-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.03
0.034161314 = product of:
0.06832263 = sum of:
0.06832263 = sum of:
0.037042964 = weight(_text_:w in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037042964 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14663331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.031279664 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031279664 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13474444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.020853112 = product of:
0.041706223 = sum of:
0.041706223 = product of:
0.083412446 = sum of:
0.083412446 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083412446 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13474444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.02
0.020853112 = product of:
0.041706223 = sum of:
0.041706223 = product of:
0.083412446 = sum of:
0.083412446 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083412446 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13474444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.018431721 = product of:
0.036863443 = sum of:
0.036863443 = product of:
0.073726885 = sum of:
0.073726885 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073726885 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13474444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Zitatenanalyse und verwandte Verfahren : Vorträge einer öffentlichen Sitzung während der 32. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation, Oktober 1979 (1980)
0.02
0.015434569 = product of:
0.030869137 = sum of:
0.030869137 = product of:
0.061738275 = sum of:
0.061738275 = weight(_text_:w in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061738275 = score(doc=417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14663331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.42103854 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: NACKE, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne; GERDEL, W.: Datentechnische Methoden in der Referenzanalyse; EISENHARDT, O.-H.: Ergebnisse der Referenzanalyse; KRUG, G.: List-Analyse; LANGE, H.: Requestanalyse; HENZLER, R.G.: Bibliometrische Methoden der Termanalyse; NACKE, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse
-
Fröhlich, G.: ¬Das Messen des leicht Meßbaren : Output-Indikatoren, Impact-Maße: Artefakte der Szeintometrie? (1999)
0.02
0.015434569 = product of:
0.030869137 = sum of:
0.030869137 = product of:
0.061738275 = sum of:
0.061738275 = weight(_text_:w in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061738275 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14663331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.42103854 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Zuerst publiziert in: Kommunikation statt Markt: Zu einer alternativen Theorie der Informationsgesellschaft. Hrsg.: J. Becker u. W. Göhring. Sankt Augustin: GMD. (GMD Report; 61) S.27-38.
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.01
0.013033195 = product of:
0.02606639 = sum of:
0.02606639 = product of:
0.05213278 = sum of:
0.05213278 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05213278 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13474444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Marx, W.: Wie mißt man Forschungsqualität? : der Science Citation Index - ein Maßstab für die Bewertung (1996)
0.01
0.012347654 = product of:
0.024695309 = sum of:
0.024695309 = product of:
0.049390618 = sum of:
0.049390618 = weight(_text_:w in 5036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049390618 = score(doc=5036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14663331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.33683082 = fieldWeight in 5036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5036)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.011059033 = product of:
0.022118066 = sum of:
0.022118066 = product of:
0.04423613 = sum of:
0.04423613 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04423613 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13474444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Braun, T.; Glanzel, W.; Grupp, H.: ¬The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 scientific areas, 1989-1993 : Pt.1: All fields combined, mathematics, engineering, chemistry and physics (1995)
0.01
0.010804198 = product of:
0.021608396 = sum of:
0.021608396 = product of:
0.04321679 = sum of:
0.04321679 = weight(_text_:w in 761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04321679 = score(doc=761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14663331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=761)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Glänzel, W.: Visual bibliometrics : eine visuelle Oberfläche zur Erweiterung der Nutzungsmöglichkeiten bibliographischer Datenbanken (1996)
0.01
0.010804198 = product of:
0.021608396 = sum of:
0.021608396 = product of:
0.04321679 = sum of:
0.04321679 = weight(_text_:w in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04321679 = score(doc=6110,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14663331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.010426556 = product of:
0.020853112 = sum of:
0.020853112 = product of:
0.041706223 = sum of:
0.041706223 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041706223 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13474444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004)
0.01
0.0096969735 = product of:
0.019393947 = sum of:
0.019393947 = product of:
0.13575763 = sum of:
0.13575763 = weight(_text_:author's in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13575763 = score(doc=2266,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25858006 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The term author co-citation is defined and classified according to four distinct forms: the pure first-author co-citation, the pure author co-citation, the general author co-citation, and the special co-authorlco-citation. Each form can be used to obtain one count in an author co-citation study, based an a binary counting rule, which either recognizes the co-citedness of two authors in a given reference list (1) or does not (0). Most studies using author co-citations have relied solely an first-author cocitation counts as evidence of an author's oeuvre or body of work contributed to a research field. In this article, we argue that an author's contribution to a selected field of study should not be limited, but should be based an his/her complete list of publications, regardless of author ranking. We discuss the implications associated with using each co-citation form and show where simple first-author co-citations fit within our classification scheme. Examples are given to substantiate each author co-citation form defined in our classification, including a set of sample Dialog(TM) searches using references extracted from the SciSearch database.
-
Hyland, K.: Self-citation and self-reference : credibility and promotion in academic publication (2003)
0.01
0.0096969735 = product of:
0.019393947 = sum of:
0.019393947 = product of:
0.13575763 = sum of:
0.13575763 = weight(_text_:author's in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13575763 = score(doc=5156,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25858006 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Hyland examines self referencing practices by analyzing their textual uses in 240 randomly chosen research papers and 800 abstracts across 80 expert selected journals from 1997 and 1998 in eight disciplines, as a key to their author's assumptions as to their own role in the research process and to the practices of their disciplines. Scanned texts produced a corpus of nearly 1.5 million words which was searched using WordPilot for first person pronouns and all mentions of an author's previous work. There were 6,689 instances of self reference in the papers and 459 in the abstracts; on the average 28 cases per paper, 17% of which were self citations. There was one self mention in every two abstracts. Nearly 70% of self reference and mention occurred in humanities and social science papers, but biologists employed the most self citation overall and 12% of hard science citations were found to be self citations. Interviews indicated that self citation was deemed important in establishing authority by fitting oneself into the research framework. Self mention arises in four main contexts: stating the goal or the structure of the paper, explaining a procedure, stating results or a claim, and elaborating an argument.
-
White, H.D.: Authors as citers over time (2001)
0.01
0.009501055 = product of:
0.01900211 = sum of:
0.01900211 = product of:
0.13301477 = sum of:
0.13301477 = weight(_text_:author's in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13301477 = score(doc=5581,freq=6.0), product of:
0.25858006 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.5144046 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study explores the tendency of authors to recite themselves and others in multiple works over time, using the insights gained to build citation theory. The set of all authors whom an author cites is defined as that author's citation identity. The study explains how to retrieve citation identities from the Institute for Scientific Information's files on Dialog and how to deal with idiosyncrasies of these files. As the author's oeuvre grows, the identity takes the form of a core-and-scatter distribution that may be divided into authors cited only once (unicitations) and authors cited at least twice (recitations). The latter group, especially those recited most frequently, are interpretable as symbols of a citer's main substantive concerns. As illustrated by the top recitees of eight information scientists, identities are intelligible, individualized, and wide-ranging. They are ego-centered without being egotistical. They are often affected by social ties between citers and citees, but the universal motivator seems to be the perceived relevance of the citees' works. Citing styles in identities differ: "scientific-paper style" authors recite heavily, adding to core; "bibliographic-essay style" authors are heavy on unicitations, adding to scatter; "literature-review style" authors do both at once. Identities distill aspects of citers' intellectual lives, such as orienting figures, interdisciplinary interests, bidisciplinary careers, and conduct in controversies. They can also be related to past schemes for classifying citations in categories such as positive-negative and perfunctory- organic; indeed, one author's frequent recitation of another, whether positive or negative, may be the readiest indicator of an organic relation between them. The shape of the core-and-scatter distribution of names in identities can be explained by the principle of least effort. Citers economize on effort by frequently reciting only a relatively small core of names in their identities. They also economize by frequent use of perfunctory citations, which require relatively little context, and infrequent use of negative citations, which require contexts more laborious to set
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.01
0.009123236 = product of:
0.018246472 = sum of:
0.018246472 = product of:
0.036492944 = sum of:
0.036492944 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036492944 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13474444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.01
0.009123236 = product of:
0.018246472 = sum of:
0.018246472 = product of:
0.036492944 = sum of:
0.036492944 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036492944 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13474444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.01
0.009123236 = product of:
0.018246472 = sum of:
0.018246472 = product of:
0.036492944 = sum of:
0.036492944 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036492944 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13474444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.01
0.007819916 = product of:
0.015639832 = sum of:
0.015639832 = product of:
0.031279664 = sum of:
0.031279664 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031279664 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13474444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.01
0.007819916 = product of:
0.015639832 = sum of:
0.015639832 = product of:
0.031279664 = sum of:
0.031279664 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031279664 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13474444 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038478296 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
