-
Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995)
0.11
0.10742821 = product of:
0.21485642 = sum of:
0.21485642 = sum of:
0.07209203 = weight(_text_:m in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07209203 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.54987466 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
0.14276439 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14276439 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
-
Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994)
0.05
0.052748322 = sum of:
0.024195446 = product of:
0.09678178 = sum of:
0.09678178 = weight(_text_:authors in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09678178 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.028552879 = product of:
0.057105757 = sum of:
0.057105757 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057105757 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The nature and implications of electrocopying are summarised. After a brief review of the principles of copyright, the issue of whether electrocopying infringes copyright is debated. Publishers are aware of the threat that electrocopying poses to their business. The various options available to publishers for responding to electrocopying are summarised. Patterns of scholarly communications and the relationships between authors, publishers and libraries are being challenged. Constructive dialogue is necessary if the issues are to be resolved
- Source
- Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
-
Schwartz, E.: Like a book on a wire (1993)
0.05
0.046154782 = sum of:
0.021171015 = product of:
0.08468406 = sum of:
0.08468406 = weight(_text_:authors in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08468406 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.024983767 = product of:
0.049967535 = sum of:
0.049967535 = weight(_text_:22 in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049967535 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses the publishing of books online on the Internet, in the USA. The issues is treated mainly in relation to trade publishers. Outlines various ways in which such publishers have so far used the Internet, for example in the publishing of the full text of works of fiction, for publishing catalogues, and for presenting authors to the public via bulletin boards or electronic conferences. Notes a number or problems which arise: copyright, payment for accessing items, advertising restrictions, and the ease with which the published unit can be tampered with when available on the Internet. Also discusses collaboration and conflicts between publishers and the technology industry
- Source
- Publishers weekly. 240(1993) no.47, 22 Nov., S.33-35,38
-
Wakeling, S.; Creaser, C.; Pinfield, S.; Fry, J.; Spezi, V.; Willett, P.; Paramita, M.: Motivations, understandings, and experiences of open-access mega-journal authors : results of a large-scale survey (2019)
0.05
0.04605306 = sum of:
0.037041556 = product of:
0.14816622 = sum of:
0.14816622 = weight(_text_:authors in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14816622 = score(doc=5317,freq=12.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.61688256 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.009011503 = product of:
0.018023007 = sum of:
0.018023007 = weight(_text_:m in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018023007 = score(doc=5317,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Open-access mega-journals (OAMJs) are characterized by their large scale, wide scope, open-access (OA) business model, and "soundness-only" peer review. The last of these controversially discounts the novelty, significance, and relevance of submitted articles and assesses only their "soundness." This article reports the results of an international survey of authors (n = 11,883), comparing the responses of OAMJ authors with those of other OA and subscription journals, and drawing comparisons between different OAMJs. Strikingly, OAMJ authors showed a low understanding of soundness-only peer review: two-thirds believed OAMJs took into account novelty, significance, and relevance, although there were marked geographical variations. Author satisfaction with OAMJs, however, was high, with more than 80% of OAMJ authors saying they would publish again in the same journal, although there were variations by title, and levels were slightly lower than subscription journals (over 90%). Their reasons for choosing to publish in OAMJs included a wide variety of factors, not significantly different from reasons given by authors of other journals, with the most important including the quality of the journal and quality of peer review. About half of OAMJ articles had been submitted elsewhere before submission to the OAMJ with some evidence of a "cascade" of articles between journals from the same publisher.
-
Jensen, M.: Digital structure, digital design : issues in designing electronic publications (1996)
0.04
0.042971283 = product of:
0.08594257 = sum of:
0.08594257 = sum of:
0.02883681 = weight(_text_:m in 7481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02883681 = score(doc=7481,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 7481, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7481)
0.057105757 = weight(_text_:22 in 7481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057105757 = score(doc=7481,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7481, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7481)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of scholarly publishing. 28(1996) no.1, S.13-22
-
Alexander, M.: Digitising books, manuscripts and scholarly materials : preparation, handling, scanning, recognition, compression, storage formats (1998)
0.04
0.042971283 = product of:
0.08594257 = sum of:
0.08594257 = sum of:
0.02883681 = weight(_text_:m in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02883681 = score(doc=3686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
0.057105757 = weight(_text_:22 in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057105757 = score(doc=3686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:00:52
-
Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009)
0.04
0.039561242 = sum of:
0.018146584 = product of:
0.072586335 = sum of:
0.072586335 = weight(_text_:authors in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072586335 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.021414658 = product of:
0.042829316 = sum of:
0.042829316 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042829316 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A review of recent developments in electronic publishing, with a focus on Open Access (OA) is provided. It describes the two main types of OA, i.e. the `gold' OA journal route and the 'green' repository route, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the two, and the reactions of the publishing industry to these developments. Quality, cost and copyright issues are explored, as well as some of the business models of OA. It is noted that whilst so far there is no evidence that a shift to OA will lead to libraries cancelling subscriptions to toll-access journals, this may happen in the future, and that despite the apparently compelling reasons for authors to move to OA, so far few have shown themselves willing to do so. Conclusions about the future of scholarly publications are drawn.
- Date
- 8. 7.2010 19:22:45
-
Clark, M.: Structural defects : form and content in electronic publishing (1996)
0.04
0.03861385 = sum of:
0.024195446 = product of:
0.09678178 = sum of:
0.09678178 = weight(_text_:authors in 4776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09678178 = score(doc=4776,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 4776, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4776)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014418405 = product of:
0.02883681 = sum of:
0.02883681 = weight(_text_:m in 4776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02883681 = score(doc=4776,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 4776, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4776)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Examines the development of structured document formatting systems, in particular TeX/LaTeX. Discusses the view that authors simply write, while the formatting software does the work of rendering the structured text into a suitable visual form. Cites examples which contest the view that form and content can be separated completely
-
Kommers, P.A.M.; Ferreira, A.; Kwak, A.K.: Document management for hypermedia design (1997)
0.04
0.03861385 = sum of:
0.024195446 = product of:
0.09678178 = sum of:
0.09678178 = weight(_text_:authors in 7515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09678178 = score(doc=7515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 7515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7515)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014418405 = product of:
0.02883681 = sum of:
0.02883681 = weight(_text_:m in 7515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02883681 = score(doc=7515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 7515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7515)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Electronic texts offer new ways to store, retrieve, update, and cross-link information. Hypermedia documents require new levels of organization and strict discipline from authors, editors, and managers. This book provides a step-by step guide to all aspects of hypermedia development, from strategic decision-making to editing formats and production methods
- Type
- m
-
Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018)
0.04
0.038471885 = sum of:
0.024195446 = product of:
0.09678178 = sum of:
0.09678178 = weight(_text_:authors in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09678178 = score(doc=4631,freq=8.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014276439 = product of:
0.028552879 = sum of:
0.028552879 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028552879 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like "performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing" are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Hammerl, M.; Kempf, K.; Schäffler, H.: E-Books in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken : Versuch einer Bestandsaufnahme (2008)
0.04
0.037599873 = product of:
0.075199746 = sum of:
0.075199746 = sum of:
0.025232209 = weight(_text_:m in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025232209 = score(doc=1802,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
0.049967535 = weight(_text_:22 in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049967535 = score(doc=1802,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 5.2008 19:13:22
-
Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017)
0.03
0.031385206 = sum of:
0.017108764 = product of:
0.06843506 = sum of:
0.06843506 = weight(_text_:authors in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06843506 = score(doc=4051,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014276439 = product of:
0.028552879 = sum of:
0.028552879 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028552879 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The introduction of "altmetrics" as new tools to analyze scientific impact within the reward system of science has challenged the hegemony of citations as the predominant source for measuring scientific impact. Mendeley readership has been identified as one of the most important altmetric sources, with several features that are similar to citations. The purpose of this paper is to perform an in-depth analysis of the differences and similarities between the distributions of Mendeley readership and citations across fields. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze two issues by using in each case a common analytical framework for both metrics: the shape of the distributions of readership and citations, and the field normalization problem generated by differences in citation and readership practices across fields. In the first issue the authors use the characteristic scores and scales method, and in the second the measurement framework introduced in Crespo et al. (2013). Findings There are three main results. First, the citations and Mendeley readership distributions exhibit a strikingly similar degree of skewness in all fields. Second, the results on "exchange rates (ERs)" for Mendeley readership empirically supports the possibility of comparing readership counts across fields, as well as the field normalization of readership distributions using ERs as normalization factors. Third, field normalization using field mean readerships as normalization factors leads to comparably good results. Originality/value These findings open up challenging new questions, particularly regarding the possibility of obtaining conflicting results from field normalized citation and Mendeley readership indicators; this suggests the need for better determining the role of the two metrics in capturing scientific recognition.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Travis, B.E.; Waldt, D.C.: ¬The SGML implementation guide : a blueprint for SGML migration (1995)
0.03
0.03039746 = sum of:
0.021385957 = product of:
0.085543826 = sum of:
0.085543826 = weight(_text_:authors in 5757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085543826 = score(doc=5757,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 5757, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5757)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.009011503 = product of:
0.018023007 = sum of:
0.018023007 = weight(_text_:m in 5757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018023007 = score(doc=5757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 5757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This is the book the authors wish they had when they did their first SGML implementation. The SGML implementation guide gives you the tools you need to get your implementation started and provides help in every step of the process, from the business case, through data migration, to application development and training. There is also a technical appendix covering the SGML standard and what is necessary to write SGML applications. This book contains years of practical experience by the authors. The reader will get up-to-speed very quickly, and will be able to build the business case and implement an SGML system in his organization
- Type
- m
-
Zschunke, P.; Svensson, P.: Bücherbrett für alle Fälle : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000)
0.03
0.030284902 = product of:
0.060569804 = sum of:
0.060569804 = product of:
0.12113961 = sum of:
0.12113961 = weight(_text_:22 in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12113961 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
18. 6.2000 9:11:22
-
Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993)
0.03
0.028552879 = product of:
0.057105757 = sum of:
0.057105757 = product of:
0.114211515 = sum of:
0.114211515 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.114211515 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
-
Polatscheck, K.: Elektronische Versuchung : Test des Sony Data Discman: eine digitale Konkurrenz für Taschenbücher? (1992)
0.03
0.028552879 = product of:
0.057105757 = sum of:
0.057105757 = product of:
0.114211515 = sum of:
0.114211515 = weight(_text_:22 in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.114211515 = score(doc=6381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Zeit. Nr.xx vom ???, S.22
-
Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998)
0.03
0.028552879 = product of:
0.057105757 = sum of:
0.057105757 = product of:
0.114211515 = sum of:
0.114211515 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.114211515 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Abdoli, M.: Goodreads reviews to assess the wider impacts of books (2017)
0.03
0.027866345 = sum of:
0.015122154 = product of:
0.060488615 = sum of:
0.060488615 = weight(_text_:authors in 3768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060488615 = score(doc=3768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 3768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3768)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.01274419 = product of:
0.02548838 = sum of:
0.02548838 = weight(_text_:m in 3768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02548838 = score(doc=3768,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.19441006 = fieldWeight in 3768, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3768)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Although peer-review and citation counts are commonly used to help assess the scholarly impact of published research, informal reader feedback might also be exploited to help assess the wider impacts of books, such as their educational or cultural value. The social website Goodreads seems to be a reasonable source for this purpose because it includes a large number of book reviews and ratings by many users inside and outside of academia. To check this, Goodreads book metrics were compared with different book-based impact indicators for 15,928 academic books across broad fields. Goodreads engagements were numerous enough in the arts (85% of books had at least one), humanities (80%), and social sciences (67%) for use as a source of impact evidence. Low and moderate correlations between Goodreads book metrics and scholarly or non-scholarly indicators suggest that reader feedback in Goodreads reflects the many purposes of books rather than a single type of impact. Although Goodreads book metrics can be manipulated, they could be used guardedly by academics, authors, and publishers in evaluations.
-
Bayer, M.: ¬Die Gier der Bits und Bytes auf Gutenberg : Elektronisches Publizieren, Drucken und das papierlose E-Book melden sich in Frankfurt zu Wort (2000)
0.03
0.026857052 = product of:
0.053714104 = sum of:
0.053714104 = sum of:
0.018023007 = weight(_text_:m in 5391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018023007 = score(doc=5391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 5391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5391)
0.035691097 = weight(_text_:22 in 5391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035691097 = score(doc=5391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5391)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
-
Bleuel, J.: Online Publizieren im Internet : elektronische Zeitschriften und Bücher (1995)
0.03
0.026857052 = product of:
0.053714104 = sum of:
0.053714104 = sum of:
0.018023007 = weight(_text_:m in 1708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018023007 = score(doc=1708,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 1708, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1708)
0.035691097 = weight(_text_:22 in 1708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035691097 = score(doc=1708,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1708, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1708)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 16:15:37
- Type
- m
