Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Aufstellungssysteme Wissenschaftl. Bibliotheken"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Roth-Plettenberg, V.; Bodem, C.: Von der Magazin- zur Freihandbibliothek: das Beispiel Göttingen (1992) 0.02
    0.024060382 = product of:
      0.048120763 = sum of:
        0.04530031 = weight(_text_:von in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04530031 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.35372335 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
        0.002820454 = product of:
          0.008461362 = sum of:
            0.008461362 = weight(_text_:a in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008461362 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Type
    a
  2. Lorenz, B.: ¬Die Regensburger Verbundklassifikation : Gemeinsame Anwendung in Ost und West (1996) 0.02
    0.020050319 = product of:
      0.040100638 = sum of:
        0.03775026 = weight(_text_:von in 3957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03775026 = score(doc=3957,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.29476947 = fieldWeight in 3957, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3957)
        0.002350378 = product of:
          0.007051134 = sum of:
            0.007051134 = weight(_text_:a in 3957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007051134 = score(doc=3957,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3957, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3957)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken nach der Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands - Entwicklung und Perspektive. Kolloquium aus anlaß des 300jährigen Bestehens der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt am 6. März 1996 in Halle (Saale). Hrsg. von J. Dietze u. B. Scheschonk
    Type
    a
  3. Lorenz, B.: Überlegungen zur Verbundklassifikation (1996) 0.02
    0.016721193 = product of:
      0.033442385 = sum of:
        0.03203216 = weight(_text_:von in 5212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03203216 = score(doc=5212,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.2501202 = fieldWeight in 5212, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5212)
        0.001410227 = product of:
          0.004230681 = sum of:
            0.004230681 = weight(_text_:a in 5212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004230681 = score(doc=5212,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 5212, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5212)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit mit einer Verbundklassifikation ist im deutschen Bibliothekswesen - trotz inzwischen langjähriger Erfahrung - noch eher ungewohnt. Dabei meint man mit einer Verbundklassifikation eine von verschiedenen Institutionen angewandte und optimierte bibliothekarische Klassifikation. Dafür sind zwei Anforderungen an die Verbundpartner grundsätzlich wichtig: Bereitschaft zur Übernahme ohne allzu große Änderungen und Bereitschaft zum Kompromiß. Zum Entstehen einer Verbundklassifikation sind nötig: Inhaltliche und formale Voraussetzungen; geeignetes Umfeld; Bereitstellung von Hilfsmitteln. Diese Überlegungen werden anhand der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation als der größten deutschen Verbundklassifikation exemplarisch gezeigt. Dazu wird auf einige Ergebnisse inhaltlicher Arbeit hingewiesen. Die Verbundklassifikation stellt somit zweifellos eine echte und - in der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation bereits seit 25 Jahren bestehende - progressive Entwicklung dar. Die zunehmende Zahl der Partner steht für die Richtigkeit dieses Weges
    Type
    a
  4. Lorenz, B.: Systematische Aufstellung in deutschen wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken (1995) 0.01
    0.012030191 = product of:
      0.024060382 = sum of:
        0.022650154 = weight(_text_:von in 6968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022650154 = score(doc=6968,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.17686167 = fieldWeight in 6968, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6968)
        0.001410227 = product of:
          0.004230681 = sum of:
            0.004230681 = weight(_text_:a in 6968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004230681 = score(doc=6968,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 6968, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6968)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Aufstellungssystematiken: Die Klassifikation der Library of Congress (LCC) - Die Fachsystematiken der Universitätsbibliothek Bielefeld (Bi) - Die Fachsystematiken der Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Bremen (Br) - Die Aufstellungssystematik der Gesamthochschulbibliotheken des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (HBZ) - Die Aufstellungssystematiken der Universitätsbibliothek Konstanz (K) - Die Aufstellungssystematiken der Universitätsbibliothek Regensburg (R) - Die Aufstellungssystematiken der Universitätsbibliothek Trier (T) Beispiele für den Vergleich der Aufstellungssystematiken: Zahl der verwendeten Aufstellungssystematiken - Quantitativer Gesamtumfang der Aufstellungssystematiken - Quantitativer Umfang einzelner Systematiken - Quantitativ umfangreiche Systematiken innerhalb der Aufstellungssystematiken der einzelnen Bibliotheken - Beispiele für aus dem Rahmen fallende Einzelsystematiken - Beispiele für Abgrenzungen von Themenbereichen in den Systematiken - Beispiele für durch verschiedene Systematiken erfaßte Themenbereiche - Gegenüberstellung einiger Systematiken - Beispiele für Themenbereiche und ihre Einordnung in Systematiken Aufstellungssystematiken im Bibliotheksverbund: Grundüberlegungen zur Systematischen Aufstellung - Allgemeine Anforderungen an Aufstellungssystematiken - Besondere Anforderungen und Probleme bei systematischer Aufstellung - Notwendigkeit bibliothekarischer Sacherschließung neben der systematischen Aufstellung
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 20(1996) H.1, S.133-134 (A. Halle)
  5. Lorenz, B.: ¬The Regensburg Classification Scheme : users and partners (1995) 0.01
    0.010001066 = product of:
      0.040004265 = sum of:
        0.040004265 = product of:
          0.060006395 = sum of:
            0.007977448 = weight(_text_:a in 2886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007977448 = score(doc=2886,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2886, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2886)
            0.052028947 = weight(_text_:22 in 2886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052028947 = score(doc=2886,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2886, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2886)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Description of the history and development of the home-made Regensburg Classification Scheme since 1964 and its notation which has been built according to the one of the Library of Congress. Although not intended in the beginning, the scheme has become the common tool for a number of Bavarian libraries since 1970 and also of libraries in Switzerland (since 1986) and the socalled new German states (after 1990). The individual schedules are listed and also the classification aids published with the scheme's progressing. Concludingly future plans are outlined
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) nos.3/4, S.158-161
    Type
    a
  6. Umlauf, K.: Einführung in die bibliothekarische Klassifikationstheorie und -praxis : Mit Übungen (1999-) 0.01
    0.0098078055 = product of:
      0.039231222 = sum of:
        0.039231222 = weight(_text_:von in 1710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039231222 = score(doc=1710,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.30633342 = fieldWeight in 1710, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1710)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die Einführung macht mit den Grundbegriffen der bibliothekarischen Klassifikationstheorie und -praxis sowie ausgewählten Bibliotheksklassifikationen bekannt. Eingangs wird die Problemstellung, für die Klassifikationen eine Lösung bieten sollen, umrissen. Dann werden anhand von Fragen die Aspekte zur Entwicklung und Beurteilung von Klassifikationen allgemein und Aufstellungssystematiken im Besonderen umrissen (Sachgerechtheit und Zielgruppenentsprechung, Gliederung, Schlüsselung und Normung, Notation, Klassenbeschreibung und Terminologie, Umfang und Erweiterbarkeit, Anwendungsregeln, Register). Auch organisatorische Aspekte der Anwendung von Klassifikationen werden umrissen. Kurz beschrieben werden ausgewählte Klassifikationen: Die internationale Dezimalklassifikation DK und die DDC, die Regensburger Verbundklassifikation RVK, die Basisklassifikation, die SfB, die KAB, die ASB. Es folgen ausgewählte Literaturhinweise. Ferner werden Übungen zum Klassifizieren ausgewählter Titel mit Hinweisen auf Möglichkeiten zur Selbstüberprüfung und zur Notationsrevision gegeben
  7. Stäcker, T.: ¬Die Basisklassifikation als Aufstellungssystematik in der Johannes a Lasco Bibliothek in Emden (1998) 0.00
    0.0013295747 = product of:
      0.005318299 = sum of:
        0.005318299 = product of:
          0.015954897 = sum of:
            0.015954897 = weight(_text_:a in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015954897 = score(doc=1441,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  8. Andraschek-Holzer, R.: ¬Der künftige Freihandbereich der Niederösterreichischen Landesbibliothek in Sankt Pölten (1996) 0.00
    0.0011633779 = product of:
      0.0046535116 = sum of:
        0.0046535116 = product of:
          0.013960535 = sum of:
            0.013960535 = weight(_text_:a in 707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013960535 = score(doc=707,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 707, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=707)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Location
    A
    Type
    a
  9. Chemelli, R.: DK-Code : Neue Aufstellungssystematik der Universitätsbibliothek der Technischen Universität Graz (1993) 0.00
    9.97181E-4 = product of:
      0.003988724 = sum of:
        0.003988724 = product of:
          0.011966172 = sum of:
            0.011966172 = weight(_text_:a in 7583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011966172 = score(doc=7583,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 7583, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7583)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Location
    A
    Type
    a
  10. Jager, K. de: Obsolescence and stress : a study of the use of books on open shelves at a university library (1994) 0.00
    8.309842E-4 = product of:
      0.0033239368 = sum of:
        0.0033239368 = product of:
          0.0099718105 = sum of:
            0.0099718105 = weight(_text_:a in 7655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0099718105 = score(doc=7655,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 7655, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7655)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the results of a study at the main library of Cape Town University, to investigate complaints about ageing book stock and declining resources and observations that many books were hardly circulating. The study aimed to establish the proportion of the books in the library which were actively circulating and whether the accepted phenomenon of decline in use with age, or obsolescence, would be supported in an environment where a reduction in the purchase of new books was evident. Two separate investigations were conducted: a diachronous study of accession dates, classification numbers and date labels of the open shelf collection; and a synchronous study of books on loan during the period of investigation. The resulting database consisted of 2654 and 1023 records respectively. Evidence suggests that older books, do not exhibit the expected characteristics of obsolescence and, while a certain measure of decline of use with age was demonstrated, such decline may be reversed in times of decreasing resources or increasing demands from existing resources. Suggests that the library could develop an informed weeding policy that will enable it to remove from the shelves those materials that have remained unused or little used for 25 years or more
    Type
    a
  11. Lämmert, E.: ¬Das überdachte Labyrinth (1990) 0.00
    8.2263234E-4 = product of:
      0.0032905294 = sum of:
        0.0032905294 = product of:
          0.009871588 = sum of:
            0.009871588 = weight(_text_:a in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009871588 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  12. Lorenz, B.: Überlegungen zur Aufstellungsklassifikation (1992) 0.00
    7.051135E-4 = product of:
      0.002820454 = sum of:
        0.002820454 = product of:
          0.008461362 = sum of:
            0.008461362 = weight(_text_:a in 4090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008461362 = score(doc=4090,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4090, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4090)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  13. Höckmair, B.: ¬Eine One-Person Library stellt sich vor : die Bibliothek des Deutschen Notarinstituts (1996) 0.00
    7.051135E-4 = product of:
      0.002820454 = sum of:
        0.002820454 = product of:
          0.008461362 = sum of:
            0.008461362 = weight(_text_:a in 5444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008461362 = score(doc=5444,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5444, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5444)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  14. Lorenz, B.: Längerfristige Optimierung desselben Faches bei zwei Aufstellungsklassifikationen : Soziologie in Bielefeld und im Regensburger Verbund (1997) 0.00
    7.051135E-4 = product of:
      0.002820454 = sum of:
        0.002820454 = product of:
          0.008461362 = sum of:
            0.008461362 = weight(_text_:a in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008461362 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  15. Lorenz, B.: Klassifikatorische Sacherschließung : eine Einführung (1998) 0.00
    3.5255676E-4 = product of:
      0.001410227 = sum of:
        0.001410227 = product of:
          0.004230681 = sum of:
            0.004230681 = weight(_text_:a in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004230681 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: IfB 7(1999) H.1/4, S.172-174 (W. Gödert); Bibliothek: Forschung u. Praxis 24(2000) H.1, S.117-119 (A. Müller-Dreier); ProLibris 6(2001) H.1, S.61 (U. Pflugk)