Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"i"
  1. Traniello, P.: ¬La Biblioteca nell'Encyclopedie tra sinstesi riepilogativa e spunti critici (1997) 0.05
    0.047071442 = sum of:
      0.020975841 = product of:
        0.083903365 = sum of:
          0.083903365 = weight(_text_:authors in 5435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.083903365 = score(doc=5435,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052200247 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5435, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5435)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.026095599 = product of:
        0.052191198 = sum of:
          0.052191198 = weight(_text_:p in 5435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052191198 = score(doc=5435,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052200247 = queryNorm
              0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 5435, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5435)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Analyses 5 articles on subjects of bibliographic interest in the 1st ed. (1751-80) of Encyclopedie, now re-issued in facsimile form. The article headings (translated) are Bibliomane, Bibliomania, Librarian, Library, and Catalogue. The relevant authors include Diderot, d'Alembert and David, among others. By identifying likely sources, the analysis throws light on library science developments in the early 18th century. D'Alembert's contribution, in particular, contains the seeds of the modern view of what libraries ought not to be
  2. Nistico, R.: Studio e indicizzazione delle dediche librarie (1998) 0.05
    0.045729287 = sum of:
      0.020975841 = product of:
        0.083903365 = sum of:
          0.083903365 = weight(_text_:authors in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.083903365 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052200247 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.024753446 = product of:
        0.04950689 = sum of:
          0.04950689 = weight(_text_:22 in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04950689 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052200247 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Book dedications by authors, often in verse form and appearing just before the title page, are one of the 6 elements describes by the French scholar Genette as paratextual. For some reasons dedications have failed to interest librarians, yet books containing them can be a valid object of bibliographic study, for the reasons that they carry special markings: are an example of a specific literary or semantic class; and reveal linguistic/stylistic features. Examines the history of literary dedications, citing examples by well-known writers, and suggests that cataloguing software should have a special field to record dedication
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:41:06
  3. Atti del sminario di studi sulla CDU. Roma, 22. settembre 1975. A cura di Maria Pia Carosella (1977) 0.02
    0.024753446 = product of:
      0.04950689 = sum of:
        0.04950689 = product of:
          0.09901378 = sum of:
            0.09901378 = weight(_text_:22 in 3477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09901378 = score(doc=3477,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052200247 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3477, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3477)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Buizza, P.; Guerrini, M.: ¬Un modello concettuale per il nuovo Soggettario : l'indicizzazione per soggetto alla luce di FRBR (2001) 0.02
    0.018639714 = product of:
      0.037279427 = sum of:
        0.037279427 = product of:
          0.074558854 = sum of:
            0.074558854 = weight(_text_:p in 3738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074558854 = score(doc=3738,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052200247 = queryNorm
                0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 3738, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3738)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998) 0.01
    0.014144826 = product of:
      0.028289651 = sum of:
        0.028289651 = product of:
          0.056579303 = sum of:
            0.056579303 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056579303 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052200247 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:40:57
  6. Santoro, M.: Ripensare la CDU (1995) 0.01
    0.0130477995 = product of:
      0.026095599 = sum of:
        0.026095599 = product of:
          0.052191198 = sum of:
            0.052191198 = weight(_text_:p in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052191198 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052200247 = queryNorm
                0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A detailed examination of the UDC's history, function and future prospects. Among topics discussed are: the early pioneering work of P. Otlet and H. LaFontaine; the development of Colon Classification; the 'UDC versus switching language' debate in the 1970s; the FID standard reference code project; and the recent scheme by Williamson and McIlwaine to restructure UDC completely, converting it into a Colon Classification and also creating a thesaurus drawn from the same classification. Comments that UDC, far from being a 'prehistoric monster', is becoming a sort of test laboratory for developing new and interesting documentation structures
  7. Aghemo, A.: Anche l'arte ha sue regole : e possibile anche per il bibliotecario del servizio d'informazione fondare la sua attivita su un 'codice' certo? (1993) 0.01
    0.012376723 = product of:
      0.024753446 = sum of:
        0.024753446 = product of:
          0.04950689 = sum of:
            0.04950689 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04950689 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052200247 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  8. Aghemo, A.: Come valutare il servizio di informazione (1993) 0.01
    0.012376723 = product of:
      0.024753446 = sum of:
        0.024753446 = product of:
          0.04950689 = sum of:
            0.04950689 = weight(_text_:22 in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04950689 = score(doc=4413,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052200247 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  9. Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993) 0.01
    0.012376723 = product of:
      0.024753446 = sum of:
        0.024753446 = product of:
          0.04950689 = sum of:
            0.04950689 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04950689 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052200247 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  10. Vedaldi, M.; Nordio, T.: Un progetto di recupero automatico del pregresso (1995) 0.01
    0.011986194 = product of:
      0.023972388 = sum of:
        0.023972388 = product of:
          0.09588955 = sum of:
            0.09588955 = weight(_text_:authors in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09588955 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052200247 = queryNorm
                0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Political Sciences Library of the University of Padua completed in 1994 a pilot project to add all its book material purchased since 1970 (some 20.000 monographs) to its public online catalogue. The library decided against creating a parallel database, and to work instead directly thorugh its existing SBN base, thus avoiding duplication of authors and titles and saving time. Library of Congress tapes were acquired and a special rapid cataloguing software (RAP) was developed, written in natural-Adabas. Describes the project's methodology, problems and results
  11. Sambataro, A.: Ai margini, ma non marginali (1996) 0.01
    0.011986194 = product of:
      0.023972388 = sum of:
        0.023972388 = product of:
          0.09588955 = sum of:
            0.09588955 = weight(_text_:authors in 5552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09588955 = score(doc=5552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052200247 = queryNorm
                0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 5552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5552)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the bibligraphical value of authors' handwritten marginal notes, comments and explanations. Such notes may be merely trivial, or consist of invective, but some examples have proved extremely useful for the comprehension of obscure or contradictory texts. The possibility of surprising discoveries in marginal notes has always attracted some researchers to this field. Cataloguing such notes by fixed rules is difficult; as a bibliographical entity, each note is unique and unrepeatable. Librarians should be flexible and intuitive in their approach. Supports the thesis with historical references and quotations
  12. Serrai, A.: Johann Michael Franke e il catalogo della Bibliotheca Bunaviana (1750-1756) (1995) 0.01
    0.010487921 = product of:
      0.020975841 = sum of:
        0.020975841 = product of:
          0.083903365 = sum of:
            0.083903365 = weight(_text_:authors in 5541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083903365 = score(doc=5541,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052200247 = queryNorm
                0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5541, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5541)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Bünau Library catalogue (1750-56), which initially comprised 3 tomes of 7 volumes and had 16.000 authors listed in its final index, is the most systematically structured in the history of bibliography, its architecture being so analytical that it almost fulfils the librarian's dream of so organising a collection that it develops organically from within. Describes with examples of indexing the work of the Bünau Library's first director, J.M. Franke (1717-75), who began his task with the 42.000 volumes in Count Heinrich von Bülau's private collection, and later supervised their incorporation with the Brühl and Dresden Electoral Library collections
  13. Cecchini, C.; Zanchetta, C.; Paolo Borin, P.; Xausa, G.: Computational design e sistemi di classificazione per la verifica predittiva delle prestazioni di sistema degli organismi edilizi : Computational design and classification systems to support predictive checking of performance of building systems (2017) 0.01
    0.009319857 = product of:
      0.018639714 = sum of:
        0.018639714 = product of:
          0.037279427 = sum of:
            0.037279427 = weight(_text_:p in 5856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037279427 = score(doc=5856,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052200247 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 5856, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5856)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Nuovo soggettario : guida al sistema italiano di indicizzazione per soggetto, prototipo del thesaurus (2007) 0.01
    0.0064569865 = product of:
      0.012913973 = sum of:
        0.012913973 = product of:
          0.025827946 = sum of:
            0.025827946 = weight(_text_:p in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025827946 = score(doc=664,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052200247 = queryNorm
                0.13761206 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 34(2007) no.1, S.58-60 (P. Buizza): "This Nuovo soggettario is the first sign of subject indexing renewal in Italy. Italian subject indexing has been based until now on Soggettario per i cataloghi delle biblioteche italiane (Firenze, 1956), a list of preferred terms and see references, with suitable hierarchical subdivisions and cross references, derived from the subject catalogue of the National Library in Florence (BNCF). New headings later used in Bibliografia nazionale italiana (BNI) were added without references, nor indeed with any real maintenance. Systematic instructions on how to combine the terms are lacking: the indexer using this instrument is obliged to infer the order of terms absent from the lists by consulting analogous entries. Italian libraries are suffering from the limits of this subject catalogue: vocabulary is inadequate, obsolete and inconsistent, the syndetic structure incomplete and inaccurate, and the syntax ill-defined, poorly explained and unable to reflect complex subjects. In the nineties, the Subject Indexing Research Group (Gruppo di ricerca sull'indicizzazione per soggetto, GRIS) of the AIB (Italian Library Association) developed the indexing theory and some principles of PRECIS and drew up guidelines based on consistent principles for vocabulary, semantic relationships and subject string construction, the latter according to role syntax (Guida 1997). In overhauling the Soggettario, the National Library in Florence aimed at a comprehensive indexing system. (A report on the method and evolution of the work has been published in Knowledge Organization (Lucarelli 2005), while the feasibility study is available in Italian (Per un nuovo Soggettario 2002). Any usable terms from the old Soggettario will be transferred to the new system, while taking into consideration international norms and interlinguistic compatibility, as well as applications outside the immediate library context. The terms will be accessible via a suitable OPAC operating on the most advanced software.
    An entry is structured so as to present all the essential elements of the indexing system. For each term are given: category, facet, related terms, Dewey interdisciplinary class number and, if necessary; definition or scope notes. Sources used are referenced (an appendix in the book lists those used in the current work). Historical notes indicate whenever a change of term has occurred, thus smoothing the transition from the old lists. In chapter 5, the longest one, detailed instructions with practical examples show how to create entries and how to relate terms; upper relationships must always be complete, right up to the top term, whereas hierarchies of related terms not yet fully developed may remain unfinished. Subject string construction consists in a double operation: analysis and synthesis. The former is the analysis of logical functions performed by single concepts in the definition of the subject (e.g., transitive actions, object, agent, etc.) or in syntactic relationships (transitive relationships and belonging relationship), so that each term for those concepts is assigned its role (e.g., key concept, transitive element, agent, instrument, etc.) in the subject string, where the core is distinct from the complementary roles (e.g., place, time, form, etc.). Synthesis is based on a scheme of nuclear and complementary roles, and citation order follows agreed-upon principles of one-to-one relationships and logical dependence. There is no standard citation order based on facets, in a categorial logic, but a flexible one, although thorough. For example, it is possible for a time term (subdivision) to precede an action term, when the former is related to the latter as the object of action: "Arazzi - Sec. 16.-17. - Restauro" [Tapestry - 16th-17th century - Restoration] (p. 126). So, even with more complex subjects, it is possible to produce perfectly readable strings covering the whole of the subject matter without splitting it into two incomplete and complementary headings. To this end, some unusual connectives are adopted, giving the strings a more discursive style.
    Pages
    246 p. + 1 CD-ROM