Search (266 results, page 3 of 14)

0.012733776 = product of:
  0.025467552 = sum of:
    0.025467552 = product of:
      0.07640266 = sum of:
        0.07640266 = weight(_text_:k in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07640266 = score(doc=5295,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.012733776 = product of:
  0.025467552 = sum of:
    0.025467552 = product of:
      0.07640266 = sum of:
        0.07640266 = weight(_text_:k in 1945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07640266 = score(doc=1945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 1945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1945)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.440-445.

0.012733776 = product of:
  0.025467552 = sum of:
    0.025467552 = product of:
      0.07640266 = sum of:
        0.07640266 = weight(_text_:k in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07640266 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.313-316.

0.012733776 = product of:
  0.025467552 = sum of:
    0.025467552 = product of:
      0.07640266 = sum of:
        0.07640266 = weight(_text_:k in 4108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07640266 = score(doc=4108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 4108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4108)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

SIGIR'04: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference an Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Ed.: K. Järvelin, u.a

0.012733776 = product of:
  0.025467552 = sum of:
    0.025467552 = product of:
      0.07640266 = sum of:
        0.07640266 = weight(_text_:k in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07640266 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.012516268 = product of:
  0.025032535 = sum of:
    0.025032535 = product of:
      0.037548803 = sum of:
        0.02228411 = weight(_text_:k in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02228411 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.13804297 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
        0.015264692 = weight(_text_:h in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015264692 = score(doc=5089,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.13586831 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)

0.012253631 = product of:
  0.024507262 = sum of:
    0.024507262 = product of:
      0.073521785 = sum of:
        0.073521785 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073521785 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

15. 3.2000 10:22:37

0.012253631 = product of:
  0.024507262 = sum of:
    0.024507262 = product of:
      0.073521785 = sum of:
        0.073521785 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073521785 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 3.2013 14:56:22

0.012236182 = product of:
  0.024472363 = sum of:
    0.024472363 = product of:
      0.036708545 = sum of:
        0.015264692 = weight(_text_:h in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015264692 = score(doc=1616,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.13586831 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
        0.021443853 = weight(_text_:22 in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021443853 = score(doc=1616,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The information available in languages other than English in the World Wide Web is increasing significantly. According to a report from Computer Economics in 1999, 54% of Internet users are English speakers ("English Will Dominate Web for Only Three More Years," Computer Economics, July 9, 1999, http://www.computereconomics. com/new4/pr/pr990610.html). However, it is predicted that there will be only 60% increase in Internet users among English speakers verses a 150% growth among nonEnglish speakers for the next five years. By 2005, 57% of Internet users will be non-English speakers. A report by CNN.com in 2000 showed that the number of Internet users in China had been increased from 8.9 million to 16.9 million from January to June in 2000 ("Report: China Internet users double to 17 million," CNN.com, July, 2000, http://cnn.org/2000/TECH/computing/07/27/ china.internet.reut/index.html). According to Nielsen/ NetRatings, there was a dramatic leap from 22.5 millions to 56.6 millions Internet users from 2001 to 2002. China had become the second largest global at-home Internet population in 2002 (US's Internet population was 166 millions) (Robyn Greenspan, "China Pulls Ahead of Japan," Internet.com, April 22, 2002, http://cyberatias.internet.com/big-picture/geographics/article/0,,5911_1013841,00. html). All of the evidences reveal the importance of crosslingual research to satisfy the needs in the near future. Digital library research has been focusing in structural and semantic interoperability in the past. Searching and retrieving objects across variations in protocols, formats and disciplines are widely explored (Schatz, B., & Chen, H. (1999). Digital libraries: technological advances and social impacts. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, February, 32(2), 45-50.; Chen, H., Yen, J., & Yang, C.C. (1999). International activities: development of Asian digital libraries. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, 32(2), 48-49.). However, research in crossing language boundaries, especially across European languages and Oriental languages, is still in the initial stage. In this proposal, we put our focus an cross-lingual semantic interoperability by developing automatic generation of a cross-lingual thesaurus based an English/Chinese parallel corpus. When the searchers encounter retrieval problems, Professional librarians usually consult the thesaurus to identify other relevant vocabularies. In the problem of searching across language boundaries, a cross-lingual thesaurus, which is generated by co-occurrence analysis and Hopfield network, can be used to generate additional semantically relevant terms that cannot be obtained from dictionary. In particular, the automatically generated cross-lingual thesaurus is able to capture the unknown words that do not exist in a dictionary, such as names of persons, organizations, and events. Due to Hong Kong's unique history background, both English and Chinese are used as official languages in all legal documents. Therefore, English/Chinese cross-lingual information retrieval is critical for applications in courts and the government. In this paper, we develop an automatic thesaurus by the Hopfield network based an a parallel corpus collected from the Web site of the Department of Justice of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) Government. Experiments are conducted to measure the precision and recall of the automatic generated English/Chinese thesaurus. The result Shows that such thesaurus is a promising tool to retrieve relevant terms, especially in the language that is not the same as the input term. The direct translation of the input term can also be retrieved in most of the cases.

0.012170627 = product of:
  0.024341254 = sum of:
    0.024341254 = product of:
      0.03651188 = sum of:
        0.018008279 = weight(_text_:k in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018008279 = score(doc=91,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.11155556 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
        0.0185036 = weight(_text_:h in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0185036 = score(doc=91,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Jiri Panyr: Thesauri, Semantische Netze, Frames, Topic Maps, Taxonomien, Ontologien - begriffliche Verwirrung oder konzeptionelle Vielfalt? Heinz-Dieter Maas: Indexieren mit AUTINDEX Wilhelm Gaus, Rainer Kaluscha: Maschinelle inhaltliche Erschließung von Arztbriefen und Auswertung von Reha-Entlassungsberichten Klaus Lepsky: Automatische Indexierung des Reallexikons zur Deutschen Kunstgeschichte - Analysen und Entwicklungen Ilse Harms: Die computervermittelte Kommunikation als ein Instrument des Wissensmanagements in Organisationen August- Wilhelm Scheer, Dirk Werth: Geschäftsregel-basiertes Geschäftsprozessmanagement Thomas Seeger: Akkreditierung und Evaluierung von Hochschullehre und -forschung in Großbritannien. Hinweise für die Situation in Deutschland Bernd Hagenau: Gehabte Sorgen hab' ich gern? Ein Blick zurück auf die Deutschen Bibliothekartage 1975 bis 1980 - Persönliches Jorgo Chatzimarkakis: Sprache und Information in Europa Alfred Gulden: 7 Briefe und eine Anmerkung Günter Scholdt: Der Weg nach Europa im Spiegel von Mundartgedichten Alfred Guldens Wolfgang Müller: Prof. Dr. Harald H. Zimmermann - Seit 45 Jahren der Universität des Saarlandes verbunden Heinz-Dirk Luckhardt: Computerlinguistik und Informationswissenschaft: Facetten des wissenschaftlichen Wirkens von Harald H. Zimmermann Schriftenverzeichnis Harald H. Zimmermanns 1967-2005 - Projekte in Verantwortung von Harald H. Zimmermann - Adressen der Beiträgerinnen und Beiträger

Footnote

Rez. in Mitt. VÖB 59(2006) Nr.3, S.75-78 (O. Oberhauser): "Beim vorliegenden Buch handelt es sich um die Festschrift zum 65. Geburtstag des mit Ende des Sommersemesters 2006 in den Ruhestand getretenen Universitätsprofessors für Informationswissenschaft, Harald H. Zimmermann, jenes 1941 in Völklingen geborenen Computerlinguisten, der die Informationswissenschaft als akademische Disziplin in Deutschland mitbegründet und seit 1980 an der Universität des Saarlandes vertreten hat. Die insgesamt 26 Beiträge des von Professor Zimmermanns Mitarbeitern betreuten, optisch gediegen anmutenden Saur-Bandes gliedern sich - so das Inhaltsverzeichnis - in vier Themenschwerpunkte: - Information und Kommunikation - Sprache und Computer, insbesondere Information Retrieval und Automatische Indexierung - Analysen und Entwicklungen - Persönliches Die Aufsätze selbst variieren, wie bei Festschriften üblich bzw. unvermeidbar, hinsichtlich Länge, Stil, thematischem Detail und Anspruchsniveau. Neben wissenschaftlichen Beiträgen findet man hier auch Reminiszenzen und Literarisches. Die nachfolgende Auswahl zeigt, was mich selbst an diesem Buch interessiert hat:
In Thesauri, Semantische Netze, Frames, Topic Maps, Taxonomien, Ontologien - begriffliche Verwirrung oder konzeptionelle Vielfalt? (S. 139-151) gibt Jiri Panyr (München/Saarbrücken) eine gut lesbare und nützliche Übersicht über die im Titel des Beitrags genannten semantischen Repräsentationsformen, die im Zusammenhang mit dem Internet und insbesondere mit dem vorgeschlagenen Semantic Web immer wieder - und zwar häufig unpräzise oder gar unrichtig - Anwendung finden. Insbesondere die Ausführungen zum Modebegriff Ontologie zeigen, dass dieser nicht leichtfertig als Quasi-Synonym zu Thesaurus oder Klassifikation verwendet werden darf. Panyrs Beitrag ist übrigens thematisch verwandt mit jenem von K.-D. Schmitz (Köln), Wörterbuch, Thesaurus, Terminologie, Ontologie (S. 129-137). Abgesehen von dem einfallslosen Titel Wer suchet, der findet? (S. 107- 118) - zum Glück mit dem Untertitel Verbesserung der inhaltlichen Suchmöglichkeiten im Informationssystem Der Deutschen Bibliothek versehen - handelt es sich bei diesem Artikel von Elisabeth Niggemann (Frankfurt am Main) zwar um keinen wissenschaftlichen, doch sicherlich den praktischsten, lesbarsten und aus bibliothekarischer Sicht interessantesten des Buches. Niggemann gibt einen Überblick über die bisherige sachliche Erschliessung der bibliographischen Daten der inzwischen zur Deutschen Nationalbibliothek mutierten DDB, sowie einen Statusbericht nebst Ausblick über gegenwärtige bzw. geplante Verbesserungen der inhaltlichen Suche. Dazu zählen der breite Einsatz eines automatischen Indexierungsverfahrens (MILOS/IDX) ebenso wie Aktivitäten im klassifikatorischen Bereich (DDC), die Vernetzung nationaler Schlagwortsysteme (Projekt MACS) sowie die Beschäftigung mit Crosskonkordanzen (CARMEN) und Ansätzen zur Heterogenitätsbehandlung. Das hier von zentraler Stelle deklarierte "commitment" hinsichtlich der Verbesserung der sachlichen Erschließung des nationalen Online-Informationssystems erfüllt den eher nur Kleinmut und Gleichgültigkeit gewohnten phäakischen Beobachter mit Respekt und wehmutsvollem Neid.
Mit automatischer Indexierung beschäftigen sich auch zwei weitere Beiträge. Indexieren mit AUTINDEX von H.-D. Mass (Saarbrücken) ist leider knapp und ohne didaktische Ambition verfasst, sodass man sich nicht wirklich vorstellen kann, wie dieses System funktioniert. Übersichtlicher stellt sich der Werkstattbericht Automatische Indexierung des Reallexikons zur deutschen Kunstgeschichte von K. Lepsky (Köln) dar, der zeigt, welche Probleme und Schritte bei der Digitalisierung, Indexierung und Web-Präsentation der Volltexte eines grossen fachlichen Nachschlagewerkes anfallen. Weitere interessante Beiträge befassen sich z.B. mit Summarizing-Leistungen im Rahmen eines e-Learning-Projektes (R. Kuhlen), mit dem Schalenmodell und dem Semantischen Web (J. Krause; aus nicht näher dargelegten Gründen in englischer Sprache) und mit der Akkreditierung/ Evaluierung von Hochschullehre und -forschung in Großbritannien (T. Seeger). In Summe liegt hier eine würdige Festschrift vor, über die sich der Gefeierte sicherlich gefreut haben wird. Für informationswissenschaftliche Spezialsammlungen und größere Bibliotheken ist der Band allemal eine Bereicherung. Ein Wermutstropfen aber doch: Obzwar mit Information und Sprache ein optisch ansprechend gestaltetes Buch produziert wurde, enthüllt eine nähere Betrachtung leider allzu viele Druckfehler, mangelhafte Worttrennungen, unkorrigierte grammatikalische Fehler, sowie auch Inkonsistenzen bei Kursivdruck und Satzzeichen. Lektoren und Korrektoren sind, so muss man wieder einmal schmerzlich zur Kenntnis nehmen, ein aussterbender Berufsstand."

RSWK

Zimmermann, Harald H. / Bibliographie

Subject

Zimmermann, Harald H. / Bibliographie

0.011630241 = product of:
  0.023260482 = sum of:
    0.023260482 = product of:
      0.069781445 = sum of:
        0.069781445 = weight(_text_:h in 6799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069781445 = score(doc=6799,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.6211123 = fieldWeight in 6799, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6799)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Künstliche Intelligenz. 1995, H.5, S.27-33

0.011630241 = product of:
  0.023260482 = sum of:
    0.023260482 = product of:
      0.069781445 = sum of:
        0.069781445 = weight(_text_:h in 6944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069781445 = score(doc=6944,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.6211123 = fieldWeight in 6944, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6944)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

c't. 1997, H.1, S.108

0.01102596 = product of:
  0.02205192 = sum of:
    0.02205192 = product of:
      0.033077877 = sum of:
        0.02228411 = weight(_text_:k in 6671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02228411 = score(doc=6671,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.13804297 = fieldWeight in 6671, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6671)
        0.010793767 = weight(_text_:h in 6671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010793767 = score(doc=6671,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.096073404 = fieldWeight in 6671, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6671)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

HARMAN, D.: Relevance feedback revisited; AALBERSBERG, I.J.: Incremental relevance feedback; TAGUE-SUTCLIFFE, J.: Measuring the informativeness of a retrieval process; LEWIS, D.D.: An evaluation of phrasal and clustered representations on a text categorization task; BLOSSEVILLE, M.J., G. HÉBRAIL, M.G. MONTEIL u. N. PÉNOT: Automatic document classification: natural language processing, statistical analysis, and expert system techniques used together; MASAND, B., G. LINOFF u. D. WALTZ: Classifying news stories using memory based reasoning; KEEN, E.M.: Term position ranking: some new test results; CROUCH, C.J. u. B. YANG: Experiments in automatic statistical thesaurus construction; GREFENSTETTE, G.: Use of syntactic context to produce term association lists for text retrieval; ANICK, P.G. u. R.A. FLYNN: Versioning of full-text information retrieval system; BURKOWSKI, F.J.: Retrieval activities in a database consisting of heterogeneous collections; DEERWESTER, S.C., K. WACLENA u. M. LaMAR: A textual object management system; NIE, J.-Y.:Towards a probabilistic modal logic for semantic-based information retrieval; WANG, A.W., S.K.M. WONG u. Y.Y. YAO: An analysis of vector space models based on computational geometry; BARTELL, B.T., G.W. COTTRELL u. R.K. BELEW: Latent semantic indexing is an optimal special case of multidimensional scaling; GLAVITSCH, U. u. P. SCHÄUBLE: A system for retrieving speech documents; MARGULIS, E.L.: N-Poisson document modelling; HESS, M.: An incrementally extensible document retrieval system based on linguistics and logical principles; COOPER, W.S., F.C. GEY u. D.P. DABNEY: Probabilistic retrieval based on staged logistic regression; FUHR, N.: Integration of probabilistic fact and text retrieval; CROFT, B., L.A. SMITH u. H. TURTLE: A loosely-coupled integration of a text retrieval system and an object-oriented database system; DUMAIS, S.T. u. J. NIELSEN: Automating the assignement of submitted manuscripts to reviewers; GOST, M.A. u. M. MASOTTI: Design of an OPAC database to permit different subject searching accesses; ROBERTSON, A.M. u. P. WILLETT: Searching for historical word forms in a database of 17th century English text using spelling correction methods; FAX, E.A., Q.F. CHEN u. L.S. HEATH: A faster algorithm for constructing minimal perfect hash functions; MOFFAT, A. u. J. ZOBEL: Parameterised compression for sparse bitmaps; GRANDI, F., P. TIBERIO u. P. Zezula: Frame-sliced patitioned parallel signature files; ALLEN, B.: Cognitive differences in end user searching of a CD-ROM index; SONNENWALD, D.H.: Developing a theory to guide the process of designing information retrieval systems; CUTTING, D.R., J.O. PEDERSEN, D. KARGER, u. J.W. TUKEY: Scatter/ Gather: a cluster-based approach to browsing large document collections; CHALMERS, M. u. P. CHITSON: Bead: Explorations in information visualization; WILLIAMSON, C. u. B. SHNEIDERMAN: The dynamic HomeFinder: evaluating dynamic queries in a real-estate information exploring system

0.010745874 = product of:
  0.021491747 = sum of:
    0.021491747 = product of:
      0.03223762 = sum of:
        0.010793767 = weight(_text_:h in 5759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010793767 = score(doc=5759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.096073404 = fieldWeight in 5759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5759)
        0.021443853 = weight(_text_:22 in 5759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021443853 = score(doc=5759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 5759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5759)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Handelsblatt. Nr.79 vom 24.4.2001, S.22

0.01061148 = product of:
  0.02122296 = sum of:
    0.02122296 = product of:
      0.06366888 = sum of:
        0.06366888 = weight(_text_:k in 1304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06366888 = score(doc=1304,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 1304, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1304)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.01061148 = product of:
  0.02122296 = sum of:
    0.02122296 = product of:
      0.06366888 = sum of:
        0.06366888 = weight(_text_:k in 2777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06366888 = score(doc=2777,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 2777, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2777)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.446-456.

0.01061148 = product of:
  0.02122296 = sum of:
    0.02122296 = product of:
      0.06366888 = sum of:
        0.06366888 = weight(_text_:k in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06366888 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.503-512

0.01061148 = product of:
  0.02122296 = sum of:
    0.02122296 = product of:
      0.06366888 = sum of:
        0.06366888 = weight(_text_:k in 1750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06366888 = score(doc=1750,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 1750, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1750)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.01061148 = product of:
  0.02122296 = sum of:
    0.02122296 = product of:
      0.06366888 = sum of:
        0.06366888 = weight(_text_:k in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06366888 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.317-322.

0.01061148 = product of:
  0.02122296 = sum of:
    0.02122296 = product of:
      0.06366888 = sum of:
        0.06366888 = weight(_text_:k in 1954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06366888 = score(doc=1954,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 1954, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1954)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.518-526