Search (184 results, page 1 of 10)

0.03840839 = product of:
  0.30726713 = sum of:
    0.29098088 = weight(_text_:515 in 7930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29098088 = score(doc=7930,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22183119 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        1.3117222 = fieldWeight in 7930, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7930)
    0.016286267 = weight(_text_:information in 7930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016286267 = score(doc=7930,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 7930, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7930)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42(1991), S.515-527

0.0071352283 = product of:
  0.038054552 = sum of:
    0.011536777 = weight(_text_:der in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011536777 = score(doc=6966,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
    0.0123412805 = weight(_text_:information in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0123412805 = score(doc=6966,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
    0.014176494 = product of:
      0.028352989 = sum of:
        0.028352989 = weight(_text_:22 in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028352989 = score(doc=6966,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104688935 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)

Abstract

Describes the technique used to study hypertext systems from a very general point of view, focus on monitoring searchers' behaviour, predict the estimation of the ultimate goals of the searchers, and estimate the searchers' determination to find these goals. The components are combined via a Markov chain approach so as to study information retrieval in general and hypertext (hypermedia) in particular. Demonstrates how these estimations can be used to assist searchers during their searching process and presents the derivation of a relevance function for documents, based on these estimations

Source

Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon

0.0067894217 = product of:
  0.054315373 = sum of:
    0.0071252417 = weight(_text_:information in 391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071252417 = score(doc=391,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 391, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=391)
    0.047190133 = product of:
      0.09438027 = sum of:
        0.09438027 = weight(_text_:engineering in 391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09438027 = score(doc=391,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16061439 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.58762026 = fieldWeight in 391, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=391)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)

Abstract

Reports results of a study that examined factors influencing the adoption and use of electronic networks by science and engineering faculty in 6 small universities in the southerneaster USA. Part of the study gathered data on the purpose, type, and extent of electronic communications. Data were gathered by mail questionnaire and by follow up site visits. Reports on 5 types of network use, electronic mail, electronic discussion groups, accessing remote databases, accessing remote computer facilities, and file transfer. For each service, data are reported for frequency of use by purpose: research, teaching administration, social and current awareness. Outlines preliminary use indicators for each service in terms of heavy and moderate use

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.6, S.496-507

0.0041152826 = product of:
  0.03292226 = sum of:
    0.025797019 = weight(_text_:der in 2527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025797019 = score(doc=2527,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.38630107 = fieldWeight in 2527, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2527)
    0.0071252417 = weight(_text_:information in 2527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071252417 = score(doc=2527,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2527, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2527)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)

Abstract

An 2 biowissenschaftlichen Einrichtungen der Grundlagenforschung, dem Max-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin, Berlin-Buch und dem Leibniz-Institut für Neurobiologie, Magdeburg, wurden 1997 bzw. 1998 Nutzerbefragungen durchgeführt. Obwohl die untersuchten Gruppen beträchtliche Altersunterschiede aufwiesen, ergeben sich einheitliche Trends: für etwa 2/3 der Wissenschaftler ist gegenwärtig die Nutzung von Printmedien und elektronischen Informationsofferten gleichwertig, während etwa 15% der Befragten letzteren den Vorzug geben. Bei der Datenbanknutzung ist festzustellen, daß MEDLINE die überragende Position sowohl bei der CD-ROM als auch Online im Internet einnimmt

Source

nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 49(1998) H.8, S.463-470

0.003999004 = product of:
  0.031992033 = sum of:
    0.019777333 = weight(_text_:der in 4068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019777333 = score(doc=4068,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 4068, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4068)
    0.0122147 = weight(_text_:information in 4068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0122147 = score(doc=4068,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4068, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4068)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)

Source

nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 50(1999) H.7, S.407-412

0.0037636273 = product of:
  0.030109018 = sum of:
    0.015932525 = weight(_text_:information in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015932525 = score(doc=1795,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
    0.014176494 = product of:
      0.028352989 = sum of:
        0.028352989 = weight(_text_:22 in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028352989 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104688935 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)

Abstract

Presents a recently composite view of several user studies in information retrieval. Contains personal conclusions and speculations based on these studies, rather than formal statistical results, which so often are not comparable from 1 experiment to another. Suggests a taxonomy of user characteristics for such studies, in order to make results comparable. Discusses methods and effects of user training, then manner of expression of a query or information need, conduct of a search, use of the system command language or its equivalent, analysis by the user of retrieved information, and user satisfaction with outcome. Concludes with suggestions for system design and experimental methodology

Source

Canadian journal of information and library science. 19(1994) no.4, S.1-22

0.003469559 = product of:
  0.027756471 = sum of:
    0.017630402 = weight(_text_:information in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017630402 = score(doc=297,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
    0.010126068 = product of:
      0.020252137 = sum of:
        0.020252137 = weight(_text_:22 in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020252137 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104688935 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)

Abstract

In information needs, seeking and use (INSU) research, individuals have most commonly been perceived as users (e.g., Kuhlthau, 1991; Dervin & Nilan, 1986; Dervin, 1989; Belkin, 1980). The concept user originates from the user of libraries and other information services and information systems. Over the years the scope of the concept has become wider and it is nowadays often understood in the sense of seekers of information (e.g., Wilson, 1981; Marchionini, 1995) and users of information (e.g., Streatfield, 1983). Nevertheless, the concept has remained ambiguous by being on the one hand universal and on the other hand extremely specific. The purpose of this paper is to map and evaluate views on people whose information behaviour has been in one way or another the core of our research area. The goal is to shed some light on various relationships between the different aspects of doers in INSU studies. The paper is inspired by Dervin's (1997) analysis of context where she identified among other themes the nature of subject by contrasting a `transcendental individual' with a `decentered subject', and Talja's (1997) presentation about constituting `information' and `user' from the discourse analytic viewpoint as opposed to the cognitive viewpoint. Instead of the metatheoretical approach applied by Dervin and Talja, a more concrete approach is valid in the present analysis where no direct arguments for or against the underlying metatheories are itemised. The focus is on doers in INSU studies leaving other, even closely-related concepts (i.e., information, information seeking, knowledge etc.), outside the scope of the paper.

Date

22. 3.2002 9:55:52

Source

Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, Sheffield, UK, 1998. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen

0.0032775435 = product of:
  0.026220348 = sum of:
    0.01609428 = weight(_text_:information in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01609428 = score(doc=2339,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.30666938 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
    0.010126068 = product of:
      0.020252137 = sum of:
        0.020252137 = weight(_text_:22 in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020252137 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104688935 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)

Abstract

Over the last 4 years, the Information Interaction Laboratory at Rutgers' School of communication, Information and Library Studies has performed a series of investigations concerned with various aspects of people's interactions with advanced information retrieval (IR) systems. We have benn especially concerned with understanding not just what people do, and why, and with what effect, but also with what they would like to do, and how they attempt to accomplish it, and with what difficulties. These investigations have led to some quite interesting conclusions about the nature and structure of people's interactions with information, about support for cooperative human-computer interaction in query reformulation, and about the value of visualization of search results for supporting various forms of interaction with information. In this discussion, I give an overview of the research program and its projects, present representative results from the projects, and discuss some implications of these results for support of subject searching in information retrieval systems

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

Imprint

Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science

Source

Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al

0.0030431054 = product of:
  0.024344843 = sum of:
    0.0081431335 = weight(_text_:information in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0081431335 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
    0.016201708 = product of:
      0.032403417 = sum of:
        0.032403417 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032403417 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104688935 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)

Date

22. 5.1999 19:07:29

Source

Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.6, S.419-429

0.0025394442 = product of:
  0.020315554 = sum of:
    0.012214699 = weight(_text_:information in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012214699 = score(doc=296,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.23274568 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
    0.008100854 = product of:
      0.016201708 = sum of:
        0.016201708 = weight(_text_:22 in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016201708 = score(doc=296,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104688935 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)

Abstract

Previous empirical studies of searcher behaviour have drawn attention to a wide variety of factors that affect performance; for instance, the display of retrieved results can alter search strategies (Allen 1991, 1994), the information need type influences search behaviour, (Elkerton et al 1984, Marchionini 1995); while the task complexity, reflected in the information need can affect user's search behaviour (Large et al 1994). Furthermore, information source selection (Bassilli 1977), and the user's model of the system and domain impact on the search process (Michel 1994); while motivation (Solomon 1993, Jacobsen et al 1992) and the importance of the information need (Wendt 1969) also influence search duration and the effort a user will employ. Rouse and Rouse (1984) in a review of empirical studies, summarise a wide variety of variables that can effect searching behaviour, including payoff, costs of searching, resource available, amount of information sought, characteristics of the data and conflicts between documents. It appears that user behaviour is inconsistent in the search strategies adopted even for the same search need and system (Davidson 1977, Iivonen 1995). Theories of searcher behaviour have been proposed that provide explanations of aspects of end-user behaviour, such as the evolution of the user's information need and the problems of articulating a query, [Bates (1979, 1989), Markey and Atherton 1978], effective search strategies in browsing and goal directed searches [Marchionini 1995, Belkin (1987, 1993)], the linguistic problem of matching search terms with indexing terms or content of target documents through an expert intermediary (Ingwersen 1982) or cognitive aspects of IR (Kulthau 1984, Ingwersen 1996).

Date

22. 3.2002 9:54:13

Source

Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, Sheffield, UK, 1998. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen

0.002452123 = product of:
  0.019616984 = sum of:
    0.011516129 = weight(_text_:information in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011516129 = score(doc=286,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
    0.008100854 = product of:
      0.016201708 = sum of:
        0.016201708 = weight(_text_:22 in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016201708 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104688935 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)

Abstract

This paper highlights some of the significant findings from author's PhD: "Factors affecting the end-use of electronic databases in public libraries." Public libraries have a wide range of different types of users who, unlike academic or special library users, are not necessarily information-trained (see Coles, 1998). Whereas the academic, special library user may have specific information needs that can be met by electronic sources, public library users do not necessarily have such specific information needs that can easily be identified and met. Most user surveys have tended to concentrate on the searching and retrieval aspect of information seeking behaviour, whereas this study's user survey focused more on how people perceived and related to Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). It was not how people searched a particular electronic source, in this case CD-ROM, that was of prime interest but rather whether or not people actually used them at all and the reasons why people did or did not use electronic media. There were several reasons the study looked at CD-ROM specifically. Firstly, CD-ROM is a well established technology, most people should be familiar with CD-ROM/multimedia. Secondly, CD-ROM was, at the start of the study, the only open access electronic media widely available in public libraries. As well as examining why public library users chose to use electronic sources, the paper looks at the types of CD-ROM databases used both in the library and in general Also examined are what sort of searches users carried out. Where appropriate some of the problems inherent in studying end-users in public libraries and the difficulty in getting reliable data, are discussed. Several methods were used to collect the data. I wished to avoid limiting research to a small sample of library sites, the aim was to be as broad in scope as possible. There were two main groups of people 1 wished to look at: non-users as well as CD-ROM users

Date

22. 3.2002 8:51:28

Source

Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 13-15 August 1998, Sheffield, UK. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen

0.0023327523 = product of:
  0.018662019 = sum of:
    0.011536777 = weight(_text_:der in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011536777 = score(doc=517,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
    0.0071252417 = weight(_text_:information in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071252417 = score(doc=517,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052480884 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)

Content

Dieser Beitrag enthält beispielsweise die Zahlen, daß 30% der Recherchen bei 0 Treffern landen, daß bei den verbleibenden 70% die durchschnittliche Trefferzahl bei 170 liegt, daß Benutzer durchschnittlich aber nur 7 Treffer genauer ansehen

Footnote

Simultaneously published as Enhancing Access to Information: Designing Catalogs for the 21st Century

0.0023033053 = product of:
  0.036852885 = sum of:
    0.036852885 = weight(_text_:der in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036852885 = score(doc=174,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.55185866 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)

Footnote

Mitglieder der Arbeitsgruppe: D. Engl, J. Friedl, J. Labner, M. Sandner, W. Schlacher, A. Schmidt, A. Zartl

Source

Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 50(1997) H.3/4, S.28-49

0.002180246 = product of:
  0.034883935 = sum of:
    0.034883935 = weight(_text_:der in 5289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034883935 = score(doc=5289,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.5223744 = fieldWeight in 5289, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5289)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)

Content

Enthält die Abschnitte: (1) Einleitung, (2) Beschreibung der Feldstudie, (3) Der OPAC, (4) Der Benutzer, (5) Der Zettelkatalog und die OPACs der 1. Generation, (6) Die OPACs der 2. Generation, (7) Die OPACs der 3. Generation, (8) Was sollte ein guter OPAC heute leisten

0.0019544193 = product of:
  0.03127071 = sum of:
    0.03127071 = weight(_text_:der in 5105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03127071 = score(doc=5105,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.46826762 = fieldWeight in 5105, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5105)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)

Abstract

Die Einführung von CD-ROM Datenbanken als neue Informationstechnologie hat die Formen der Informationsgewinnung in bestimmten wissenschaftlichen Fachgebieten grundlegend geändert. Der Beitrag berichtet über Ergebnisse wissenschaftlicher Begleitforschung bei Endnutzerrecherchen in der CD-ROM-Version der Datenbank MEDLINE. Hierzu wurden drei verschiedene Erhebungen durchgeführt. Hiernach ist die überwiegende Zahl der Endnutzer (89,3%) mit dem jeweiligen Rechercheresultat zufrieden, wobei Benutzer mit geringer Rechercheerfahrung eine höhere Zufriedenheitsrate erreichen als Benutzer mit umfangreicheren Recherchekenntnissen. Die Gründe zur Nutzung von CD-ROM-Systemen resultieren voriwegend aus der klinischen Alltagsroutine oder täglichen Forschungspraxis, während vermittelte Online-Literatursuchen tendenziell häufiger im Zusammenhang mit einmaligen Ereignissen der wissenschaftlichen Aus- und Weiterbildung stehen. Die selbständige CD-ROM Literaturrecherche stellt für die befragten Ärzte und Wissenschaftler die bevorzugte Methode der Informationsgewinnung dar. Die analysierten Endnutzerrecherchen weisen allerdings Fehler und Defizite hinsichtlich einer optimalen Suchstrategie auf, die zu unbemerktn Informationsverlusten und zu Fehlbeurteilungen des wissenschaftlichen Kenntnisstandes führen

0.0017875961 = product of:
  0.028601538 = sum of:
    0.028601538 = product of:
      0.057203077 = sum of:
        0.057203077 = weight(_text_:engineering in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057203077 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16061439 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029895496 = queryNorm
            0.35615164 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)

0.0017480858 = product of:
  0.027969373 = sum of:
    0.027969373 = weight(_text_:der in 2063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027969373 = score(doc=2063,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 2063, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2063)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)

Source

Der Online-Publikumskatalog der Universitätsbibliothek Düsseldorf: methodische Erkenntnisse und Erfahrungen, OPAC-Kolloquium am 27.-28.11.1989. Hrsg.: G. Gattermann

0.0017480858 = product of:
  0.027969373 = sum of:
    0.027969373 = weight(_text_:der in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027969373 = score(doc=2064,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)

Source

Der Online-Publikumskatalog der Universitätsbibliothek Düsseldorf: methodische Erkenntnisse und Erfahrungen, OPAC-Kolloquium am 27.-28.11.1989. Hrsg.: G. Gattermann

0.0017480858 = product of:
  0.027969373 = sum of:
    0.027969373 = weight(_text_:der in 545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027969373 = score(doc=545,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 545, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=545)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)

Content

"Es wird interessant sein, das Vorgehen der Benutzer am OPAC mit den Ergebnissen dieser Untersuchung am Mikrofiche-Katalog zu vergleichen"

0.001648111 = product of:
  0.026369777 = sum of:
    0.026369777 = weight(_text_:der in 491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026369777 = score(doc=491,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06677957 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029895496 = queryNorm
        0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 491, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=491)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)