Search (37 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Kaden, B.: Elektronisches Publizieren (2013) 0.01
    0.009692165 = product of:
      0.05815299 = sum of:
        0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05815299 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  2. Bauer, B.; Budroni, P.; Ferus, A.; Ganguly, R.; Ramminger, E.; Sánchez Solís, B.: E-Infrastructures Austria 2015 : Bericht über das zweite Jahr des Hochschulraumstrukturmittelprojekts für den koordinierten Aufbau und die kooperative Weiterentwicklung von Repositorieninfrastrukturen PDF (2016) 0.01
    0.008393662 = product of:
      0.05036197 = sum of:
        0.05036197 = weight(_text_:b in 3038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05036197 = score(doc=3038,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.33900195 = fieldWeight in 3038, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3038)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Im zweiten Projektjahr hat sich das HRSM-Projekt e-Infrastructures Austria nicht nur zu einer breit akzeptierten Plattform für Vernetzungsforen, Sitzungen und Weiterbildungseinheiten etabliert, sondern es stehen auch erste Deliverables zur Verfügung, die dem Gesamtziel, dem Aufbau von nachhaltigen Archivinfrastrukturen und der Konsolidierung von Wissen im Bereich Sicherung und Bereitstellung von digitalen Daten, dienlich sind. Anfang 2015 wurde im Rahmen des Projekts eine Befragung durchgeführt, welche das wissenschaftliche und künstlerisch-wissenschaftliche Personal 20 öffentlicher Universitäten sowie drei außeruniversitärer Forschungseinrichtungen in Österreich umfasste. Ziel war es, den praktischen Umgang mit Forschungsdaten zu erheben und das Serviceangebot in diesem Bereich auf die vorhandenen Bedürfnisse abzustimmen. Die Befragungsergebnisse zeigen einen deutlichen Nachholbedarf im Bereich des Datenmanagements. Der Aufbau der technischen Infrastruktur im Bereich Dokumentenserver (Projektsäule A) ist bei allen Partnern weit vorangeschritten, daher wird die Konzentration im letzten Projektjahr vor allem auf Säule B (Forschungsdaten) liegen. Der Forschungsdaten-Abschlussbericht bildet die Basis für eine ExpertInnengruppe, die sich mit der Frage der strategischen Ausrichtung für den Umgang mit Forschungsdaten und Forschungsdatenmanagement in Österreich beschäftigt. Projektsäule C (Wissensnetzwerk) erfährt insofern eine Stärkung, als für das letzte Projektjahr eine zentral organisierte, viertägige Veranstaltung "Fortbildungsseminar für Forschungsdaten und e-Infrastrukturen" für alle Projektpartner konzipiert wird.
  3. Rücker, B.: Open Access in den Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften : Perspektiven für bibliothekarische Dienstleistungen (2010) 0.01
    0.007753731 = product of:
      0.046522386 = sum of:
        0.046522386 = weight(_text_:b in 2567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046522386 = score(doc=2567,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 2567, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2567)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  4. Bauer, B.; Stieg, K.: Open Access Publishing in Österreich 2010 (2010) 0.01
    0.006784515 = product of:
      0.04070709 = sum of:
        0.04070709 = weight(_text_:b in 3683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04070709 = score(doc=3683,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 3683, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3683)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  5. Gullath, B.; Ikas, W.-V.: Zum Nutzen von E-Zeitschriften, Datenbanken und Internet-Publikationen : Neue Wege im Ausbau der BSB-Forschungsdokumentation zu Handschriften und Seltenen Drucken (2011) 0.01
    0.006784515 = product of:
      0.04070709 = sum of:
        0.04070709 = weight(_text_:b in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04070709 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  6. Fallaw, C.; Dunham, E.; Wickes, E.; Strong, D.; Stein, A.; Zhang, Q.; Rimkus, K.; ill Ingram, B.; Imker, H.J.: Overly honest data repository development (2016) 0.01
    0.006784515 = product of:
      0.04070709 = sum of:
        0.04070709 = weight(_text_:b in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04070709 = score(doc=3371,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  7. Fecher, B.; Sokolovska, N.; Friesike, S.; Wagner, G.G.: Governance von Forschungsinfrastruktur am Beispiel von Open Access : Oligopolisierung des Verlagswesens, Plattformisierung der wissenschaftlichen Kommunikation (2019) 0.01
    0.006784515 = product of:
      0.04070709 = sum of:
        0.04070709 = weight(_text_:b in 5501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04070709 = score(doc=5501,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 5501, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5501)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  8. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.01
    0.006695188 = product of:
      0.040171128 = sum of:
        0.040171128 = product of:
          0.080342256 = sum of:
            0.080342256 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.080342256 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041930884 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  9. Bias, R.G.; Larson, K.; Huang, S.-C.; Aumer-Ryan, P.R.; Montesclaros, C.: ¬An exploratory study of visual and psychological correlates of preference for onscreen subpixel-rendered text (2010) 0.01
    0.0058152988 = product of:
      0.03489179 = sum of:
        0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 3438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03489179 = score(doc=3438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 3438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3438)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Font-rendering technologies play a critical role in presenting clear and aesthetic fonts to enhance the experience of reading from computer screens. This article presents three studies investigating visual and psychological correlates of people's preferences toward different onscreen text enhancements such as ClearType developed by Microsoft. Findings suggested that (a) people's acuity and hue sensitivity were two major factors that affect their preferences to ClearType's color filtering of subpixels on fonts, and (b) specific personality traits such as disagreeableness also could correlate with people's impressions of different onscreen text enhancements that were used. These empirical data would inform digital typographers and human-computer interaction scientists who aim to develop better systems of onscreen reading.
  10. Solomon, D.J.; Björk, B.-C.: ¬A study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012) 0.01
    0.0058152988 = product of:
      0.03489179 = sum of:
        0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03489179 = score(doc=365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  11. Björk, B.-C.: ¬The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles : a failed experiment? (2012) 0.01
    0.0058152988 = product of:
      0.03489179 = sum of:
        0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03489179 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  12. Hu, B.; Dong, X.; Zhang, C.; Bowman, T.D.; Ding, Y.; Milojevic, S.; Ni, C.; Yan, E.; Larivière, V.: ¬A lead-lag analysis of the topic evolution patterns for preprints and publications (2015) 0.01
    0.0058152988 = product of:
      0.03489179 = sum of:
        0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03489179 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  13. Brembs, B.: So your institute went cold turkey on publisher X : what now? (2016) 0.01
    0.0058152988 = product of:
      0.03489179 = sum of:
        0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 3562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03489179 = score(doc=3562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 3562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3562)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  14. Loos, A.: ¬Die Million ist geknackt (2015) 0.01
    0.0056810556 = product of:
      0.03408633 = sum of:
        0.03408633 = product of:
          0.06817266 = sum of:
            0.06817266 = weight(_text_:22 in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06817266 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041930884 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    7. 4.2015 17:22:03
  15. Solomon, D.J.; Björk, B.-C.: Publication fees in open access publishing : sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2012) 0.00
    0.0048460825 = product of:
      0.029076494 = sum of:
        0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029076494 = score(doc=754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=754)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  16. Laakso, M.; Björk, B.-C.: Delayed open access : an overlooked high-impact category of openly available scientific literature (2013) 0.00
    0.0048460825 = product of:
      0.029076494 = sum of:
        0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029076494 = score(doc=944,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 944, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=944)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  17. Björk, B.-C.; Laakso, M.; Welling, P.; Paetau, P.: Anatomy of green open access (2014) 0.00
    0.0048460825 = product of:
      0.029076494 = sum of:
        0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029076494 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  18. Pinfield, S.; Salter, J.; Bath, P.A.; Hubbard, B.; Millington, P.; Anders, J.H.S.; Hussain, A.: Open-access repositories worldwide, 2005-2012 : past growth, current characteristics, and future possibilities (2014) 0.00
    0.0048460825 = product of:
      0.029076494 = sum of:
        0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 1542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029076494 = score(doc=1542,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1542, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1542)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  19. Budroni, P.; Ganguly, R.: E-Infrastructure Austria : eine Referenzarchitektur zur dauerhaften Bereitstellung von Daten aus der Forschung als Aufgabe für wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken (2015) 0.00
    0.0048460825 = product of:
      0.029076494 = sum of:
        0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029076494 = score(doc=2612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Im Jänner 2014 wurde das nationale dreijährige HRSM-Projekt e-Infrastructures Austria initiiert. Gesamtziel ist der koordinierte Aufbau und die Weiterentwicklung von Repositorieninfrastrukturen für Forschung und Lehre in ganz Österreich sowie ein effizientes und nachhaltiges Forschungsdatenmanagement an allen teilnehmenden 20 Universitäten und fünf weiteren außeruniversitären Forschungseinrichtungen. Das Projekt gliedert sich in drei Teilprojekte, die thematisch ineinander übergreifen und/oder aufeinander aufbauen. Die Koordination erfolgt durch die Universität Wien. Bis Ende 2016 sollen drei Ziele realisiert werden: - Teilprojekt A (Ziel 1): Aufbau von Dokumentenservern auf lokaler Ebene an den Partneruniversitäten. Zweck: Aufstellung von institutionellen Repositorien an allen teilnehmenden Einrichtungen (alle österreichischen Universitäten mit Ausnahme der Medizinischen Universität Innsbruck) - Teilprojekt B (Ziel 2): Erarbeitung eines strategischen Konzepts für das zukünftige Forschungsdatenmanagement in Österreich - Teilprojekt C (Ziel 3): Aufbau einer Wissensinfrastruktur ("knowledge infrastructure") für alle 25 Projektpartner.
  20. Vincent-Lamarre, P.; Boivin, J.; Gargouri, Y.; Larivière, V.; Harnad, S.: Estimating open access mandate effectiveness : the MELIBEA score (2016) 0.00
    0.0048460825 = product of:
      0.029076494 = sum of:
        0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029076494 = score(doc=3162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    MELIBEA is a directory of institutional open-access policies for research output that uses a composite formula with eight weighted conditions to estimate the "strength" of open access (OA) mandates (registered in ROARMAP). We analyzed total Web of Science-(WoS)-indexed publication output in years 2011-2013 for 67 institutions in which OA was mandated to estimate the mandates' effectiveness: How well did the MELIBEA score and its individual conditions predict what percentage of the WoS-indexed articles is actually deposited in each institution's OA repository, and when? We found a small but significant positive correlation (0.18) between the MELIBEA "strength" score and deposit percentage. For three of the eight MELIBEA conditions (deposit timing, internal use, and opt-outs), one value of each was strongly associated with deposit percentage or latency ([a] immediate deposit required; [b] deposit required for performance evaluation; [c] unconditional opt-out allowed for the OA requirement but no opt-out for deposit requirement). When we updated the initial values and weights of the MELIBEA formula to reflect the empirical association we had found, the score's predictive power for mandate effectiveness doubled (0.36). There are not yet enough OA mandates to test further mandate conditions that might contribute to mandate effectiveness, but the present findings already suggest that it would be productive for existing and future mandates to adopt the three identified conditions so as to maximize their effectiveness, and thereby the growth of OA.

Languages

  • e 19
  • d 17

Types

  • a 36
  • el 8
  • m 1
  • More… Less…