Search (335 results, page 1 of 17)

0.10410525 = sum of:
  0.047752663 = product of:
    0.19101065 = sum of:
      0.19101065 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19101065 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.05635259 = product of:
    0.11270518 = sum of:
      0.11270518 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11270518 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22

0.099748164 = product of:
  0.19949633 = sum of:
    0.19949633 = sum of:
      0.12905559 = weight(_text_:f in 4634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12905559 = score(doc=4634,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.6227791 = fieldWeight in 4634, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4634)
      0.07044074 = weight(_text_:22 in 4634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07044074 = score(doc=4634,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4634, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4634)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language

f

Location

F

Source

Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 2000, no.186, S.20-22

0.09701809 = product of:
  0.19403619 = sum of:
    0.19403619 = sum of:
      0.1095073 = weight(_text_:f in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1095073 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.52844554 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
      0.084528886 = weight(_text_:22 in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.084528886 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

30. 8.2005 9:22:54

0.08084841 = product of:
  0.16169682 = sum of:
    0.16169682 = sum of:
      0.09125608 = weight(_text_:f in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09125608 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
      0.07044074 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07044074 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand

0.065325305 = sum of:
  0.01790725 = product of:
    0.071629 = sum of:
      0.071629 = weight(_text_:authors in 2953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.071629 = score(doc=2953,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 2953, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2953)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.047418058 = product of:
    0.094836116 = sum of:
      0.094836116 = weight(_text_:f in 2953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.094836116 = score(doc=2953,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.45764732 = fieldWeight in 2953, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2953)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article presents the process adopted by the France to bring library catalogs to the Web of data and the RDA role in this general strategy. After analising RDA limits and inconsistencies, inherited from the tradition of AACR and MARC21 catalogues, the authors present the French approach to RDA and its positioning in correlation to international standards like ISBD and FRBR. The method adopted in France for FRBRising the catalogues go through a technical work of creating alignment beteween existing data, exploiting the technologies applied to the creation of data.bnf.fr and through a revision of the French cataloguing rules, allowing FRBRised metadata creation. This revision is based on RDA and it is setting up a French RDA application profile, keeping the analysis on the greater differences. RDA adoption, actually, is not a crucial issue in France and not a self standing purpose; it is just a tool for the transition of bibliographic data towards the Web of data.

Language

f

Location

F

0.05419971 = sum of:
  0.029545454 = product of:
    0.11818182 = sum of:
      0.11818182 = weight(_text_:authors in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11818182 = score(doc=6740,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024654258 = product of:
    0.049308516 = sum of:
      0.049308516 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049308516 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4

0.05419971 = sum of:
  0.029545454 = product of:
    0.11818182 = sum of:
      0.11818182 = weight(_text_:authors in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11818182 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024654258 = product of:
    0.049308516 = sum of:
      0.049308516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049308516 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.05283142 = sum of:
  0.020891791 = product of:
    0.083567165 = sum of:
      0.083567165 = weight(_text_:authors in 5398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083567165 = score(doc=5398,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5398, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5398)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.03193963 = product of:
    0.06387926 = sum of:
      0.06387926 = weight(_text_:f in 5398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06387926 = score(doc=5398,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 5398, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5398)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

University Library at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) acquired a large and unique collection of foundation annual reports. It was decided that cataloging them as serials, with the attendant problems of successive entry maintenance and access, was not acceptable. The reports for each foundation were treated as a collection with a unifying, made-up main title and updateable holdings (245 $f). The concept of main entry was retained, but the actual entry changes when the foundation name changes. The authors conclude with a call to make rules 21.3B1 and 21.2C1 optional.

0.05283142 = sum of:
  0.020891791 = product of:
    0.083567165 = sum of:
      0.083567165 = weight(_text_:authors in 513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083567165 = score(doc=513,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 513, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=513)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.03193963 = product of:
    0.06387926 = sum of:
      0.06387926 = weight(_text_:f in 513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06387926 = score(doc=513,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 513, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=513)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The increasing availability of Chinese language materials and other materials of Chinese authorship in North American libraries are posing major complications for cataloging which lead to retrieval problems, as exemplified by Chinese personal names and titles in this study. These complications include: the intricate nature of the Chinese script along with the extensive use of the traditional and simplified Chinese characters, and the application of variant romanizatlon schemes. includine Pinyin. Proposed solutions to improve access to Chinese language materials include: providing more access points in Pinyin form, establishing standards for international practice in romanizing Chinese personal names and in publishing the order of the family and given names of all authors, and linking cataloging authority files with OPACs.

0.052701503 = sum of:
  0.025324676 = product of:
    0.101298705 = sum of:
      0.101298705 = weight(_text_:authors in 1984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.101298705 = score(doc=1984,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1984, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1984)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.027376825 = product of:
    0.05475365 = sum of:
      0.05475365 = weight(_text_:f in 1984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05475365 = score(doc=1984,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 1984, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1984)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In May 2012, National Library Board (NLB) Singapore decided to implement Resource Description and Access (RDA) for NLB and targeted its implementation on April 1, 2013. This article presents NLB's RDA journey as it documents and highlights the library's experience in executing RDA in a seamless, systematic approach. The authors share how NLB formulated its implementation strategy and action plan, the adoption and development of the plan, as well as the discussions and milestone decisions made. Based on the Library of Congress' training materials, NLB customized and packaged its training programs to suit the specific needs of NLB staff. NLB also made local decisions needed before cataloging in RDA, communicated its decisions to a user group, and obtained feedback from them. This article also describes the challenges faced, and how NLB overcame them. As RDA is still a work in progress, NLB recognizes that more effort is required to take RDA to the next level. Finally, the authors share NLB's future plans for RDA.

0.052701503 = sum of:
  0.025324676 = product of:
    0.101298705 = sum of:
      0.101298705 = weight(_text_:authors in 846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.101298705 = score(doc=846,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 846, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=846)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.027376825 = product of:
    0.05475365 = sum of:
      0.05475365 = weight(_text_:f in 846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05475365 = score(doc=846,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 846, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=846)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

It is well known that, within the Latin production of written text, peculiar metric schemes were followed not only in poetic compositions, but also in many prose works. Such metric patterns were based on so-called syllabic quantity, that is, on the length of the involved syllables, and there is substantial evidence suggesting that certain authors had a preference for certain metric patterns over others. In this research we investigate the possibility to employ syllabic quantity as a base for deriving rhythmic features for the task of computational authorship attribution of Latin prose texts. We test the impact of these features on the authorship attribution task when combined with other topic-agnostic features. Our experiments, carried out on three different datasets using support vector machines (SVMs) show that rhythmic features based on syllabic quantity are beneficial in discriminating among Latin prose authors.

0.052052625 = sum of:
  0.023876332 = product of:
    0.09550533 = sum of:
      0.09550533 = weight(_text_:authors in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09550533 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.028176295 = product of:
    0.05635259 = sum of:
      0.05635259 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05635259 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Examines a simpler cataloguing format offered by PCs, without disturbing compatibility, using A-Z cataloguing rules for data input, category codes for tagging and computer-supported data input through windows. Gives numerous examples of catalogue entries, basing techniques on certain category schemes set out by Klaus Haller and Hans Popst. Examines catalogue entries in respect of categories of data bases for authors and corporate names, titles, single volume works, serial issues of collected works, and limited editions of works in several volumes.

Source

Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856

0.046456896 = sum of:
  0.025324676 = product of:
    0.101298705 = sum of:
      0.101298705 = weight(_text_:authors in 6521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.101298705 = score(doc=6521,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 6521, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6521)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.021132221 = product of:
    0.042264443 = sum of:
      0.042264443 = weight(_text_:22 in 6521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042264443 = score(doc=6521,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6521, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6521)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Examines changes in the rules for cataloguing certein categories of printed material, anonymous works, including: those described as being 'by the author of' another named work; pseudonymous works; edited works (collections of writings of several authors); and conference proceedings. Discusses the relevant rules from the British Museum, the 1908 joint code, the Bodleian, Cambridge University Library and AACR2, Samples of London publications taken in specimen years between 1841 and 1991 show that there has been a decrease in anonymous works and in works with personal authors, offset by a sharp increase in multiple authorship, edited works and conference proceedings. Concludes that these changes have taken place in response to external forces. Some changes have been because the rules have been found to be unworkable or based on unnecessary or false distinctions which were impossible for the cataloguer to interpret

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.29-50

0.045546047 = sum of:
  0.020891791 = product of:
    0.083567165 = sum of:
      0.083567165 = weight(_text_:authors in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083567165 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024654258 = product of:
    0.049308516 = sum of:
      0.049308516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049308516 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Book dedications by authors, often in verse form and appearing just before the title page, are one of the 6 elements describes by the French scholar Genette as paratextual. For some reasons dedications have failed to interest librarians, yet books containing them can be a valid object of bibliographic study, for the reasons that they carry special markings: are an example of a specific literary or semantic class; and reveal linguistic/stylistic features. Examines the history of literary dedications, citing examples by well-known writers, and suggests that cataloguing software should have a special field to record dedication

Date

22. 2.1999 20:41:06

0.045546047 = sum of:
  0.020891791 = product of:
    0.083567165 = sum of:
      0.083567165 = weight(_text_:authors in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083567165 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024654258 = product of:
    0.049308516 = sum of:
      0.049308516 = weight(_text_:22 in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049308516 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The authors describe the creation of online series authority records on the University of Florida Libraries' NOTIS-based LUIS system. It is an original method that uses serial bibliographic records as a basis for series authority records. We hope that our explanation of this pioneering method will be useful in varying degrees to other libraries attempting to convert their series authorities to an online environment. We also hope that this paper will prompt discussion among catalogers about series authorities in the online environment.

Date

8. 1.2007 12:29:22

0.045546047 = sum of:
  0.020891791 = product of:
    0.083567165 = sum of:
      0.083567165 = weight(_text_:authors in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083567165 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024654258 = product of:
    0.049308516 = sum of:
      0.049308516 = weight(_text_:22 in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049308516 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper reviews issues related to the cataloging of Internet resources and considers shortand long-term directions for cataloging and the general provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. The strengths and weakness of using a library catalog model to improve access to Internet resources are discussed and compared with a review of related efforts. Based on experience gained through two OCLC Internet cataloging projects, the authors recommend continued and vigorous appplication of library cataloging standards and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogs, cataloging, and libraries in general will continue to evolve.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.197-238

0.045546047 = sum of:
  0.020891791 = product of:
    0.083567165 = sum of:
      0.083567165 = weight(_text_:authors in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083567165 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024654258 = product of:
    0.049308516 = sum of:
      0.049308516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049308516 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, to be known as Resource Description and Access (RDA), has indicated that the replacement for the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) will allow the use of family names as authors and will provide rules for their formation. This paper discusses what a family name describes; examines how information seekers look for family names and what they expect to find; describes the ways in which family names have been established in Anglo-American cataloging and archival traditions; asks how adequately the headings established under these rules help users seek such information; and suggests how revised cataloging rules might better enable users to identify resources that meet their needs.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.0398473 = product of:
  0.0796946 = sum of:
    0.0796946 = product of:
      0.1593892 = sum of:
        0.1593892 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1593892 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2000 19:22:27

0.038716678 = product of:
  0.077433355 = sum of:
    0.077433355 = product of:
      0.15486671 = sum of:
        0.15486671 = weight(_text_:f in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15486671 = score(doc=903,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.74733484 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language

f

0.03871408 = sum of:
  0.021103898 = product of:
    0.08441559 = sum of:
      0.08441559 = weight(_text_:authors in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08441559 = score(doc=883,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.017610185 = product of:
    0.03522037 = sum of:
      0.03522037 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03522037 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.

Date

22. 1.2023 18:40:36