-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.04
0.043881536 = product of:
0.10239025 = sum of:
0.03648725 = product of:
0.145949 = sum of:
0.145949 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.145949 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2596874 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.020501392 = weight(_text_:j in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501392 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.04540161 = sum of:
0.020501392 = weight(_text_:j in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501392 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.02490022 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02490022 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10726349 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Patrick, J.; Zhang, J.; Artola-Zubillaga, X.: ¬An architecture and query language for a federation of heterogeneous dictionary databases (2000)
0.03
0.028993348 = product of:
0.101476714 = sum of:
0.067651145 = weight(_text_:j in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067651145 = score(doc=339,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.69507736 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
0.033825573 = product of:
0.067651145 = sum of:
0.067651145 = weight(_text_:j in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067651145 = score(doc=339,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.69507736 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Perez-Carballo, J.; Strzalkowski, T.: Natural language information retrieval : progress report (2000)
0.02
0.020501394 = product of:
0.07175487 = sum of:
0.04783658 = weight(_text_:j in 6421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04783658 = score(doc=6421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 6421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6421)
0.02391829 = product of:
0.04783658 = sum of:
0.04783658 = weight(_text_:j in 6421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04783658 = score(doc=6421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 6421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6421)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Vilar, P.; Dimec, J.: Krnjenje kot osnova nekaterih nekonvencionalnih metod poizvedovanja (2000)
0.02
0.017572623 = product of:
0.061504178 = sum of:
0.041002784 = weight(_text_:j in 6331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041002784 = score(doc=6331,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 6331, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6331)
0.020501392 = product of:
0.041002784 = sum of:
0.041002784 = weight(_text_:j in 6331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041002784 = score(doc=6331,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 6331, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6331)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001)
0.02
0.017572623 = product of:
0.061504178 = sum of:
0.041002784 = weight(_text_:j in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041002784 = score(doc=6386,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
0.020501392 = product of:
0.041002784 = sum of:
0.041002784 = weight(_text_:j in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041002784 = score(doc=6386,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
-
Diaz, I.; Morato, J.; Lioréns, J.: ¬An algorithm for term conflation based on tree structures (2002)
0.02
0.016567627 = product of:
0.05798669 = sum of:
0.038657796 = weight(_text_:j in 246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038657796 = score(doc=246,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.39718705 = fieldWeight in 246, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=246)
0.019328898 = product of:
0.038657796 = sum of:
0.038657796 = weight(_text_:j in 246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038657796 = score(doc=246,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.39718705 = fieldWeight in 246, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=246)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Sienel, J.; Weiss, M.; Laube, M.: Sprachtechnologien für die Informationsgesellschaft des 21. Jahrhunderts (2000)
0.02
0.015691191 = product of:
0.05491917 = sum of:
0.017084492 = weight(_text_:j in 5557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017084492 = score(doc=5557,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 5557, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5557)
0.037834678 = sum of:
0.017084492 = weight(_text_:j in 5557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017084492 = score(doc=5557,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 5557, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5557)
0.020750185 = weight(_text_:22 in 5557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020750185 = score(doc=5557,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10726349 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5557, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5557)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 26.12.2000 13:22:17
-
Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001)
0.01
0.014643851 = product of:
0.051253475 = sum of:
0.034168985 = weight(_text_:j in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034168985 = score(doc=5863,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
0.017084492 = product of:
0.034168985 = sum of:
0.034168985 = weight(_text_:j in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034168985 = score(doc=5863,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Retrievaltests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das aufgrund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
-
Xu, J.; Weischedel, R.; Licuanan, A.: Evaluation of an extraction-based approach to answering definitional questions (2004)
0.01
0.014643851 = product of:
0.051253475 = sum of:
0.034168985 = weight(_text_:j in 4107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034168985 = score(doc=4107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4107)
0.017084492 = product of:
0.034168985 = sum of:
0.034168985 = weight(_text_:j in 4107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034168985 = score(doc=4107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4107)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Yang, C.C.; Luk, J.: Automatic generation of English/Chinese thesaurus based on a parallel corpus in laws (2003)
0.01
0.013814487 = product of:
0.0483507 = sum of:
0.016912786 = weight(_text_:j in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016912786 = score(doc=1616,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.17376934 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
0.031437915 = sum of:
0.016912786 = weight(_text_:j in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016912786 = score(doc=1616,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.17376934 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
0.014525129 = weight(_text_:22 in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014525129 = score(doc=1616,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10726349 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The information available in languages other than English in the World Wide Web is increasing significantly. According to a report from Computer Economics in 1999, 54% of Internet users are English speakers ("English Will Dominate Web for Only Three More Years," Computer Economics, July 9, 1999, http://www.computereconomics. com/new4/pr/pr990610.html). However, it is predicted that there will be only 60% increase in Internet users among English speakers verses a 150% growth among nonEnglish speakers for the next five years. By 2005, 57% of Internet users will be non-English speakers. A report by CNN.com in 2000 showed that the number of Internet users in China had been increased from 8.9 million to 16.9 million from January to June in 2000 ("Report: China Internet users double to 17 million," CNN.com, July, 2000, http://cnn.org/2000/TECH/computing/07/27/ china.internet.reut/index.html). According to Nielsen/ NetRatings, there was a dramatic leap from 22.5 millions to 56.6 millions Internet users from 2001 to 2002. China had become the second largest global at-home Internet population in 2002 (US's Internet population was 166 millions) (Robyn Greenspan, "China Pulls Ahead of Japan," Internet.com, April 22, 2002, http://cyberatias.internet.com/big-picture/geographics/article/0,,5911_1013841,00. html). All of the evidences reveal the importance of crosslingual research to satisfy the needs in the near future. Digital library research has been focusing in structural and semantic interoperability in the past. Searching and retrieving objects across variations in protocols, formats and disciplines are widely explored (Schatz, B., & Chen, H. (1999). Digital libraries: technological advances and social impacts. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, February, 32(2), 45-50.; Chen, H., Yen, J., & Yang, C.C. (1999). International activities: development of Asian digital libraries. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, 32(2), 48-49.). However, research in crossing language boundaries, especially across European languages and Oriental languages, is still in the initial stage. In this proposal, we put our focus an cross-lingual semantic interoperability by developing automatic generation of a cross-lingual thesaurus based an English/Chinese parallel corpus. When the searchers encounter retrieval problems, Professional librarians usually consult the thesaurus to identify other relevant vocabularies. In the problem of searching across language boundaries, a cross-lingual thesaurus, which is generated by co-occurrence analysis and Hopfield network, can be used to generate additional semantically relevant terms that cannot be obtained from dictionary. In particular, the automatically generated cross-lingual thesaurus is able to capture the unknown words that do not exist in a dictionary, such as names of persons, organizations, and events. Due to Hong Kong's unique history background, both English and Chinese are used as official languages in all legal documents. Therefore, English/Chinese cross-lingual information retrieval is critical for applications in courts and the government. In this paper, we develop an automatic thesaurus by the Hopfield network based an a parallel corpus collected from the Web site of the Department of Justice of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) Government. Experiments are conducted to measure the precision and recall of the automatic generated English/Chinese thesaurus. The result Shows that such thesaurus is a promising tool to retrieve relevant terms, especially in the language that is not the same as the input term. The direct translation of the input term can also be retrieved in most of the cases.
-
Bager, J.: Teurer Dolmetscher : Forschungsprojekt Verbmobil - Rückblick und Ausblick (2001)
0.01
0.0117150815 = product of:
0.041002784 = sum of:
0.02733519 = weight(_text_:j in 5659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02733519 = score(doc=5659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 5659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5659)
0.013667595 = product of:
0.02733519 = sum of:
0.02733519 = weight(_text_:j in 5659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02733519 = score(doc=5659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 5659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Nhongkai, S.N.; Bentz, H.-J.: Bilinguale Suche mittels Konzeptnetzen (2006)
0.01
0.0117150815 = product of:
0.041002784 = sum of:
0.02733519 = weight(_text_:j in 3914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02733519 = score(doc=3914,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 3914, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3914)
0.013667595 = product of:
0.02733519 = sum of:
0.02733519 = weight(_text_:j in 3914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02733519 = score(doc=3914,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 3914, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3914)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Moens, M.F.; Dumortier, J.: Use of a text grammar for generating highlight abstracts of magazine articles (2000)
0.01
0.010250697 = product of:
0.035877436 = sum of:
0.02391829 = weight(_text_:j in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02391829 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
0.011959145 = product of:
0.02391829 = sum of:
0.02391829 = weight(_text_:j in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02391829 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Kuo, J.-S.; Li, H.; Yang, Y.-K.: Active learning for constructing transliteration lexicons from the Web (2008)
0.01
0.010250697 = product of:
0.035877436 = sum of:
0.02391829 = weight(_text_:j in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02391829 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
0.011959145 = product of:
0.02391829 = sum of:
0.02391829 = weight(_text_:j in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02391829 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Goller, C.; Löning, J.; Will, T.; Wolff, W.: Automatic document classification : a thourough evaluation of various methods (2000)
0.01
0.008786311 = product of:
0.030752089 = sum of:
0.020501392 = weight(_text_:j in 5480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501392 = score(doc=5480,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5480, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5480)
0.010250696 = product of:
0.020501392 = sum of:
0.020501392 = weight(_text_:j in 5480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501392 = score(doc=5480,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5480, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5480)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Jaaranen, K.; Lehtola, A.; Tenni, J.; Bounsaythip, C.: Webtran tools for in-company language support (2000)
0.01
0.008786311 = product of:
0.030752089 = sum of:
0.020501392 = weight(_text_:j in 5553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501392 = score(doc=5553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5553)
0.010250696 = product of:
0.020501392 = sum of:
0.020501392 = weight(_text_:j in 5553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501392 = score(doc=5553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5553)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Carter-Sigglow, J.: ¬Die Rolle der Sprache bei der Informationsvermittlung (2001)
0.01
0.008786311 = product of:
0.030752089 = sum of:
0.020501392 = weight(_text_:j in 5882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501392 = score(doc=5882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5882)
0.010250696 = product of:
0.020501392 = sum of:
0.020501392 = weight(_text_:j in 5882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501392 = score(doc=5882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Bookstein, A.; Kulyukin, V.; Raita, T.; Nicholson, J.: Adapting measures of clumping strength to assess term-term similarity (2003)
0.01
0.008786311 = product of:
0.030752089 = sum of:
0.020501392 = weight(_text_:j in 1609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501392 = score(doc=1609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 1609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1609)
0.010250696 = product of:
0.020501392 = sum of:
0.020501392 = weight(_text_:j in 1609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501392 = score(doc=1609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 1609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1609)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Atlam, E.-S.; Morita, K.; Fuketa, M.; Aoe, J.-i.: ¬A new method for selecting English field association terms of compound words and its knowledge representation (2002)
0.01
0.008786311 = product of:
0.030752089 = sum of:
0.020501392 = weight(_text_:j in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501392 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
0.010250696 = product of:
0.020501392 = sum of:
0.020501392 = weight(_text_:j in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501392 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Cimiano, P.; Völker, J.; Studer, R.: Ontologies on demand? : a description of the state-of-the-art, applications, challenges and trends for ontology learning from text (2006)
0.01
0.008786311 = product of:
0.030752089 = sum of:
0.020501392 = weight(_text_:j in 6014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501392 = score(doc=6014,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 6014, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6014)
0.010250696 = product of:
0.020501392 = sum of:
0.020501392 = weight(_text_:j in 6014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501392 = score(doc=6014,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.030630698 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 6014, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6014)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
