Search (51 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Heiner-Freiling, M.: Survey on subject heading languages used in national libraries and bibliographies (2000) 0.23 
    0.22954226 = product of:
  0.28692782 = sum of:
    0.08656685 = weight(_text_:list in 5921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08656685 = score(doc=5921,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25191793 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.183657 = idf(docFreq=673, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.34363115 = fieldWeight in 5921, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.183657 = idf(docFreq=673, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5921)
    0.023634095 = weight(_text_:of in 5921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023634095 = score(doc=5921,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 5921, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5921)
    0.100947246 = weight(_text_:subject in 5921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.100947246 = score(doc=5921,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.5807668 = fieldWeight in 5921, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5921)
    0.07577964 = product of:
      0.15155928 = sum of:
        0.15155928 = weight(_text_:headings in 5921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15155928 = score(doc=5921,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.23569997 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.6430178 = fieldWeight in 5921, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5921)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.8 = coord(4/5)
    Abstract
    Surveys conducted during the last four years under the auspices of the International Federation of Library Associations and Organizations (IFLA) reveal that the Library of Congress Subject Headings is heavily used in national libraries outside of the United States, particularly in English-speaking countries. Many other countries report using a translation or adaptation of LCSH as their principal subject heading language. Magda Heiner-Freiling presents an analysis of the IFLA data, which also includes information on the classification schemes used by the libraries and whether or not the libraries have produced a manual on the creation and application of subject headings. The paper concludes with an Appendix showing the complete data from the 88 national libraries that respond to the surveys
    Object
    Sears List of Subject Headings
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
  2. Zins, C.; Guttmann, D.: Structuring Web bibliographic resources : an exemplary subject classification scheme (2000) 0.10 
    0.099733494 = product of:
  0.16622248 = sum of:
    0.019297158 = weight(_text_:of in 6056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019297158 = score(doc=6056,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 6056, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6056)
    0.1090355 = weight(_text_:subject in 6056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1090355 = score(doc=6056,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.6272999 = fieldWeight in 6056, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6056)
    0.03788982 = product of:
      0.07577964 = sum of:
        0.07577964 = weight(_text_:headings in 6056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07577964 = score(doc=6056,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23569997 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.3215089 = fieldWeight in 6056, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6056)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    The Internet challenges designers of reference resources to structure user interfaces so that they facilitate quick access to bibliographies. Designers can organize bibliographies in chronological order of publication, alphabetical listing by author or title and/or subject-headings; or can follow a subject classification scheme from the relevant field. Chronological order of publication and alphabetical listings of authors and titles are the simplest ways to organize bibliographic materials, but these methods usually fall to present the thematic relations among the various items. The subject classification is the most systematic presentation, but the most complicated to develop. This study explores the subject classification model, elaborates its rationale, demonstrates an exemplary faceted subject classification scheme grounded in solid scientific foundations, and clarifies the scientific foundations of the three-phase structuring methodology that was utilized. The exemplary classificatory model is a seven-facet subject classification scheme designed for classifying scholarly papers in the field of Logotherapy. The study, in particular the scientific structuring methodology, provides an example for structuring bibliographic resources in the social sciences, as well as in other academic fields
  3. Bourdon, F.; Landry, P.: Best practices for subject access to national bibliographies : interim report by the Working Group on Guidelines for Subject Access by National Bibliographic Agencies (2007) 0.05 
    0.048203416 = product of:
  0.12050854 = sum of:
    0.01299809 = weight(_text_:of in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01299809 = score(doc=698,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
    0.10751045 = weight(_text_:subject in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10751045 = score(doc=698,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.61852604 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The working group to establish guidelines for subject access by national bibliographic agencies was set up in 2005 in order to analyse the question of subject access and propose key elements for an indexing policy for national bibliographies. The group's mandate is to put forward recommendations based on best practices for subject access to national bibliographies. The group is presently assessing the elements which should be included in an indexing policy and will present an initial version of its recommendations in 2008.
  4. Connell, T.H.; Prabha, C.: Characteristics of resources represented in the OCLC CORC database (2002) 0.05 
    0.045738153 = product of:
  0.07623025 = sum of:
    0.02542624 = weight(_text_:of in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02542624 = score(doc=162,freq=30.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
          5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
            30.0 = termFreq=30.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
    0.034342952 = weight(_text_:subject in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034342952 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.19758089 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
    0.016461061 = product of:
      0.032922123 = sum of:
        0.032922123 = weight(_text_:22 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032922123 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    More and more libraries are providing access to Web resources through OCLC's (Online Computer Resource Center) Cooperative Online Resource Catalog (CORC) and, by extension, OCLC's WorldCat database. The ability to use a database to its maximum potential depends upon understanding what a database contains and the guidelines for its construction. This study examines the characteristics of Web resources in CORC in terms of their subject matter, the source of the content, publication patterns, and the units of information chosen for representation in the database. The majority of the 414 resources in the sample belonged to the social sciences. Academic libraries and government agencies contributed more than 90% of the records for resources in the sample. Using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2d edition (AACR2) definitions for publication patterns that are part of the upcoming 2002 amendments reveals that nearly half of the sample fell into the category of integrating resources. Identifying units of representation of the resources described was more difficult. Existing definitions for Web units in development are not adequate to describe all of the resources in the sample. In addition, there is wide variability in the units of representation chosen for inclusion by the libraries contributing records, resulting in little predictability in what units of information might be found in the database.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Hawkins, D.T.; Larson, S.E.; Caton, B.Q.: Information Science Abstracts : tracking the literature of information science (2003) 0.02 
    0.018591788 = product of:
  0.046479467 = sum of:
    0.016737599 = weight(_text_:of in 1685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016737599 = score(doc=1685,freq=52.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.22024246 = fieldWeight in 1685, product of:
          7.2111025 = tf(freq=52.0), with freq of:
            52.0 = termFreq=52.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1685)
    0.029741868 = weight(_text_:subject in 1685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029741868 = score(doc=1685,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.17111006 = fieldWeight in 1685, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1685)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Subject classifications and thesauri have become more important than ever in the Web environment. Efforts made to organize information into subject classifications, or taxonomies, offer users the opportunity to substantially improve the effectiveness of their search and retrieval activities. This article continues earlier research an the development of a new definition of the field of information science and the creation of a "map" of the field showing subjects central to it and their relationships to those an the periphery. A case study describes the creation of a new classification structure (taxonomy) for the Information Science Abstracts (ISA) database, aiming to reflect and accommodate the rapid and continued technological and market changes affecting the information industry today and into the future. Based an a sample of some 3,000 ISA abstracts, two validation experiments were conducted by a three-member team comprising a database editor, a reference librarian, and an abstractor-indexer, who represent three of the major communities within the information science field. In the first experiment, the sample of abstracts was classified according to the proposed new taxonomy; alter analysis of the data and revision of the taxonomy, it was revalidated and fine tuned in a second experiment. Indexer consistency measures obtained in this study were significantly higher than those found in previous studies. The taxonomy resulting from this research employs the concepts, definition, and map of information science previously developed. It presents them in an organized hierarchical view of the field and thus makes a significant contribution to information science.
    Content
    Das System: 1. INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH 1.1 Basic concepts, definitions, theories, methodologies, and applications 1.2 Properties, needs, quality, and value of information 1.3 Statistics, measurement Bibliometrics, citation analysis, scientometrics, informetrics 1.4 Information retrieval research Searching techniques (Boolean, fuzzy, natural language), the search process, precision/relevance, ranking/recall, searching models, query formulation, inverted files, updating, database structures 1.5 User behavior and uses of information systems Searcher tactics, information overload, user surveys, usability studies 1.6 Human-computer interface Human factors, ergonomics, design issues 1.7 Communication Editing, writing, linguistics, Internet authoring and design principles 1.8 Operations research/mathematics Modeling, Boolean logic, coding, systems analysis, algorithms, compression 1.9 History of information science, biographies
    2. KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION 2.1 Thesauri, authority lists Taxonomies, ontologies, semantic networks, nomenclatures, terminologies, vocabularies 2.2 Cataloging and classification Tagging, metatags, Dublin Core, DOIs, OPACs, MARC, AACR2, topic maps, cataloging processes and theories 2.3 Abstracting, indexing, reviewing Automatic indexing and abstracting 2.4 Standards and protocols NISO, Z39.5, XML, SGML, HTML, Open Archives Initiative (OAI), Encoded Archival Description (EAD), OpenURL, portable document format (PDF) 3. THE INFORMATION PROFESSION 3.1 Information professionals Intermediaries, searchers, reference librarians, information brokers, translators, educators, librarians and librarianship, mentoring, career outlook, future of the profession, professional ethics, skills and competencies 3.2 Organizations and societies 4. SOCIETAL ISSUES 4.1 Information ethics, plagiarism, credibility 4.2 Information literacy, lifelong learning 4.3 The Information Society Universal access and accessibility, technological and socioeconomic impacts of information, technology forecasts, information flows, futures scenarios, preservation 5. THE INFORMATION INDUSTRY 5.1 Information and knowledge management Knowledge transfer in organizations, business strategies 5.2 Markets and players Vendor profiles and Interviews, trends 5.3 Economics and pricing Business models, value chain 5.4 Marketing, e-commerce 6. PUBLISHING AND DISTRIBUTION 6.1 Print 6.2 Electronic E-journals, e-books 6.3 Secondary publishing Abstracting and indexing services, directories 6.4 Scholarly communication Peer review process, future of journals, dissertations, grey literature
    7. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES 7.1 Internet World Wide Web, Invisible Web, Deep Web, search engines, browsers, hypermedia, Listservs, bulletin boards, portals, gateways, directories, pathfinders 7.2 Intranets, Web conferencing 7.3 Software Programming languages, operating systems, platforms 7.4 Hardware 7.5 Multimedia 7.6 Document management Imaging, scanning, text retrieval, digitization, records management, bookmarking, hypertext systems, preservation technologies, digitization, linking and electronic cross referencing, storage, digital rights management 7.7 AI, expert systems, intelligent agents Cybernetics, visualization and mapping, data mining, pattern and character recognition, search agents and robots 7.8 Telecommunications Networks, wireless and satellite information delivery, Palm Pilots and other PDAs, LANs and WANs 7.9 Security, access control, authentication, encryption Digital watermarking 7.10 Other B. ELECTRONIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND SERVICES 8.1 Information searching and retrieval systems and Services Bibliographie, numeric, and Image databases; descriptions of online Services 8.2 Customized information systems, alerting, current awareness 8.3 Document delivery systems and Services Interlibrary loan, resource sharing 8.4 Geographie information systems 9. SUBJECT-SPECIFIC SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS 9.1 Physical sciences Chemistry, physics, engineering, earth sciences, Computer science, energy, mathematics 9.2 Life sciences Medicine, biosciences, agriculture, environment 9.3 Social sciences, humanities, history, linguistics 9.4 Business Management, economics, companies 9.5 Law, political science, government Patents and trademarks, intellectual property, case law 9.6 News 9.7 Education, library and information science, ready reference 9.8 Other/multidisciplinary Biography and genealogy databases, encyclopedias, databases of theses and dissertations
    10. LIBRARIES AND LIBRARY SERVICES 10.1 Library descriptions and types Special, government, academic, and public libraries, archives, museums, state and national libraries, depository libraries 10.2 Library Services 10.3 Library automation, operations, and strategic planning 10.4 Library consortia and networks, coalitions, cooperatives 10.5 Digital and virtual libraries, hybrid libraries 10.6 Education and training Distance learning, continuing education, bibliographic instruction library schools, courses and Curricula 11. GOVERNMENT AND LEGAL INFORMATION AND ISSUES 11.1 Intellectual property protection Copyright issues and implications, fair use, trademarks, patent law 11.2 Legislation, laws, and regulations (except Copyright) 11.3 Contracts and licensing 11.4 Liability issues Filtering, censorship, privacy 11.5 Sources of public information 11.6 Information policies and studies Security, encryption, privacy, freedom of information, censoring, national and other information policies 11.7 Systems and infrastructure Technology transfer
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.8, S.771-781
  6. Zumer, M.: Guidelines for (electronic) national bibliographies : work in progress (2005) 0.02 
    0.017438909 = product of:
  0.043597274 = sum of:
    0.020551786 = weight(_text_:of in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020551786 = score(doc=4346,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
    0.023045486 = product of:
      0.04609097 = sum of:
        0.04609097 = weight(_text_:22 in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04609097 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The Working group on Guidelines for (electronic) national bibliographies has started the work with an analysis of users and use of national bibliographies (NB). In addition to the well known importance of NB for libraries and librarians, other users and their requirements were identified. The results are presented and discussed; both existing and potential users and use were taken into account. The group will continue the work by specifying the functionality to support the various needs of different users.
    Date
    1.11.2005 18:56:22
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.
  7. Stoklasova, B.; Balikova, M.; Celbová, L.: Relationship between subject gateways and national bibliographies in international context (engl. Fassung) (2003) 0.01 
    0.013737181 = product of:
  0.068685904 = sum of:
    0.068685904 = weight(_text_:subject in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068685904 = score(doc=1938,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.39516178 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  8. Gerber, B.: Elektronische Zeitschriften : Das 6. Hamburger Kolloquium im Zeichen der Neuen Medien (2001) 0.01 
    0.0092181945 = product of:
  0.04609097 = sum of:
    0.04609097 = product of:
      0.09218194 = sum of:
        0.09218194 = weight(_text_:22 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09218194 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2001 12:14:06
  9. Neu: ID 3000 : Lektoratsdienste weiter verfeinert (2002) 0.01 
    0.007901309 = product of:
  0.039506543 = sum of:
    0.039506543 = product of:
      0.07901309 = sum of:
        0.07901309 = weight(_text_:22 in 5399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07901309 = score(doc=5399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5399)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2003 10:25:41
  10. Bourdon, F.: Funktionale Anforderungen an bibliographische Datensätze und ein internationales Nummernsystem für Normdaten : wie weit kann Normierung durch Technik unterstützt werden? (2001) 0.01 
    0.007901309 = product of:
  0.039506543 = sum of:
    0.039506543 = product of:
      0.07901309 = sum of:
        0.07901309 = weight(_text_:22 in 6888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07901309 = score(doc=6888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    26.12.2011 12:30:22
  11. Alex, H.; Heiner-Freiling, M.: DDC-Sachgruppen der Deutschen Naitonalbibliografie : Leitfaden zu ihrer Vergabe (2003) 0.01 
    0.007901309 = product of:
  0.039506543 = sum of:
    0.039506543 = product of:
      0.07901309 = sum of:
        0.07901309 = weight(_text_:22 in 2191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07901309 = score(doc=2191,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2191, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2191)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 5.2004 11:46:52
  12. Heinemann, A.: Online-Rezensionsjournale der Geschichtswissenschaft (2008) 0.01 
    0.006518248 = product of:
  0.03259124 = sum of:
    0.03259124 = product of:
      0.06518248 = sum of:
        0.06518248 = weight(_text_:22 in 87) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06518248 = score(doc=87,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 87, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=87)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 2.2008 13:22:11
  13. Egghe, L.: Sampling and concentration values of incomplete bibliographies (2002) 0.01 
    0.0058129225 = product of:
  0.029064612 = sum of:
    0.029064612 = weight(_text_:of in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029064612 = score(doc=450,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This article studies concentration aspects of bibliographies. More, in particular, we study the impact of incompleteness of such a bibliography on its concentration values (i.e., its degree of inequality of production of its sources). Incompleteness is modeled by sampling in the complete bibliography. The model is general enough to comprise truncation of a bibliography as well as a systematic sample on sources or items. In all cases we prove that the sampled bibliography (or incomplete one) has a higher concentration value than the complete one. These models, hence, shed some light on the measurement of production inequality in incomplete bibliographies.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.4, S.271-281
  14. Krummel, D.W.: Bibliography (2009) 0.01 
    0.0055582174 = product of:
  0.027791087 = sum of:
    0.027791087 = weight(_text_:of in 3752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027791087 = score(doc=3752,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 3752, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3752)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The basic families of bibliography are distinguished, followed by an overview of the history of bibliography. Major works in the world of bibliography are cited in their contexts. The practices of assembling and searching bibliographical lists are summarized, and the last section, which focuses on physical bibliography, surveys the study of books as artifactual evidence.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  15. Heiner-Freiling, M.; Landry, P.: ¬The use of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) for the organisation of national bibliographies : Switzerland and Germany/Austria (2005) 0.01 
    0.0054580607 = product of:
  0.027290303 = sum of:
    0.027290303 = weight(_text_:of in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027290303 = score(doc=4348,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The paper describes the efforts of three national libraries to use the DDC to improve access in German to the national bibliographies of Switzerland, Germany and Austria. The reasons that led to the use of the DDC for the organisation of the bibliographies and the difficulties in adopting a common approach will be explained. The paper will deal with the approach of using the Second Dewey Summary and the adaptations made to suit the bibliographic requirements of each country's bibliography. The presentation will also explain the challenges of incorporating German requirements in the new outline of the different series of the Deutsche Nationalbibliograpfie and will show how these were successfully resolved.
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.
  16. Hutzler, E.: 10 Jahre Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek : Kontinuität und Wandel einer kooperativen Dienstleistung (2008) 0.01 
    0.0052675395 = product of:
  0.026337698 = sum of:
    0.026337698 = product of:
      0.052675396 = sum of:
        0.052675396 = weight(_text_:22 in 1700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052675396 = score(doc=1700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1700)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 2.2008 13:39:04
  17. Franzmeier, G.: ¬Die Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB) (2001) 0.01 
    0.0052675395 = product of:
  0.026337698 = sum of:
    0.026337698 = product of:
      0.052675396 = sum of:
        0.052675396 = weight(_text_:22 in 1777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052675396 = score(doc=1777,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1777, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1777)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2008 13:56:55
  18. Zumer, M.: User interfaces of national bibliographies on CD-ROM : results of a survey (2000) 0.01 
    0.0051992363 = product of:
  0.02599618 = sum of:
    0.02599618 = weight(_text_:of in 4896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02599618 = score(doc=4896,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 4896, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4896)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  19. Hendry, D.G.; Jenkins, J.R.; McCarthy, J.F.: Collaborative bibliography (2006) 0.01 
    0.005085248 = product of:
  0.02542624 = sum of:
    0.02542624 = weight(_text_:of in 980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02542624 = score(doc=980,freq=30.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 980, product of:
          5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
            30.0 = termFreq=30.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=980)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    A bibliography is traditionally characterized by the judgments, bounded by explicit selection criteria, made by a single compiler. Because these criteria concern the attributes ascribed to a work and the needs of readers, bibliographic work is largely conceptual even across technological eras and domains. Yet, the development of networked information services, made possible by WWW infrastructure, has enabled very large numbers of people to discover, organize, and publish information, including bibliographies. Indeed, bibliographies, or at least bibliography-like artifacts, are a common genre of website, often published by people without specialized skills in information organization who follow non-rigorous selection procedures. Nevertheless, even if the items from these lists are poorly selected and described, this publishing activity is fundamentally important because it structures information locally, creating a patchy network of secondary access points. In turn, these access points enable information discovery, the formation and development of communities of interest, the estimation of document relevance by search engines, and so on. In sum, this activity, and the enabling technical infrastructure, invites bibliographies to take on new interactive possibilities. The aim of this article is to extend the traditional view of bibliography to encompass collaborative possibilities for wide, or narrow, participation in the shaping of bibliographies and the selection of items. This is done by examining the nature of bibliography on the Web, by proposing a conceptual model that opens bibliography to participatory practices, and by discussing a case study where a team sought to develop a bibliography of electronic resources. This examination reveals splendid opportunities for expanding the notion of bibliography with participatory policies while remaining true to its ancient roots.
  20. Gömpel, R.: IFLA-CDNL Alliance for Bibliographic Standards (ICABS) update (2005) 0.00 
    0.004726819 = product of:
  0.023634095 = sum of:
    0.023634095 = weight(_text_:of in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023634095 = score(doc=4347,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04859849 = queryNorm
        0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Almost two years ago the IFLA-CDNL Alliance for Bibliographic Standards has been established at the IFLA conference in Berlin. The following paper gives a short overview about the ICABS-related activities of the alliance partners. Objectives and goals of ICABS The objectives of ICABS are: - to coordinate activities aimed at the development of standards and practices for bibliographic and resource control - to support the international exchange of bibliographic resources by supporting, promoting, developing, and testing the maintenance of metadata and format standards - to ensure the promotion of new conventions - to act as a clearinghouse for information on all IFLA endeavours in these fields - to organize and participate in seminars and workshops - to enhance communication within the community.
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.
    Series
    129 SI - Division of Bibliographic Control; 025-E

Authors

Languages

  • e 30
  • d 20
  • es 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 35
  • el 13
  • m 3
  • p 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications