-
Shen, X.; Li, D.; Shen, C.: Evaluating China's university library Web sites using correspondence analysis (2006)
0.13
0.12958115 = product of:
0.2591623 = sum of:
0.2591623 = sum of:
0.19513549 = weight(_text_:500 in 5277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19513549 = score(doc=5277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.5403525 = fieldWeight in 5277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5277)
0.064026825 = weight(_text_:22 in 5277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064026825 = score(doc=5277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5277)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:40:18
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.4, S.493-500
-
Qin, J.; Hernández, N.: Building interoperable vocabulary and structures for learning objects : an empirical study (2006)
0.12
0.12243791 = sum of:
0.061458062 = product of:
0.18437418 = sum of:
0.18437418 = weight(_text_:objects in 4926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18437418 = score(doc=4926,freq=8.0), product of:
0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 4926, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4926)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.060979843 = product of:
0.12195969 = sum of:
0.12195969 = weight(_text_:500 in 4926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12195969 = score(doc=4926,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.33772033 = fieldWeight in 4926, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4926)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The structural, functional, and production views on learning objects influence metadata structure and vocabulary. The authors drew on these views and conducted a literature review and in-depth analysis of 14 learning objects and over 500 components in these learning objects to model the knowledge framework for a learning object ontology. The learning object ontology reported in this article consists of 8 top-level classes, 28 classes at the second level, and 34 at the third level. Except class Learning object, all other classes have the three properties of preferred term, related term, and synonym. To validate the ontology, we conducted a query log analysis that focused an discovering what terms users have used at both conceptual and word levels. The findings show that the main classes in the ontology are either conceptually or linguistically similar to the top terms in the query log data. The authors built an "Exercise Editor" as an informal experiment to test its adoption ability in authoring tools. The main contribution of this project is in the framework for the learning object domain and the methodology used to develop and validate an ontology.
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.12
0.11783104 = sum of:
0.093820974 = product of:
0.2814629 = sum of:
0.2814629 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2814629 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5008076 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.024010058 = product of:
0.048020117 = sum of:
0.048020117 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048020117 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019)
0.11
0.114053026 = sum of:
0.08604129 = product of:
0.25812384 = sum of:
0.25812384 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25812384 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.028011736 = product of:
0.05602347 = sum of:
0.05602347 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05602347 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
- Date
- 21.11.2019 18:46:22
-
ChaPudhry, A.S.; Periasamy, M.: ¬A study of current practices of selected libraries in cataloguing electronic journals (2001)
0.11
0.11338352 = product of:
0.22676703 = sum of:
0.22676703 = sum of:
0.17074355 = weight(_text_:500 in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17074355 = score(doc=746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.47280845 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
0.05602347 = weight(_text_:22 in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05602347 = score(doc=746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- MARC records and online policy documents of selected libraries were reviewed to study the approaches taken by libraries worldwide to catalogue electronic journals. In general, libraries catalogue those electronic journals that are subscribed by them on priority basis. Most of them annotate the e-journal to the print record, some prefer to catalogue them separately, while the majority of the libraries adopt both approaches. While most of the libraries studied prefer full record, cataloguing e-journals separately with a brief record (at least containing MARC fields 245, 500, and 856) that identifies and locates the resource seems to be the best practice.
- Date
- 22. 1.2007 20:46:57
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.11
0.108913176 = product of:
0.21782635 = sum of:
0.21782635 = product of:
0.32673952 = sum of:
0.09218709 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09218709 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.23455243 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23455243 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5008076 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Lercher, A.: Correlation over time for citations to mathematics articles (2013)
0.11
0.1062469 = product of:
0.2124938 = sum of:
0.2124938 = sum of:
0.17247704 = weight(_text_:500 in 661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17247704 = score(doc=661,freq=4.0), product of:
0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.47760868 = fieldWeight in 661, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=661)
0.040016767 = weight(_text_:22 in 661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040016767 = score(doc=661,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 661, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=661)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Explicit definition of the limits of citation analysis demands additional tests for the validity of citation analysis. The stability of citation rankings over time can be regarded as confirming the validity of evaluative citation analysis. This stability over time was investigated for two sets of citation records from the Web of Science (Thomson Reuters, Philadelphia, PA) for articles published in journals classified in Journal Citation Reports as Mathematics. These sets are of all such articles for the 1960s and for the 1970s. This study employs only descriptive statistics and draws no inferences to any larger population. The study found a high correlation from one decade to the next of rankings among sets of most highly cited articles. However, the study found a low correlation for rankings among articles whose ranks were the 500 directly below those of the 500 most cited. This perhaps expected result is discussed in terms of the Glänzel-Schubert-Schoepflin stochastic model for citation processes and also in connection with an account of the purposes of evaluative citation analysis. This interpretative context suggests why the limitations of citation analysis may be inherent to citation analysis even when it is done well.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:23:35
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.10
0.101545274 = sum of:
0.06953186 = product of:
0.20859557 = sum of:
0.20859557 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20859557 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.032013413 = product of:
0.064026825 = sum of:
0.064026825 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064026825 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998)
0.10
0.101545274 = sum of:
0.06953186 = product of:
0.20859557 = sum of:
0.20859557 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20859557 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.032013413 = product of:
0.064026825 = sum of:
0.064026825 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064026825 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Holetschek, J. et al.: Natural history in Europeana : accessing scientific collection objects via LOD (2016)
0.10
0.10147483 = sum of:
0.061458062 = product of:
0.18437418 = sum of:
0.18437418 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18437418 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.040016767 = product of:
0.08003353 = sum of:
0.08003353 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08003353 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Fidel, R.: Searchers' selection of search keys : 1. The selection routine (1991)
0.10
0.097567745 = product of:
0.19513549 = sum of:
0.19513549 = product of:
0.39027098 = sum of:
0.39027098 = weight(_text_:500 in 2993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.39027098 = score(doc=2993,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
1.080705 = fieldWeight in 2993, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2993)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42(1991), S.490-500
-
Derr, R.L.: ¬The concept of information in ordinary discourse (1985)
0.10
0.097567745 = product of:
0.19513549 = sum of:
0.19513549 = product of:
0.39027098 = sum of:
0.39027098 = weight(_text_:500 in 3297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.39027098 = score(doc=3297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
1.080705 = fieldWeight in 3297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3297)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 21(1985) no.6, S.489-500
-
¬The First Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-1) (1993)
0.10
0.097567745 = product of:
0.19513549 = sum of:
0.19513549 = product of:
0.39027098 = sum of:
0.39027098 = weight(_text_:500 in 3352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.39027098 = score(doc=3352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
1.080705 = fieldWeight in 3352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- NIST special publication; 500-207
-
Scammell, A.: Handbook of information management (2001)
0.10
0.097567745 = product of:
0.19513549 = sum of:
0.19513549 = product of:
0.39027098 = sum of:
0.39027098 = weight(_text_:500 in 3347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.39027098 = score(doc=3347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
1.080705 = fieldWeight in 3347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3347)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- 500 S
-
Digital libraries: current issues : Digital Libraries Workshop DL 94, Newark, NJ, May 19-20, 1994. Selected papers (1995)
0.10
0.097185865 = product of:
0.19437173 = sum of:
0.19437173 = sum of:
0.14635162 = weight(_text_:500 in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14635162 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.40526438 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
0.048020117 = weight(_text_:22 in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048020117 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.1996 18:26:45
- Footnote
- Rez. in: ABI-Technik 15(1995) H.4, S.499-500 (B. Dugall)
-
Zeng, M.L.; Gracy, K.F.; Zumer, M.: Using a semantic analysis tool to generate subject access points : a study using Panofsky's theory and two research samples (2014)
0.10
0.097185865 = product of:
0.19437173 = sum of:
0.19437173 = sum of:
0.14635162 = weight(_text_:500 in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14635162 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.40526438 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
0.048020117 = weight(_text_:22 in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048020117 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.493-500
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Soos, C.; Leazer, H.H.: Presentations of authorship in knowledge organization (2020)
0.09
0.091708876 = sum of:
0.030729031 = product of:
0.09218709 = sum of:
0.09218709 = weight(_text_:objects in 21) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09218709 = score(doc=21,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 21, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=21)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.060979843 = product of:
0.12195969 = sum of:
0.12195969 = weight(_text_:500 in 21) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12195969 = score(doc=21,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.33772033 = fieldWeight in 21, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=21)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The "author" is a concept central to many publication and documentation practices, often carrying legal, professional, social, and personal importance. Typically viewed as the solitary owner of their creations, a person is held responsible for their work and positioned to receive the praise and criticism that may emerge in its wake. Although the role of the individual within creative production is undeniable, literary (Foucault 1977; Bloom 1997) and knowledge organization (Moulaison et. al. 2014) theorists have challenged the view that the work of one person can-or should-be fully detached from their professional and personal networks. As these relationships often provide important context and reveal the role of community in the creation of new things, their absence from catalog records presents a falsely simplified view of the creative process. Here, we address the consequences of what we call the "author-asowner" concept and suggest that an "author-as-node" approach, which situates an author within their networks of influence, may allow for more relational representation within knowledge organization systems, a framing that emphasizes rather than erases the messy complexities that affect the production of new objects and ideas.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 47(2020) no.6, S.486-500
-
Sehgal, R.L.: ¬An introduction to Dewey Decimal Classification (2005)
0.09
0.08927597 = product of:
0.17855194 = sum of:
0.17855194 = sum of:
0.12195969 = weight(_text_:500 in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12195969 = score(doc=1467,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.33772033 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
0.056592252 = weight(_text_:22 in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056592252 = score(doc=1467,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Inhalt: Section A: Number Building in Dewey Decimal Classification Chapters 1. Dewey Decimal Classification: An Introduction 2. Relative Index and its Utility 3. Table 1: Standard Subdivisions 4. Table 2: Areas 5. Table 3: Subdivisions of Individual Literature 6. Table 4: Aubdivisions of Individual Languages 7. Table 5: Racial, Ethnic National Groups 8. Table 6: Languages 9. Table 7: Persons 10. Number Building in Dewey Decimal Classification 11. Classification of Books According to Dewey Decimal classification 12. 000 Generalities 13. 100 Philosophy and Related Disciplines 14. 200 Religion 15. 300 Social Sciences 16. 400 Languages 17. 500 Pure Sciences 18. 600 Technology (Applied Sciences) 19. 700 The Arts 20. 800 Literature (Belles-Relaters) 21. 900 General Geography and History Exercises Solutions
- Date
- 28. 2.2008 17:22:52
- Object
- DDC-22
-
Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994)
0.09
0.088852115 = sum of:
0.06084038 = product of:
0.18252113 = sum of:
0.18252113 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18252113 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.028011736 = product of:
0.05602347 = sum of:
0.05602347 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05602347 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
-
Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011)
0.09
0.088852115 = sum of:
0.06084038 = product of:
0.18252113 = sum of:
0.18252113 = weight(_text_:objects in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18252113 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.028011736 = product of:
0.05602347 = sum of:
0.05602347 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05602347 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059071355 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:23:07
