-
Whyde, J.S.: Issues in the cataloging of commercially available videocassettes of television programs (1991)
0.12
0.1196868 = product of:
0.598434 = sum of:
0.598434 = weight(_text_:2200 in 2199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.598434 = score(doc=2199,freq=1.0), product of:
0.62128955 = queryWeight, product of:
8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.96321267 = fieldWeight in 2199, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2199)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- 2200
-
Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994)
0.11
0.113957405 = product of:
0.2848935 = sum of:
0.21798477 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21798477 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
0.37497213 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.06690876 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06690876 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Theoretical considerations in the bibliographic control of music materials in libraries (1985)
0.11
0.11114555 = product of:
0.27786386 = sum of:
0.21798477 = weight(_text_:objects in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21798477 = score(doc=343,freq=4.0), product of:
0.37497213 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.05987908 = weight(_text_:7 in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05987908 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic control does not differ in substance from one type of material to another. Therefore it is not possible to separate the bibliographic control of music materials entirely from the larger domain of bibliographic control activity. The literature of music librarianship is examined for relevant theoretical explanations. Specific problems of description and access are used to show that, in general, the requirements for bibliographic control of music fit neatly into the theoretical structure for all bibliographic control. The primary purpose of descriptive cataloging of musical objects is to identify and differentiate among objects in a library collection. Where the concept of responsibility is relevant, access is provided through the names of composers or performers. Systematic access is provided through co-equal facets: medium, manifestation, and form.
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 12:35:33
-
Bierbaum, E.G.: Records and access : museum registration and library cataloging (1988)
0.10
0.097836606 = product of:
0.24459152 = sum of:
0.17615828 = weight(_text_:objects in 432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17615828 = score(doc=432,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37497213 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 432, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=432)
0.06843324 = weight(_text_:7 in 432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06843324 = score(doc=432,freq=2.0), product of:
0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.2928101 = fieldWeight in 432, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=432)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Libraries and museums are alike in collecting sources of information, whether print or nonprint items, sound recordings, or three-dimensional objects. The institutions also maintain records of their collections in files or systems which reflect the purpose of the collections. This article compares and contrasts museum registration and library cataloging procedures, suggesting that differences in records management result from philosophical and historical differences. It is suggested also that the competencies of library and information science may be applied to museum registration.
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 17:58:46
-
Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998)
0.09
0.0884189 = product of:
0.22104725 = sum of:
0.15413849 = weight(_text_:objects in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15413849 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37497213 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.06690876 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06690876 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
- Date
- 24. 1.2007 19:38:22
-
Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001)
0.09
0.086940244 = product of:
0.2173506 = sum of:
0.10264986 = weight(_text_:7 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10264986 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.43921518 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.114700735 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.114700735 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
- Isbn
- 1-56308-932-7
-
Madison, O.M.A.: ¬The IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records : international standards for bibliographic control (2000)
0.08
0.08139815 = product of:
0.20349538 = sum of:
0.15570341 = weight(_text_:objects in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15570341 = score(doc=187,freq=4.0), product of:
0.37497213 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
0.047791976 = weight(_text_:22 in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047791976 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The formal charge for the IFLA study involving international bibliography standards was to delineate the functions that are performed by the bibliographic record with respect to various media, applications, and user needs. The method used was the entity relationship analysis technique. Three groups of entities that are the key objects of interest to users of bibliographic records were defined. The primary group contains four entities: work, expression, manifestation, and item. The second group includes entities responsible for the intellectual or artistic content, production, or ownership of entities in the first group. The third group includes entities that represent concepts, objects, events, and places. In the study we identified the attributes associated with each entity and the relationships that are most important to users. The attributes and relationships were mapped to the functional requirements for bibliographic records that were defined in terms of four user tasks: to find, identify, select, and obtain. Basic requirements for national bibliographic records were recommended based on the entity analysis. The recommendations of the study are compared with two standards, AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) and the Dublin Core, to place them into pragmatic context. The results of the study are being used in the review of the complete set of ISBDs as the initial benchmark in determining data elements for each format.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Howarth, L.: FRBR and Linked Data : connecting FRBR and Linked Data (2012)
0.07
0.07337746 = product of:
0.18344365 = sum of:
0.13211872 = weight(_text_:objects in 1926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13211872 = score(doc=1926,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37497213 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 1926, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1926)
0.05132493 = weight(_text_:7 in 1926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05132493 = score(doc=1926,freq=2.0), product of:
0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 1926, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1926)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- From the time of the earliest catalogues documenting private collections, to the present proliferation of repositories of material and digital objects, the bibliographic record as an aggregation of logical and physical characteristics of a resource has prevailed. The development of the FRBR conceptual model introduced a shift in focus away from the record as a whole to component pieces of data (or disaggregated data) where those data elements have the potential to be shared and used in diverse, even novel ways. Tim Berners-Lee's "rules" underlying the Open Linked Data Project, offer an opportunity for FRBR-compliant, quality bibliographic data to be exposed to the digital universe via the Semantic Web. Context and potential for seizing this advantage are explored.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.5/7, S.763-776
-
Kirfel, G.: Methodisch-didaktische Überlegungen zum Fach "Alphabetische Katalogisierung" nach den "Preußischen Instruktionen" (1976)
0.07
0.0724502 = product of:
0.18112549 = sum of:
0.08554155 = weight(_text_:7 in 6492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08554155 = score(doc=6492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.36601263 = fieldWeight in 6492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6492)
0.09558395 = weight(_text_:22 in 6492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09558395 = score(doc=6492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6492)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 22. 3.2016 12:14:11
- Pages
- S.7-18
-
Seminario FRBR : Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: reguisiti funzionali per record bibliografici, Florence, 27-28 January 2000, Proceedings (2000)
0.07
0.0724502 = product of:
0.18112549 = sum of:
0.08554155 = weight(_text_:7 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08554155 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.36601263 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
0.09558395 = weight(_text_:22 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09558395 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 29. 8.2005 12:54:22
- Isbn
- 88-7812-067-7
-
Struble, C.A.; Kohberger, P.B.: Statistical survey to determine availability of cataloging copy on OCLC (1987)
0.07
0.06929856 = product of:
0.17324638 = sum of:
0.09677922 = weight(_text_:7 in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09677922 = score(doc=358,freq=4.0), product of:
0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.41409606 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
0.076467164 = weight(_text_:22 in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076467164 = score(doc=358,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 14:06:19
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.3, S.13-22
-
Roughton, K.G.: Educating the dinosaur : the evolution of catalog management at the Iowa State University Library (1985)
0.06
0.057960164 = product of:
0.14490041 = sum of:
0.06843324 = weight(_text_:7 in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06843324 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.2928101 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
0.076467164 = weight(_text_:22 in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076467164 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:11
-
Olson, C.: Cataloging Southeast Asian language materials : the case of the Thai language (1996)
0.05
0.050715137 = product of:
0.12678784 = sum of:
0.05987908 = weight(_text_:7 in 5112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05987908 = score(doc=5112,freq=2.0), product of:
0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 5112, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5112)
0.06690876 = weight(_text_:22 in 5112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06690876 = score(doc=5112,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5112, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5112)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 7. 1.1997 17:34:09
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.10-28
-
Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996)
0.05
0.050715137 = product of:
0.12678784 = sum of:
0.05987908 = weight(_text_:7 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05987908 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.06690876 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06690876 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 7. 1.1997 17:34:09
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
-
Baia, W.; Randall, K.M.; Leatham, C.: Creativity in serials cataloguing : heresy or necessity? (1998)
0.05
0.050715137 = product of:
0.12678784 = sum of:
0.05987908 = weight(_text_:7 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05987908 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.06690876 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06690876 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 7. 1.1999 19:22:13
-
Striedieck, S.: Online catalog maintenance : the OOPS command in LIAS (1985)
0.05
0.050715137 = product of:
0.12678784 = sum of:
0.05987908 = weight(_text_:7 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05987908 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.06690876 = weight(_text_:22 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06690876 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:30
-
Bloss, M.E.: Testing RDA at Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science : the students' perspectives (2011)
0.05
0.050715137 = product of:
0.12678784 = sum of:
0.05987908 = weight(_text_:7 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05987908 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
0.06690876 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06690876 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 25. 5.2015 18:36:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 49(2011) no.7/8, S.582-599
-
Koster, L.: Persistent identifiers for heritage objects (2020)
0.04
0.044039574 = product of:
0.22019787 = sum of:
0.22019787 = weight(_text_:objects in 5718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22019787 = score(doc=5718,freq=8.0), product of:
0.37497213 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 5718, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5718)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Persistent identifiers (PID's) are essential for getting access and referring to library, archive and museum (LAM) collection objects in a sustainable and unambiguous way, both internally and externally. Heritage institutions need a universal policy for the use of PID's in order to have an efficient digital infrastructure at their disposal and to achieve optimal interoperability, leading to open data, open collections and efficient resource management. Here the discussion is limited to PID's that institutions can assign to objects they own or administer themselves. PID's for people, subjects etc. can be used by heritage institutions, but are generally managed by other parties. The first part of this article consists of a general theoretical description of persistent identifiers. First of all, I discuss the questions of what persistent identifiers are and what they are not, and what is needed to administer and use them. The most commonly used existing PID systems are briefly characterized. Then I discuss the types of objects PID's can be assigned to. This section concludes with an overview of the requirements that apply if PIDs should also be used for linked data. The second part examines current infrastructural practices, and existing PID systems and their advantages and shortcomings. Based on these practical issues and the pros and cons of existing PID systems a list of requirements for PID systems is presented which is used to address a number of practical considerations. This section concludes with a number of recommendations.
-
Jeng, L.H.: ¬A converging vision of cataloging in the electronic world (1996)
0.04
0.043596953 = product of:
0.21798477 = sum of:
0.21798477 = weight(_text_:objects in 7686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21798477 = score(doc=7686,freq=4.0), product of:
0.37497213 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 7686, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7686)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Traditional cataloguing practices have been geared to printed materials or other materials that have fixed forms. The advent of electronic library materials poses new challenges for cataloguing as electronic objects may exist in multiple and changing versions. Discusses current attempts to organize electronic information objects in a world that is messy, volatile and uncontrolled and traces library cataloguing from manual to electronic organization. Electronic text may be available as a standalone ASCII, PostScript or another file. The file can reside on a floppy disk or on a minicomputer or mainframe computer as a file with a URL address and directory path. Briefly reviews some Internet indexing projects and prototypes, presents a vision of what cataloguing could evolve into the electronic world and discusses what needs to be done to realise this vision
-
Bowman, J.H.: Changing cataloging rules in relation to changing patterns of publication (1996)
0.04
0.043470122 = product of:
0.1086753 = sum of:
0.05132493 = weight(_text_:7 in 6521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05132493 = score(doc=6521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 6521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6521)
0.057350367 = weight(_text_:22 in 6521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057350367 = score(doc=6521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6521)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 7. 1.1997 17:34:09
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.29-50
