Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme"
  1. Lorenz, B.: Systematische Aufstellung in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart (2002) 0.01 
    0.011716543 = product of:
  0.035149626 = sum of:
    0.029973019 = weight(_text_:forschung in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029973019 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1858777 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.16125129 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
    0.0051766094 = product of:
      0.015529828 = sum of:
        0.015529828 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015529828 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Bibliothekarische Sacherschließung stellt zunächst eine praktische Aufgabe dar. Gleichwohl sollte bibliothekarische Sacherschließung als Ganzes und in einem wesentlichen Teilbereich wie der Systematischen Freihandaufstellung auch in ihrer historischen Entwicklung und Bedeutung gesehen werden. Ein bedeutender Aspekt bleibt die notwendige Einordnung in das größere Umfeld, vor allem der Bibliotheksgeschichte, aber auch der Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Schwerpunkte bilden hier die Geschichte der Dezimalmethode mit den Teilbereichen UDK und DDC und die Nachkriegsgeschichte der klassifikatorischen Erschließung an wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken Deutschlands, einschließlich der neuen Entwicklung der Verbundarbeit in der Klassifikation. Bedeutend sind weiter die Beispiele für den Vergleich von Aufstellungsklassifikationen als Annäherung an eine zu entwickelnde Methodik. Dabei stellen sich auch Fragen des Inhalts ausgewählter Klassifikationssysteme in historischer Betrachtung. Dies entspricht bereits dem Bibliotheksplan 73, der immerhin Fragen der Bibliotheksgeschichte und der Klassifikation zu den genuinen Bereichen bibliothekswissenschaftlicher Forschung rechnet.
    Date
    22. 3.2008 17:56:19
  2. Hulme, E.W.: Principles of book classification (1985) 0.01 
    0.007419094 = product of:
  0.044514563 = sum of:
    0.044514563 = weight(_text_:propose in 3626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044514563 = score(doc=3626,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.22691247 = fieldWeight in 3626, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3626)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    One of the earliest works on the theory of classification appeared in a series of six chapters an the "Principles of Book Classification" published between October 1911 and May 1912 in the Library Association Record. In this publication, the author, E. Wyndham Hulme (1859-1954) whose career included twenty-five years as Librarian of the British Patent Office, set forth the fundamentals of classification as manifested in both the classed and the alphabetical catalogs. The work and the ideas contained therein have largely been forgotten. However, one phrase stands out and has been used frequently in the discussions of classification and indexing, particularly in reference to systems such as Library of Congress Classification, Dewey Decimal Classification, and Library of Congress Subject Headings. That phrase is "literary warrant"-meaning that the basis for classification is to be found in the actual published literature rather than abstract philosophical ideas or concepts in the universe of knowledge or the "order of nature and system of the sciences." To the extent that classification and indexing systems should be based upon existing literature rather than the universe of human knowledge, the concept of "literary warrant" defines systems used in library and information services, as distinguished from a purely philosophical classification. Library classification attempts to classify library materials-the records of knowledge-rather than knowledge itself; the establishment of a class or a heading for a subject is based an existing literature treating that subject. The following excerpt contains Hulme's definition of "literary warrant." Hulme first rejects the notion of using "the nature of the subject matter to be divided" as the basis for establishing headings, then he proceeds to propose the use of "literary warrant," that is, "an accurate survey and measurement of classes in literature," as the determinant.
  3. Foskett, D.J.: ¬'A rustic in the library' : The first Dr. Pafford Memorial Lecture (1997) 0.01 
    0.0069334726 = product of:
  0.041600835 = sum of:
    0.041600835 = product of:
      0.06240125 = sum of:
        0.031341594 = weight(_text_:29 in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031341594 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
        0.031059656 = weight(_text_:22 in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031059656 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
    Source
    Journal of librarianship and information science. 29(1997) no.4, S.211-216
  4. Rötzer, A.: ¬Die Einteilung der Wissenschaften : Analyse und Typologisierung von Wissenschaftsklassifikationen (2003) 0.01 
    0.005828087 = product of:
  0.03496852 = sum of:
    0.03496852 = weight(_text_:forschung in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03496852 = score(doc=684,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1858777 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.1881265 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    In dem Maße, in dem sich die Wissenschaften partikularisieren und atomisieren, wird es immer schwieriger, Überblick zu gewinnen auch schon über nah verwandte Wissenschaften. Daher wächst die Bedeutung der Klassifizierung hinsichtlich ihrer pragmatischen Funktionen stark an. Zudem sind es heute besonders die Querschnittswissenschaften, die im Zentrum des Forschungsinteresses stehen. Dort werden derzeit die größten Fortschritte gemacht. Man denke dabei nur an die Krebsforschung, die sich im molekularen Bereich in einen Forschungsraum zwischen Chemie und Biologie bewegt. Gerade die Medizin bietet viele Beispiele dieser die Wissenschaftsgrenzen überschreitenden Forschungen: der ganze Bereich der Gentechnik, die Nanotechnik, aber auch die medizinische Informatik und Robotik. Aus diesem Grund sind es nicht nur pragmatische Funktionen, die von einer heutigen Wissenschaftsklassifikation bedient werden müssen, sondern auch epistemologische. Wissenschaftsklassifikationen bieten die Möglichkeit, Zusammenhänge zwischen den Wissenschaften erkennbar machen und eröffnen damit unter Umständen neue Wege der Forschung. Dennoch geriet die Wissenschaftsklassifikation gerade in den letzten Jahren in eine Krise. Die Absage an die Systemhaftigkeit des Ganzen der Wissenschaft, die sich im Zuge der postmodernen Theorie durchgesetzt hat, stellte die Wissenschaftsklassifikation vor Probleme, die sie mit den üblichen Ansätzen nicht lösen konnte. Neue Wege der Klassifikation vor dem Hintergrund der Erkenntnisse dieser neuen Theorieansätze galt es nun zu finden. Jede Zeit findet sich ihre Problemlösungswege, und so hat sich auch für die Wissenschaftsklassifikation der Gegenwart neue Möglichkeiten eröffnet, die sich mit Hilfe der neuen Medien verwirklichen lassen.
  5. Pflug, G.: Classification in the libraries of the German Federal Republic (1982) 0.00 
    0.0046431995 = product of:
  0.027859196 = sum of:
    0.027859196 = product of:
      0.08357759 = sum of:
        0.08357759 = weight(_text_:29 in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08357759 = score(doc=1248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    International classification. 9(1982), S.27-29
  6. Wellisch, H.H.: Organisatorische Neuordnung des DK-Systems (1971) 0.00 
    0.004601431 = product of:
  0.027608585 = sum of:
    0.027608585 = product of:
      0.08282575 = sum of:
        0.08282575 = weight(_text_:22 in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08282575 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971), S.55-63
  7. Wimmer, F.: ¬Die internationale Dezimalklassifikation : Betrachtungen zu ihrer Entstehungsgeschichte und Aktualität (1985) 0.00 
    0.0040627993 = product of:
  0.024376795 = sum of:
    0.024376795 = product of:
      0.073130384 = sum of:
        0.073130384 = weight(_text_:29 in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073130384 = score(doc=1167,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 29(1985) Nr.5, S.15-18
  8. Mitchell, J.S.: Dewey Decimal Classification : 125 and still growing (2001) 0.00 
    0.0034823995 = product of:
  0.020894397 = sum of:
    0.020894397 = product of:
      0.06268319 = sum of:
        0.06268319 = weight(_text_:29 in 5534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06268319 = score(doc=5534,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5534, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5534)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 2001, no.2, Nov./Dec., S.27-29
  9. Dewey, M.: Decimal classification beginnings (1990) 0.00 
    0.003451073 = product of:
  0.020706438 = sum of:
    0.020706438 = product of:
      0.062119313 = sum of:
        0.062119313 = weight(_text_:22 in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062119313 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    25.12.1995 22:28:43
  10. Barber, E.E.; Tripaldi, N.M.; Pisano, S.L.: Facts, approaches, and reflections on classification in the history of Argentine librarianship (2003) 0.00 
    0.002902 = product of:
  0.017412 = sum of:
    0.017412 = product of:
      0.052235994 = sum of:
        0.052235994 = weight(_text_:29 in 4062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052235994 = score(doc=4062,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4062, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4062)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 7.2006 20:06:08
  11. LaBarre, K.: ¬The heritage of early FC in document reference retrieval systems : 1920-1969 (2007) 0.00 
    0.0023215997 = product of:
  0.013929598 = sum of:
    0.013929598 = product of:
      0.041788794 = sum of:
        0.041788794 = weight(_text_:29 in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041788794 = score(doc=689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    28.12.2007 19:29:10
  12. Sveistrup, H.: ¬Der neue Realkatalog der SUB Hamburg (1947) 0.00 
    0.0023007155 = product of:
  0.013804292 = sum of:
    0.013804292 = product of:
      0.041412875 = sum of:
        0.041412875 = weight(_text_:22 in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041412875 = score(doc=6607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Probleme des Wiederaufbaus im wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen: aus d. Verhandlungen des 1. Bibliothekartagung der britischen Zone in Hamburg vom 22.-24.10.1946
  13. Santoro, M.: Ripensare la CDU (1995) 0.00 
    0.0020313996 = product of:
  0.012188397 = sum of:
    0.012188397 = product of:
      0.036565192 = sum of:
        0.036565192 = weight(_text_:29 in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036565192 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
  14. Olson, H.A.: Exclusivity, teleology and hierarchy : our aristotelean legacy (1999) 0.00 
    0.0020313996 = product of:
  0.012188397 = sum of:
    0.012188397 = product of:
      0.036565192 = sum of:
        0.036565192 = weight(_text_:29 in 4466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036565192 = score(doc=4466,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4466, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4466)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    13. 3.2000 10:28:29
  15. Rayward, W.B.: ¬The origins of information science and the International Institute of Bibliography / International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID) (1997) 0.00 
    0.0020131262 = product of:
  0.0120787565 = sum of:
    0.0120787565 = product of:
      0.036236268 = sum of:
        0.036236268 = weight(_text_:22 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036236268 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.2, S.3-15
  16. Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008) 0.00 
    0.0020131262 = product of:
  0.0120787565 = sum of:
    0.0120787565 = product of:
      0.036236268 = sum of:
        0.036236268 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036236268 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  17. Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012) 0.00 
    0.0020131262 = product of:
  0.0120787565 = sum of:
    0.0120787565 = product of:
      0.036236268 = sum of:
        0.036236268 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036236268 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:31:25
  18. LaBarre, K.: Bliss and Ranganathan : synthesis, synchronicity our sour grapes? (2000) 0.00 
    0.0017411998 = product of:
  0.0104471985 = sum of:
    0.0104471985 = product of:
      0.031341594 = sum of:
        0.031341594 = weight(_text_:29 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031341594 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 8.2004 9:43:23
  19. Barat, A.H.: Hungarians in the history of the UDC (2014) 0.00 
    0.0017255365 = product of:
  0.010353219 = sum of:
    0.010353219 = product of:
      0.031059656 = sum of:
        0.031059656 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031059656 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  20. Green, R.: Facet analysis and semantic frames (2017) 0.00 
    0.001451 = product of:
  0.008706 = sum of:
    0.008706 = product of:
      0.026117997 = sum of:
        0.026117997 = weight(_text_:29 in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026117997 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 9.2017 18:58:02

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 20
  • m 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications