-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.07
0.07102212 = product of:
0.14204425 = sum of:
0.14204425 = sum of:
0.08122258 = weight(_text_:y in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08122258 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2546002 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.060821664 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060821664 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18526441 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.06
0.06211499 = product of:
0.12422998 = sum of:
0.12422998 = sum of:
0.08122258 = weight(_text_:y in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08122258 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2546002 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.043007407 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043007407 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18526441 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
-
Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014)
0.06
0.06211499 = product of:
0.12422998 = sum of:
0.12422998 = sum of:
0.08122258 = weight(_text_:y in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08122258 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2546002 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.043007407 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043007407 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18526441 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:52:04
-
He, Y.; Hui, S.C.: Mining a web database for author cocitation analysis (2002)
0.05
0.047379836 = product of:
0.09475967 = sum of:
0.09475967 = product of:
0.18951935 = sum of:
0.18951935 = weight(_text_:y in 2584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18951935 = score(doc=2584,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2546002 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.7443802 = fieldWeight in 2584, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2584)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.: Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities : the flow of ides within and among disciplines (1998)
0.03
0.03384274 = product of:
0.06768548 = sum of:
0.06768548 = product of:
0.13537095 = sum of:
0.13537095 = weight(_text_:y in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13537095 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2546002 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.53170013 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.03
0.028671606 = product of:
0.05734321 = sum of:
0.05734321 = product of:
0.11468642 = sum of:
0.11468642 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11468642 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18526441 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.03
0.028671606 = product of:
0.05734321 = sum of:
0.05734321 = product of:
0.11468642 = sum of:
0.11468642 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11468642 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18526441 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Fujigaki, Y.: ¬The citation system : citation networks as repeatedly focusing on difference, continuous re-evaluation, and as persistent knowledge accumulation (1998)
0.03
0.027074192 = product of:
0.054148383 = sum of:
0.054148383 = product of:
0.10829677 = sum of:
0.10829677 = weight(_text_:y in 5129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10829677 = score(doc=5129,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2546002 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.4253601 = fieldWeight in 5129, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5129)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.03
0.025342358 = product of:
0.050684717 = sum of:
0.050684717 = product of:
0.10136943 = sum of:
0.10136943 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10136943 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18526441 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Huang, S.; Qian, J.; Huang, Y.; Lu, W.; Bu, Y.; Yang, J.; Cheng, Q.: Disclosing the relationship between citation structure and future impact of a publication (2022)
0.02
0.023930432 = product of:
0.047860865 = sum of:
0.047860865 = product of:
0.09572173 = sum of:
0.09572173 = weight(_text_:y in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09572173 = score(doc=621,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2546002 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Cui, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.: Multidimensional scholarly citations : characterizing and understanding scholars' citation behaviors (2023)
0.02
0.023930432 = product of:
0.047860865 = sum of:
0.047860865 = product of:
0.09572173 = sum of:
0.09572173 = weight(_text_:y in 847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09572173 = score(doc=847,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2546002 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 847, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=847)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Tsay, M.-Y.: From Science Citation Index to Journal Citation Reports, amd criteria for journals evaluation (1997)
0.02
0.023689918 = product of:
0.047379836 = sum of:
0.047379836 = product of:
0.09475967 = sum of:
0.09475967 = weight(_text_:y in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09475967 = score(doc=657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2546002 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.3721901 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004)
0.02
0.02333218 = product of:
0.04666436 = sum of:
0.04666436 = product of:
0.18665744 = sum of:
0.18665744 = weight(_text_:author's in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18665744 = score(doc=2266,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3555299 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The term author co-citation is defined and classified according to four distinct forms: the pure first-author co-citation, the pure author co-citation, the general author co-citation, and the special co-authorlco-citation. Each form can be used to obtain one count in an author co-citation study, based an a binary counting rule, which either recognizes the co-citedness of two authors in a given reference list (1) or does not (0). Most studies using author co-citations have relied solely an first-author cocitation counts as evidence of an author's oeuvre or body of work contributed to a research field. In this article, we argue that an author's contribution to a selected field of study should not be limited, but should be based an his/her complete list of publications, regardless of author ranking. We discuss the implications associated with using each co-citation form and show where simple first-author co-citations fit within our classification scheme. Examples are given to substantiate each author co-citation form defined in our classification, including a set of sample Dialog(TM) searches using references extracted from the SciSearch database.
-
Hyland, K.: Self-citation and self-reference : credibility and promotion in academic publication (2003)
0.02
0.02333218 = product of:
0.04666436 = sum of:
0.04666436 = product of:
0.18665744 = sum of:
0.18665744 = weight(_text_:author's in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18665744 = score(doc=5156,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3555299 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Hyland examines self referencing practices by analyzing their textual uses in 240 randomly chosen research papers and 800 abstracts across 80 expert selected journals from 1997 and 1998 in eight disciplines, as a key to their author's assumptions as to their own role in the research process and to the practices of their disciplines. Scanned texts produced a corpus of nearly 1.5 million words which was searched using WordPilot for first person pronouns and all mentions of an author's previous work. There were 6,689 instances of self reference in the papers and 459 in the abstracts; on the average 28 cases per paper, 17% of which were self citations. There was one self mention in every two abstracts. Nearly 70% of self reference and mention occurred in humanities and social science papers, but biologists employed the most self citation overall and 12% of hard science citations were found to be self citations. Interviews indicated that self citation was deemed important in establishing authority by fitting oneself into the research framework. Self mention arises in four main contexts: stating the goal or the structure of the paper, explaining a procedure, stating results or a claim, and elaborating an argument.
-
White, H.D.: Authors as citers over time (2001)
0.02
0.022860777 = product of:
0.045721553 = sum of:
0.045721553 = product of:
0.18288621 = sum of:
0.18288621 = weight(_text_:author's in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18288621 = score(doc=5581,freq=6.0), product of:
0.3555299 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.5144046 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study explores the tendency of authors to recite themselves and others in multiple works over time, using the insights gained to build citation theory. The set of all authors whom an author cites is defined as that author's citation identity. The study explains how to retrieve citation identities from the Institute for Scientific Information's files on Dialog and how to deal with idiosyncrasies of these files. As the author's oeuvre grows, the identity takes the form of a core-and-scatter distribution that may be divided into authors cited only once (unicitations) and authors cited at least twice (recitations). The latter group, especially those recited most frequently, are interpretable as symbols of a citer's main substantive concerns. As illustrated by the top recitees of eight information scientists, identities are intelligible, individualized, and wide-ranging. They are ego-centered without being egotistical. They are often affected by social ties between citers and citees, but the universal motivator seems to be the perceived relevance of the citees' works. Citing styles in identities differ: "scientific-paper style" authors recite heavily, adding to core; "bibliographic-essay style" authors are heavy on unicitations, adding to scatter; "literature-review style" authors do both at once. Identities distill aspects of citers' intellectual lives, such as orienting figures, interdisciplinary interests, bidisciplinary careers, and conduct in controversies. They can also be related to past schemes for classifying citations in categories such as positive-negative and perfunctory- organic; indeed, one author's frequent recitation of another, whether positive or negative, may be the readiest indicator of an organic relation between them. The shape of the core-and-scatter distribution of names in identities can be explained by the principle of least effort. Citers economize on effort by frequently reciting only a relatively small core of names in their identities. They also economize by frequent use of perfunctory citations, which require relatively little context, and infrequent use of negative citations, which require contexts more laborious to set
-
He, Y.; Hui, S.C.: PubSearch : a Web citation-based retrieval system (2001)
0.02
0.020305645 = product of:
0.04061129 = sum of:
0.04061129 = product of:
0.08122258 = sum of:
0.08122258 = weight(_text_:y in 4806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08122258 = score(doc=4806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2546002 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 4806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4806)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Shibata, N.; Kajikawa, Y.; Matsushima, K.: Topological analysis of citation networks to discover the future core articles (2007)
0.02
0.020305645 = product of:
0.04061129 = sum of:
0.04061129 = product of:
0.08122258 = sum of:
0.08122258 = weight(_text_:y in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08122258 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2546002 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Sidiropoulos, A.; Manolopoulos, Y.: ¬A new perspective to automatically rank scientific conferences using digital libraries (2005)
0.02
0.020305645 = product of:
0.04061129 = sum of:
0.04061129 = product of:
0.08122258 = sum of:
0.08122258 = weight(_text_:y in 1011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08122258 = score(doc=1011,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2546002 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 1011, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1011)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Zhang, G.; Ding, Y.; Milojevic, S.: Citation content analysis (CCA) : a framework for syntactic and semantic analysis of citation content (2013)
0.02
0.020305645 = product of:
0.04061129 = sum of:
0.04061129 = product of:
0.08122258 = sum of:
0.08122258 = weight(_text_:y in 975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08122258 = score(doc=975,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2546002 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 975, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=975)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Xie, J.; Lu, H.; Kang, L.; Cheng, Y.: Citing criteria and its effects on researcher's intention to cite : a mixed-method study (2022)
0.02
0.020305645 = product of:
0.04061129 = sum of:
0.04061129 = product of:
0.08122258 = sum of:
0.08122258 = weight(_text_:y in 634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08122258 = score(doc=634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2546002 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05290503 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=634)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
