Search (309 results, page 1 of 16)

0.10301879 = sum of:
  0.04725431 = product of:
    0.18901724 = sum of:
      0.18901724 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18901724 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.055764485 = product of:
    0.11152897 = sum of:
      0.11152897 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11152897 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22

0.081839524 = product of:
  0.16367905 = sum of:
    0.16367905 = sum of:
      0.10791456 = weight(_text_:v in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10791456 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.43057737 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
      0.055764485 = weight(_text_:22 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055764485 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

2. 3.2020 19:04:22

0.07160959 = product of:
  0.14321917 = sum of:
    0.14321917 = sum of:
      0.094425246 = weight(_text_:v in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.094425246 = score(doc=5323,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
      0.048793923 = weight(_text_:22 in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048793923 = score(doc=5323,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

26. 7.2006 10:44:22

0.07160959 = product of:
  0.14321917 = sum of:
    0.14321917 = sum of:
      0.094425246 = weight(_text_:v in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.094425246 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
      0.048793923 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048793923 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.06788638 = sum of:
  0.020673761 = product of:
    0.082695045 = sum of:
      0.082695045 = weight(_text_:authors in 513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.082695045 = score(doc=513,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 513, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=513)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.047212623 = product of:
    0.094425246 = sum of:
      0.094425246 = weight(_text_:v in 513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.094425246 = score(doc=513,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 513, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=513)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The increasing availability of Chinese language materials and other materials of Chinese authorship in North American libraries are posing major complications for cataloging which lead to retrieval problems, as exemplified by Chinese personal names and titles in this study. These complications include: the intricate nature of the Chinese script along with the extensive use of the traditional and simplified Chinese characters, and the application of variant romanizatlon schemes. includine Pinyin. Proposed solutions to improve access to Chinese language materials include: providing more access points in Pinyin form, establishing standards for international practice in romanizing Chinese personal names and in publishing the order of the family and given names of all authors, and linking cataloging authority files with OPACs.

0.058188327 = sum of:
  0.017720366 = product of:
    0.07088146 = sum of:
      0.07088146 = weight(_text_:authors in 2953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07088146 = score(doc=2953,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 2953, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2953)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.04046796 = product of:
    0.08093592 = sum of:
      0.08093592 = weight(_text_:v in 2953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08093592 = score(doc=2953,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 2953, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2953)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article presents the process adopted by the France to bring library catalogs to the Web of data and the RDA role in this general strategy. After analising RDA limits and inconsistencies, inherited from the tradition of AACR and MARC21 catalogues, the authors present the French approach to RDA and its positioning in correlation to international standards like ISBD and FRBR. The method adopted in France for FRBRising the catalogues go through a technical work of creating alignment beteween existing data, exploiting the technologies applied to the creation of data.bnf.fr and through a revision of the French cataloguing rules, allowing FRBRised metadata creation. This revision is based on RDA and it is setting up a French RDA application profile, keeping the analysis on the greater differences. RDA adoption, actually, is not a crucial issue in France and not a self standing purpose; it is just a tool for the transition of bibliographic data towards the Web of data.

0.054606955 = sum of:
  0.020883653 = product of:
    0.08353461 = sum of:
      0.08353461 = weight(_text_:authors in 3416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08353461 = score(doc=3416,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 3416, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3416)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.033723302 = product of:
    0.067446604 = sum of:
      0.067446604 = weight(_text_:v in 3416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.067446604 = score(doc=3416,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 3416, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3416)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

As library user needs become increasingly nuanced and technical, the lack of adequate metadata to meet user needs is creating a broadening gulf between library catalog functionality and library user expectations. One of the areas where the dearth of metadata is forming barriers is the idea of "series." While traditional bibliographic definitions of "series" have been adequate to meet user needs in the past, their inability to fully encompass more complex media types beyond simple text is forming barriers against the accessibility of non-traditional formats such as video games, artistic works, datasets, and similar information resources. This article explores the concept of "series" both as it is employed in bibliographic cataloging settings and encompasses actual works. The authors review the term's usage and general meaning across a large variety of media types beyond traditional journals and monographs. Examples are developed as counter-examples to the adequacy of the traditional bibliographic view of series. The authors conclude that the library and information science community as a whole needs to engage in a broader discussion of series cataloging practices and suggest alternate accounts of series that view them as aggregations (like collections) or as containers for intellectual content.

0.053634074 = sum of:
  0.029237112 = product of:
    0.11694845 = sum of:
      0.11694845 = weight(_text_:authors in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11694845 = score(doc=6740,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024396962 = product of:
    0.048793923 = sum of:
      0.048793923 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048793923 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4

0.053634074 = sum of:
  0.029237112 = product of:
    0.11694845 = sum of:
      0.11694845 = weight(_text_:authors in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11694845 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024396962 = product of:
    0.048793923 = sum of:
      0.048793923 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048793923 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.051509395 = sum of:
  0.023627155 = product of:
    0.09450862 = sum of:
      0.09450862 = weight(_text_:authors in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09450862 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.027882243 = product of:
    0.055764485 = sum of:
      0.055764485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055764485 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Examines a simpler cataloguing format offered by PCs, without disturbing compatibility, using A-Z cataloguing rules for data input, category codes for tagging and computer-supported data input through windows. Gives numerous examples of catalogue entries, basing techniques on certain category schemes set out by Klaus Haller and Hans Popst. Examines catalogue entries in respect of categories of data bases for authors and corporate names, titles, single volume works, serial issues of collected works, and limited editions of works in several volumes.

Source

Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856

0.048490275 = sum of:
  0.0147669725 = product of:
    0.05906789 = sum of:
      0.05906789 = weight(_text_:authors in 5327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05906789 = score(doc=5327,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5327, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5327)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.033723302 = product of:
    0.067446604 = sum of:
      0.067446604 = weight(_text_:v in 5327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.067446604 = score(doc=5327,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 5327, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5327)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In this article we examine automated language-independent authorship verification using text examples in several representative Indo-European languages, in cases when the examined texts belong to an open set of authors, that is, the author is unknown. We showcase the set of developed language-dependent and language-independent features, the model of training examples, consisting of pairs of equal features for known and unknown texts, and the appropriate method of authorship verification. An authorship verification accuracy greater than 90% was accomplished via the application of stylometric methods on four different languages (English, Greek, Spanish, and Dutch, while the verification for Dutch is slightly lower). For the multilingual case, the highest authorship verification accuracy using basic machine-learning methods, over 90%, was achieved by the application of the kNN and SVM-SMO methods, using the feature selection method SVM-RFE. The improvement in authorship verification accuracy in multilingual cases, over 94%, was accomplished via ensemble learning methods, with the MultiboostAB method being a bit more accurate, but Random Forest is generally more appropriate

0.047212623 = product of:
  0.094425246 = sum of:
    0.094425246 = product of:
      0.18885049 = sum of:
        0.18885049 = weight(_text_:v in 6138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18885049 = score(doc=6138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051448494 = queryNorm
            0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 6138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6138)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.047212623 = product of:
  0.094425246 = sum of:
    0.094425246 = product of:
      0.18885049 = sum of:
        0.18885049 = weight(_text_:v in 8058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18885049 = score(doc=8058,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051448494 = queryNorm
            0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 8058, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8058)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.047212623 = product of:
  0.094425246 = sum of:
    0.094425246 = product of:
      0.18885049 = sum of:
        0.18885049 = weight(_text_:v in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18885049 = score(doc=1250,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051448494 = queryNorm
            0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.047212623 = product of:
  0.094425246 = sum of:
    0.094425246 = product of:
      0.18885049 = sum of:
        0.18885049 = weight(_text_:v in 3843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18885049 = score(doc=3843,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051448494 = queryNorm
            0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 3843, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3843)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.045972064 = sum of:
  0.025060384 = product of:
    0.100241534 = sum of:
      0.100241534 = weight(_text_:authors in 6521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.100241534 = score(doc=6521,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 6521, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6521)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.02091168 = product of:
    0.04182336 = sum of:
      0.04182336 = weight(_text_:22 in 6521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04182336 = score(doc=6521,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6521, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6521)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Examines changes in the rules for cataloguing certein categories of printed material, anonymous works, including: those described as being 'by the author of' another named work; pseudonymous works; edited works (collections of writings of several authors); and conference proceedings. Discusses the relevant rules from the British Museum, the 1908 joint code, the Bodleian, Cambridge University Library and AACR2, Samples of London publications taken in specimen years between 1841 and 1991 show that there has been a decrease in anonymous works and in works with personal authors, offset by a sharp increase in multiple authorship, edited works and conference proceedings. Concludes that these changes have taken place in response to external forces. Some changes have been because the rules have been found to be unworkable or based on unnecessary or false distinctions which were impossible for the cataloguer to interpret

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.29-50

0.045070723 = sum of:
  0.020673761 = product of:
    0.082695045 = sum of:
      0.082695045 = weight(_text_:authors in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.082695045 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024396962 = product of:
    0.048793923 = sum of:
      0.048793923 = weight(_text_:22 in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048793923 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Book dedications by authors, often in verse form and appearing just before the title page, are one of the 6 elements describes by the French scholar Genette as paratextual. For some reasons dedications have failed to interest librarians, yet books containing them can be a valid object of bibliographic study, for the reasons that they carry special markings: are an example of a specific literary or semantic class; and reveal linguistic/stylistic features. Examines the history of literary dedications, citing examples by well-known writers, and suggests that cataloguing software should have a special field to record dedication

Date

22. 2.1999 20:41:06

0.045070723 = sum of:
  0.020673761 = product of:
    0.082695045 = sum of:
      0.082695045 = weight(_text_:authors in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.082695045 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024396962 = product of:
    0.048793923 = sum of:
      0.048793923 = weight(_text_:22 in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048793923 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The authors describe the creation of online series authority records on the University of Florida Libraries' NOTIS-based LUIS system. It is an original method that uses serial bibliographic records as a basis for series authority records. We hope that our explanation of this pioneering method will be useful in varying degrees to other libraries attempting to convert their series authorities to an online environment. We also hope that this paper will prompt discussion among catalogers about series authorities in the online environment.

Date

8. 1.2007 12:29:22

0.045070723 = sum of:
  0.020673761 = product of:
    0.082695045 = sum of:
      0.082695045 = weight(_text_:authors in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.082695045 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024396962 = product of:
    0.048793923 = sum of:
      0.048793923 = weight(_text_:22 in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048793923 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper reviews issues related to the cataloging of Internet resources and considers shortand long-term directions for cataloging and the general provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. The strengths and weakness of using a library catalog model to improve access to Internet resources are discussed and compared with a review of related efforts. Based on experience gained through two OCLC Internet cataloging projects, the authors recommend continued and vigorous appplication of library cataloging standards and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogs, cataloging, and libraries in general will continue to evolve.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.197-238

0.045070723 = sum of:
  0.020673761 = product of:
    0.082695045 = sum of:
      0.082695045 = weight(_text_:authors in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.082695045 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024396962 = product of:
    0.048793923 = sum of:
      0.048793923 = weight(_text_:22 in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048793923 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051448494 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, to be known as Resource Description and Access (RDA), has indicated that the replacement for the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) will allow the use of family names as authors and will provide rules for their formation. This paper discusses what a family name describes; examines how information seekers look for family names and what they expect to find; describes the ways in which family names have been established in Anglo-American cataloging and archival traditions; asks how adequately the headings established under these rules help users seek such information; and suggests how revised cataloging rules might better enable users to identify resources that meet their needs.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22