Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

Büttner, G.: Integration audiovisueller Aufzeichnungen in das Records Management einer Organisation : ein konzeptionelles Metadatenmodell (2017) 0.02

0.02269828 = product of:
  0.05296265 = sum of:
    0.017370364 = weight(_text_:und in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017370364 = score(doc=4202,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1013361 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
    0.0065428335 = weight(_text_:in in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0065428335 = score(doc=4202,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
    0.029049452 = weight(_text_:den in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029049452 = score(doc=4202,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13104749 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.2216712 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)

Abstract: Dieser Artikel stellt ein konzeptionelles Metadatenmodell vor, das auf Records verschiedener Medientypen anwendbar ist. Organisationen, die im Zuge ihrer Tätigkeit regelmäßig sowohl textbasierte als auch audiovisuelle Records erstellen, haben beide Medien im Sinne des Records Management zu verwalten. Dazu sind Metadaten, einschließlich der des zentralen Ordnungssystems für Records, ein Hauptwerkzeug. Inspiriert durch medienübergreifende, auf gemeinsamen Zugriff ausgerichtete Metadatenmodelle, wird ein neues Modell vorgeschlagen. Es kombiniert die hierarchische Abstraktion der existierenden Modelle mit den Prinzipien des Records Management. Das Modell kann Organisationen dabei helfen, Entscheidungen über Metadaten für ihre Records zu treffen.
Source: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 68(2017) H.1, S.25-37

Reed, B.: Metadata: core record or core business? (1997) 0.00
```
0.001869381 = product of:
  0.013085667 = sum of:
    0.013085667 = weight(_text_:in in 1764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013085667 = score(doc=1764,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 1764, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1764)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
```
Abstract

Raises critical questions about the way archivists should be managing the metadata associated with records management and recordkeeping processes in order to maintain records in their context through time in complex and rapidly changing environments. Explores some current models for specifying record metadata, drawing on the outcomes of research projects and standards activities. Speculates on the potential value of defining a core set of record metadata. The mapping of the overlap between the metadata specified in the Pittsburgh University and British Columbia University projects, and the Australian Records Management Standards, reveals a possible core set of record metadada, analysis of which has shown that it would essentially enable the descriptions of the records as passive objects
Cox, R.J.: More than diplomatic : functional requirements for evidence in recordkeeping (1997) 0.00
```
0.0013218523 = product of:
  0.009252965 = sum of:
    0.009252965 = weight(_text_:in in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009252965 = score(doc=621,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.062193166 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045721713 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
```
Abstract

In the 1990s, North American archivists and records managers shifted some of their concern with electronic records and record keeping systems to conducting research about the nature of these records and systems. Describes a research project at Pittsburgh University School of Information Sciences, which considered how electronic records might be managed by the development of recorddkeeping functional requirements. The work was supported with funding from the National Historical Publications and Records Commission. Focuses on the project's 4 main products: the functional requirements; metadata specifications for recordkeeping; and the warrant reflecting professional and societal endorsement of the requirements

Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Languages