Search (64 results, page 3 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Herb, U.: Sci-hub = Spy-Hub? (2020) 0.00 
    0.0030278922 = product of:
  0.0060557844 = sum of:
    0.0060557844 = product of:
      0.012111569 = sum of:
        0.012111569 = weight(_text_:d in 5333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012111569 = score(doc=5333,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 5333, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5333)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  2. Fecher, B.; Sokolovska, N.; Friesike, S.; Wagner, G.G.: Governance von Forschungsinfrastruktur am Beispiel von Open Access : Oligopolisierung des Verlagswesens, Plattformisierung der wissenschaftlichen Kommunikation (2019) 0.00 
    0.0030278922 = product of:
  0.0060557844 = sum of:
    0.0060557844 = product of:
      0.012111569 = sum of:
        0.012111569 = weight(_text_:d in 5501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012111569 = score(doc=5501,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 5501, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5501)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  3. Frick, C.; Kaier, C.: Publikationskosten für Zeitschriftenartikel abseits von Open-Access-Publikationsfonds : Lost in Transformation? (2020) 0.00 
    0.0030278922 = product of:
  0.0060557844 = sum of:
    0.0060557844 = product of:
      0.012111569 = sum of:
        0.012111569 = weight(_text_:d in 69) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012111569 = score(doc=69,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 69, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=69)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  4. Graf, K.: Verschlimmbesserung total : die Stümper*innen von DigiZeitschriften haben sich selbst übertroffen (2022) 0.00 
    0.0030278922 = product of:
  0.0060557844 = sum of:
    0.0060557844 = product of:
      0.012111569 = sum of:
        0.012111569 = weight(_text_:d in 599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012111569 = score(doc=599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=599)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  5. Lauer, G.: Datentracking in den Wissenschaften : Wissenschaftsorganisationen und die bizarre Asymmetrie im wissenschaftlichen Publikationssystem (2022) 0.00 
    0.0030278922 = product of:
  0.0060557844 = sum of:
    0.0060557844 = product of:
      0.012111569 = sum of:
        0.012111569 = weight(_text_:d in 931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012111569 = score(doc=931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=931)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  6. Schleim, S.: Fake Science? : Die Sache mit den Raubverlagen (2018) 0.00 
    0.0025953362 = product of:
  0.0051906724 = sum of:
    0.0051906724 = product of:
      0.010381345 = sum of:
        0.010381345 = weight(_text_:d in 1627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010381345 = score(doc=1627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 1627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1627)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  7. Darnton, R.: Im Besitz des Wissens : Von der Gelehrtenrepublik des 18. Jahrhunderts zum digitalen Google-Monopol (2009) 0.00 
    0.0025953362 = product of:
  0.0051906724 = sum of:
    0.0051906724 = product of:
      0.010381345 = sum of:
        0.010381345 = weight(_text_:d in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010381345 = score(doc=2335,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  8. Furger, M.; Ball, R.: Weg mit den Büchern! (2016) 0.00 
    0.0025953362 = product of:
  0.0051906724 = sum of:
    0.0051906724 = product of:
      0.010381345 = sum of:
        0.010381345 = weight(_text_:d in 1272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010381345 = score(doc=1272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 1272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1272)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  9. Weber, S.: ¬Die Automatisierung der Inhalte-Erstellung (2018) 0.00 
    0.0025953362 = product of:
  0.0051906724 = sum of:
    0.0051906724 = product of:
      0.010381345 = sum of:
        0.010381345 = weight(_text_:d in 4565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010381345 = score(doc=4565,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 4565, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4565)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  10. Ginther, C.; Lackner, K.: Predatory Publishing : Herausforderung für Wissenschaftler/innen und Bibliotheken (2019) 0.00 
    0.0025953362 = product of:
  0.0051906724 = sum of:
    0.0051906724 = product of:
      0.010381345 = sum of:
        0.010381345 = weight(_text_:d in 5330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010381345 = score(doc=5330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 5330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5330)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  11. Wolf, C.: Open Access Helper : neue Funktionen kurz vorgestellt (2021) 0.00 
    0.0025953362 = product of:
  0.0051906724 = sum of:
    0.0051906724 = product of:
      0.010381345 = sum of:
        0.010381345 = weight(_text_:d in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010381345 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  12. Datentracking in der Wissenschaft : Aggregation und Verwendung bzw. Verkauf von Nutzungsdaten durch Wissenschaftsverlage. Ein Informationspapier des Ausschusses für Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken und Informationssysteme der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (2021) 0.00 
    0.0025953362 = product of:
  0.0051906724 = sum of:
    0.0051906724 = product of:
      0.010381345 = sum of:
        0.010381345 = weight(_text_:d in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010381345 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  13. Lohnt sich der DEAL? 0.00 
    0.0025953362 = product of:
  0.0051906724 = sum of:
    0.0051906724 = product of:
      0.010381345 = sum of:
        0.010381345 = weight(_text_:d in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010381345 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  14. Seer, V.: Von der Schattenbibliothek zum Forschungskorpus : ein Gespräch über Sci-Hub und die Folgen für die Wissenschaft (2017) 0.00 
    0.0024469066 = product of:
  0.0048938133 = sum of:
    0.0048938133 = product of:
      0.009787627 = sum of:
        0.009787627 = weight(_text_:d in 5606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009787627 = score(doc=5606,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.118742 = fieldWeight in 5606, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5606)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die so genannten Schattenbibliotheken sind vermutlich die radikalste Form, um Beschränkungen des Zugangs zu wissenschaftlicher Literatur zu umgehen. Sie nutzen die Möglichkeiten digitaler Medien und Netze und vermitteln konsequent, niedrigschwellig und umfangreich den Zugang zu digitalen Kopien von Monographien und Aufsätzen. Obschon offensichtlich in vielen Fällen urheberrechtswidrig, erfreuen sich diese Plattformen einer regen Nachfrage und zwar naturgemäß vor allem aus dem Bereich der Wissenschaft. Es scheint, als würden die Schattenbibliotheken Versorgungslücken schließen, die auch vergleichsweise gut ausgestattete Hochschulbibliotheken haben. Einer weiterer Aspekt könnte sein, dass die sehr einfache Benutzbarkeit verbunden mit der Aussicht, ein Paper garantiert herunterladen zu können, den Umweg über VPN-Einwahl und Bibliotheks-Login unattraktiv macht. Werden Schattenbibliotheken somit zur Konkurrenz für Hochschulbibliotheken? Und mit welcher Motivation setzen sich die Betreiber dieser Plattformen einer möglichen Strafverfolgung, die im Kontext der jüngsten Urteile nun wahrscheinlicher wird, aus? Im Juni diesen Jahres bekam der Wissenschaftsverlag Elsevier, der Gewinnmargen von 37% erzielt (siehe Holcombe 2015), von einem US-Gericht knapp 13 Millionen Euro Schadensersatz für die nicht genehmigte Verbreitung von 100 wissenschaftlichen Artikeln (siehe Scherschel 2017 und Strecker 2017) zugesprochen. Die Fachgesellschaft American Chemical Society (ACS) erhielt in einem zweiten Urteil den Anspruch auf knapp 4,1 Millionen Euro Schadenersatz für 32 zu Unrecht kopierte und verbreitete Werke (Siehe Ernesto 2017). Neben der zunehmenden Kriminalisierung erfährt Sci-Hub jedoch auch großen Zuspruch, der sich neben der starken Nutzung auch in Solidaritätsbekundungen manifestiert (siehe Barok, D. et al 2015).
    Language
    d
  15. Geschuhn, K.: Vertragsunterzeichnung Springer Nature und Projekt DEAL (2020) 0.00 
    0.0024469066 = product of:
  0.0048938133 = sum of:
    0.0048938133 = product of:
      0.009787627 = sum of:
        0.009787627 = weight(_text_:d in 5654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009787627 = score(doc=5654,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.118742 = fieldWeight in 5654, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
  16. Pinfield, S.: How do physicists use an e-print archive? : implications for institutional e-print services (2001) 0.00 
    0.0021627804 = product of:
  0.0043255608 = sum of:
    0.0043255608 = product of:
      0.0086511215 = sum of:
        0.0086511215 = weight(_text_:d in 1226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0086511215 = score(doc=1226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1226)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 7(2001) no.12, x S
  17. Hummel, P.: Millionen Fachartikel illegal im Netz verfügbar (2016) 0.00 
    0.0021627804 = product of:
  0.0043255608 = sum of:
    0.0043255608 = product of:
      0.0086511215 = sum of:
        0.0086511215 = weight(_text_:d in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0086511215 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  18. "Google Books" darf weitermachen wie bisher : Entscheidung des Supreme Court in den USA (2016) 0.00 
    0.0021627804 = product of:
  0.0043255608 = sum of:
    0.0043255608 = product of:
      0.0086511215 = sum of:
        0.0086511215 = weight(_text_:d in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0086511215 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  19. Wohlgemuth, M.: EQUAP^2: Projektbericht zu Anforderungen und Erfahrungen im Review-Prozess veröffentlicht. 0.00 
    0.0021627804 = product of:
  0.0043255608 = sum of:
    0.0043255608 = product of:
      0.0086511215 = sum of:
        0.0086511215 = weight(_text_:d in 895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0086511215 = score(doc=895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=895)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  20. Brand, A.: CrossRef turns one (2001) 0.00 
    0.00183518 = product of:
  0.00367036 = sum of:
    0.00367036 = product of:
      0.00734072 = sum of:
        0.00734072 = weight(_text_:d in 1222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00734072 = score(doc=1222,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08242767 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04338591 = queryNorm
            0.0890565 = fieldWeight in 1222, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1222)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    CrossRef, the only full-blown application of the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®) System to date, is now a little over a year old. What started as a cooperative effort among publishers and technologists to prototype DOI-based linking of citations in e-journals evolved into an independent, non-profit enterprise in early 2000. We have made considerable headway during our first year, but there is still much to be done. When CrossRef went live with its collaborative linking service last June, it had enabled reference links in roughly 1,100 journals from a member base of 33 publishers, using a functional prototype system. The DOI-X prototype was described in an article published in D-Lib Magazine in February of 2000. On the occasion of CrossRef's first birthday as a live service, this article provides a non-technical overview of our progress to date and the major hurdles ahead. The electronic medium enriches the research literature arena for all players -- researchers, librarians, and publishers -- in numerous ways. Information has been made easier to discover, to share, and to sell. To take a simple example, the aggregation of book metadata by electronic booksellers was a huge boon to scholars seeking out obscure backlist titles, or discovering books they would never otherwise have known to exist. It was equally a boon for the publishers of those books, who saw an unprecedented surge in sales of backlist titles with the advent of centralized electronic bookselling. In the serials sphere, even in spite of price increases and the turmoil surrounding site licenses for some prime electronic content, libraries overall are now able to offer more content to more of their patrons. Yet undoubtedly, the key enrichment for academics and others navigating a scholarly corpus is linking, and in particular the linking that takes the reader out of one document and into another in the matter of a click or two. Since references are how authors make explicit the links between their work and precedent scholarship, what could be more fundamental to the reader than making those links immediately actionable? That said, automated linking is only really useful from a research perspective if it works across publications and across publishers. Not only do academics think about their own writings and those of their colleagues in terms of "author, title, rough date" -- the name of the journal itself is usually not high on the list of crucial identifying features -- but they are oblivious as to the identity of the publishers of all but their very favorite books and journals.
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 7(2001) no.5, xx S

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 56
  • e 8

Types

  • a 43
  • r 2
  • More… Less…

Themes