Search (73 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  1. Paolillo, J.C.: Linguistics and the information sciences (2009) 0.11
    0.10892244 = product of:
      0.21784487 = sum of:
        0.21784487 = sum of:
          0.1703053 = weight(_text_:j.c in 3840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1703053 = score(doc=3840,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3322337 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05012591 = queryNorm
              0.5126069 = fieldWeight in 3840, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3840)
          0.04753958 = weight(_text_:22 in 3840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04753958 = score(doc=3840,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05012591 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3840, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:33
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.08
    0.08008403 = sum of:
      0.059709925 = product of:
        0.2388397 = sum of:
          0.2388397 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2388397 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.42496803 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05012591 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.020374106 = product of:
        0.040748212 = sum of:
          0.040748212 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040748212 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05012591 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Park, J.S.; O'Brien, J.C.; Cai, C.J.; Ringel Morris, M.; Liang, P.; Bernstein, M.S.: Generative agents : interactive simulacra of human behavior (2023) 0.08
    0.075210676 = sum of:
      0.01438736 = product of:
        0.05754944 = sum of:
          0.05754944 = weight(_text_:authors in 972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05754944 = score(doc=972,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22851472 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05012591 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 972, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=972)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.060823318 = product of:
        0.121646635 = sum of:
          0.121646635 = weight(_text_:j.c in 972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.121646635 = score(doc=972,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3322337 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05012591 = queryNorm
              0.3661478 = fieldWeight in 972, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=972)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Believable proxies of human behavior can empower interactive applications ranging from immersive environments to rehearsal spaces for interpersonal communication to prototyping tools. In this paper, we introduce generative agents--computational software agents that simulate believable human behavior. Generative agents wake up, cook breakfast, and head to work; artists paint, while authors write; they form opinions, notice each other, and initiate conversations; they remember and reflect on days past as they plan the next day. To enable generative agents, we describe an architecture that extends a large language model to store a complete record of the agent's experiences using natural language, synthesize those memories over time into higher-level reflections, and retrieve them dynamically to plan behavior. We instantiate generative agents to populate an interactive sandbox environment inspired by The Sims, where end users can interact with a small town of twenty five agents using natural language. In an evaluation, these generative agents produce believable individual and emergent social behaviors: for example, starting with only a single user-specified notion that one agent wants to throw a Valentine's Day party, the agents autonomously spread invitations to the party over the next two days, make new acquaintances, ask each other out on dates to the party, and coordinate to show up for the party together at the right time. We demonstrate through ablation that the components of our agent architecture--observation, planning, and reflection--each contribute critically to the believability of agent behavior. By fusing large language models with computational, interactive agents, this work introduces architectural and interaction patterns for enabling believable simulations of human behavior.
  4. Deventer, J.P. van; Kruger, C.J.; Johnson, R.D.: Delineating knowledge management through lexical analysis : a retrospective (2015) 0.04
    0.03853066 = sum of:
      0.026645763 = product of:
        0.10658305 = sum of:
          0.10658305 = weight(_text_:authors in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10658305 = score(doc=3807,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.22851472 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05012591 = queryNorm
              0.46641657 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.011884895 = product of:
        0.02376979 = sum of:
          0.02376979 = weight(_text_:22 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02376979 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05012591 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Academic authors tend to define terms that meet their own needs. Knowledge Management (KM) is a term that comes to mind and is examined in this study. Lexicographical research identified KM terms used by authors from 1996 to 2006 in academic outlets to define KM. Data were collected based on strict criteria which included that definitions should be unique instances. From 2006 onwards, these authors could not identify new unique instances of definitions with repetitive usage of such definition instances. Analysis revealed that KM is directly defined by People (Person and Organisation), Processes (Codify, Share, Leverage, and Process) and Contextualised Content (Information). The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach The aim of this paper is to add to the body of knowledge in the KM discipline and supply KM practitioners and scholars with insight into what is commonly regarded to be KM so as to reignite the debate on what one could consider as KM. The lexicon used by KM scholars was evaluated though the application of lexicographical research methods as extended though Knowledge Discovery and Text Analysis methods. Findings By simplifying term relationships through the application of lexicographical research methods, as extended though Knowledge Discovery and Text Analysis methods, it was found that KM is directly defined by People (Person and Organisation), Processes (Codify, Share, Leverage, Process) and Contextualised Content (Information). One would therefore be able to indicate that KM, from an academic point of view, refers to people processing contextualised content.
    Research limitations/implications In total, 42 definitions were identified spanning a period of 11 years. This represented the first use of KM through the estimated apex of terms used. From 2006 onwards definitions were used in repetition, and all definitions that were considered to repeat were therefore subsequently excluded as not being unique instances. All definitions listed are by no means complete and exhaustive. The definitions are viewed outside the scope and context in which they were originally formulated and then used to review the key concepts in the definitions themselves. Social implications When the authors refer to the aforementioned discussion of KM content as well as the presentation of the method followed in this paper, the authors may have a few implications for future research in KM. First the research validates ideas presented by the OECD in 2005 pertaining to KM. It also validates that through the evolution of KM, the authors ended with a description of KM that may be seen as a standardised description. If the authors as academics and practitioners, for example, refer to KM as the same construct and/or idea, it has the potential to speculatively, distinguish between what KM may or may not be. Originality/value By simplifying the term used to define KM, by focusing on the most common definitions, the paper assist in refocusing KM by reconsidering the dimensions that is the most common in how it has been defined over time. This would hopefully assist in reigniting discussions about KM and how it may be used to the benefit of an organisation.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  5. French, J.C.; Powell, A.L.; Schulman, E.: Using clustering strategies for creating authority files (2000) 0.04
    0.03649399 = product of:
      0.07298798 = sum of:
        0.07298798 = product of:
          0.14597596 = sum of:
            0.14597596 = weight(_text_:j.c in 4811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14597596 = score(doc=4811,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3322337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.43937737 = fieldWeight in 4811, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4811)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Herrera-Viedma, E.; Cordón, O.; Herrera, J.C.; Luqe, M.: ¬An IRS based on multi-granular lnguistic information (2003) 0.04
    0.03649399 = product of:
      0.07298798 = sum of:
        0.07298798 = product of:
          0.14597596 = sum of:
            0.14597596 = weight(_text_:j.c in 2740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14597596 = score(doc=2740,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3322337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.43937737 = fieldWeight in 2740, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2740)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Peis, E.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, J.C.: On the evaluation of XML documents using Fuzzy linguistic techniques (2003) 0.04
    0.03649399 = product of:
      0.07298798 = sum of:
        0.07298798 = product of:
          0.14597596 = sum of:
            0.14597596 = weight(_text_:j.c in 2778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14597596 = score(doc=2778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3322337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.43937737 = fieldWeight in 2778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2778)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.03
    0.029854963 = product of:
      0.059709925 = sum of:
        0.059709925 = product of:
          0.2388397 = sum of:
            0.2388397 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2388397 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42496803 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  9. Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987) 0.03
    0.027165476 = product of:
      0.054330952 = sum of:
        0.054330952 = product of:
          0.108661905 = sum of:
            0.108661905 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108661905 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
  10. McMahon, J.G.; Smith, F.J.: Improved statistical language model performance with automatic generated word hierarchies (1996) 0.02
    0.02376979 = product of:
      0.04753958 = sum of:
        0.04753958 = product of:
          0.09507916 = sum of:
            0.09507916 = weight(_text_:22 in 3164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09507916 = score(doc=3164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Computational linguistics. 22(1996) no.2, S.217-248
  11. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.02
    0.02376979 = product of:
      0.04753958 = sum of:
        0.04753958 = product of:
          0.09507916 = sum of:
            0.09507916 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09507916 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  12. Somers, H.: Example-based machine translation : Review article (1999) 0.02
    0.02376979 = product of:
      0.04753958 = sum of:
        0.04753958 = product of:
          0.09507916 = sum of:
            0.09507916 = weight(_text_:22 in 6672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09507916 = score(doc=6672,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6672, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6672)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  13. New tools for human translators (1997) 0.02
    0.02376979 = product of:
      0.04753958 = sum of:
        0.04753958 = product of:
          0.09507916 = sum of:
            0.09507916 = weight(_text_:22 in 1179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09507916 = score(doc=1179,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1179, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1179)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  14. Baayen, R.H.; Lieber, H.: Word frequency distributions and lexical semantics (1997) 0.02
    0.02376979 = product of:
      0.04753958 = sum of:
        0.04753958 = product of:
          0.09507916 = sum of:
            0.09507916 = weight(_text_:22 in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09507916 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 2.1999 10:48:22
  15. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.02
    0.02376979 = product of:
      0.04753958 = sum of:
        0.04753958 = product of:
          0.09507916 = sum of:
            0.09507916 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09507916 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
  16. Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999) 0.02
    0.020374106 = product of:
      0.040748212 = sum of:
        0.040748212 = product of:
          0.081496425 = sum of:
            0.081496425 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081496425 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    15. 3.2000 10:22:37
  17. Boleda, G.; Evert, S.: Multiword expressions : a pain in the neck of lexical semantics (2009) 0.02
    0.020374106 = product of:
      0.040748212 = sum of:
        0.040748212 = product of:
          0.081496425 = sum of:
            0.081496425 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081496425 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 3.2013 14:56:22
  18. Monnerjahn, P.: Vorsprung ohne Technik : Übersetzen: Computer und Qualität (2000) 0.02
    0.020374106 = product of:
      0.040748212 = sum of:
        0.040748212 = product of:
          0.081496425 = sum of:
            0.081496425 = weight(_text_:22 in 5429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081496425 = score(doc=5429,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5429, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5429)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    c't. 2000, H.22, S.230-231
  19. Hutchins, J.: From first conception to first demonstration : the nascent years of machine translation, 1947-1954. A chronology (1997) 0.02
    0.016978422 = product of:
      0.033956844 = sum of:
        0.033956844 = product of:
          0.06791369 = sum of:
            0.06791369 = weight(_text_:22 in 1463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06791369 = score(doc=1463,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1463, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1463)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  20. Kuhlmann, U.; Monnerjahn, P.: Sprache auf Knopfdruck : Sieben automatische Übersetzungsprogramme im Test (2000) 0.02
    0.016978422 = product of:
      0.033956844 = sum of:
        0.033956844 = product of:
          0.06791369 = sum of:
            0.06791369 = weight(_text_:22 in 5428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06791369 = score(doc=5428,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5428, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5428)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    c't. 2000, H.22, S.220-229

Years

Languages

  • e 57
  • d 16

Types

  • a 57
  • m 9
  • el 6
  • s 4
  • p 2
  • x 2
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications