Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  1. Pribbenow, S.: Meronymic relationships : from classical mereology to complex part-whole relations (2002) 0.03
    0.034184385 = product of:
      0.06836877 = sum of:
        0.06836877 = product of:
          0.13673754 = sum of:
            0.13673754 = weight(_text_:perception in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13673754 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.42550856 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Meronymic or partonomic relations are ontological relations that are considered as fundamental as the ubiquitous, taxonomic subsumption relationship. While the latter is well-established and thoroughly investigated, there is still much work to be done in the field of meronymic relations. The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview an current research in characterizing, formalizing, classifying, and processing meronymic or partonomic relations (also called part-whole relations in artificial intelligence and application domains). The first part of the chapter investigates the role of knowledge about parts in human cognition, for example, visual perception and conceptual knowledge. The second part describes the classical approach provided by formal mereology and its extensions, which use one single transitive part-of relation, thus focusing an the notion of "part" and neglecting the notion of (something being a) "whole". This limitation leads to classifications of different part-whole relations, one of which is presented in the last part of the chapter.
  2. Bonnevie, E.: Dretske's semantic information theory and meta-theories in library and information science (2001) 0.03
    0.028486984 = product of:
      0.056973968 = sum of:
        0.056973968 = product of:
          0.113947935 = sum of:
            0.113947935 = weight(_text_:perception in 4484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113947935 = score(doc=4484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.35459045 = fieldWeight in 4484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4484)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents the semantic information theory, formulated by the philosopher Fred I. Dretske, as a contribution to the discussion of metatheories and their practical implications in the field of library and information science. Dretske's theory is described in Knowledge and the flow of information. It is founded on mathematical communication theory but developed and elaborated into a cognitive, functionalistic theory, is individually oriented, and deals with the content of information. The topics are: the information process from perception to cognition, and how concept formation takes place in terms of digitisation. Other important issues are the concepts of information and knowledge, truth and meaning. Semantic information theory can be used as a frame of reference in order to explain, clarify and refute concepts currently used in library and information science, and as the basis for critical reviews of elements of the cognitive viewpoint in IR, primarily the notion of "potential information". The main contribution of the theory lies in a clarification of concepts, but there are still problems regarding the practical applications. More research is needed to combine philosophical discussions with the practice of information and library science.
  3. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.02
    0.02374054 = product of:
      0.04748108 = sum of:
        0.04748108 = product of:
          0.09496216 = sum of:
            0.09496216 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09496216 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.9-22
  4. Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971) 0.02
    0.020349033 = product of:
      0.040698066 = sum of:
        0.040698066 = product of:
          0.08139613 = sum of:
            0.08139613 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08139613 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
  5. Conceptual structures : logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000 (2000) 0.02
    0.017092193 = product of:
      0.034184385 = sum of:
        0.034184385 = product of:
          0.06836877 = sum of:
            0.06836877 = weight(_text_:perception in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06836877 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.21275428 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Computer scientists create models of a perceived reality. Through AI techniques, these models aim at providing the basic support for emulating cognitive behavior such as reasoning and learning, which is one of the main goals of the Al research effort. Such computer models are formed through the interaction of various acquisition and inference mechanisms: perception, concept learning, conceptual clustering, hypothesis testing, probabilistic inference, etc., and are represented using different paradigms tightly linked to the processes that use them. Among these paradigms let us cite: biological models (neural nets, genetic programming), logic-based models (first-order logic, modal logic, rule-based systems), virtual reality models (object systems, agent systems), probabilistic models (Bayesian nets, fuzzy logic), linguistic models (conceptual dependency graphs, language-based rep resentations), etc. One of the strengths of the Conceptual Graph (CG) theory is its versatility in terms of the representation paradigms under which it falls. It can be viewed and therefore used, under different representation paradigms, which makes it a popular choice for a wealth of applications. Its full coupling with different cognitive processes lead to the opening of the field toward related research communities such as the Description Logic, Formal Concept Analysis, and Computational Linguistic communities. We now see more and more research results from one community enrich the other, laying the foundations of common philosophical grounds from which a successful synergy can emerge. ICCS 2000 embodies this spirit of research collaboration. It presents a set of papers that we believe, by their exposure, will benefit the whole community. For instance, the technical program proposes tracks on Conceptual Ontologies, Language, Formal Concept Analysis, Computational Aspects of Conceptual Structures, and Formal Semantics, with some papers on pragmatism and human related aspects of computing. Never before was the program of ICCS formed by so heterogeneously rooted theories of knowledge representation and use. We hope that this swirl of ideas will benefit you as much as it already has benefited us while putting together this program
  6. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.01
    0.013566022 = product of:
      0.027132044 = sum of:
        0.027132044 = product of:
          0.054264087 = sum of:
            0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054264087 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  7. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.01
    0.01187027 = product of:
      0.02374054 = sum of:
        0.02374054 = product of:
          0.04748108 = sum of:
            0.04748108 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04748108 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
  8. Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006) 0.01
    0.01187027 = product of:
      0.02374054 = sum of:
        0.02374054 = product of:
          0.04748108 = sum of:
            0.04748108 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04748108 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-33
  9. Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013) 0.01
    0.010174517 = product of:
      0.020349033 = sum of:
        0.020349033 = product of:
          0.040698066 = sum of:
            0.040698066 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040698066 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
  10. Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002) 0.01
    0.008478764 = product of:
      0.016957529 = sum of:
        0.016957529 = product of:
          0.033915058 = sum of:
            0.033915058 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033915058 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1.12.2002 11:12:22
  11. Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012) 0.01
    0.008478764 = product of:
      0.016957529 = sum of:
        0.016957529 = product of:
          0.033915058 = sum of:
            0.033915058 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033915058 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:11:25
  12. Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014) 0.01
    0.008478764 = product of:
      0.016957529 = sum of:
        0.016957529 = product of:
          0.033915058 = sum of:
            0.033915058 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033915058 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  13. Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007) 0.01
    0.008478764 = product of:
      0.016957529 = sum of:
        0.016957529 = product of:
          0.033915058 = sum of:
            0.033915058 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033915058 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11.12.2019 19:00:22