-
Hirons, J.; Hawkins, L.; French, P.: AACR2 and you : revisiting AACR2 to accomodate seriality (2000)
0.05
0.046541777 = product of:
0.16289622 = sum of:
0.050674457 = weight(_text_:j in 6339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050674457 = score(doc=6339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 6339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6339)
0.112221755 = sum of:
0.050674457 = weight(_text_:j in 6339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050674457 = score(doc=6339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 6339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6339)
0.061547298 = weight(_text_:22 in 6339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061547298 = score(doc=6339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11362684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6339)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 18. 8.2002 17:22:13
-
Huang, J.; Haynes, K.J.M.: ¬The issue of word division in cataloging Chinese language titles (2004)
0.04
0.043565907 = product of:
0.101653785 = sum of:
0.025337229 = weight(_text_:j in 5529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025337229 = score(doc=5529,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 5529, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5529)
0.06364794 = product of:
0.12729588 = sum of:
0.12729588 = weight(_text_:huang in 5529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12729588 = score(doc=5529,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2310993 = queryWeight, product of:
7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.5508277 = fieldWeight in 5529, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5529)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.012668614 = product of:
0.025337229 = sum of:
0.025337229 = weight(_text_:j in 5529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025337229 = score(doc=5529,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 5529, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5529)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
-
Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012)
0.04
0.04280895 = product of:
0.09988755 = sum of:
0.01843944 = product of:
0.07375776 = sum of:
0.07375776 = weight(_text_:authors in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07375776 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14792371 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.025337229 = weight(_text_:j in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025337229 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.056110878 = sum of:
0.025337229 = weight(_text_:j in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025337229 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.030773649 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030773649 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11362684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Kim, J.(im); Kim, J.(enna): Effect of forename string on author name disambiguation (2020)
0.04
0.035350043 = product of:
0.08248343 = sum of:
0.009313324 = product of:
0.037253294 = sum of:
0.037253294 = weight(_text_:authors in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037253294 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14792371 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.025594465 = weight(_text_:j in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025594465 = score(doc=5930,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
0.047575645 = sum of:
0.025594465 = weight(_text_:j in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025594465 = score(doc=5930,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
0.021981178 = weight(_text_:22 in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021981178 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11362684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- In author name disambiguation, author forenames are used to decide which name instances are disambiguated together and how much they are likely to refer to the same author. Despite such a crucial role of forenames, their effect on the performance of heuristic (string matching) and algorithmic disambiguation is not well understood. This study assesses the contributions of forenames in author name disambiguation using multiple labeled data sets under varying ratios and lengths of full forenames, reflecting real-world scenarios in which an author is represented by forename variants (synonym) and some authors share the same forenames (homonym). The results show that increasing the ratios of full forenames substantially improves both heuristic and machine-learning-based disambiguation. Performance gains by algorithmic disambiguation are pronounced when many forenames are initialized or homonyms are prevalent. As the ratios of full forenames increase, however, they become marginal compared to those by string matching. Using a small portion of forename strings does not reduce much the performances of both heuristic and algorithmic disambiguation methods compared to using full-length strings. These findings provide practical suggestions, such as restoring initialized forenames into a full-string format via record linkage for improved disambiguation performances.
- Date
- 11. 7.2020 13:22:58
-
Weitz, J.: Cataloger's judgment : music cataloging questions and answers from the music OCLC users group newsletter (2003)
0.03
0.033244126 = product of:
0.116354436 = sum of:
0.03619604 = weight(_text_:j in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03619604 = score(doc=4591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
0.0801584 = sum of:
0.03619604 = weight(_text_:j in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03619604 = score(doc=4591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
0.043962356 = weight(_text_:22 in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043962356 = score(doc=4591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11362684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 25.11.2005 18:22:29
-
Garrett, J.: Wandel und Kontinuität im Ethos des Katalogisierens in den USA (2006)
0.03
0.033244126 = product of:
0.116354436 = sum of:
0.03619604 = weight(_text_:j in 4962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03619604 = score(doc=4962,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4962, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4962)
0.0801584 = sum of:
0.03619604 = weight(_text_:j in 4962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03619604 = score(doc=4962,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4962, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4962)
0.043962356 = weight(_text_:22 in 4962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043962356 = score(doc=4962,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11362684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4962, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4962)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 4. 3.2006 16:29:22
-
Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023)
0.03
0.030577822 = product of:
0.07134825 = sum of:
0.013171029 = product of:
0.052684117 = sum of:
0.052684117 = weight(_text_:authors in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052684117 = score(doc=883,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14792371 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.01809802 = weight(_text_:j in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01809802 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.0400792 = sum of:
0.01809802 = weight(_text_:j in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01809802 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.021981178 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021981178 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11362684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:40:36
-
Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014)
0.03
0.029268045 = product of:
0.10243815 = sum of:
0.035832252 = weight(_text_:j in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035832252 = score(doc=2606,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.34753868 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.0666059 = sum of:
0.035832252 = weight(_text_:j in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035832252 = score(doc=2606,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.34753868 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.030773649 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030773649 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11362684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Savoy, J.: Estimating the probability of an authorship attribution (2016)
0.03
0.028924521 = product of:
0.06749055 = sum of:
0.009313324 = product of:
0.037253294 = sum of:
0.037253294 = weight(_text_:authors in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037253294 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14792371 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.01809802 = weight(_text_:j in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01809802 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
0.0400792 = sum of:
0.01809802 = weight(_text_:j in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01809802 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
0.021981178 = weight(_text_:22 in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021981178 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11362684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- In authorship attribution, various distance-based metrics have been proposed to determine the most probable author of a disputed text. In this paradigm, a distance is computed between each author profile and the query text. These values are then employed only to rank the possible authors. In this article, we analyze their distribution and show that we can model it as a mixture of 2 Beta distributions. Based on this finding, we demonstrate how we can derive a more accurate probability that the closest author is, in fact, the real author. To evaluate this approach, we have chosen 4 authorship attribution methods (Burrows' Delta, Kullback-Leibler divergence, Labbé's intertextual distance, and the naïve Bayes). As the first test collection, we have downloaded 224 State of the Union addresses (from 1790 to 2014) delivered by 41 U.S. presidents. The second test collection is formed by the Federalist Papers. The evaluations indicate that the accuracy rate of some authorship decisions can be improved. The suggested method can signal that the proposed assignment should be interpreted as possible, without strong certainty. Being able to quantify the certainty associated with an authorship decision can be a useful component when important decisions must be taken.
- Date
- 7. 5.2016 21:22:27
-
Sandberg, J.; Jin, Q.: How should catalogers provide authority control for journal article authors? : Name identifiers in the linked data world (2016)
0.03
0.025966909 = product of:
0.06058945 = sum of:
0.022583611 = product of:
0.090334445 = sum of:
0.090334445 = weight(_text_:authors in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.090334445 = score(doc=5138,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14792371 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.025337229 = weight(_text_:j in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025337229 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
0.012668614 = product of:
0.025337229 = sum of:
0.025337229 = weight(_text_:j in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025337229 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This article suggests that catalogers can provide authority control for authors of journal articles by linking to external international authority databases. It explores the representation of article authors from three disciplines in four databases: International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI), Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID), Scopus, and Virtual International Authority File (VIAF). VIAF and Scopus are particularly promising databases for journal author names, but we believe that a combination of several name databases holds more promise than relying on a single database. We provide examples of RDF links between bibliographic description and author identifiers, including a partial BIBFRAME 2.0 description.
-
Kaestner, J.: RAK-Online - Regelungsformen und Formate : Bemerkungen zum Entwurf 'RAK für Online-Kataloge' (1993)
0.02
0.024820143 = product of:
0.0868705 = sum of:
0.057913665 = weight(_text_:j in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057913665 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
0.028956832 = product of:
0.057913665 = sum of:
0.057913665 = weight(_text_:j in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057913665 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Kaestner, J.: Online-Katalog und Regelwerk (1990)
0.02
0.024820143 = product of:
0.0868705 = sum of:
0.057913665 = weight(_text_:j in 5974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057913665 = score(doc=5974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 5974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5974)
0.028956832 = product of:
0.057913665 = sum of:
0.057913665 = weight(_text_:j in 5974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057913665 = score(doc=5974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 5974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5974)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Buder, J.: Gedanken zur Regelwerksproblematik in der Online-Katalogisierung (1995)
0.02
0.024820143 = product of:
0.0868705 = sum of:
0.057913665 = weight(_text_:j in 39) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057913665 = score(doc=39,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 39, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=39)
0.028956832 = product of:
0.057913665 = sum of:
0.057913665 = weight(_text_:j in 39) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057913665 = score(doc=39,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 39, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=39)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Hudson, J.: Revisions to contributed cataloging in a cooperative cataloging database (1981)
0.02
0.024820143 = product of:
0.0868705 = sum of:
0.057913665 = weight(_text_:j in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057913665 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
0.028956832 = product of:
0.057913665 = sum of:
0.057913665 = weight(_text_:j in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057913665 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: ¬The effectiveness of copy cotaloging at eliminating typographical errors in shared bibliographic records (2004)
0.02
0.023270888 = product of:
0.08144811 = sum of:
0.025337229 = weight(_text_:j in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025337229 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
0.056110878 = sum of:
0.025337229 = weight(_text_:j in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025337229 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
0.030773649 = weight(_text_:22 in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030773649 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11362684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Dickinson, J.; Martin, C.K.; Mering, M.: Falling in and out of love : the impact of moving to a remote location on cataloging workflow (2003)
0.02
0.023270888 = product of:
0.08144811 = sum of:
0.025337229 = weight(_text_:j in 151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025337229 = score(doc=151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=151)
0.056110878 = sum of:
0.025337229 = weight(_text_:j in 151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025337229 = score(doc=151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=151)
0.030773649 = weight(_text_:22 in 151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030773649 = score(doc=151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11362684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=151)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Byrd, J.: ¬A cooperative cataloguing proposal for Slavic and East European languages and the languages of the former Soviet Union (1993)
0.02
0.023270888 = product of:
0.08144811 = sum of:
0.025337229 = weight(_text_:j in 564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025337229 = score(doc=564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=564)
0.056110878 = sum of:
0.025337229 = weight(_text_:j in 564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025337229 = score(doc=564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=564)
0.030773649 = weight(_text_:22 in 564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030773649 = score(doc=564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11362684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=564)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 12. 1.2007 13:22:35
-
Kim, J.; Diesner, J.: Distortive effects of initial-based name disambiguation on measurements of large-scale coauthorship networks (2016)
0.02
0.022098312 = product of:
0.051562726 = sum of:
0.013171029 = product of:
0.052684117 = sum of:
0.052684117 = weight(_text_:authors in 2936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052684117 = score(doc=2936,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14792371 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 2936, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2936)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.025594465 = weight(_text_:j in 2936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025594465 = score(doc=2936,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 2936, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2936)
0.012797233 = product of:
0.025594465 = sum of:
0.025594465 = weight(_text_:j in 2936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025594465 = score(doc=2936,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 2936, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2936)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Scholars have often relied on name initials to resolve name ambiguities in large-scale coauthorship network research. This approach bears the risk of incorrectly merging or splitting author identities. The use of initial-based disambiguation has been justified by the assumption that such errors would not affect research findings too much. This paper tests that assumption by analyzing coauthorship networks from five academic fields-biology, computer science, nanoscience, neuroscience, and physics-and an interdisciplinary journal, PNAS. Name instances in data sets of this study were disambiguated based on heuristics gained from previous algorithmic disambiguation solutions. We use disambiguated data as a proxy of ground-truth to test the performance of three types of initial-based disambiguation. Our results show that initial-based disambiguation can misrepresent statistical properties of coauthorship networks: It deflates the number of unique authors, number of components, average shortest paths, clustering coefficient, and assortativity, while it inflates average productivity, density, average coauthor number per author, and largest component size. Also, on average, more than half of top 10 productive or collaborative authors drop off the lists. Asian names were found to account for the majority of misidentification by initial-based disambiguation due to their common surname and given name initials.
-
Jett, J.; Humpal, N.; Charles, V.; Lee, J.-H.: What is a series, really? (2017)
0.02
0.022098312 = product of:
0.051562726 = sum of:
0.013171029 = product of:
0.052684117 = sum of:
0.052684117 = weight(_text_:authors in 3416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052684117 = score(doc=3416,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14792371 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 3416, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3416)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.025594465 = weight(_text_:j in 3416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025594465 = score(doc=3416,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 3416, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3416)
0.012797233 = product of:
0.025594465 = sum of:
0.025594465 = weight(_text_:j in 3416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025594465 = score(doc=3416,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 3416, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3416)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- As library user needs become increasingly nuanced and technical, the lack of adequate metadata to meet user needs is creating a broadening gulf between library catalog functionality and library user expectations. One of the areas where the dearth of metadata is forming barriers is the idea of "series." While traditional bibliographic definitions of "series" have been adequate to meet user needs in the past, their inability to fully encompass more complex media types beyond simple text is forming barriers against the accessibility of non-traditional formats such as video games, artistic works, datasets, and similar information resources. This article explores the concept of "series" both as it is employed in bibliographic cataloging settings and encompasses actual works. The authors review the term's usage and general meaning across a large variety of media types beyond traditional journals and monographs. Examples are developed as counter-examples to the adequacy of the traditional bibliographic view of series. The authors conclude that the library and information science community as a whole needs to engage in a broader discussion of series cataloging practices and suggest alternate accounts of series that view them as aggregations (like collections) or as containers for intellectual content.
-
McLaren, J.; Gillis, J.M.: Is this rule necessary? : a discussion of new rules for rare serials (2006)
0.02
0.021876212 = product of:
0.051044494 = sum of:
0.013038653 = product of:
0.05215461 = sum of:
0.05215461 = weight(_text_:authors in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05215461 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14792371 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.025337229 = weight(_text_:j in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025337229 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
0.012668614 = product of:
0.025337229 = sum of:
0.025337229 = weight(_text_:j in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025337229 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03244785 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Rare serials have always been the stepchild of cataloging rules, in both the serials cataloging world and the rare book cataloging world. This article focuses on the problems raised by this history, including definition of "rare" in the serials world, a description of their special characteristics and of the problems rare serials pose for catalogers. Issues addressed include the inadequacy of present day rules for accurate cataloging and recommended solutions for these problems that have been developed and tested by the authors.
