Search (31 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Fischer, J.: Rezeptpflichtig : Biztalk: XML-Framework zum Dokumentenaustausch (2002) 0.09 
    0.08589759 = product of:
  0.12884638 = sum of:
    0.09033571 = weight(_text_:resources in 848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09033571 = score(doc=848,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.483971 = fieldWeight in 848, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=848)
    0.03851066 = product of:
      0.07702132 = sum of:
        0.07702132 = weight(_text_:management in 848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07702132 = score(doc=848,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 848, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=848)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  2. Batley, S.: ¬The I in information architecture : the challenge of content management (2007) 0.08 
    0.078421414 = product of:
  0.11763212 = sum of:
    0.06022381 = weight(_text_:resources in 809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06022381 = score(doc=809,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.32264733 = fieldWeight in 809, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=809)
    0.05740831 = product of:
      0.11481662 = sum of:
        0.11481662 = weight(_text_:management in 809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11481662 = score(doc=809,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.6661758 = fieldWeight in 809, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=809)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a review of content management in the context of information architecture. Design/methodology/approach - The method adopted is a review of definitions of information architecture and an analysis of the importance of content and its management within information architecture. Findings - Concludes that reality will not necessarily match the vision of organisations investing in information architecture. Originality/value - The paper considers practical issues around content and records management.
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  3. Murthy, S.S.: ¬The National Tuberculosis Institute, Bangalore : recent development in library and information services (2006) 0.07 
    0.07389541 = product of:
  0.11084311 = sum of:
    0.08516933 = weight(_text_:resources in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08516933 = score(doc=1502,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.45629224 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
    0.025673775 = product of:
      0.05134755 = sum of:
        0.05134755 = weight(_text_:management in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05134755 = score(doc=1502,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Briefly describes the information products and services, the related databases, development of digital library and web-resources and web-based services, vocabulary control tools, networking, and other projects of the Library of the National Tuberculosis Institute (NTI), Bangalore. Acknowledges the involvement of and advice and assistance provided by Prof. A. Neelameghan to these programmes and projects.
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  4. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.07 
    0.07229667 = product of:
  0.108445 = sum of:
    0.08121385 = product of:
      0.24364153 = sum of:
        0.24364153 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24364153 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43351194 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.027231153 = product of:
      0.054462306 = sum of:
        0.054462306 = weight(_text_:management in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054462306 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  5. Vasudevan, M.C.; Mohan, M.; Kapoor, A.: Information system for knowledge management in the specialized division of a hospital (2006) 0.06 
    0.061070394 = product of:
  0.09160559 = sum of:
    0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052695833 = score(doc=1499,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
    0.038909752 = product of:
      0.077819504 = sum of:
        0.077819504 = weight(_text_:management in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077819504 = score(doc=1499,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Information systems are essential support for knowledge management in all types of enterprises. This paper describes the evolution and development of a specialized hospital information system. The system is designed to integrate for access and retrieval from databases of patients' case records, and related images - CATSCAN, MRI, X-Ray - and to enable online access to full text of relevant papers on the Internet/WWW. The generation of information products and services from the system is briefly described.
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  6. Toebak, P.: ¬Das Dossier nicht die Klassifikation als Herzstück des Records Management (2009) 0.04 
    0.041803353 = product of:
  0.12541005 = sum of:
    0.12541005 = sum of:
      0.090770505 = weight(_text_:management in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.090770505 = score(doc=3220,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051133685 = queryNorm
          0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
      0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034639545 = score(doc=3220,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051133685 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Die September/Oktober-Ausgabe 2009 der IWP ist eine Schwerpunktausgabe zum Records Management. Es ist interessant, dass einmal aus fachlich ganz anderer Perspektive auf diese Management- Disziplin geschaut wird. Viele Aspekte werden angesprochen: Terminologie, Rolle des Archivwesens, Interdisziplinarität, Langzeitaufbewahrung und Standardisierung. Im Artikel "Wissensorganisation und Records Management. Was ist der 'state of the art'?" steht die Wissensorganisation als Schwachstelle des Records Management zentral. Dies zu Recht: Das logische Datenmodell von DOMEA - das Gleiche gilt für GEVER und ELAK - entspricht beispielsweise nicht in allen Hinsichten der Geschäftsrealität. Daraus entstehen für die Mitarbeitenden im Arbeitsalltag öfters mehr Verständnisprobleme als sie bewältigen können oder wollen. Die systemische Unterstützung der eingesetzten EDRMS (nicht alle Produkte verdienen übrigens diesen Namen) wird dadurch geschwächt. Die Wissensorganisation genügt in vielen Fällen (noch) nicht. Das Problem liegt allerdings weniger bei der Klassifikation (Aktenplan), wie Ulrike Spree meint. Auch hier kommen Anomalien vor. Ein Ordnungssystem im Records Management umfasst mehr als nur die Klassifikation. Zudem dürfen die prinzipiellen, inhärenten Unterschiede zwischen Records Management einerseits und Wissens- und Informationsmanagement andererseits nicht vergessen gehen. Nicht die Klassifikation ist beim Records Management das zentrale Werkzeug der Informationsrepräsentation und -organisation, sondern die saubere Dossierbildung und die stringente, strukturstabile Umsetzung davon im Datenmodell. Hierauf geht die Autorin nicht ein. Ich werde aus dieser Sicht auf ihren Beitrag in der Schwerpunktausgabe reagieren.
    Date
    6.12.2009 17:22:17
  7. Lam-Adesina, A.M.; Jones, G.J.F.: Examining and improving the effectiveness of relevance feedback for retrieval of scanned text documents (2006) 0.04 
    0.035790663 = product of:
  0.053685993 = sum of:
    0.037639882 = weight(_text_:resources in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037639882 = score(doc=977,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
    0.016046109 = product of:
      0.032092217 = sum of:
        0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032092217 = score(doc=977,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Important legacy paper documents are digitized and collected in online accessible archives. This enables the preservation, sharing, and significantly the searching of these documents. The text contents of these document images can be transcribed automatically using OCR systems and then stored in an information retrieval system. However, OCR systems make errors in character recognition which have previously been shown to impact on document retrieval behaviour. In particular relevance feedback query-expansion methods, which are often effective for improving electronic text retrieval, are observed to be less reliable for retrieval of scanned document images. Our experimental examination of the effects of character recognition errors on an ad hoc OCR retrieval task demonstrates that, while baseline information retrieval can remain relatively unaffected by transcription errors, relevance feedback via query expansion becomes highly unstable. This paper examines the reason for this behaviour, and introduces novel modifications to standard relevance feedback methods. These methods are shown experimentally to improve the effectiveness of relevance feedback for errorful OCR transcriptions. The new methods combine similar recognised character strings based on term collection frequency and a string edit-distance measure. The techniques are domain independent and make no use of external resources such as dictionaries or training data.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.3, S.633-649
  8. Großmann, K.; Schaaf, T.: Datenbankbasiertes Dokumentenmanagementsystem im Versuchswesen (2001) 0.02 
    0.017795136 = product of:
  0.053385407 = sum of:
    0.053385407 = sum of:
      0.025673775 = weight(_text_:management in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.025673775 = score(doc=5868,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051133685 = queryNorm
          0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
      0.027711634 = weight(_text_:22 in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027711634 = score(doc=5868,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051133685 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    16. 5.2001 12:22:23
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  9. Kampffmeyer, U.: Records Management und Schriftgutverwaltung (2009) 0.02 
    0.01711585 = product of:
  0.05134755 = sum of:
    0.05134755 = product of:
      0.1026951 = sum of:
        0.1026951 = weight(_text_:management in 3131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1026951 = score(doc=3131,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 3131, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3131)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Der Begriff Records Management ist in Deutschland wenig geläufig. Die zugehörige ISO/DIN-Norm wird mit Schriftgutverwaltung übersetzt. Die Akzeptanz von Records Management entspricht nicht der Bedeutung, die die ordnungsgemäße Verwaltung und Erschließung von elektronischen Dokumenten in der öffentlichen Verwaltung und der freien Wirtschaft hat. Marktuntersuchungen haben gezeigt, dass der Einsatz von Records Management in Deutschland noch am Anfang steht.
  10. Spree, U.: Wissensorganisation und Records Management : Was ist der State of the Art? Literaturübersicht (2009) 0.02 
    0.01674409 = product of:
  0.05023227 = sum of:
    0.05023227 = product of:
      0.10046454 = sum of:
        0.10046454 = weight(_text_:management in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10046454 = score(doc=3132,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.5829038 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Ordnungssysteme, vor allem in Form von Aktenplänen und business classifications schemes, gelten weiterhin als ein Kernelement von elektronischen Records Management Systemen. Die Rezeption und Nutzung von in den Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaften entwickelten normativen Vorgaben und/oder Forschungsergebnissen zu Ordnungssystemen ist in der Records Management Community hingegen noch eher selten und zufällig. Aufgrund der Auswertung aktueller Fachliteratur zum Thema Records Management / Schriftgutverwaltung sowie der Erfahrungen der Autorin in zwei Lehrveranstaltungen, die die Eignung informationswissenschaftlicher Ansätze der Wissensorganisation auf Probleme der Schriftgutverwaltung überprüft haben, lässt sich eine Reihe von konkreten Empfehlungen für die Integration wissensorganisatorischer Expertise bei der Entwicklung von Records Management Systemen auf organisatorischer und inhaltlicher Ebene ableiten.
  11. Kampffmeyer, U.: MoReq und MoReq2 (2009) 0.02 
    0.01674409 = product of:
  0.05023227 = sum of:
    0.05023227 = product of:
      0.10046454 = sum of:
        0.10046454 = weight(_text_:management in 3133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10046454 = score(doc=3133,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.5829038 = fieldWeight in 3133, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3133)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Die Abkürzung MoReq steht für Model Requirements for the Management of Electronic Records. MoReq ist der europäische Standard für das Records Management. Herausgegeben wurde der von der Europäischen Kommission beauftragte und geförderte Standard vom DLM Forum. Seit Februar 2008 ist die Version MoReq2 gültig. MoReq2 umfasst nicht nur die Anforderungen an das Records Management sondern beinhaltet auch ein XML-Schema, einen Katalog mit Testszenarien und Testdaten sowie ein Zertifizierungsverfahren für Records Management Produkte. MoReq2 deckt den gesamten Lebenszyklus von Records von ihrer Entstehung, Nutzung und Verwaltung bis zur Archivierung und Löschung ab. Verschiedene europäische Staaten haben MoReq2 bereits adaptiert und die ersten Records Management Produkte befinden sich in der Zertifizierung.
  12. Haessler, J.: Entwicklung von Records Management Software : "Weg von einzelnen Projektlösungen hin zum Softwarehersteller" (2009) 0.02 
    0.015128418 = product of:
  0.045385253 = sum of:
    0.045385253 = product of:
      0.090770505 = sum of:
        0.090770505 = weight(_text_:management in 3128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.090770505 = score(doc=3128,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 3128, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3128)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Records Management Software wird in Deutschland auch von vielen kleinen und mittelständischen Unternehmen entwickelt. Die IWP sprach mit Joachim Haessler, dem Inhaber der Schwarzwälder Firma HAESSLER. Das Interview führte Ulrike Spree.
  13. Veal, D.C.: Techniques of document management : a review of text retrieval and related technologies (2001) 0.01 
    0.014822762 = product of:
  0.044468287 = sum of:
    0.044468287 = product of:
      0.088936575 = sum of:
        0.088936575 = weight(_text_:management in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088936575 = score(doc=4150,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.51601756 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Present and possible future developments in the techniques of document management are reviewed, the major ones being text retrieval and scanning and OCR. Acquisition, indexing and thesauri, publishing and dissemination and the document management industry are also addressed. The emerging standards are reviewed and the impact of the Internet is analysed.
  14. Otten, B.A.: Funktionsprofile : Neue Herausforderung für schnelleren Informationsfluss und Kostensenkungen bei DMS und WFM (2003) 0.01 
    0.012969918 = product of:
  0.038909752 = sum of:
    0.038909752 = product of:
      0.077819504 = sum of:
        0.077819504 = weight(_text_:management in 1120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077819504 = score(doc=1120,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 1120, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1120)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Im Laufe der Jahre wurden die Prozesse von Dokumentmanagementsystem (DMS) und Workflow-Management (WFM) immer besser in Informationsprozesse eingebettet. Mit Business Process Management (BPM) bezeichnet man die Verschmelzung von DMS und WFM, und auch die Integration mit dem Internet spielt hierbei eine Rolle. Content Management kann auf effiziente Weise zu einem optimalen BPM beitragen. Kommunikation in Arbeitsprozessen ist die Verwendung von Dokumenten durch Mitarbeiter untereinander. Die heutigen Entwicklungen insbesondere bei Enterprise Portals (unternehmensweite Einbettung in Arbeitsprozesse) erfordert einen direkten und automatischen Zugang zu allen Arten von "Dokumenten" in allen Prozessen. Die Erstellung von Funktionsprofilen ist ein neues und anspruchsvolles, aber auch notwen diges Hilfsmittel, um BPM erfolgreich einsetzen zu können
  15. Nelke, P.: Von der Tape-Library zum Content-Management-System : die Digitalisierung des Videoarchivs bei CNN (2003) 0.01 
    0.0128368875 = product of:
  0.03851066 = sum of:
    0.03851066 = product of:
      0.07702132 = sum of:
        0.07702132 = weight(_text_:management in 1517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07702132 = score(doc=1517,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 1517, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1517)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  16. Bantin, P.: Electronic records management : a review of the work of a decade and a reflection on future directions (2002) 0.01 
    0.0128368875 = product of:
  0.03851066 = sum of:
    0.03851066 = product of:
      0.07702132 = sum of:
        0.07702132 = weight(_text_:management in 4255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07702132 = score(doc=4255,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 4255, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4255)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  17. Mummenthey, I.; Kotte, J.; Brüdegam, J.: Schriftgutverwaltung Records Management und Records Preservation : Selbstverständnis des Staatsarchivs Hamburg in einer modernen Verwaltung (2009) 0.01 
    0.0128368875 = product of:
  0.03851066 = sum of:
    0.03851066 = product of:
      0.07702132 = sum of:
        0.07702132 = weight(_text_:management in 3135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07702132 = score(doc=3135,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 3135, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3135)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Was hat ein Staatsarchiv mit Schriftgutverwaltung zu tun? Ist Schriftgutverwaltung nur ein altbackener Begriff für das moderne Records Management? Was ist Records Preservation? Und wo ist der Bezug zu Orwells Roman "1984"? Diese Fragen will der Beitrag beantworten. Im ersten Teil beschreibt Irmgard Mummenthey zunächst die Aufgaben des Staatsarchivs der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg und erläutert Begrifflichkeiten. Sie geht dann auf Records Management als strategische Aufgabe des Staatsarchivs ein und skizziert die Bedeutung sowohl einer vertrauenswürdigen Überlieferung als auch eines Archivs selbst in einem demokratischen Rechtsstaat. Jenny Kotte stellt dann im zweiten Teil die wichtigsten Standards vor. Diese sind maßgebliche Instrumente, um den Stellenwert von Schriftgutverwaltung bzw. Records Management und damit seine Qualität zu sichern. Julia Brüdegam berichtet im dritten Teil, wie das Staatsarchiv seinen gesetzlichen Auftrag, die hamburgische Verwaltung zu beraten, praktisch umsetzt. Da die drei Autorinnen sich in ihrer täglichen Arbeit auf die öffentliche Verwaltung konzentrieren (müssen), liegt dort auch unweigerlich der Schwerpunkt dieses Beitrags.
  18. Frohmann, B.: Revisiting "what is a document?" (2009) 0.01 
    0.012546628 = product of:
  0.037639882 = sum of:
    0.037639882 = weight(_text_:resources in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037639882 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051133685 = queryNorm
        0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a reconsideration of Michael Buckland's important question, "What is a document?", analysing the point and purpose of definitions of "document" and "documentation". Design/methodology/approach - Two philosophical notions of the point of definitions are contrasted: John Stuart Mill's concept of a "real" definition, purporting to specify the nature of the definiendum; and a concept of definition based upon a foundationalist philosophy of language. Both conceptions assume that a general, philosophical justification for using words as we do is always in order. This assumption is criticized by deploying Hilary Putnam's arguments against the orthodox Wittgensteinian interpretation of criteria governing the use of language. The example of the cabinets of curiosities of the sixteenth-century English and European virtuosi is developed to show how one might productively think about what documents might be, but without a definition of a document. Findings - Other than for specific, instrumentalist purposes (often appropriate for specific case studies), there is no general philosophical reason for asking, what is a document? There are good reasons for pursuing studies of documentation without the impediments of definitions of "document" or "documentation". Originality/value - The paper makes an original contribution to the new interest in documentation studies by providing conceptual resources for multiplying, rather than restricting, the areas of application of the concepts of documents and documentation.
  19. Meer, K. van der: Document information systems (2009) 0.01 
    0.011117073 = product of:
  0.033351216 = sum of:
    0.033351216 = product of:
      0.06670243 = sum of:
        0.06670243 = weight(_text_:management in 3771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06670243 = score(doc=3771,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.38701317 = fieldWeight in 3771, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3771)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    From characteristics of information, documents and document information systems (document IS), motives to use document IS are described. A few cases are presented. The functional aspects of document IS are described, derived from ISO standard 15489 on records management and the Sarbanes-Oxley law, and made operational in MoReq and DoD standard 5015.2. Explicit attention is given to related subjects from a viewpoint of document management: information sharing (workflow, knowledge management), and interoperability of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools; authenticity because of the possible evidential value of documents; and digital longevity because of the possible long-time function of archival documents. The technical aspects answer functional demands; important information science standards, and standard components for 12 characteristics of document IS are described, among others ODMA, the XML family, OAIS, and metadata schemes. The design methodological aspects answer functional demands and technical possibilities. Models are introduced and the way of working of, e.g., a digitization project is described.
  20. Krüger, J.D.: Kostenlos und gut : Web-Content-Management-Systeme im Überblick (2003) 0.01 
    0.010697406 = product of:
  0.032092217 = sum of:
    0.032092217 = product of:
      0.064184435 = sum of:
        0.064184435 = weight(_text_:management in 1726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064184435 = score(doc=1726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 1726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1726)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Authors

Languages

  • d 21
  • e 10

Themes