-
Iivonen, M.; Kivimäki, K.: Common entities and missing properties : similarities and differences in the indexing of concepts (1998)
0.03
0.025861522 = product of:
0.038792282 = sum of:
0.017698597 = product of:
0.07079439 = sum of:
0.07079439 = weight(_text_:authors in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07079439 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23425597 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.021093683 = weight(_text_:m in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021093683 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The selection and representation of concepts in indexing of the same documents in 2 databases of library and information studies are considered. the authors compare the indexing of 49 documents in KINF and LISA. They focus on the types of concepts presented in indexing, the degree of concept consistency in indexing, and similarities and differences in the indexing of concepts. The largest group of indexed concepts in both databases was the category of entities while concepts belonging to the category of properties were almost missing in both databases. The second largest group of indexed concepts in KINF was the category of activities and in LISA the category of dimensions. Although the concept consistency between KINF and LISA remained rather low and was only 34%, there were approximately 2,2 concepts per document which were indexed from the same documents in both databses. These common concepts belonged mostly to the category of entities
-
Hooper, R.S.: Indexer consistency tests : origins, measurements, results and utilization (1965)
0.02
0.02343743 = product of:
0.070312284 = sum of:
0.070312284 = weight(_text_:m in 7495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070312284 = score(doc=7495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.54987466 = fieldWeight in 7495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=7495)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Type
- m
-
Ansari, M.: Matching between assigned descriptors and title keywords in medical theses (2005)
0.02
0.021551266 = product of:
0.0323269 = sum of:
0.01474883 = product of:
0.05899532 = sum of:
0.05899532 = weight(_text_:authors in 4739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05899532 = score(doc=4739,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23425597 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 4739, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4739)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.017578071 = weight(_text_:m in 4739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017578071 = score(doc=4739,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 4739, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4739)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - To examine the degree of exact and partial match between the assigned descriptors and title keywords of medical theses written in Farsi and submitted for a PhD degree.Design/methodology/approach - A sample population of 506 theses in Pediatrics, Gynecology, Cardiology and Psychiatry was randomly picked out of a total of 909 indexed in the Indexing Department of the Central Library of the Iran University of Medical Science and Health Care Services. The results obtained are compared with those reported for other documents written in Farsi and English. Where applicable, the influence of the foreign language and its structure is commented on.Findings - It is shown that the degree of match between the assigned descriptors and the title keywords is greater than 70 per cent, equaling those reported for Farsi books and Michigan University Library catalogue in USA. It is also shown that the frequency of the match has increased since 1982, indicating that the authors have become more attentive in their choice of title.Research limitations/implications - Detailed analysis of results, however, shows significant differences between the degree of exact match amongst the four categories, with psychiatry theses that use more common terms showing highest exact match findings (50 per cent).Originality/value - This paper highlights the need for a closer collaboration with medical institutions for definition of approved terms and their incorporation in indexation in order to improve findings in various medical categories.
-
Cleverdon, C.W.; Mills, J.; Keen, M.: Factors determining the performance of indexing systems : ASLIB Cranfield research project (1966)
0.02
0.016406199 = product of:
0.049218595 = sum of:
0.049218595 = weight(_text_:m in 5363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049218595 = score(doc=5363,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 5363, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5363)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960)
0.01
0.013923994 = product of:
0.041771982 = sum of:
0.041771982 = product of:
0.083543964 = sum of:
0.083543964 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083543964 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17994252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
-
Gretz, M.; Thomas, M.: Indexierungen in biomedizinischen Literaturdatenbanken : eine vergleichende Analyse (1991)
0.01
0.011600934 = product of:
0.034802802 = sum of:
0.034802802 = weight(_text_:m in 5104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034802802 = score(doc=5104,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.27217406 = fieldWeight in 5104, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5104)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Chartron, G.; Dalbin, S.; Monteil, M.-G.; Verillon, M.: Indexation manuelle et indexation automatique : dépasser les oppositions (1989)
0.01
0.011600934 = product of:
0.034802802 = sum of:
0.034802802 = weight(_text_:m in 3516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034802802 = score(doc=3516,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.27217406 = fieldWeight in 3516, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3516)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Braam, R.R.; Bruil, J.: Quality of indexing information : authors' views on indexing of their articles in chemical abstracts online CA-file (1992)
0.01
0.01021829 = product of:
0.030654868 = sum of:
0.030654868 = product of:
0.12261947 = sum of:
0.12261947 = weight(_text_:authors in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12261947 = score(doc=2638,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23425597 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Studies the quality of subject indexing by Chemical Abstracts Indexing Service by confronting authors with the particular indexing terms attributed to their computer, for 270 articles published in 54 journals, 5 articles out of each journal. Responses (80%) indicate the superior quality of keywords, both as content descriptors and as retrieval tools. Author judgements on these 2 different aspects do not always converge, however. CAS's indexing policy to cover only 'new' aspects is reflected in author's judgements that index lists are somewhat incomplete, in particular in the case of thesaurus terms (index headings). The large effort expanded by CAS in maintaining and using a subject thesuaurs, in order to select valid index headings, as compared to quick and cheap keyword postings, does not lead to clear superior quality of thesaurus terms for document description nor in retrieval. Some 20% of papers were not placed in 'proper' CA main section, according to authors. As concerns the use of indexing data by third parties, in bibliometrics, users should be aware of the indexing policies behind the data, in order to prevent invalid interpretations
-
Gil-Leiva, I.; Alonso-Arroyo, A.: Keywords given by authors of scientific articles in database descriptors (2007)
0.01
0.009832554 = product of:
0.02949766 = sum of:
0.02949766 = product of:
0.11799064 = sum of:
0.11799064 = weight(_text_:authors in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11799064 = score(doc=211,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23425597 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In this article, the authors analyze the keywords given by authors of scientific articles and the descriptors assigned to the articles to ascertain the presence of the keywords in the descriptors. Six-hundred forty INSPEC (Information Service for Physics, Engineering, and Computing), CAB (Current Agriculture Bibliography) abstracts, ISTA (Information Science and Technology Abstracts), and LISA (Library and Information Science Abstracts) database records were consulted. After detailed comparisons, it was found that keywords provided by authors have an important presence in the database descriptors studied; nearly 25% of all the keywords appeared in exactly the same form as descriptors, with another 21% though normalized, still detected in the descriptors. This means that almost 46% of keywords appear in the descriptors, either as such or after normalization. Elsewhere, three distinct indexing policies appear, one represented by INSPEC and LISA (indexers seem to have freedom to assign the descriptors they deem necessary); another is represented by CAB (no record has fewer than four descriptors and, in general, a large number of descriptors is employed). In contrast, in ISTA, a certain institutional code exists towards economy in indexing because 84% of records contain only four descriptors.
-
Iivonen, M.: ¬The impact of the indexing environment on interindexer consistency (1990)
0.01
0.009374971 = product of:
0.028124912 = sum of:
0.028124912 = weight(_text_:m in 4779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028124912 = score(doc=4779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 4779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4779)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Ladewig, C.; Rieger, M.: Ähnlichkeitsmessung mit und ohne aspektische Indexierung (1998)
0.01
0.009374971 = product of:
0.028124912 = sum of:
0.028124912 = weight(_text_:m in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028124912 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002)
0.01
0.009328817 = product of:
0.013993225 = sum of:
0.007031228 = weight(_text_:m in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007031228 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.054987464 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.006961997 = product of:
0.013923994 = sum of:
0.013923994 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013923994 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17994252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Type
- m
-
Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996)
0.01
0.009282663 = product of:
0.027847989 = sum of:
0.027847989 = product of:
0.055695977 = sum of:
0.055695977 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055695977 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17994252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
-
Iivonen, M.: Interindexer consistency and the indexing environment (1990)
0.01
0.0082030995 = product of:
0.024609298 = sum of:
0.024609298 = weight(_text_:m in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024609298 = score(doc=3593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990)
0.01
0.0081223305 = product of:
0.02436699 = sum of:
0.02436699 = product of:
0.04873398 = sum of:
0.04873398 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04873398 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17994252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
-
Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006)
0.01
0.0081223305 = product of:
0.02436699 = sum of:
0.02436699 = product of:
0.04873398 = sum of:
0.04873398 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04873398 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17994252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 4. 1.2007 10:22:26
-
Reich, P.; Biever, E.J.: Indexing consistency : The input/output function of thesauri (1991)
0.01
0.007866043 = product of:
0.023598127 = sum of:
0.023598127 = product of:
0.09439251 = sum of:
0.09439251 = weight(_text_:authors in 2258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09439251 = score(doc=2258,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23425597 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 2258, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2258)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This study measures inter-indexer consistency as determined by the number of identical terms assigned to the same document by two different indexing organizations using the same thesaurus as a source for the entry vocabulary. The authors derive consistency figures of 24 percent and 45 percent for two samples. Factors in the consistency failures include variations in indexing depth, differences in choice of concepts for indexing, different indexing policies, and a highly specific indexing vocabulray. Results indicate that broad search strategies are often necessary for adequate search yields.
-
Hudon, M.: Conceptual compatibility in controlled language tools used to index and access the content of moving image collections (2004)
0.01
0.007031228 = product of:
0.021093683 = sum of:
0.021093683 = weight(_text_:m in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021093683 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Kedar, R.; Shoham, S.: ¬The subject cataloging of monographs with the use of a thesaurus (2003)
0.01
0.007031228 = product of:
0.021093683 = sum of:
0.021093683 = weight(_text_:m in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021093683 = score(doc=2700,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
-
Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005)
0.01
0.006961997 = product of:
0.020885991 = sum of:
0.020885991 = product of:
0.041771982 = sum of:
0.041771982 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041771982 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17994252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051385287 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 18. 6.2005 13:16:22
