Search (40 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Kataloge"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Eversberg, B.: ADV und Zetteldruck : ein Widerspruch? (1975) 0.04
    0.04193744 = product of:
      0.08387488 = sum of:
        0.08387488 = sum of:
          0.009313605 = weight(_text_:a in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009313605 = score(doc=4431,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
          0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02496453 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
          0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049596746 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A method is outlined which would permit a large number of libraries of all types to use centralised cataloguing facilities without the need for their own automatic data processing equipment and outlay. The method is seen as an alternative to the OCLC on-line data bank, and permits the ordering of printed catalogue cards by machine-readable but hand-prepared data cards, such as the loan cards which readers at the Münster library are at present required to complete. The proposed sequence of ordering is set out in 11 stages
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390
    Type
    a
  2. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American Cataloging Alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2003) 0.02
    0.022905817 = product of:
      0.045811635 = sum of:
        0.045811635 = product of:
          0.06871745 = sum of:
            0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0067215143 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
            0.061995935 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061995935 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.3-22
    Type
    a
  3. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American cataloging alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2002) 0.02
    0.01603407 = product of:
      0.03206814 = sum of:
        0.03206814 = product of:
          0.04810221 = sum of:
            0.0047050603 = weight(_text_:a in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047050603 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 35(2002) nos.1/2, S.3-22
    Type
    a
  4. Eversberg, B.: Zur Katalogpolitik der alten Hochschulbibliotheken : Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung (1978) 0.01
    0.009997789 = product of:
      0.019995578 = sum of:
        0.019995578 = product of:
          0.029993366 = sum of:
            0.008149404 = weight(_text_:a in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008149404 = score(doc=368,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
            0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021843962 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    After a long delay the final edition of RAK has been published. The old university libraries have suffered for years from using the Prussian Instructions which are obsolete and time-consuming; they have hesitated to give their old catalogues up but should do so as soon as possible. A new cataloguing policy is now needed, moving away from traditional practices that still govern even RAK towards simplified rules suitable for future developments such as use in centralised regional catalogues and in automated data processing. Simplified rules are proposed and discussed in relation to American and British minimal cataloguing, with suggestions for changes in basic terminology, general rules, main and subordinate entries, personal name and corporate body entries and subject headings
    Source
    DFW. 26(1978) H.6, S.229-234,236
    Type
    a
  5. Walravens, H.: Serials cataloging in Germany : the historical development (2003) 0.01
    0.009997789 = product of:
      0.019995578 = sum of:
        0.019995578 = product of:
          0.029993366 = sum of:
            0.008149404 = weight(_text_:a in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008149404 = score(doc=5651,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
            0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021843962 = score(doc=5651,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper outlines the development of serials cataloguing in Germany, which started with entries usually in systematic catalogues. Cataloguing codes were developed first by individual major libraries; the establishment of a Prussian union catalogue called for generally recognized rules, but these focused mainly on sorting and filing. When, in the 1960s, the Prussian Instructions were given up in favor of RAK (Regeln für Alphabetische Katalogisierung), ISBD was adopted for the descriptive part. As to modern international cooperation, this paper explains that the main obstacles are not so much different cataloguing codes but the lack of consensus on the definition of a serial title. Recent revision efforts missed the opportunity of accepting an International Standard Serials Title.
    Type
    a
  6. Lubetzky, S.: Development of cataloging rules (1953) 0.01
    0.009533988 = product of:
      0.019067977 = sum of:
        0.019067977 = product of:
          0.028601965 = sum of:
            0.009878568 = weight(_text_:a in 2626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009878568 = score(doc=2626,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 2626, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2626)
            0.018723397 = weight(_text_:h in 2626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018723397 = score(doc=2626,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2626, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2626)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The growth of the rules which shape library catalogs and determine their character and usefulness is susceptible of much more extended treatment than is possible here. What is attempted in the following pages is to point out present trends and to indicate their significance. Evidently the year 1941 marked the beginning of a new phase in the evolution of cataloging rules. The publication then of the preliminary American second edition of the A.L.A. Catalog Rules appears as the culmination of a movement inspired exactly one hundred years earlier by the issue of Panizzi's rules. The latter followed a very long period in which rudimentary methods of cataloging slowly evolved and the need of rules to systematize the work gradually came to be recognized. As long as libraries were small and few books were published, the contents of a library could be recorded in any fashion that struck the fancy of the one in charge. Catalogs were made by librarians largely for their own use and had one simple function, that of an inventory or a collection of lists showing the holdings. The form and arrangement of the entries were arbitrary.
    Source
    Library Trends. 2(1953), H.2, S.179-186
    Type
    a
  7. Walravens, H.: Serials cataloging in Germany : the historical development (2003) 0.01
    0.008569533 = product of:
      0.017139066 = sum of:
        0.017139066 = product of:
          0.025708599 = sum of:
            0.006985203 = weight(_text_:a in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006985203 = score(doc=5650,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
            0.018723397 = weight(_text_:h in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018723397 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper outlines the development of serials cataloguing in Germany, which started with entries usually in systematic catalogues. Cataloguing codes were developed first by individual major libraries; the establishment of a Prussian union catalogue called for generally recognized rules, but these focused mainly on sorting and filing. When, in the 1960s, the Prussian Instructions were given up in favor of RAK (Regeln für Alphabetische Katalogisierung), ISBD was adopted for the descriptive part. As to modern international cooperation, this paper explains that the main obstacles are not so much different cataloguing codes but the lack of consensus on the definition of a serial title. Recent revision efforts missed the opportunity of accepting an International Standard Serials Title.
    Type
    a
  8. Kasprzik, A.: Vorläufer der Internationalen Katalogisierungsprinzipien (2014) 0.01
    0.008569533 = product of:
      0.017139066 = sum of:
        0.017139066 = product of:
          0.025708599 = sum of:
            0.006985203 = weight(_text_:a in 1619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006985203 = score(doc=1619,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1619, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1619)
            0.018723397 = weight(_text_:h in 1619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018723397 = score(doc=1619,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1619, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1619)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Für eine korrekte und zielführende Formalerschließung lassen sich drei Ebenen von Leitlinien definieren: Zielsetzungen, Prinzipien und Regeln der Katalogisierung. Der vorliegende Artikel befasst sich hauptsächlich mit den (möglichen) Zielsetzungen und Prinzipien der Katalogisierung. In der Einleitung der im Jahr 2009 herausgegebenen "Erklärung zu den Internationalen Katalogisierungsprinzipien" (ICP) ist vermerkt, dass die dort vorgelegte Prinzipiensammlung aufbaut auf "den großen Katalogtraditionen der Welt". Diese Traditionen werden dann mit drei Referenzen aus der frühen Fachliteratur belegt: Den Schriften von Charles A. Cutter (1904), Shiyali R. Ranganathan (1955) und Seymour Lubetzky (1969). In diesem Artikel werden nach einem kurzen chronologischen Überblick die drei genannten Publikationen und insbesondere die darin enthaltenen Feststellungen zu Sinn und Zweck von international einheitlichen Prinzipien für die bibliothekarische Formalerschließung in ihren geschichtlichen Kontext eingeordnet und ihr jeweiliger Einfluss auf die diversen existierenden Formulierungen von Zielen und Prinzipien näher beleuchtet. Außerdem werden einige bemerkenswert moderne Gedankengänge in den betreffenden Schriften aufgezeigt. Ein abschließendes Fazit fasst die wichtigsten Zielsetzungen und Prinzipien der Katalogisierung noch einmal mit Bezug auf die verwendete Literatur zur Theorie der Informationsorganisation zusammen.
    Source
    Perspektive Bibliothek. 3(2014) H.2, S.120-143
    Type
    a
  9. Popst, H.; Croissant, C.R.: ¬The development of descriptive cataloging in Germany (2002) 0.01
    0.007441449 = product of:
      0.014882898 = sum of:
        0.014882898 = product of:
          0.022324346 = sum of:
            0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 5487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0067215143 = score(doc=5487,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 5487, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5487)
            0.015602832 = weight(_text_:h in 5487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015602832 = score(doc=5487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 5487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5487)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses the development of descriptive cataloging in Germany and the evolution of cataloging principles. The Instruktionen für die alphabetischen Kataloge der preußischen Bibliotheken (Instructions for the Alphabetic Catalogs of the Prussian Libraries, known as the Prussian Instructions, or PI, for short) were published in 1899. The so-called Berliner Anweisungen ("Berlin Instructions," Instructions for the Alphabetic Catalog in Public Libraries) appeared in 1938. Discussion for reform of cataloging rules began in the 1950s and received impetus from the International Conference on Cataloging Principles in Paris in 1961 and from the International Meeting of Cataloging Experts in Copenhagen in 1969. Preliminary drafts of the new Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung, RAK (Rules for Descriptive Cataloging) were issued between 1969 and 1976; the complete edition of the RAK was published in the German Democratic Republic (East Germany) in 1976 and in a slightly different version in 1977 for the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany). A version for academic libraries appeared in 1983, followed by a version for public libraries in 1986. Between 1987 and 1997, supplementary rules for special categories of materials were published.
    Type
    a
  10. Predeek, A.: Antonio Panizzi und der alphabetische Katalog des Britischen Museums (1937) 0.00
    0.0025348421 = product of:
      0.0050696842 = sum of:
        0.0050696842 = product of:
          0.015209052 = sum of:
            0.015209052 = weight(_text_:a in 8963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015209052 = score(doc=8963,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 8963, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8963)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  11. Carpenter, M.: ¬The original 73 rules of the British Museum : a preliminary analysis (2003) 0.00
    0.0025348421 = product of:
      0.0050696842 = sum of:
        0.0050696842 = product of:
          0.015209052 = sum of:
            0.015209052 = weight(_text_:a in 2162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015209052 = score(doc=2162,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 2162, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2162)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: Crestadoro, A.: The art of making catalogues of libraries: or, a method to obtain in a short time a most perfect, complete, and satisfactory printed catalog of the British Museum Library / by a reader therein [i.e. A. Crestadoro]. London: Published and sold by The Literary, Scientific & Artistic Reference Office 1856.
    Type
    a
  12. Schmidt, G.: Panizzis Regeln für den alphabetischen Katalog : zur Entstehungsgeschichte der 91 'Rules for the compilation of the catalogue' (1982) 0.00
    0.0023711277 = product of:
      0.0047422554 = sum of:
        0.0047422554 = product of:
          0.014226765 = sum of:
            0.014226765 = weight(_text_:a in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014226765 = score(doc=5491,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Crestadoro, A.: The art of making catalogues of libraries: or, a method to obtain in a short time a most perfect, complete, and satisfactory printed catalog of the British Museum Library / by a reader therein [i.e. A. Crestadoro]. London: Published and sold by The Literary, Scientific & Artistic Reference Office 1856.
    Type
    a
  13. Carpenter, M.: ¬The original 73 rules of the British Museum : a preliminary analysis (2002) 0.00
    0.0021255296 = product of:
      0.004251059 = sum of:
        0.004251059 = product of:
          0.012753177 = sum of:
            0.012753177 = weight(_text_:a in 2160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012753177 = score(doc=2160,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.24171482 = fieldWeight in 2160, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2160)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The well-known 91 rules of the 1841 British Museum catalog, adopted in July 1839, had an ancestor in a draft of 73 rules from March 1839, a document that might be called the original rules of Anthony Panizzi. The code, finally sanctioned by the British Museum Trustees, has some substantial differences from the original draft, differences that seem to foreshadow later discussion on cataloging rules. In this preliminary analysis, some of these differences are described. Additionally, the origin of the rules is discussed.
    Content
    Vgl. auch: Crestadoro, A.: The art of making catalogues of libraries: or, a method to obtain in a short time a most perfect, complete, and satisfactory printed catalog of the British Museum Library / by a reader therein [i.e. A. Crestadoro]. London: Published and sold by The Literary, Scientific & Artistic Reference Office 1856.
    Type
    a
  14. Jones, E.A.: Death of a cataloguing code : Seymour Lubetzky's code of cataloging rules and the question of institutions (1996) 0.00
    0.0020039687 = product of:
      0.0040079374 = sum of:
        0.0040079374 = product of:
          0.012023811 = sum of:
            0.012023811 = weight(_text_:a in 4433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012023811 = score(doc=4433,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 4433, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4433)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Technical services management: 1965-1990. A quarter of a century of change and a look into the future. Festschrift for Kathryn Luther Henderson. Ed.: L.C. Smith et al
    Type
    a
  15. Rijk, E. de: Thomas Hyde, Julia Pettee and the development of cataloguing principles : with a translation of Hyde's 1674 preface to the reader (1991) 0.00
    0.0019208328 = product of:
      0.0038416656 = sum of:
        0.0038416656 = product of:
          0.011524997 = sum of:
            0.011524997 = weight(_text_:a in 528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011524997 = score(doc=528,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 528, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=528)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Julia Pettee's claim to find in Thomas Hyde's 'Preface to the Bodleian catalogue of 1674' a formulation of the first principle of modern cataloguing stands up to the criticism of Eva Verona and Carolyn Frost. Her statement of that principle, 'that the cataloguer should recognise and assemble literary units under a single caption', faithfully summarises the common intent of the procedures described in Hyde's preface. Further, this principle should not be identified with the literary unit principle alone (a common misconception), but refers to the 2 interrelated principles of authorship and the literary unit. That Hyde 'formulated' these principles cab be defended only if we permit Pettee a certain latitude in her use of language.
    Type
    a
  16. Radford, W.: Cataloges, codes and bibliographical control (1949) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=1837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  17. Gallagher, H.M.: Dr. Osborn's 1941 "The Crisis in Cataloging" : a shift in thought toward American pragmatism (1991) 0.00
    0.0017783458 = product of:
      0.0035566916 = sum of:
        0.0035566916 = product of:
          0.010670074 = sum of:
            0.010670074 = weight(_text_:a in 506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010670074 = score(doc=506,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 506, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=506)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper identifies the text of Dr. Andrew Osborn's 1941 "The Crisis in Cataloging" as a place where a shift in the shared set of assumptions governing cataloging rules and practices occurs. Cataloging from 1930-1942 was in a state of change and confusion. Existing guidelines of 1908 Cataloging Rules, the draft being revised which was to become the 1941 Anglo-American Code, and Library of Congress cards and practices all proved to contribute to the difficulties in cataloging rather than remedy them. Dr. Osborn functioned as a "gatekeeper" who understood and integrated the available intellectual discourse on American Pragmatism and introduces it to Librarianship. "The Crisis in Cataloging" articulates what the theoretical presuppositions are of the then-available guidelines, and explains the erros of their consequences. It is possible to identify in "Crisis" the introduction of four specific conceptual changes which become a part of the discourse and shared assumptions of cataloging. Each concept is shown to be possible because of ideas, values, and ways of thinking introduced by the philosophy of American Pragmatism.
    Type
    a
  18. Brunt, R.: From main entry to work authority record : development of a cataloguing fundamental (1999) 0.00
    0.0017534725 = product of:
      0.003506945 = sum of:
        0.003506945 = product of:
          0.0105208345 = sum of:
            0.0105208345 = weight(_text_:a in 756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0105208345 = score(doc=756,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 756, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=756)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the confusion between main entry and main entry heading and attempts to finally lay the ghost to rest by shifting the emphasis onto the problem of work authority - the problem with which the theory of main entry is actually concerned. Concentrating on the second function of the catalogue as defined in the "Paris principles" of 1961, the paper examines various contributions on main entry including those delivered at the Toronto conference on AACR in 1997. Proposes the establishment of a global work authority file in which each individual work is primarily identified by a modified version of the uniform title, a departure which would restore the title (as opposed to the author) as principal identifier of the work.
    Type
    a
  19. Dobreski, B.; Kwasnik, B.: Changing depictions of persons in library practice : spirits, pseudonyms, and human books (2017) 0.00
    0.0015842763 = product of:
      0.0031685526 = sum of:
        0.0031685526 = product of:
          0.0095056575 = sum of:
            0.0095056575 = weight(_text_:a in 4140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0095056575 = score(doc=4140,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 4140, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Among knowledge organizing institutions, libraries have a rich history of depicting persons as information. From personal authority records to descriptions of oral history interviews, libraries have amassed data on persons from a variety of perspectives. Within this set of traditions, however, subtle but significant shifts in practice and conception have occurred, particularly concerning how persons are interpreted and depicted and how such depictions are justified. To explore these issues, we looked to four specific library traditions: authority work, community information, oral history, and "human library" events. Within these traditions, we identified six standards guiding the representation of persons. We performed a content analysis of these standards, along with a semantic alignment and comparison of descriptive elements. From this analysis, we reconstructed an historical timeline and a set of narratives capturing changing definitions of people, a shifting focus from names to identities, and an increasing acceptance of varied sources of justification. Findings show not only a number of critical variations within library practices but also practical and ethical issues concerning the responsibility of libraries as well as the redistribution and reuse of library data on the web.
    Type
    a
  20. Creider, L.S.: ¬A comparison of the Paris Principles and the International Cataloguing Principles (2009) 0.00
    0.0015522675 = product of:
      0.003104535 = sum of:
        0.003104535 = product of:
          0.009313605 = sum of:
            0.009313605 = weight(_text_:a in 2985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009313605 = score(doc=2985,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 2985, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2985)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    After more than forty-five years of cataloging experience with the Paris Principles and their impact on the international sharing of bibliographic data, the process of replacing them with a wider and deeper set of International Cataloguing Principles is nearing completion. This paper compares the scope, technological context, process of decision-making, conceptual framework, and amount of change involved in the adoption of the two different statements.
    Type
    a