text_:s.u in 5289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30586052 = score(doc=5289,freq=2.0), product of:
0.46580815 = queryWeight, product of:
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.65662336 = fieldWeight in 5289, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5289)
0.038229033 = weight(_text_:22 in 5289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038229033 = score(doc=5289,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16468045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5289, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5289)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:20:20
-
Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001)
0.12
0.11963326 = product of:
0.23926651 = sum of:
0.23926651 = product of:
0.47853303 = sum of:
0.18672825 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18672825 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3986952 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.2918048 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2918048 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4984048 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
-
Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993)
0.09
0.09416529 = sum of:
0.04319324 = product of:
0.17277296 = sum of:
0.17277296 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17277296 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21438722 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.05097205 = product of:
0.1019441 = sum of:
0.1019441 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1019441 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16468045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
-
Bajwa, S.U.; Kitchlew, N.; Shahzad, K-; Rehman, K.U.: Phronesis knowledge as enabler of intuitive decision making (2015)
0.09
0.08920932 = product of:
0.17841864 = sum of:
0.17841864 = product of:
0.35683727 = sum of:
0.35683727 = weight(_text_:s.u in 2101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.35683727 = score(doc=2101,freq=2.0), product of:
0.46580815 = queryWeight, product of:
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.7660606 = fieldWeight in 2101, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Rehman, S.U.; Chaudhry, A.S.: KM education in LIS programs (2005)
0.08
0.07646513 = product of:
0.15293026 = sum of:
0.15293026 = product of:
0.30586052 = sum of:
0.30586052 = weight(_text_:s.u in 4357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30586052 = score(doc=4357,freq=2.0), product of:
0.46580815 = queryWeight, product of:
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.65662336 = fieldWeight in 4357, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4357)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.08
0.07513299 = sum of:
0.05601847 = product of:
0.22407389 = sum of:
0.22407389 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22407389 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3986952 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.019114517 = product of:
0.038229033 = sum of:
0.038229033 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038229033 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16468045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Kim, S.U.: Exploring the knowledge development process of English language learners at a high school : how do English language proficiency and the nature of research task influence student learning? (2015)
0.06
0.06372094 = product of:
0.12744188 = sum of:
0.12744188 = product of:
0.25488377 = sum of:
0.25488377 = weight(_text_:s.u in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25488377 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.46580815 = queryWeight, product of:
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.54718614 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Siddiqui, M.A.: ¬A bibliometric study of authorship characteristics in four international information science journals (1997)
0.06
0.05879004 = sum of:
0.039675523 = product of:
0.15870209 = sum of:
0.15870209 = weight(_text_:authors in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15870209 = score(doc=853,freq=12.0), product of:
0.21438722 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.7402591 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.019114517 = product of:
0.038229033 = sum of:
0.038229033 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038229033 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16468045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a bibliometric study of the authorship characteristics of articles published in 4 major information science periodicals: JASIS, Information technology and libraries, Journal of information science, and Program. The aim was to determine the details of their authors, such as: sex, occupation, affiliation, geographic distribution, and institutional affiliation. A total of 163 articles published in 1993 and written by 294 authors were analyzed. Results indicate that: men (206 or 70%) publish 3.0 times more articles than women (69 or 23,5%). Schools of library and information science contributed the most authors. The majority of authors came from the USA (148 or 50,3%), with the Midwest region claiming the largest share (110 or 25,0%). Academic libraries (110 or 37,4%) account for the major share of library publication. 12 schools of library and information science, in the USA, contributed 32 authors (50,0%) and assistant professors (25 or 39,1%) publish the most in these library schools. Male school of library and information science authors publish 1,6 times more than their female counterparts
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23
-
Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006)
0.06
0.05503091 = sum of:
0.03273064 = product of:
0.13092256 = sum of:
0.13092256 = weight(_text_:authors in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13092256 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21438722 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02230027 = product of:
0.04460054 = sum of:
0.04460054 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04460054 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16468045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996)
0.06
0.05503091 = sum of:
0.03273064 = product of:
0.13092256 = sum of:
0.13092256 = weight(_text_:authors in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13092256 = score(doc=597,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21438722 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02230027 = product of:
0.04460054 = sum of:
0.04460054 = weight(_text_:22 in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04460054 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16468045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper considers the relevance of Charles Ami Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to the uiniverse of Internet accessible digital objects and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. The paper examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the World Wide Web. THe authors identify emerging techniques and technologies that can be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloging to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.25-42
-
Castanha, R.C.G.; Wolfram, D.: ¬The domain of knowledge organization : a bibliometric analysis of prolific authors and their intellectual space (2018)
0.05
0.05410656 = sum of:
0.038177796 = product of:
0.15271118 = sum of:
0.15271118 = weight(_text_:authors in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15271118 = score(doc=4150,freq=16.0), product of:
0.21438722 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.7123147 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.015928764 = product of:
0.031857528 = sum of:
0.031857528 = weight(_text_:22 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031857528 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16468045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The domain of knowledge organization (KO) represents a foundational area of information science. One way to better understand the intellectual structure of the KO domain is to apply bibliometric methods to key contributors to the literature. This study analyzes the most prolific contributing authors to the journal Knowledge Organization, the sources they cite and the citations they receive for the period 1993 to 2016. The analyses were conducted using visualization outcomes of citation, co-citation and author bibliographic coupling analysis to reveal theoretical points of reference among authors and the most prominent research themes that constitute this scientific community. Birger Hjørland was the most cited author, and was situated at or near the middle of each of the maps based on different citation relationships. The proximities between authors resulting from the different citation relationships demonstrate how authors situate themselves intellectually through the citations they give and how other authors situate them through the citations received. There is a consistent core of theoretical references as well among the most productive authors. We observed a close network of scholarly communication between the authors cited in this core, which indicates the actual role of the journal Knowledge Organization as a space for knowledge construction in the area of knowledge organization.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.13-22
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.05
0.051509447 = sum of:
0.03239493 = product of:
0.12957972 = sum of:
0.12957972 = weight(_text_:authors in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12957972 = score(doc=4215,freq=8.0), product of:
0.21438722 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.60441905 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.019114517 = product of:
0.038229033 = sum of:
0.038229033 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038229033 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16468045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Soergel, D.: Knowledge organization for learning (2014)
0.05
0.05043439 = sum of:
0.018897042 = product of:
0.07558817 = sum of:
0.07558817 = weight(_text_:authors in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07558817 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21438722 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.031537347 = product of:
0.06307469 = sum of:
0.06307469 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06307469 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16468045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses and illustrates through examples how meaningful or deep learning can be supported through well-structured presentation of material, through giving learners schemas they can use to organize knowledge in their minds, and through helping learners to understand knowledge organization principles they can use to construct their own schemas. It is a call to all authors, educators and information designers to pay attention to meaningful presentation that expresses the internal structure of the domain and facilitates the learner's assimilation of concepts and their relationships.
- Pages
- S.22-32
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012)
0.05
0.049938686 = sum of:
0.022906676 = product of:
0.091626704 = sum of:
0.091626704 = weight(_text_:authors in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.091626704 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21438722 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.027032012 = product of:
0.054064024 = sum of:
0.054064024 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054064024 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16468045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
-
Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996)
0.05
0.049024723 = sum of:
0.026724454 = product of:
0.106897816 = sum of:
0.106897816 = weight(_text_:authors in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106897816 = score(doc=6740,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21438722 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02230027 = product of:
0.04460054 = sum of:
0.04460054 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04460054 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16468045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006)
0.05
0.049024723 = sum of:
0.026724454 = product of:
0.106897816 = sum of:
0.106897816 = weight(_text_:authors in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106897816 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21438722 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02230027 = product of:
0.04460054 = sum of:
0.04460054 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04460054 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16468045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:05:39
-
Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012)
0.05
0.049024723 = sum of:
0.026724454 = product of:
0.106897816 = sum of:
0.106897816 = weight(_text_:authors in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106897816 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21438722 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02230027 = product of:
0.04460054 = sum of:
0.04460054 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04460054 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16468045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Oliveira, E.T. de; Cabrini Gracio, M.C.: Theoretical referents in Knowledge Organization : a domain analysis of the Knowledge Organization journal (2012)
0.05
0.0489917 = sum of:
0.033062935 = product of:
0.13225174 = sum of:
0.13225174 = weight(_text_:authors in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13225174 = score(doc=823,freq=12.0), product of:
0.21438722 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.61688256 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.015928764 = product of:
0.031857528 = sum of:
0.031857528 = weight(_text_:22 in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031857528 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16468045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Aiming at contributing to the epistemological characterization of the area of knowledge organization, our goal is to analyze the KO journal, since its creation in 1993, as a knowledge domain, from a nuclear community of the most productive and greater impact authors, analyzing the dialogue among citing authors and cited ones, and also the co-citations established by the citing authors. We worked with a corpus of 310 articles published between 1993 and 2011 produced by a total of 360 authors. The relatively more productive authors, a group geographically concentrated in Europe (37%), North America (44%) and Asia (19%), is clearly explained by the historical European origin of the ISKO and by an increasing North American presence along the years. Of the 33 most cited authors, 22 were co-cited in at least 6 works, which suggests that they are the theoretical referential nucleus of the area, in the studied journal. Finally, we observe that the area reveals theme cohesion and coherence in its production, enabling us to clearly visualize its theoretical referential nucleus and to confirm the role performed by the KO magazine as a catalyzing agent of international theoretical construction in the area.
-
Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010)
0.05
0.04716935 = sum of:
0.028054833 = product of:
0.11221933 = sum of:
0.11221933 = weight(_text_:authors in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11221933 = score(doc=4000,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21438722 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.019114517 = product of:
0.038229033 = sum of:
0.038229033 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038229033 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16468045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Author research impact was examined based on citer analysis (the number of citers as opposed to the number of citations) for 90 highly cited authors grouped into three broad subject areas. Citer-based outcome measures were also compared with more traditional citation-based measures for levels of association. The authors found that there are significant differences in citer-based outcomes among the three broad subject areas examined and that there is a high degree of correlation between citer and citation-based measures for all measures compared, except for two outcomes calculated for the social sciences. Citer-based measures do produce slightly different rankings of authors based on citer counts when compared to more traditional citation counts. Examples are provided. Citation measures may not adequately address the influence, or reach, of an author because citations usually do not address the origin of the citation beyond self-citations.
- Date
- 28. 9.2010 12:54:22
-
Pepermans, G.; Rousseau, S.: ¬The decision to submit to a journal : another example of a valence-consistent shift? (2016)
0.05
0.04716935 = sum of:
0.028054833 = product of:
0.11221933 = sum of:
0.11221933 = weight(_text_:authors in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11221933 = score(doc=2925,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21438722 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.019114517 = product of:
0.038229033 = sum of:
0.038229033 = weight(_text_:22 in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038229033 = score(doc=2925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16468045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047026973 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article we use a stated choice experiment to study researcher preferences in the information sciences and to investigate the relative importance of different journal characteristics in convincing potential authors to submit to a particular journal. The analysis distinguishes high quality from standard quality articles and focuses on the question whether communicating acceptance rates rather than rejection rates leads to other submission decisions. Our results show that a positive framing effect might be present when authors decide on submitting a high quality article. No evidence of a framing effect is found when authors consider a standard quality article. From a journal marketing perspective, this is important information for editors. Communicating acceptance rates rather than rejection rates might help to convince researchers to submit to their journal.
- Date
- 7. 5.2016 20:02:22
