Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  1. Lucas, W.; Topi, H.: Form and function : the impact of query term and operator usage on Web search results (2002) 0.05
    0.047432996 = product of:
      0.14229898 = sum of:
        0.14229898 = weight(_text_:usage in 198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14229898 = score(doc=198,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.26936847 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04878962 = queryNorm
            0.5282689 = fieldWeight in 198, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=198)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Conventional wisdom holds that queries to information retrieval systems will yield more relevant results if they contain multiple topic-related terms and use Boolean and phrase operators to enhance interpretation. Although studies have shown that the users of Web-based search engines typically enter short, term-based queries and rarely use search operators, little information exists concerning the effects of term and operator usage on the relevancy of search results. In this study, search engine users formulated queries on eight search topics. Each query was submitted to the user-specified search engine, and relevancy ratings for the retrieved pages were assigned. Expert-formulated queries were also submitted and provided a basis for comparing relevancy ratings across search engines. Data analysis based on our research model of the term and operator factors affecting relevancy was then conducted. The results show that the difference in the number of terms between expert and nonexpert searches, the percentage of matching terms between those searches, and the erroneous use of nonsupported operators in nonexpert searches explain most of the variation in the relevancy of search results. These findings highlight the need for designing search engine interfaces that provide greater support in the areas of term selection and operator usage
  2. Kellar, M.; Watters, C.; Shepherd, M.: ¬A field study characterizing Web-based information seeking tasks (2007) 0.05
    0.047432996 = product of:
      0.14229898 = sum of:
        0.14229898 = weight(_text_:usage in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14229898 = score(doc=335,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.26936847 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04878962 = queryNorm
            0.5282689 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Previous studies have examined various aspects of user behavior on the Web, including general information-seeking patterns, search engine use, and revisitation habits. Little research has been conducted to study how users navigate and interact with their Web browser across different information-seeking tasks. We have conducted a field study of 21 participants, in which we logged detailed Web usage and asked participants to provide task categorizations of their Web usage based on the following categories: Fact Finding, Information Gathering, Browsing, and Transactions. We used implicit measures logged during each task session to provide usage measures such as dwell time, number of pages viewed, and the use of specific browser navigation mechanisms. We also report on differences in how participants interacted with their Web browser across the range of information-seeking tasks. Within each type of task, we found several distinguishing characteristics. In particular, Information Gathering tasks were the most complex; participants spent more time completing this task, viewed more pages, and used the Web browser functions most heavily during this task. The results of this analysis have been used to provide implications for future support of information seeking on the Web as well as direction for future research in this area.
  3. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Williams, P.; Dobrowolski, T.: Re-appraising information seeking behaviour in a digital environment : bouncers, checkers, returnees and the like (2004) 0.03
    0.032862537 = product of:
      0.09858761 = sum of:
        0.09858761 = weight(_text_:usage in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09858761 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26936847 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04878962 = queryNorm
            0.36599535 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Collating data from a number of log and questionnaire studies conducted largely into the use of a range of consumer health digital information platforms, Centre for Information Behaviour and the Evaluation of Research (Ciber) researchers describe some new thoughts on characterising (and naming) information seeking behaviour in the digital environment, and in so doing, suggest a new typology of digital users. The characteristic behaviour found is one of bouncing in which users seldom penetrate a site to any depth, tend to visit a number of sites for any given information need and seldom return to sites they once visited. They tend to "feed" for information horizontally, and whether they search a site of not depends heavily on "digital visibility", which in turn creates all the conditions for "bouncing". The question whether this type of information seeking represents a form of "dumbing down or up", and what it all means for publishers, librarians and information providers, who might be working on other, possible outdated usage paradigms, is discussed.
  4. Wang, P.; Berry, M.W.; Yang, Y.: Mining longitudinal Web queries : trends and patterns (2003) 0.03
    0.028315838 = product of:
      0.08494751 = sum of:
        0.08494751 = product of:
          0.16989502 = sum of:
            0.16989502 = weight(_text_:mining in 6561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16989502 = score(doc=6561,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2752929 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.642448 = idf(docFreq=425, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04878962 = queryNorm
                0.61714274 = fieldWeight in 6561, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.642448 = idf(docFreq=425, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6561)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This project analyzed 541,920 user queries submitted to and executed in an academic Website during a four-year period (May 1997 to May 2001) using a relational database. The purpose of the study is three-fold: (1) to understand Web users' query behavior; (2) to identify problems encountered by these Web users; (3) to develop appropriate techniques for optimization of query analysis and mining. The linguistic analyses focus an query structures, lexicon, and word associations using statistical measures such as Zipf distribution and mutual information. A data model with finest granularity is used for data storage and iterative analyses. Patterns and trends of querying behavior are identified and compared with previous studies.
  5. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.02
    0.01542408 = product of:
      0.04627224 = sum of:
        0.04627224 = product of:
          0.09254448 = sum of:
            0.09254448 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09254448 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17085294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04878962 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  6. Byström, K.: Information seekers in context : an analysis of the 'doer' in INSU studies (1999) 0.01
    0.0055086007 = product of:
      0.016525801 = sum of:
        0.016525801 = product of:
          0.033051603 = sum of:
            0.033051603 = weight(_text_:22 in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033051603 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17085294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04878962 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:55:52
  7. Aloteibi, S.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing geographic query reformulation : an exploratory study (2014) 0.01
    0.0055086007 = product of:
      0.016525801 = sum of:
        0.016525801 = product of:
          0.033051603 = sum of:
            0.033051603 = weight(_text_:22 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033051603 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17085294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04878962 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26. 1.2014 18:48:22
  8. Monchaux, S.; Amadieu, F.; Chevalier, A.; Mariné, C.: Query strategies during information searching : effects of prior domain knowledge and complexity of the information problems to be solved (2015) 0.01
    0.0055086007 = product of:
      0.016525801 = sum of:
        0.016525801 = product of:
          0.033051603 = sum of:
            0.033051603 = weight(_text_:22 in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033051603 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17085294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04878962 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    25. 1.2016 18:46:22
  9. Ennis, M.; Sutcliffe, A.G.; Watkinson, S.J.: Towards a predictive model of information seeking : empirical studies of end-user-searching (1999) 0.00
    0.0044068806 = product of:
      0.013220641 = sum of:
        0.013220641 = product of:
          0.026441282 = sum of:
            0.026441282 = weight(_text_:22 in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026441282 = score(doc=296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17085294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04878962 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:54:13