Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Kataloge"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Popst, H.; Croissant, C.R.: ¬The development of descriptive cataloging in Germany (2002) 0.03
    0.030989328 = product of:
      0.12395731 = sum of:
        0.12395731 = product of:
          0.24791463 = sum of:
            0.24791463 = weight(_text_:instructions in 5487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24791463 = score(doc=5487,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.31902805 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0453587 = queryNorm
                0.7770935 = fieldWeight in 5487, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses the development of descriptive cataloging in Germany and the evolution of cataloging principles. The Instruktionen für die alphabetischen Kataloge der preußischen Bibliotheken (Instructions for the Alphabetic Catalogs of the Prussian Libraries, known as the Prussian Instructions, or PI, for short) were published in 1899. The so-called Berliner Anweisungen ("Berlin Instructions," Instructions for the Alphabetic Catalog in Public Libraries) appeared in 1938. Discussion for reform of cataloging rules began in the 1950s and received impetus from the International Conference on Cataloging Principles in Paris in 1961 and from the International Meeting of Cataloging Experts in Copenhagen in 1969. Preliminary drafts of the new Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung, RAK (Rules for Descriptive Cataloging) were issued between 1969 and 1976; the complete edition of the RAK was published in the German Democratic Republic (East Germany) in 1976 and in a slightly different version in 1977 for the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany). A version for academic libraries appeared in 1983, followed by a version for public libraries in 1986. Between 1987 and 1997, supplementary rules for special categories of materials were published.
  2. Walravens, H.: Serials cataloging in Germany : the historical development (2003) 0.02
    0.02169253 = product of:
      0.08677012 = sum of:
        0.08677012 = product of:
          0.17354023 = sum of:
            0.17354023 = weight(_text_:instructions in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17354023 = score(doc=5651,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31902805 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0453587 = queryNorm
                0.54396546 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper outlines the development of serials cataloguing in Germany, which started with entries usually in systematic catalogues. Cataloguing codes were developed first by individual major libraries; the establishment of a Prussian union catalogue called for generally recognized rules, but these focused mainly on sorting and filing. When, in the 1960s, the Prussian Instructions were given up in favor of RAK (Regeln für Alphabetische Katalogisierung), ISBD was adopted for the descriptive part. As to modern international cooperation, this paper explains that the main obstacles are not so much different cataloguing codes but the lack of consensus on the definition of a serial title. Recent revision efforts missed the opportunity of accepting an International Standard Serials Title.
  3. Walravens, H.: Serials cataloging in Germany : the historical development (2003) 0.02
    0.018593598 = product of:
      0.07437439 = sum of:
        0.07437439 = product of:
          0.14874879 = sum of:
            0.14874879 = weight(_text_:instructions in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14874879 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31902805 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0453587 = queryNorm
                0.46625614 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper outlines the development of serials cataloguing in Germany, which started with entries usually in systematic catalogues. Cataloguing codes were developed first by individual major libraries; the establishment of a Prussian union catalogue called for generally recognized rules, but these focused mainly on sorting and filing. When, in the 1960s, the Prussian Instructions were given up in favor of RAK (Regeln für Alphabetische Katalogisierung), ISBD was adopted for the descriptive part. As to modern international cooperation, this paper explains that the main obstacles are not so much different cataloguing codes but the lack of consensus on the definition of a serial title. Recent revision efforts missed the opportunity of accepting an International Standard Serials Title.
  4. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American Cataloging Alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2003) 0.01
    0.007681847 = product of:
      0.030727388 = sum of:
        0.030727388 = product of:
          0.061454777 = sum of:
            0.061454777 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061454777 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0453587 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    S.3-22
  5. Steinhagen, E.N.: Historical perspective of a union catalog in Chile : authorities and periodicals (2003) 0.01
    0.007681847 = product of:
      0.030727388 = sum of:
        0.030727388 = product of:
          0.061454777 = sum of:
            0.061454777 = weight(_text_:22 in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061454777 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0453587 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 7.2006 20:06:22
  6. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American cataloging alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2002) 0.01
    0.0053772926 = product of:
      0.02150917 = sum of:
        0.02150917 = product of:
          0.04301834 = sum of:
            0.04301834 = weight(_text_:22 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04301834 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0453587 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 35(2002) nos.1/2, S.3-22