Search (87 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Lahary, D.: Recommandations pour l'exchange de donnees d'exemplaires en format UNIMARC : un document de reference (1998) 0.03 
    0.034319576 = product of:
  0.102958724 = sum of:
    0.089029126 = weight(_text_:propose in 4620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.089029126 = score(doc=4620,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.45382494 = fieldWeight in 4620, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4620)
    0.013929598 = product of:
      0.041788794 = sum of:
        0.041788794 = weight(_text_:29 in 4620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041788794 = score(doc=4620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4620)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    To facilitate exchange, holdings data needs to be integrated into the main bibliographic record sequence in local collections. Recent recommendations for French libraries propose using designated fields within UNIMARC, to meet the needs respectively of departmental lending libraries and joint catalogues. Further provisions for holdings data is being considered at international level
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  2. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.03 
    0.025708353 = product of:
  0.07712506 = sum of:
    0.06677184 = weight(_text_:propose in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06677184 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.3403687 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
    0.010353219 = product of:
      0.031059656 = sum of:
        0.031059656 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031059656 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
  3. Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011) 0.03 
    0.025708353 = product of:
  0.07712506 = sum of:
    0.06677184 = weight(_text_:propose in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06677184 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.3403687 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
    0.010353219 = product of:
      0.031059656 = sum of:
        0.031059656 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031059656 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) is currently the most broadly used bibliographic standard for encoding and exchanging bibliographic data. However, MARC may not fully support representation of the dynamic nature and semantics of digital resources because of its rigid and single-layered linear structure. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model, which is designed to overcome the problems of MARC, does not provide sufficient data elements and adopts a predetermined hierarchy. A flexible structure for bibliographic data with detailed data elements is needed. Integrating MARC format with the hierarchical structure of FRBR is one approach to meet this need. The purpose of this research is to propose an approach that can facilitate interoperability between MARC and FRBR by providing a conceptual structure that can function as a mediator between MARC data elements and FRBR attributes.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Croissant, C.R.: MARC21 und die anglo-amerikanische Katalogisierungspraxis (2004) 0.02 
    0.023433086 = product of:
  0.07029925 = sum of:
    0.059946038 = weight(_text_:forschung in 1764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059946038 = score(doc=1764,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1858777 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.32250258 = fieldWeight in 1764, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1764)
    0.010353219 = product of:
      0.031059656 = sum of:
        0.031059656 = weight(_text_:22 in 1764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031059656 = score(doc=1764,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1764, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1764)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    13. 8.2004 21:22:06
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 28(2004) H.1, S.11-35
  5. Koch, W.; Stock, K.F.: Analyse bestehender Datenformate im Bibliothekswesen (1971) 0.01 
    0.013321342 = product of:
  0.07992805 = sum of:
    0.07992805 = weight(_text_:forschung in 4280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07992805 = score(doc=4280,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1858777 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.43000343 = fieldWeight in 4280, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4280)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Diese Arbeit stellt das Ergebnis eines Forschungsauftrages dar, den das Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Forschung dem Rechenzentrum Graz erteilt hat. Ausgewertet und verglichen wurden: MARCII, BNB-MARC, MONOCLE (franz. MARC), DB-Schema, DFG-Schema, Bielefelder Kategorienschema, Regensburger Kategorienschema, BRD-DMI (Datenerhebungskatalog BMI). In Kurzform werden auch etliche andere Schemata aufgelistet, die heute nicht mehr akzuell sind - bis auf das ZDB-Schema
  6. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.01 
    0.011555789 = product of:
  0.06933473 = sum of:
    0.06933473 = product of:
      0.10400209 = sum of:
        0.052235994 = weight(_text_:29 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052235994 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
        0.051766098 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051766098 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  7. Martin, P.: Conventions and notations for knowledge representation and retrieval (2000) 0.01 
    0.011128641 = product of:
  0.06677184 = sum of:
    0.06677184 = weight(_text_:propose in 5070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06677184 = score(doc=5070,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.3403687 = fieldWeight in 5070, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5070)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Much research has focused on the problem of knowledge accessibility, sharing and reuse. Specific languages (e.g. KIF, CG, RDF) and ontologies have been proposed. Common characteristics, conventions or ontological distinctions are beginning to emerge. Since knowledge providers (humans and software agents) must follow common conventions for the knowledge to be widely accessed and re-used, we propose lexical, structural, semantic and ontological conventions based on various knowledge representation projects and our own research. These are minimal conventions that can be followed by most and cover the most common knowledge representation cases. However, agreement and refinements are still required. We also show that a notation can be both readable and expressive by quickly presenting two new notations -- Formalized English (FE) and Frame-CG (FCG) - derived from the CG linear form [9] and Frame-Logics [4]. These notations support the above conventions, and are implemented in our Web-based knowledge representation and document indexation tool, WebKB¹ [7]
  8. Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004) 0.01 
    0.00924463 = product of:
  0.05546778 = sum of:
    0.05546778 = product of:
      0.08320167 = sum of:
        0.041788794 = weight(_text_:29 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041788794 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
        0.041412875 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041412875 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:29:32
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
  9. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.01 
    0.00924463 = product of:
  0.05546778 = sum of:
    0.05546778 = product of:
      0.08320167 = sum of:
        0.041788794 = weight(_text_:29 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041788794 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.041412875 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041412875 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:21:29
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
  10. DFG und Mellon-Foundation fördern internationalen Datenaustausch (2006) 0.01 
    0.008325839 = product of:
  0.049955033 = sum of:
    0.049955033 = weight(_text_:forschung in 5070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049955033 = score(doc=5070,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1858777 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.26875216 = fieldWeight in 5070, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5070)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    "Der aktuelle Speicherort einer Publikation verliert angesichts der steigenden Zahl an digital vorliegenden und über das World Wide Weh verfügbaren Publikationen seine Bedeutung. Entscheidend für die Forschung sind Aufindbarkeit und schnelle Nutzungsmöglichkeit der Informationen. Global zu arbeiten, Daten, Informationen und Texte zu tauschen ist zur täglichen Routine für Wissenschaftler und Bibliothekare geworden. Deutschsprachige und ausländische Bibliotheken verwenden derzeit noch unterschiedliche Standards bei der Speicherung und dem Austausch von Katalogdaten. Die von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft und der Andrew W. Mellon Foundation geförderten Projekte verfolgen das Ziel, die Daten deutschsprachiger Bibliotheken weltweit sichtbar zu machen. Das Interesse von Wissenschaftlern ist nicht auf ihre jeweilige eigene nationale und kulturelle Umgebung beschränkt. Sie benötigen Informationen über Dokumente und Daten aus der ganzen Welt. Gleichzeitig wollen sie die eigenen Forschungsergebnisse in der internationalen Forschungsgemeinschaft zur Diskussion stellen. Sprachraumübergreifende Standards für Metadaten und deren reibungsloser gegenseitiger Austausch sind Voraussetzung für die wissenschaftliche Kommunikation und für den individuellen Erfolg des einzelnen Forschers. Die Deutsche Bibliothek pflegt seit vielen Jahren Kooperationsbeziehungen auf nationaler und internationaler Ebene. Dazu gehören die Entwicklung und Anwendung von gemeinsamen Regeln und Standards sowie Produktion und Vertrieb von bibliografischen Dienstleistungen und die Pflege kooperativ geführter Datenbanken, insbesondere für Normdaten. Einen weiteren Schwerpunkt bilden Entwicklung und Anwendung moderner Technologien für die Langzeitarchivierung der Bestände im Rahmen internationaler Kooperationen, unabhängig davon, ob die Publikationen auf Papier, Mikrofilm oder digital vorliegen."
  11. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.00 
    0.004880555 = product of:
  0.029283328 = sum of:
    0.029283328 = product of:
      0.08784998 = sum of:
        0.08784998 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08784998 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  12. Boßmeyer, C.; Henze, V.: ¬2. MAB-Expertengespräch (1995) 0.00 
    0.0046431995 = product of:
  0.027859196 = sum of:
    0.027859196 = product of:
      0.08357759 = sum of:
        0.08357759 = weight(_text_:29 in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08357759 = score(doc=2914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.2, S. 322-327
  13. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.00 
    0.004601431 = product of:
  0.027608585 = sum of:
    0.027608585 = product of:
      0.08282575 = sum of:
        0.08282575 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08282575 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  14. Helmkamp, K.; Oehlschläger, S.: Standardisierung : Ein Meilenstein auf dem Weg zur Internationalisierung; Im Jahr 2007 erfolgt der Umstieg auf MARC 21 (2006) 0.00 
    0.0041629197 = product of:
  0.024977516 = sum of:
    0.024977516 = weight(_text_:forschung in 65) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024977516 = score(doc=65,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1858777 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.13437608 = fieldWeight in 65, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=65)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    "Mit der steigenden Zahl von digitalen und digitalisierten Dokumenten, die im World Wide Web zur Verfügung stehen, verliert der aktuelle Speicherort einer Publikation seine Bedeutung. Entscheidend für die Forschung sind vielmehr Auffindbarkeit und schnelle Nutzungsmöglichkeit von Informationen. Global in elektronischen Umgebungen zu arbeiten, Daten, Informationen, Texte zu tauschen und zu mischen, ist zur täglichen Routine für Wissenschaftler und Bibliothekare geworden. Das Interesse von Wissenschaftlern ist nicht auf ihre jeweilige eigene nationale und kulturelle Umgebung beschränkt. Sie benötigen Informationen über Dokumente und Daten aus der ganzen Welt. Gleichzeitig wollen sie die eigenen Forschungsergebnisse in der internationalen Forschungsgemeinschaft zur Diskussion stellen. Sprachraumübergreifende Standards für Metadaten und ein reibungsloser Metadatenaustausch sind Voraussetzung für die wissenschaftliche Kommunikation und für den individuellen Erfolg des einzelnen Forschers. Deutschsprachige und ausländische Bibliotheken verwenden derzeit noch unterschiedliche Standards bei der Speicherung und dem Austausch von Katalogdaten. Während in Deutschland und Österreich das Maschinelle Austauschformat für Bibliotheken MAB2 verwendet wird, ist das Format Machine Readable Cataloguing MARC 21 der weltweit am weitesten verbreitete Standard. Der Standardisierungsausschuss hat in seiner 9. Sitzung am 15. Dezember 2004 wegweisende Beschlüsse zur Internationalisierung der deutschen Standards gefasst.' Diese sehen als ersten Meilenstein die flächendeckende Einführung von MARC 21 als Austauschformat vor. Die Verbundsysteme als größte Datenproduzenten haben sich verpflichtet, MARC 21 einheitlich, das heißt ohne verbundspezifische Besonderheiten, einzuführen und anzuwenden. Gleichzeitig werden die bisher unterschiedlichen Verbundrichtlinien vereinheitlicht. Die Einführung von MARC 21 bildet zusammen mit den Bestrebungen zur Verbesserung der Zusammenarbeit der Verbundsysteme einen entscheidenden Schritt, die Voraussetzungen für Fremddatenübernahme und Datentausch für die deutschen Bibliotheken sowohl auf nationaler als auch auf internationaler Ebene erheblich zu verbessern.
  15. Devadason, F.J.: Common format for machine-readable bibliographic records for India : a proposal (1978) 0.00 
    0.0040627993 = product of:
  0.024376795 = sum of:
    0.024376795 = product of:
      0.073130384 = sum of:
        0.073130384 = weight(_text_:29 in 5539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073130384 = score(doc=5539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5539)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Towards a common bibliographic exchange format? International Symposium on Bibliographic Exchange Formats, Taormina, Sicily, 27-29 April 1978
  16. Boßmeyer, C.; Henze, V.: Neue MAB-Formatversion MAB2 endgültig verabschiedet (1995) 0.00 
    0.0040627993 = product of:
  0.024376795 = sum of:
    0.024376795 = product of:
      0.073130384 = sum of:
        0.073130384 = weight(_text_:29 in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073130384 = score(doc=2306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.9, S.1428-1446
  17. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.00 
    0.0040262523 = product of:
  0.024157513 = sum of:
    0.024157513 = product of:
      0.072472535 = sum of:
        0.072472535 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072472535 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  18. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.00 
    0.0040262523 = product of:
  0.024157513 = sum of:
    0.024157513 = product of:
      0.072472535 = sum of:
        0.072472535 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072472535 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  19. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.00 
    0.0040262523 = product of:
  0.024157513 = sum of:
    0.024157513 = product of:
      0.072472535 = sum of:
        0.072472535 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072472535 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  20. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.00 
    0.0040262523 = product of:
  0.024157513 = sum of:
    0.024157513 = product of:
      0.072472535 = sum of:
        0.072472535 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072472535 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 51
  • d 21
  • f 8
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 75
  • s 9
  • m 6
  • b 2
  • l 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications