Search (94 results, page 5 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Kettunen, K.; Kunttu, T.; Järvelin, K.: To stem or lemmatize a highly inflectional language in a probabilistic IR environment? (2005) 0.01
    0.0067521087 = product of:
      0.013504217 = sum of:
        0.013504217 = product of:
          0.027008435 = sum of:
            0.027008435 = weight(_text_:p in 4395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027008435 = score(doc=4395,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1359764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037818365 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4395, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4395)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To show that stem generation compares well with lemmatization as a morphological tool for a highly inflectional language for IR purposes in a best-match retrieval system. Design/methodology/approach - Effects of three different morphological methods - lemmatization, stemming and stem production - for Finnish are compared in a probabilistic IR environment (INQUERY). Evaluation is done using a four-point relevance scale which is partitioned differently in different test settings. Findings - Results show that stem production, a lighter method than morphological lemmatization, compares well with lemmatization in a best-match IR environment. Differences in performance between stem production and lemmatization are small and they are not statistically significant in most of the tested settings. It is also shown that hitherto a rather neglected method of morphological processing for Finnish, stemming, performs reasonably well although the stemmer used - a Porter stemmer implementation - is far from optimal for a morphologically complex language like Finnish. In another series of tests, the effects of compound splitting and derivational expansion of queries are tested. Practical implications - Usefulness of morphological lemmatization and stem generation for IR purposes can be estimated with many factors. On the average P-R level they seem to behave very close to each other in a probabilistic IR system. Thus, the choice of the used method with highly inflectional languages needs to be estimated along other dimensions too. Originality/value - Results are achieved using Finnish as an example of a highly inflectional language. The results are of interest for anyone who is interested in processing of morphological variation of a highly inflected language for IR purposes.
  2. Ahlgren, P.; Kekäläinen, J.: Indexing strategies for Swedish full text retrieval under different user scenarios (2007) 0.01
    0.0067521087 = product of:
      0.013504217 = sum of:
        0.013504217 = product of:
          0.027008435 = sum of:
            0.027008435 = weight(_text_:p in 896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027008435 = score(doc=896,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1359764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037818365 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 896, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=896)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Symonds, M.; Bruza, P.; Zuccon, G.; Koopman, B.; Sitbon, L.; Turner, I.: Automatic query expansion : a structural linguistic perspective (2014) 0.01
    0.0067521087 = product of:
      0.013504217 = sum of:
        0.013504217 = product of:
          0.027008435 = sum of:
            0.027008435 = weight(_text_:p in 1338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027008435 = score(doc=1338,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1359764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037818365 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1338, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1338)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Hoenkamp, E.; Bruza, P.: How everyday language can and will boost effective information retrieval (2015) 0.01
    0.0067521087 = product of:
      0.013504217 = sum of:
        0.013504217 = product of:
          0.027008435 = sum of:
            0.027008435 = weight(_text_:p in 2123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027008435 = score(doc=2123,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1359764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037818365 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 2123, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2123)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Rozinajová, V.; Macko, P.: Using natural language to search linked data (2017) 0.01
    0.0067521087 = product of:
      0.013504217 = sum of:
        0.013504217 = product of:
          0.027008435 = sum of:
            0.027008435 = weight(_text_:p in 3488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027008435 = score(doc=3488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1359764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037818365 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 3488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3488)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Muneer, I.; Sharjeel, M.; Iqbal, M.; Adeel Nawab, R.M.; Rayson, P.: CLEU - A Cross-language english-urdu corpus and benchmark for text reuse experiments (2019) 0.01
    0.0067521087 = product of:
      0.013504217 = sum of:
        0.013504217 = product of:
          0.027008435 = sum of:
            0.027008435 = weight(_text_:p in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027008435 = score(doc=5299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1359764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037818365 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Schaer, P.: Sprachmodelle und neuronale Netze im Information Retrieval (2023) 0.01
    0.0067521087 = product of:
      0.013504217 = sum of:
        0.013504217 = product of:
          0.027008435 = sum of:
            0.027008435 = weight(_text_:p in 799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027008435 = score(doc=799,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1359764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037818365 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 799, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=799)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Park, J.S.; O'Brien, J.C.; Cai, C.J.; Ringel Morris, M.; Liang, P.; Bernstein, M.S.: Generative agents : interactive simulacra of human behavior (2023) 0.01
    0.0067521087 = product of:
      0.013504217 = sum of:
        0.013504217 = product of:
          0.027008435 = sum of:
            0.027008435 = weight(_text_:p in 972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027008435 = score(doc=972,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1359764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037818365 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 972, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=972)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Sienel, J.; Weiss, M.; Laube, M.: Sprachtechnologien für die Informationsgesellschaft des 21. Jahrhunderts (2000) 0.01
    0.0064048334 = product of:
      0.012809667 = sum of:
        0.012809667 = product of:
          0.025619334 = sum of:
            0.025619334 = weight(_text_:22 in 5557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025619334 = score(doc=5557,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13243347 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037818365 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5557, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5557)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2000 13:22:17
  10. Fóris, A.: Network theory and terminology (2013) 0.01
    0.0064048334 = product of:
      0.012809667 = sum of:
        0.012809667 = product of:
          0.025619334 = sum of:
            0.025619334 = weight(_text_:22 in 1365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025619334 = score(doc=1365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13243347 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037818365 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 9.2014 21:22:48
  11. Rötzer, F.: KI-Programm besser als Menschen im Verständnis natürlicher Sprache (2018) 0.01
    0.0051238667 = product of:
      0.010247733 = sum of:
        0.010247733 = product of:
          0.020495467 = sum of:
            0.020495467 = weight(_text_:22 in 4217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020495467 = score(doc=4217,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13243347 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037818365 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4217, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4217)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2018 11:32:44
  12. Schürmann, H.: Software scannt Radio- und Fernsehsendungen : Recherche in Nachrichtenarchiven erleichtert (2001) 0.00
    0.004483383 = product of:
      0.008966766 = sum of:
        0.008966766 = product of:
          0.017933533 = sum of:
            0.017933533 = weight(_text_:22 in 5759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017933533 = score(doc=5759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13243347 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037818365 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 5759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Handelsblatt. Nr.79 vom 24.4.2001, S.22
  13. Yang, C.C.; Luk, J.: Automatic generation of English/Chinese thesaurus based on a parallel corpus in laws (2003) 0.00
    0.004483383 = product of:
      0.008966766 = sum of:
        0.008966766 = product of:
          0.017933533 = sum of:
            0.017933533 = weight(_text_:22 in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017933533 = score(doc=1616,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13243347 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037818365 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The information available in languages other than English in the World Wide Web is increasing significantly. According to a report from Computer Economics in 1999, 54% of Internet users are English speakers ("English Will Dominate Web for Only Three More Years," Computer Economics, July 9, 1999, http://www.computereconomics. com/new4/pr/pr990610.html). However, it is predicted that there will be only 60% increase in Internet users among English speakers verses a 150% growth among nonEnglish speakers for the next five years. By 2005, 57% of Internet users will be non-English speakers. A report by CNN.com in 2000 showed that the number of Internet users in China had been increased from 8.9 million to 16.9 million from January to June in 2000 ("Report: China Internet users double to 17 million," CNN.com, July, 2000, http://cnn.org/2000/TECH/computing/07/27/ china.internet.reut/index.html). According to Nielsen/ NetRatings, there was a dramatic leap from 22.5 millions to 56.6 millions Internet users from 2001 to 2002. China had become the second largest global at-home Internet population in 2002 (US's Internet population was 166 millions) (Robyn Greenspan, "China Pulls Ahead of Japan," Internet.com, April 22, 2002, http://cyberatias.internet.com/big-picture/geographics/article/0,,5911_1013841,00. html). All of the evidences reveal the importance of crosslingual research to satisfy the needs in the near future. Digital library research has been focusing in structural and semantic interoperability in the past. Searching and retrieving objects across variations in protocols, formats and disciplines are widely explored (Schatz, B., & Chen, H. (1999). Digital libraries: technological advances and social impacts. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, February, 32(2), 45-50.; Chen, H., Yen, J., & Yang, C.C. (1999). International activities: development of Asian digital libraries. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, 32(2), 48-49.). However, research in crossing language boundaries, especially across European languages and Oriental languages, is still in the initial stage. In this proposal, we put our focus an cross-lingual semantic interoperability by developing automatic generation of a cross-lingual thesaurus based an English/Chinese parallel corpus. When the searchers encounter retrieval problems, Professional librarians usually consult the thesaurus to identify other relevant vocabularies. In the problem of searching across language boundaries, a cross-lingual thesaurus, which is generated by co-occurrence analysis and Hopfield network, can be used to generate additional semantically relevant terms that cannot be obtained from dictionary. In particular, the automatically generated cross-lingual thesaurus is able to capture the unknown words that do not exist in a dictionary, such as names of persons, organizations, and events. Due to Hong Kong's unique history background, both English and Chinese are used as official languages in all legal documents. Therefore, English/Chinese cross-lingual information retrieval is critical for applications in courts and the government. In this paper, we develop an automatic thesaurus by the Hopfield network based an a parallel corpus collected from the Web site of the Department of Justice of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) Government. Experiments are conducted to measure the precision and recall of the automatic generated English/Chinese thesaurus. The result Shows that such thesaurus is a promising tool to retrieve relevant terms, especially in the language that is not the same as the input term. The direct translation of the input term can also be retrieved in most of the cases.
  14. Melzer, C.: ¬Der Maschine anpassen : PC-Spracherkennung - Programme sind mittlerweile alltagsreif (2005) 0.00
    0.004483383 = product of:
      0.008966766 = sum of:
        0.008966766 = product of:
          0.017933533 = sum of:
            0.017933533 = weight(_text_:22 in 4044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017933533 = score(doc=4044,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13243347 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037818365 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 4044, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4044)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22

Years

Languages

  • e 74
  • d 19
  • slv 1
  • More… Less…

Types