Search (70 results, page 2 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Formale Begriffsanalyse"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995) 0.00
    0.0022179869 = product of:
      0.0044359737 = sum of:
        0.0044359737 = product of:
          0.013307921 = sum of:
            0.013307921 = weight(_text_:a in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013307921 = score(doc=595,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  2. Lex, W.: ¬A representation of concepts for their computerization (1987) 0.00
    0.0021952377 = product of:
      0.0043904753 = sum of:
        0.0043904753 = product of:
          0.013171425 = sum of:
            0.013171425 = weight(_text_:a in 618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013171425 = score(doc=618,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 618, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=618)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A lattice theoretical description of concept hierarchies is developed using for attributes the terms "given", "negated", "open" and "impossible" as the truth-values of a four-valued logic. Similar to the theory of B. Ganter and R. Wille so does this framework permit a precise representation of the usual interdependences in a field of related concepts - such as superconcepts, subconcept, contrary concepts etc. -, whenever the concepts under consideration can be sufficiently described by the presence or absence of certain attributes ...
    Type
    a
  3. Priss, U.: Lattice-based information retrieval (2000) 0.00
    0.0019208328 = product of:
      0.0038416656 = sum of:
        0.0038416656 = product of:
          0.011524997 = sum of:
            0.011524997 = weight(_text_:a in 6055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011524997 = score(doc=6055,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 6055, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6055)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A lattice-based model for information retrieval was suggested in the 1960's but has been seen as a theoretical possibility hard to practically apply ever since. This paper attempts to revive the lattice model and demonstrate its applicability in an information retrieval system, FalR, that incorporates a graphical representation of a faceted thesaurus. It shows how Boolean queries can be lattice-theoretically related to the concepts of the thesaurus and visualized within the thesaurus display. An advantage of FaIR is that it allows for a high level of transparency of the system, which can be controlled by the user
    Type
    a
  4. Priss, U.: ¬A graphical interface for conceptually navigating faceted thesauri (1998) 0.00
    0.0019208328 = product of:
      0.0038416656 = sum of:
        0.0038416656 = product of:
          0.011524997 = sum of:
            0.011524997 = weight(_text_:a in 6658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011524997 = score(doc=6658,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 6658, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6658)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a graphical interface for the navigation and construction of faceted thesauri that is based on formal concept analysis. Each facet of a thesaurus is represented as a mathematical lattice that is further subdivided into components. Users can graphically navigate through the Java implementation of the interface by clicking on terms that connect facets and components. Since there are many applications for thesauri in the knowledge representation field, such a graphical interface has the potential of being very useful
    Type
    a
  5. Skorsky, M.: How to draw a concept lattice with parallelograms (1989) 0.00
    0.0019011315 = product of:
      0.003802263 = sum of:
        0.003802263 = product of:
          0.011406789 = sum of:
            0.011406789 = weight(_text_:a in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011406789 = score(doc=592,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  6. Großkopf, A.; Harras, G.: Begriffliche Erkundung semantischer Strukturen von Sprechaktverben (2000) 0.00
    0.0019011315 = product of:
      0.003802263 = sum of:
        0.003802263 = product of:
          0.011406789 = sum of:
            0.011406789 = weight(_text_:a in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011406789 = score(doc=4204,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  7. Ganter, B.: Algorithmen zur formalen Begriffsanalyse (1991) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 3038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=3038,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3038, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3038)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  8. Wille, R.: Line diagrams of hierarchical concept systems (1984) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 3040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=3040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3040)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  9. Wille, R.: Bedeutungen von Begriffsverbänden (1987) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 3041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=3041,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3041, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3041)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  10. Wille, R.: Geometric representations of concept lattices (1989) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 3042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=3042,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3042, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3042)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  11. Wille, R.: Concept lattices and conceptual knowledge systems (1992) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 3142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=3142,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3142, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3142)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  12. Priss, U.: Formal concept analysis in information science (2006) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 4305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=4305,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4305, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4305)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  13. Sedelow, W.A.: ¬The formal analysis of concepts (1993) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=620,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The present paper focuses on the extraction, by means of a formal logical/mathematical methodology (i.e. automatically, exclusively by rule), of concept content, as in, for example, continuous discourse. The approach to a fully formal defintion of concept content ultimately is owing to a German government initiative to establish 'standards' regarding concepts, in conjunction with efforts to stipulate precisely (and then, derivatively, through computer prgrams) data and information needs according to work role in certain government offices
    Type
    a
  14. Kipke, U.; Wille, R.: Formale Begriffsanalyse erläutert an einem Wortfeld (1987) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 6233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=6233,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6233, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6233)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  15. De Maio, C.; Fenza, G.; Loia, V.; Senatore, S.: Hierarchical web resources retrieval by exploiting Fuzzy Formal Concept Analysis (2012) 0.00
    0.0016464281 = product of:
      0.0032928563 = sum of:
        0.0032928563 = product of:
          0.009878568 = sum of:
            0.009878568 = weight(_text_:a in 2737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009878568 = score(doc=2737,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 2737, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2737)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, knowledge structuring is assuming important roles in several real world applications such as decision support, cooperative problem solving, e-commerce, Semantic Web and, even in planning systems. Ontologies play an important role in supporting automated processes to access information and are at the core of new strategies for the development of knowledge-based systems. Yet, developing an ontology is a time-consuming task which often needs an accurate domain expertise to tackle structural and logical difficulties in the definition of concepts as well as conceivable relationships. This work presents an ontology-based retrieval approach, that supports data organization and visualization and provides a friendly navigation model. It exploits the fuzzy extension of the Formal Concept Analysis theory to elicit conceptualizations from datasets and generate a hierarchy-based representation of extracted knowledge. An intuitive graphical interface provides a multi-facets view of the built ontology. Through a transparent query-based retrieval, final users navigate across concepts, relations and population.
    Type
    a
  16. Carpineto, C.; Romano, G.: Order-theoretical ranking (2000) 0.00
    0.0015842763 = product of:
      0.0031685526 = sum of:
        0.0031685526 = product of:
          0.0095056575 = sum of:
            0.0095056575 = weight(_text_:a in 4766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0095056575 = score(doc=4766,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 4766, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4766)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Current best-match ranking (BMR) systems perform well but cannot handle word mismatch between a query and a document. The best known alternative ranking method, hierarchical clustering-based ranking (HCR), seems to be more robust than BMR with respect to this problem, but it is hampered by theoretical and practical limitations. We present an approach to document ranking that explicitly addresses the word mismatch problem by exploiting interdocument similarity information in a novel way. Document ranking is seen as a query-document transformation driven by a conceptual representation of the whole document collection, into which the query is merged. Our approach is nased on the theory of concept (or Galois) lattices, which, er argue, provides a powerful, well-founded, and conputationally-tractable framework to model the space in which documents and query are represented and to compute such a transformation. We compared information retrieval using concept lattice-based ranking (CLR) to BMR and HCR. The results showed that HCR was outperformed by CLR as well as BMR, and suggested that, of the two best methods, BMR achieved better performance than CLR on the whole document set, whereas CLR compared more favorably when only the first retrieved documents were used for evaluation. We also evaluated the three methods' specific ability to rank documents that did not match the query, in which case the speriority of CLR over BMR and HCR was apparent
    Type
    a
  17. Ganter, B.; Wille, R.: Conceptual scaling (1989) 0.00
    0.0015683535 = product of:
      0.003136707 = sum of:
        0.003136707 = product of:
          0.009410121 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 3138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=3138,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3138, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3138)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  18. Kollewe, W.: Data representation by nested line diagrams illustrated by a survey of pensioners (1991) 0.00
    0.0015683535 = product of:
      0.003136707 = sum of:
        0.003136707 = product of:
          0.009410121 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 5230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=5230,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5230, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    With formal concept analysis surveys are analyzable in the way that a meaningful picture of the answers of the interviewed persons is available. Line diagrams of large concept lattices might become less readable up to the point that it is impossible to pursue the line segments with the eyes. Nested line diagrams give the opportunity to overcome these difficulties. The main idea of nested line diagrams is to partition the line diagram into boxes so that line segments between two boxes are all parallel and may be replaced by one line segment. The possibility to draw line diagrams with more than two factors does allow it to describe concept lattices with many hundred or thousand concepts in a clear structure. In practice it has often been proven useful to take standardized scales for the single levels
    Type
    a
  19. Zickwolff, M.: Zur Rolle der Formalen Begriffsanalyse in der Wissensakquisition (1994) 0.00
    0.0015683535 = product of:
      0.003136707 = sum of:
        0.003136707 = product of:
          0.009410121 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 8938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=8938,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 8938, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8938)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  20. Wille, R.: Knowledge acquisition by methods of formal concept analysis (1989) 0.00
    0.0015683535 = product of:
      0.003136707 = sum of:
        0.003136707 = product of:
          0.009410121 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=594,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 594, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=594)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a