-
Holley, R.P.: IFLA and international standards in the area of bibliographic control (1996)
0.05
0.051011465 = product of:
0.17854013 = sum of:
0.07034942 = weight(_text_:networks in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07034942 = score(doc=5572,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19231078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.36581108 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
0.10819071 = weight(_text_:standards in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10819071 = score(doc=5572,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.5970379 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The Division of Bibliographic Control of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) has taken an active role in standard setting to foster universal bibliographic control (UBC). UBC is built upon the assumption that a national cataloging agency will catalog national imprints and then share the records nationally and internationally. Standards in support of UBC include the International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions, UNIMARC, authority lists, and miscellaneous guidelines. The IFLA standard setting process requires consensus building and compromise among the various traditions of bibliographic control. The increasing importance of library networks and the internationalization of bibliographic control may reduce the importance of IFLA as a standard setting body.
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
-
Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information : papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College London, 3-18 August 1990 (1991)
0.04
0.04270736 = product of:
0.14947575 = sum of:
0.12364653 = weight(_text_:standards in 7884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12364653 = score(doc=7884,freq=24.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.68232906 = fieldWeight in 7884, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7884)
0.02582923 = product of:
0.05165846 = sum of:
0.05165846 = weight(_text_:policy in 7884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05165846 = score(doc=7884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21800333 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.23696178 = fieldWeight in 7884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7884)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- 31 papers consider the major international bodies concerned with standards and the problems associated with special forms and different scripts. The creation of bibliographic records including the role of national bibliographic agencies is considered. Standards for subject access and the impact of automation are also covered
- Content
- Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: TEMPLETON, R.: The Library Association's role in developing standards; HARRISON, H.P.: Special materials and problems: standards for audiovisual materials; ANDERSON, D.: Selections of bibliographic standards and the processes of standardization; GILCHRIST, A.: The standards jungle; BOURNE, R.: The IFLA UBCIM programme: standards in the changing world; ROBERTS, W.: The role of IFLA in framing and promoting bibliographic standards; HILL, M.W.: Standards for information handling: needs and dilemmas; JUSU-SHERIFF, G.: Standardization: an African viewpoint; BISWAS, S.C.: Standardization of bibliographic control in South Asia; CROUCHER, M.: The British National Bibliography: an historical perspective; BUCKLEY, B.J.: CD-ROM at the British Library; HOPKINSON, A.: Information transfer and exchange formats; HESELTINE, R.G.: Library automation in the 1990s: the open systems future; GRAVES, S.E.: Problems of serials control; ODDY, P.: Authority control in the local, national and international environment; MITCHELL, J.: Library co-operatives: bibliographic databases; BROWN, S.: Angl-American cataloguing rules; MORELELI-CACOURIS, M. u. M. SKEPASTIANU: Cataloguing practices in Greece; MUN, K.S.: Bibliographic description and information exchange in Southeast Asia: a survey; CURWEN, A.G.: International standard bibliographic description; HANCOCK-BEAULIEU, M.: Bibliographic standards and the online catalogue user; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Subject cataloguing and LCSH; AITCHISON, J.: Subject control: thesaurus construction standards; SWEENEY, R.: Dewey Decimal Classification: an international standard; McILWAINE, I.C.: Present role and future policy for UDC as a standard for subject control; BUXTON, A.B.: UDC in online systems; BUXTON, A.B.: International gateways; BUXTON, A.B.: Common command languages
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995)
0.04
0.041623175 = product of:
0.14568111 = sum of:
0.12364653 = weight(_text_:standards in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12364653 = score(doc=4414,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.68232906 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.022034585 = product of:
0.04406917 = sum of:
0.04406917 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04406917 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
-
Eden, B.L.: Metadata and librarianship : will MARC survive? (2004)
0.04
0.04120232 = product of:
0.14420812 = sum of:
0.124927856 = weight(_text_:standards in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.124927856 = score(doc=4750,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.68939996 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
0.019280262 = product of:
0.038560525 = sum of:
0.038560525 = weight(_text_:22 in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038560525 = score(doc=4750,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Metadata schema and standards are now a part of the information landscape. Librarianship has slowly realized that MARC is only one of a proliferation of metadata standards, and that MARC has many pros and cons related to its age, original conception, and biases. Should librarianship continue to promote the MARC standard? Are there better metadata standards out there that are more robust, user-friendly, and dynamic in the organization and presentation of information? This special issue examines current initiatives that are actively incorporating MARC standards and concepts into new metadata schemata, while also predicting a future where MARC may not be the metadata schema of choice for the organization and description of information.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.6-7
-
Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997)
0.04
0.035140444 = product of:
0.12299155 = sum of:
0.10095696 = weight(_text_:standards in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10095696 = score(doc=1757,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.5571193 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.022034585 = product of:
0.04406917 = sum of:
0.04406917 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04406917 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Computers play an important role in the development of bibliographic databases. Exchange formats are needed for the generation and exchange of bibliographic data at different levels: international, national, regional and local. Discusses the formats available at national and international level such as the International Standard Exchange Format (ISO 2709); the various MARC formats and the Common Communication Format (CCF). Work on Indian standards involving the Bureau of Indian Standards, the National Information System for Science and Technology (NISSAT) and other institutions proceeds only slowly
- Source
- DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
-
Jacobs, J.W.; Summers, E.; Ankersen, E.: Cyril: expanding the horizons of MARC21 (2004)
0.04
0.035140444 = product of:
0.12299155 = sum of:
0.10095696 = weight(_text_:standards in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10095696 = score(doc=4749,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.5571193 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
0.022034585 = product of:
0.04406917 = sum of:
0.04406917 = weight(_text_:22 in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04406917 = score(doc=4749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Describes the construction of the author's Perl program, Cyril, to add vernacular Russian (Cyrillic) characters to existing MARC records. The program takes advantage of the ALA-LC standards for Romanization to create character mappings that "de-transliterate" specified MARC fields. The creation of Cyril raises both linguistic and technical issues, which are thoroughly examined. Concludes by considering the implications for cataloging and authority control standards, as we move to a multilingual, multi-script bibliographic environment.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.8-17
-
McCallum, S.: What makes a standard? (1996)
0.03
0.030594578 = product of:
0.21416204 = sum of:
0.21416204 = weight(_text_:standards in 5104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21416204 = score(doc=5104,freq=18.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
1.1818285 = fieldWeight in 5104, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5104)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Describes the characteristics of de jure standards developed by the formal standards organizations (ISO, ANSI, and NISO) and formal industry groups, and de facto standards developed by informal, self selected groups and companies. Compares this process with that used to develop Internet standards. Examines 3 key standards for the library community on this basis: standards that form the basis for encoding bibliographic data (MARC); standards for electronic documents (SGML-based), and standards for ordering and purchasing bibliographic items (EDIFACT-based)
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
-
Xu, A.; Hess, K.; Akerman, L.: From MARC to BIBFRAME 2.0 : Crosswalks (2018)
0.03
0.027104767 = product of:
0.09486668 = sum of:
0.05024958 = weight(_text_:networks in 5172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05024958 = score(doc=5172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19231078 = queryWeight, product of:
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.26129362 = fieldWeight in 5172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5172)
0.044617094 = weight(_text_:standards in 5172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044617094 = score(doc=5172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.24621427 = fieldWeight in 5172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5172)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- One of the big challenges facing academic libraries today is to increase the relevance of the libraries to their user communities. If the libraries can increase the visibility of their resources on the open web, it will increase the chances of the libraries to reach to their user communities via the user's first search experience. BIBFRAME and library Linked Data will enable libraries to publish their resources in a way that the Web understands, consume Linked Data to enrich their resources relevant to the libraries' user communities, and visualize networks across collections. However, one of the important steps for transitioning to BIBFRAME and library Linked Data involves crosswalks, mapping MARC fields and subfields across data models and performing necessary data reformatting to be in compliance with the specifications of the new model, which is currently BIBFRAME 2.0. This article looks into how the Library of Congress has mapped library bibliographic data from the MARC format to the BIBFRAME 2.0 model and vocabulary published and updated since April 2016, available from http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/index.html based on the recently released conversion specifications and converter, developed by the Library of Congress with input from many community members. The BIBFRAME 2.0 standard and conversion tools will enable libraries to transform bibliographic data from MARC into BIBFRAME 2.0, which introduces a Linked Data model as the improved method of bibliographic control for the future, and make bibliographic information more useful within and beyond library communities.
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Heft: 'Setting standards to work and live by: A memorial Festschrift for Valerie Bross'.
-
Radwanski, A.: Rozwoj formatu MARC (1996)
0.03
0.026691983 = product of:
0.093421936 = sum of:
0.07138735 = weight(_text_:standards in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07138735 = score(doc=3052,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
0.022034585 = product of:
0.04406917 = sum of:
0.04406917 = weight(_text_:22 in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04406917 = score(doc=3052,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Discusses the origins of the MARC format and its development connected with the proceedings of the Library of Congress and the British Library. Presents 2 standards: ISO 2709 and ISBD. Focuses on national and international formats elaborated in the 1970s and 1980s, including UNIMARC (1975) and CCF (1984). Outlines the prospects and directions of MARC format development, that is, integration of the format and implementing MARC in the network environment
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 20:34:37
-
Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004)
0.03
0.026691983 = product of:
0.093421936 = sum of:
0.07138735 = weight(_text_:standards in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07138735 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
0.022034585 = product of:
0.04406917 = sum of:
0.04406917 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04406917 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This case study details the evolution of descriptive practices and standards used in the Mount Holyoke College Archives and the Five College Finding Aids Access Project, discusses the relationship of Encoded Archival Description (EAD) and the MARC standard in reference to archival description, and addresses the challenges and opportunities of transferring data from one metadata standard to another. The study demonstrates that greater standardization in archival description allows archivists to respond more effectively to technological change.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
-
El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001)
0.03
0.026691983 = product of:
0.093421936 = sum of:
0.07138735 = weight(_text_:standards in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07138735 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.022034585 = product of:
0.04406917 = sum of:
0.04406917 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04406917 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This article is a survey of representative metadata efforts comparing them to MARC 21 metadata in order to determine if new electronic formats require the development of a new set of standards. This study surveys the ongoing metadata projects in order to identify what types of metadata exist and how they are used and also compares and analyzes selected metadata elements in an attempt to illustrate how they are related to MARC 21 metadata format elements.
- Date
- 23. 1.2007 11:22:30
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.03
0.026691983 = product of:
0.093421936 = sum of:
0.07138735 = weight(_text_:standards in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07138735 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.022034585 = product of:
0.04406917 = sum of:
0.04406917 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04406917 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Avram, H.D.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1961-1974 (2009)
0.02
0.023355486 = product of:
0.081744194 = sum of:
0.062463928 = weight(_text_:standards in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062463928 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.34469998 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
0.019280262 = product of:
0.038560525 = sum of:
0.038560525 = weight(_text_:22 in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038560525 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The MARC Program of the Library of Congress, led during its formative years by the author of this entry, was a landmark in the history of automation. Technical procedures, standards, and formatting for the catalog record were experimented with and developed in modern form in this project. The project began when computers were mainframe, slow, and limited in storage. So little was known then about many aspects of automation of library information resources that the MARC project can be seen as a pioneering effort with immeasurable impact.
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:22:53
-
Aslanidi, M.; Papadakis, I.; Stefanidakis, M.: Name and title authorities in the music domain : alignment of UNIMARC authorities format with RDA (2018)
0.02
0.023355486 = product of:
0.081744194 = sum of:
0.062463928 = weight(_text_:standards in 5178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062463928 = score(doc=5178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.34469998 = fieldWeight in 5178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5178)
0.019280262 = product of:
0.038560525 = sum of:
0.038560525 = weight(_text_:22 in 5178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038560525 = score(doc=5178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5178)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This article discusses and highlights alignment issues that arise between UNIMARC Authorities Format and Resource Description and Access (RDA) regarding the creation of name and title authorities for musical works and creators. More specifically, RDA, as an implementation of the FRAD model, is compared with the UNIMARC Authorities Format (Updates 2012 and 2016) in an effort to highlight various cases where the discovery of equivalent fields between the two standards is not obvious. The study is envisioned as a first step in an ongoing process of working with the UNIMARC community throughout RDA's advancement and progression regarding the entities [musical] Work and Names.
- Date
- 19. 3.2019 12:17:22
-
Leeves, J.: Harmonising standards for bibliographic data interchange (1993)
0.02
0.02207974 = product of:
0.15455817 = sum of:
0.15455817 = weight(_text_:standards in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15455817 = score(doc=6031,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.85291135 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Reviews the provision for bibliographic data within EDIFACT, compares those provisions with the BIC draft standards for bibliographic databases and examines the implications for MARC based standards. Outlines the role of the major players involved. Describes stanbdards dealing with EDIFACT in greatest detail. Describes the library systems using the records
-
Standards: back to the future? : Proceedings of a workshop on the future of bibliographic standards (1993)
0.02
0.021633634 = product of:
0.15143543 = sum of:
0.15143543 = weight(_text_:standards in 7527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15143543 = score(doc=7527,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.83567894 = fieldWeight in 7527, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7527)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Cataloging and classification standards and rules (1996)
0.02
0.020236412 = product of:
0.14165488 = sum of:
0.14165488 = weight(_text_:standards in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14165488 = score(doc=57,freq=14.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.7817061 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Issue devoted to the theme: cataloguing and classification standards and rules
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: McCALLUM, S.: What makes a standard?; HOLLEY, R.P.: IFLA and international standards in the area of bibliographical control; STERN, B.: Internationalizing the rules in AACR2: adopting and translating AACR2 for use in non-Anglo-American and non-English-speaking cataloging environments; GUILES, K., R. EWALD u. B. TILLETT: The evolution of LCRIs: from de facto standards to ?; SPICHER, K.M.: The development of the MARC format; THOMAS, S.E.: The core bibliographic record and the program for cooperative cataloging; PALOWITCH, C. u. L. HOROWITZ: Meta-information structures for networked information resources; KUHAGEN, J.A.: Standards for name and series authority records; WILLIAMSON, N.: Standards and rules for subject access; GUENTHER, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme: implementation of the USMARC Format for Classification Data; LEAZER, G.H.: Recent research on the sequential bibliographical relationship and its implications for standards and the library catalog: an examination of serials
-
Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996)
0.02
0.01842326 = product of:
0.12896281 = sum of:
0.12896281 = sum of:
0.0904023 = weight(_text_:policy in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0904023 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21800333 = queryWeight, product of:
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
0.038560525 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038560525 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- The chief of cataloguing policy and support office at the LoC presents her views on the usefulness of conceptual modelling in determining future directions for cataloguing and the MARC format. After describing the evolution of bibliographic processes, suggests usign the entity-relationship conceptual model to step back from how we record information today and start thinking about what information really means and why we provide it. Argues that now is the time to reexamine the basic principles which underpin Anglo-American cataloguing codes and that MARC formats should be looked at to see how they can evolve towards a future, improved structure for communicating bibliographic and authority information
- Source
- OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
-
Madison, O.M.A.: Standards in light of new technologies : functional requirements for bibliographic records (1999)
0.02
0.017846838 = product of:
0.124927856 = sum of:
0.124927856 = weight(_text_:standards in 4182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.124927856 = score(doc=4182,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.68939996 = fieldWeight in 4182, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4182)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Zwink, E.: Eindrücke von der Veranstaltung (2002)
0.02
0.017846838 = product of:
0.124927856 = sum of:
0.124927856 = weight(_text_:standards in 1062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.124927856 = score(doc=1062,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.04065836 = queryNorm
0.68939996 = fieldWeight in 1062, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1062)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Footnote
- Teil eines Heftschwerpunktes: 'Amerikanische Standards für das deutsche Bibliothekswesen?: RAK - AACR2'
