Search (26 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  • × theme_ss:"Rechtsfragen"
  1. Jochum, U.: Donald Trump und der bibliothekarisch-bürokratische Allianzkomplex : Geschrieben von Uwe Jochum am 19.2.2017, (2017) 0.03 
    0.028070446 = product of:
  0.056140892 = sum of:
    0.052850362 = weight(_text_:von in 3446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052850362 = score(doc=3446,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.41267726 = fieldWeight in 3446, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3446)
    0.0032905294 = product of:
      0.009871588 = sum of:
        0.009871588 = weight(_text_:a in 3446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009871588 = score(doc=3446,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3446, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3446)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Type
    a
  2. Grötschel, M.: Copyright und elektronisches Publizieren : Auf dem Weg zu vernüftigen Regelungen? (2001) 0.02 
    0.022294924 = product of:
  0.044589847 = sum of:
    0.042709544 = weight(_text_:von in 16) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042709544 = score(doc=16,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.3334936 = fieldWeight in 16, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=16)
    0.0018803024 = product of:
      0.005640907 = sum of:
        0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 16) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005640907 = score(doc=16,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 16, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=16)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Das Committee on Electronic Information and Communication (CEIC) der International Mathematical Union (IMU) hat die Aufgabe, sich über die langfristige Informationsversorgung in der Mathematik Gedanken zu machen und Lösungsvorschläge hierfür zu erarbeiten. Das Kernthema ist natürlich "Elektronisches Publizieren". Dazu gehören auch Copyright-Regelungen. Mit diesem Artikel beginnt eine kleine Serie von Aufsätzen, in denen ich (in meiner Funktion als eines von elf CEIC-Mitgliedern) die Empfehlungen des CEIC erläutern werde
    Type
    a
  3. Steinhauer, E.W.: ¬Die Sammlung, Bewahrung und Verwaltung von Netzpublikationen durch Pflichtexemplarbibliotheken in Deutschland : Probleme und Lösungen mit Blick auf die Gesetzgebung der Länder und des Bundes (2015) 0.02 
    0.022294924 = product of:
  0.044589847 = sum of:
    0.042709544 = weight(_text_:von in 2572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042709544 = score(doc=2572,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.3334936 = fieldWeight in 2572, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2572)
    0.0018803024 = product of:
      0.005640907 = sum of:
        0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 2572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005640907 = score(doc=2572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2572)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Die rechtlichen und organisatorischen Rahmenbedingungen des Sammelns von Netzpublikationen in Deutschland werden dargestellt, die Schaffung ausreichender rechtlicher Rahmenbedingungen angemahnt und eine dreigliedrige Sammlungsstruktur vorgeschlagen. Angeregt wird die Gründung einer eigenständigen Gedächtnisinstitution für das Internet.
    Type
    a
  4. Wüpper, T.: Springer beklagt Sparkurs der Bibliotheken : Buchgeschäft des Verlages leidet - Kritik an fehlendem Urheberrecht für Multimedia (1996) 0.02 
    0.020050319 = product of:
  0.040100638 = sum of:
    0.03775026 = weight(_text_:von in 4378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03775026 = score(doc=4378,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.29476947 = fieldWeight in 4378, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4378)
    0.002350378 = product of:
      0.007051134 = sum of:
        0.007051134 = weight(_text_:a in 4378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007051134 = score(doc=4378,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4378, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4378)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    "Harsche Kritik übt Springer an der Praxis der Bibliotheken, über Kopierzentralen und elektronische Netze Informationen zu vervielfältigen und auszutauschen, wodurch der Kauf von Büchern unnötig wird. Das komme eine 'Enteignung' der Verlage gleich, sagte der Geschäftsführer Dietrich Götze vor der Presse"
    Type
    a
  5. Herb, U.: Open Access zwischen Revolution und Goldesel : eine Bilanz fünfzehn Jahre nach der Erklärung der Budapest Open Access Initiative (2017) 0.02 
    0.016933937 = product of:
  0.033867873 = sum of:
    0.032692686 = weight(_text_:von in 3551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032692686 = score(doc=3551,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.25527787 = fieldWeight in 3551, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3551)
    0.001175189 = product of:
      0.003525567 = sum of:
        0.003525567 = weight(_text_:a in 3551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003525567 = score(doc=3551,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 3551, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3551)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Die Erklärungen und Positionierungen zu Open Access anfangs der 2000er Jahre waren von Umbruchstimmung, Euphorie und Idealismus getragen, eine Revolution des wissenschaftlichen Publizierens wurde vielfach vorhergesagt. Die Erwartungen an Open Access lagen auf der Hand und waren umrissen: Wissenschaftlern war an rascher Verbreitung ihrer eigenen Texte gelegen sowie an der Verfügbarkeit der Texte ihrer Kollegen, Bibliothekaren an einer Abhilfe für stark steigende Journalpreise, den Wissenschaftseinrichtungen an effizienter und freier Verbreitung ihrer Inhalte. Einzig die Position der kommerziellen Wissenschaftsverlage zu Open Access war überwiegend zögerlich bis ablehnend. Der Artikel versucht sich 15 Jahre nach dem Treffen der Budapest Open Access Initiative 2001 an einer Bilanz zum Open Access. 2016 muss festgehalten werden, dass die von den maßgeblichen Open-Access-Advokaten früherer Tage erhoffte Revolution wohl ausbleiben wird. Vielmehr scheint aktuell die Entwicklung des Open Access weitgehend von den vormals in Open-Access-Szenarien kaum erwähnten kommerziellen Verlagen angetrieben. Zwar findet sich auch Open Access in wissenschaftlicher Selbstverwaltung, dennoch bleiben die Akteure im wissenschaftlichen Publizieren bislang die gleichen wie 2001 und die schon damals bekannten Konzentrationseffekte am Publikationsmarkt setzen sich fort.
    Type
    a
  6. Müller, H.: Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen für Digitale Information (2010) 0.01 
    0.014035223 = product of:
  0.028070446 = sum of:
    0.026425181 = weight(_text_:von in 3365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026425181 = score(doc=3365,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.20633863 = fieldWeight in 3365, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3365)
    0.0016452647 = product of:
      0.004935794 = sum of:
        0.004935794 = weight(_text_:a in 3365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004935794 = score(doc=3365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 3365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3365)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In der Gesetzgebungsdebatte zur Verabschiedung des Zweiten Gesetzes zur Regelung des Urheberrechts in der Informationsgesellschaft wurde bereits im Jahre 2006 ein Dritter Korb speziell für die Belange von Bildung und Wissenschaft in Aussicht gestellt. Der Bundesrat hatte ein bildungs- und wissenschaftsfreundlicheres Urheberrecht bzw. ein dezidiertes WissenschaftsUrheberrecht gefordert. Die Allianz der deutschen Wissenschaftsorganisationen hält es für dringend erforderlich, in der laufenden Legislaturperiode die Arbeit an diesen für die Wissenschaft immens wichtigen ergänzenden Regelungen zu einem Abschluss zu bringen. Sie unterbreitet deshalb dem Gesetzgeber konkrete Vorschläge für u.a. ein Zweitveröffentlichungsrecht, für verwaiste Werke und für eine allgemeine Wissenschaftsschranke.
    Type
    a
  7. Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994) 0.01 
    0.010001066 = product of:
  0.040004265 = sum of:
    0.040004265 = product of:
      0.060006395 = sum of:
        0.007977448 = weight(_text_:a in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007977448 = score(doc=7245,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
        0.052028947 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052028947 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The nature and implications of electrocopying are summarised. After a brief review of the principles of copyright, the issue of whether electrocopying infringes copyright is debated. Publishers are aware of the threat that electrocopying poses to their business. The various options available to publishers for responding to electrocopying are summarised. Patterns of scholarly communications and the relationships between authors, publishers and libraries are being challenged. Constructive dialogue is necessary if the issues are to be resolved
    Source
    Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
    Type
    a
  8. "Google Books" darf weitermachen wie bisher : Entscheidung des Supreme Court in den USA (2016) 0.01 
    0.009437565 = product of:
  0.03775026 = sum of:
    0.03775026 = weight(_text_:von in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03775026 = score(doc=2923,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.29476947 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Der Internet-Riese darf sein Projekt "Google Books" wie gehabt fortsetzen. Der Oberste US-Gerichtshof lehnte die von einer Autorenvereingung geforderte Revision ab. Google teste mit seinem Projekt zwar die Grenzen der Fairness aus, handele aber rechtens, sagten die Richter.
    Content
    " Im Streit mit Google um Urheberrechte ist eine Gruppe von Buchautoren am Obersten US-Gericht gescheitert. Der Supreme Court lehnte es ab, die google-freundliche Entscheidung eines niederen Gerichtes zur Revision zuzulassen. In dem Fall geht es um die Online-Bibliothek "Google Books", für die der kalifornische Konzern Gerichtsunterlagen zufolge mehr als 20 Millionen Bücher digitalisiert hat. Durch das Projekt können Internet-Nutzer innerhalb der Bücher nach Stichworten suchen und die entsprechenden Textstellen lesen. Die drei zuständigen Richter entschieden einstimmig, dass in dem Fall zwar die Grenzen der Fairness ausgetestet würden, aber das Vorgehen von Google letztlich rechtens sei. Entschädigungen in Milliardenhöhe gefürchtet Die von dem Interessensverband Authors Guild angeführten Kläger sahen ihre Urheberrechte durch "Google Books" verletzt. Dazu gehörten auch prominente Künstler wie die Schriftstellerin und Dichterin Margaret Atwood. Google führte dagegen an, die Internet-Bibliothek kurbele den Bücherverkauf an, weil Leser dadurch zusätzlich auf interessante Werke aufmerksam gemacht würden. Google reagierte "dankbar" auf die Entscheidung des Supreme Court. Der Konzern hatte befürchtet, bei einer juristischen Niederlage Entschädigungen in Milliardenhöhe zahlen zu müssen."
  9. Schwartz, E.: Like a book on a wire (1993) 0.01 
    0.009232819 = product of:
  0.036931276 = sum of:
    0.036931276 = product of:
      0.055396914 = sum of:
        0.009871588 = weight(_text_:a in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009871588 = score(doc=582,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
        0.045525327 = weight(_text_:22 in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045525327 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Discusses the publishing of books online on the Internet, in the USA. The issues is treated mainly in relation to trade publishers. Outlines various ways in which such publishers have so far used the Internet, for example in the publishing of the full text of works of fiction, for publishing catalogues, and for presenting authors to the public via bulletin boards or electronic conferences. Notes a number or problems which arise: copyright, payment for accessing items, advertising restrictions, and the ease with which the published unit can be tampered with when available on the Internet. Also discusses collaboration and conflicts between publishers and the technology industry
    Source
    Publishers weekly. 240(1993) no.47, 22 Nov., S.33-35,38
    Type
    a
  10. Euler, E.: Open-Access-Strategie des Landes Brandenburg (2019) 0.01 
    0.008173171 = product of:
  0.032692686 = sum of:
    0.032692686 = weight(_text_:von in 5367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032692686 = score(doc=5367,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.25527787 = fieldWeight in 5367, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5367)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Das vorliegende Papier ist das Ergebnis eines durch das MWFK Brandenburg geförderten Projektes, das seit November 2018 unter der Leitung von Prof. Dr. jur. Ellen Euler, LL.M. an der Fachhochschule Potsdam angesiedelt ist. Ziel war und ist es, alle in das wissenschaftliche Publizieren involvierten Bereiche und Akteure aus ganz Brandenburg in ein transparentes, kollaboratives und integratives Multistakeholderprojekt einzubinden und an der Erarbeitung dieser Strategie zu beteiligen. Abschließend hat sich die Brandenburgische Landesrektorenkonferenz (BLRK), in der alle brandenburgischen Hochschulen vertreten sind, im Juli 2019 mit der vorliegenden Strategie befasst. Alle Institutionen, die aktiv am Prozess teilhaben wollten, insbesondere die Hochschuleinrichtungen im Land Brandenburg und deren Infrastruktureinrichtungen, haben Vertreterinnen und Vertreter benannt, welche die Interessen und Bedürfnisse des jeweiligen Bereiches wahrnahmen und in die Strategie eingebracht haben. Durch bilaterale Gespräche, Vernetzungstreffen, Intensivworkshops und einen abschließenden Book Sprint, bei dem Expertinnen und Experten aus Wissenschaft, Forschung, Kultur und Zivilgesellschaft wertvolle Ideen und Empfehlungen zur Formulierung einer gemeinsamen Strategie zu mehr Offenheit von Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kultur im Land Brandenburg ausgearbeitet haben, die teilweise in die vorliegende Strategie eingeflossen sind, ist ein festes Netzwerk entstanden, das den weiteren Prozess über die hier vorliegende Open-Access-Strategie für wissenschaftliche Publikationen hinaus begleiten wird. Open Access als Querschnittsaufgabe bedarf gemeinsamer und koordinierter Anstrengungen auf allen Ebenen. Die vorliegende Open-Access-Strategie definiert Ziele für das Land Brandenburg und die von den relevanten Akteuren (Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler, Hochschulen, Infrastruktureinrichtungen und Landesregierung) umzusetzenden Maßnahmen, die zur Zielerreichung beitragen sollen, ebenso wie die notwendigen Maßnahmen zur Nachverfolgung der Zielerreichung. Das Wissen aus dem Land Brandenburg soll so verstärkt sichtbar, auffindbar, zugänglich und nutzbar gemacht werden. Der Wissenschaftsstandort Brandenburg wird damit attraktiver und die Innovationsfähigkeit der Region und der wissensbasierten Unternehmen des Landes Brandenburg wird gestärkt.
  11. Peukert, A.; Sonnenberg, M.: ¬Das Urheberrecht und der Wandel des wissenschaftlichen Kommunikationssystems (2016) 0.00 
    9.97181E-4 = product of:
  0.003988724 = sum of:
    0.003988724 = product of:
      0.011966172 = sum of:
        0.011966172 = weight(_text_:a in 3253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011966172 = score(doc=3253,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 3253, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3253)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Type
    a
  12. Gasaway, L.N.: Scholarly publication and copyright in networked electronic publishing (1995) 0.00 
    9.401512E-4 = product of:
  0.003760605 = sum of:
    0.003760605 = product of:
      0.011281814 = sum of:
        0.011281814 = weight(_text_:a in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011281814 = score(doc=2438,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The publication of scholarly works in a networked electronic environment presents opportunities for solving problems with printed services. At the same time, copyright developed primarily for printed works, has been used to create stumbling blocks both for faculty authors and their institutions. This has accurred because publishers have required a transfer of copyright as a quid pro quo for publication. New models of copyright ownership and management can be developed for electronic publishing of scholarly works and research uses, and ultimately will reduce costs to universities which currently must repurchase faculty produced works from commercial publishers
    Type
    a
  13. Forgeron, J.-F.; Haas, M.-E.: ¬La diffusion de documents electronique (1996) 0.00 
    8.309842E-4 = product of:
  0.0033239368 = sum of:
    0.0033239368 = product of:
      0.0099718105 = sum of:
        0.0099718105 = weight(_text_:a in 3476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0099718105 = score(doc=3476,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 3476, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3476)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Discusses copyright and electronic document delivery. However copyright is implemented legally, the principle of protecting an author's work remains the same. Offers collective management as a solution
    Type
    a
  14. Lügger, J.: Mathematisches Publizieren und die elektronische Welt (1994) 0.00 
    8.2263234E-4 = product of:
  0.0032905294 = sum of:
    0.0032905294 = product of:
      0.009871588 = sum of:
        0.009871588 = weight(_text_:a in 5681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009871588 = score(doc=5681,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5681, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5681)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Type
    a
  15. Stubley, P.: Future developments and impacts of multimedia (1994) 0.00 
    8.141949E-4 = product of:
  0.0032567796 = sum of:
    0.0032567796 = product of:
      0.009770338 = sum of:
        0.009770338 = weight(_text_:a in 1105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009770338 = score(doc=1105,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1105, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1105)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Dealing with some of the effects of multimedia for those involved in the conventional publishing chain. Among the aspects dealt with are the rival formats for distribution and playback; how publishers are apporaching multimedia, and software companies approaching publishing; multimedia music; ownership copyright; and networking implications. Notes the role of SuperJANET in the UK in the area of multimedia networking, and the prospect of publishers beginning to use networks as a way of publishing and distributing their products
    Footnote
    Condensed version of a report published by the British Library Research and Development Department in Apr 94, entitled 'Multimedia publishing'
    Type
    a
  16. Moebius, R.: ¬Die Zitiercommunity (2019) 0.00 
    7.051135E-4 = product of:
  0.002820454 = sum of:
    0.002820454 = product of:
      0.008461362 = sum of:
        0.008461362 = weight(_text_:a in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008461362 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Type
    a
  17. Singleton, A.K.J.: Electronic journals for everyone? (1993) 0.00 
    6.6478737E-4 = product of:
  0.0026591495 = sum of:
    0.0026591495 = product of:
      0.007977448 = sum of:
        0.007977448 = weight(_text_:a in 7371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007977448 = score(doc=7371,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 7371, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7371)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    From incomplete networks, questions of quality control and copyright, to unified pricing policies, the route to fully electronic scientific communication has many pitfalls. However, change is inevitable, and a quick tour of the models currently being investigated is provided. These include researchers' own electronic publishing ventures. OCLC/AAAS electronic journal 'Current clinical trials', 'IEE's Electronics letters', American Chemical Society (ACS) projects with and without graphics, Elsevier's TULIP (The University Licensing Programme) project to supply 42 materials science journals in electronic form, and the Institute of Physics Publishing future developments including the SuperJournal demonstration project on the SuperJanet network
    Type
    a
  18. Khalil, M.A.; Jayatilleke, R.: ¬The use of electronic journals in libraries (1996) 0.00 
    6.6478737E-4 = product of:
  0.0026591495 = sum of:
    0.0026591495 = product of:
      0.007977448 = sum of:
        0.007977448 = weight(_text_:a in 5685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007977448 = score(doc=5685,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5685, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5685)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Examines the factors that currently limit the use of electronic journals in libraries. Introduces a number of electronic journals. Highlights the advantages and disadvantages of accessing electronic journals. Discusses their impact on libraries and librarians and problems of copyright compliance
    Type
    a
  19. Hunter, K.: Issues and experiments in electronic publishing and dissemination (1994) 0.00 
    6.6478737E-4 = product of:
  0.0026591495 = sum of:
    0.0026591495 = product of:
      0.007977448 = sum of:
        0.007977448 = weight(_text_:a in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007977448 = score(doc=586,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Examines the USA national context of electronic publishing. Before the visions of electronic publishing become a reality the following issues must be dealt with: market readiness, availability of public and private funding, delivery standards, enabling software, intellectual property concerns, and new pricing and licensing models. Examines CD-ROM publishing, customized college publishing, and electronic only journals and discusses the electronic distribution of traditional print journals
    Type
    a
  20. Prinsley, M.: Internationally harmonised copyright of electronic publishing : conspicuous by its absence (1997) 0.00 
    6.6478737E-4 = product of:
  0.0026591495 = sum of:
    0.0026591495 = product of:
      0.007977448 = sum of:
        0.007977448 = weight(_text_:a in 1708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007977448 = score(doc=1708,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1708, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1708)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Considers the international harmonisation of copyright law. Outlines the geo/political background. Gives a history of attempts by the European Union to control digital copyright and treaties agreed by the World Intellectual Property Organization in 1996 to deal with material in digital formats. Outlines copyright infringement, types of databases and their varying copyright protection
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 14
  • e 11
  • f 1

Types

  • a 23
  • el 5
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes