-
Robin, J.; McKeown, K.: Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation (1996)
0.06
0.055875443 = product of:
0.111750886 = sum of:
0.111750886 = sum of:
0.056949116 = weight(_text_:k in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056949116 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.180489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
0.054801766 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054801766 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17705351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Automatic summarizing : introduction (1995)
0.03
0.028474558 = product of:
0.056949116 = sum of:
0.056949116 = product of:
0.11389823 = sum of:
0.11389823 = weight(_text_:k in 626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11389823 = score(doc=626,freq=8.0), product of:
0.180489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 626, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=626)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Enthält u.a. Beiträge von: J. BATEMAN u. E. TEICH; R. BRANDOW, K. MITZE u. L.F. RAU; B. ENDRES-NIGGEMEYER, E. MAIER u. A. SIGEL; M.T. MAYBURY; K. McKEOWN, J. ROBIN u. K. KUKICH; A. ROTHKEGEL
- Editor
- Sparck Jones, K. u. B. Endres-Niggemeyer
-
McKeown, K.; Robin, J.; Kukich, K.: Generating concise natural language summaries (1995)
0.03
0.025168192 = product of:
0.050336383 = sum of:
0.050336383 = product of:
0.10067277 = sum of:
0.10067277 = weight(_text_:k in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10067277 = score(doc=2932,freq=4.0), product of:
0.180489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.5577778 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Craven, T.C.: Abstracts produced using computer assistance (2000)
0.02
0.018920569 = product of:
0.037841137 = sum of:
0.037841137 = product of:
0.15136455 = sum of:
0.15136455 = weight(_text_:author's in 4809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15136455 = score(doc=4809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33977288 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4809)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Experimental subjects wrote abstracts using a simplified version of the TEXNET abstracting assistance software. In addition to the full text, subjects were presented with either keywords or phrases extracted automatically. The resulting abstracts, and the times taken, were recorded automatically; some additional information was gathered by oral questionnaire. Selected abstracts produced were evaluated on various criteria by independent raters. Results showed considerable variation among subjects, but 37% found the keywords or phrases 'quite' or 'very' useful in writing their abstracts. Statistical analysis failed to support several hypothesized relations: phrases were not viewed as significantly more helpful than keywords; and abstracting experience did not correlate with originality of wording, approximation of the author abstract, or greater conciseness. Requiring further study are some unanticipated strong correlations including the following: Windows experience and writing an abstract like the author's; experience reading abstracts and thinking one had written a good abstract; gender and abstract length; gender and use of words and phrases from the original text. Results have also suggested possible modifications to the TEXNET software
-
Wang, W.; Hwang, D.: Abstraction Assistant : an automatic text abstraction system (2010)
0.02
0.018920569 = product of:
0.037841137 = sum of:
0.037841137 = product of:
0.15136455 = sum of:
0.15136455 = weight(_text_:author's in 3981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15136455 = score(doc=3981,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33977288 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 3981, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3981)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In the interest of standardization and quality assurance, it is desirable for authors and staff of access services to follow the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) guidelines in preparing abstracts. Using the statistical approach an extraction system (the Abstraction Assistant) was developed to generate informative abstracts to meet the ANSI guidelines for structural content elements. The system performance is evaluated by comparing the system-generated abstracts with the author's original abstracts and the manually enhanced system abstracts on three criteria: balance (satisfaction of the ANSI standards), fluency (text coherence), and understandability (clarity). The results suggest that it is possible to use the system output directly without manual modification, but there are issues that need to be addressed in further studies to make the system a better tool.
-
Johnson, F.C.; Paice, C.D.; Black, W.J.; Neal, A.P.: ¬The application of linguistic processing to automatic abstract generation (1993)
0.02
0.017796598 = product of:
0.035593197 = sum of:
0.035593197 = product of:
0.07118639 = sum of:
0.07118639 = weight(_text_:k in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07118639 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.180489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.538-552.
-
Salton, G.; Allan, J.; Buckley, C.; Singhal, A.: Automatic analysis, theme generation, and summarization of machine readable texts (1994)
0.02
0.017796598 = product of:
0.035593197 = sum of:
0.035593197 = product of:
0.07118639 = sum of:
0.07118639 = weight(_text_:k in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07118639 = score(doc=1949,freq=2.0), product of:
0.180489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.478-483.
-
Marsh, E.: ¬A production rule system for message summarisation (1984)
0.02
0.017796598 = product of:
0.035593197 = sum of:
0.035593197 = product of:
0.07118639 = sum of:
0.07118639 = weight(_text_:k in 1956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07118639 = score(doc=1956,freq=2.0), product of:
0.180489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 1956, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1956)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.534-537.
-
Reeve, L.H.; Han, H.; Brooks, A.D.: ¬The use of domain-specific concepts in biomedical text summarization (2007)
0.02
0.01576714 = product of:
0.03153428 = sum of:
0.03153428 = product of:
0.12613712 = sum of:
0.12613712 = weight(_text_:author's in 955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12613712 = score(doc=955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33977288 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=955)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Text summarization is a method for data reduction. The use of text summarization enables users to reduce the amount of text that must be read while still assimilating the core information. The data reduction offered by text summarization is particularly useful in the biomedical domain, where physicians must continuously find clinical trial study information to incorporate into their patient treatment efforts. Such efforts are often hampered by the high-volume of publications. This paper presents two independent methods (BioChain and FreqDist) for identifying salient sentences in biomedical texts using concepts derived from domain-specific resources. Our semantic-based method (BioChain) is effective at identifying thematic sentences, while our frequency-distribution method (FreqDist) removes information redundancy. The two methods are then combined to form a hybrid method (ChainFreq). An evaluation of each method is performed using the ROUGE system to compare system-generated summaries against a set of manually-generated summaries. The BioChain and FreqDist methods outperform some common summarization systems, while the ChainFreq method improves upon the base approaches. Our work shows that the best performance is achieved when the two methods are combined. The paper also presents a brief physician's evaluation of three randomly-selected papers from an evaluation corpus to show that the author's abstract does not always reflect the entire contents of the full-text.
-
Brandow, R.; Mitze, K.; Rau, L.F.: Automatic condensation of electronic publications by sentence selection (1995)
0.01
0.014237279 = product of:
0.028474558 = sum of:
0.028474558 = product of:
0.056949116 = sum of:
0.056949116 = weight(_text_:k in 2929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056949116 = score(doc=2929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.180489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 2929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2929)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Sparck Jones, K.; Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Introduction: automatic summarizing (1995)
0.01
0.014237279 = product of:
0.028474558 = sum of:
0.028474558 = product of:
0.056949116 = sum of:
0.056949116 = weight(_text_:k in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056949116 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
0.180489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ahmad, K.: Text summarisation : the role of lexical cohesion analysis (1995)
0.01
0.014237279 = product of:
0.028474558 = sum of:
0.028474558 = product of:
0.056949116 = sum of:
0.056949116 = weight(_text_:k in 5795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056949116 = score(doc=5795,freq=2.0), product of:
0.180489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 5795, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5795)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Gomez, J.; Allen, K.; Matney, M.; Awopetu, T.; Shafer, S.: Experimenting with a machine generated annotations pipeline (2020)
0.01
0.014237279 = product of:
0.028474558 = sum of:
0.028474558 = product of:
0.056949116 = sum of:
0.056949116 = weight(_text_:k in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056949116 = score(doc=657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.180489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Goh, A.; Hui, S.C.: TES: a text extraction system (1996)
0.01
0.013700441 = product of:
0.027400883 = sum of:
0.027400883 = product of:
0.054801766 = sum of:
0.054801766 = weight(_text_:22 in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054801766 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17705351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 2.1997 10:22:43
-
Jones, P.A.; Bradbeer, P.V.G.: Discovery of optimal weights in a concept selection system (1996)
0.01
0.013700441 = product of:
0.027400883 = sum of:
0.027400883 = product of:
0.054801766 = sum of:
0.054801766 = weight(_text_:22 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054801766 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17705351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Lam, W.; Chan, K.; Radev, D.; Saggion, H.; Teufel, S.: Context-based generic cross-lingual retrieval of documents and automated summaries (2005)
0.01
0.010677959 = product of:
0.021355918 = sum of:
0.021355918 = product of:
0.042711835 = sum of:
0.042711835 = weight(_text_:k in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042711835 = score(doc=1965,freq=2.0), product of:
0.180489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Automatic summarising : the state of the art (2007)
0.01
0.010677959 = product of:
0.021355918 = sum of:
0.021355918 = product of:
0.042711835 = sum of:
0.042711835 = weight(_text_:k in 932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042711835 = score(doc=932,freq=2.0), product of:
0.180489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 932, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=932)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Nomoto, T.: Discriminative sentence compression with conditional random fields (2007)
0.01
0.010677959 = product of:
0.021355918 = sum of:
0.021355918 = product of:
0.042711835 = sum of:
0.042711835 = weight(_text_:k in 945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042711835 = score(doc=945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.180489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=945)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper focuses on a particular approach to automatic sentence compression which makes use of a discriminative sequence classifier known as Conditional Random Fields (CRF). We devise several features for CRF that allow it to incorporate information on nonlinear relations among words. Along with that, we address the issue of data paucity by collecting data from RSS feeds available on the Internet, and turning them into training data for use with CRF, drawing on techniques from biology and information retrieval. We also discuss a recursive application of CRF on the syntactic structure of a sentence as a way of improving the readability of the compression it generates. Experiments found that our approach works reasonably well compared to the state-of-the-art system [Knight, K., & Marcu, D. (2002). Summarization beyond sentence extraction: A probabilistic approach to sentence compression. Artificial Intelligence 139, 91-107.].
-
Steinberger, J.; Poesio, M.; Kabadjov, M.A.; Jezek, K.: Two uses of anaphora resolution in summarization (2007)
0.01
0.010677959 = product of:
0.021355918 = sum of:
0.021355918 = product of:
0.042711835 = sum of:
0.042711835 = weight(_text_:k in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042711835 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
0.180489 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Vanderwende, L.; Suzuki, H.; Brockett, J.M.; Nenkova, A.: Beyond SumBasic : task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion (2007)
0.01
0.010275331 = product of:
0.020550663 = sum of:
0.020550663 = product of:
0.041101325 = sum of:
0.041101325 = weight(_text_:22 in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041101325 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17705351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050560288 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In recent years, there has been increased interest in topic-focused multi-document summarization. In this task, automatic summaries are produced in response to a specific information request, or topic, stated by the user. The system we have designed to accomplish this task comprises four main components: a generic extractive summarization system, a topic-focusing component, sentence simplification, and lexical expansion of topic words. This paper details each of these components, together with experiments designed to quantify their individual contributions. We include an analysis of our results on two large datasets commonly used to evaluate task-focused summarization, the DUC2005 and DUC2006 datasets, using automatic metrics. Additionally, we include an analysis of our results on the DUC2006 task according to human evaluation metrics. In the human evaluation of system summaries compared to human summaries, i.e., the Pyramid method, our system ranked first out of 22 systems in terms of overall mean Pyramid score; and in the human evaluation of summary responsiveness to the topic, our system ranked third out of 35 systems.
