Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Schöne neue Welt? : Fragen und Antworten: Wie Facebook menschliche Gedanken auslesen will (2017) 0.02
    0.021452643 = product of:
      0.042905286 = sum of:
        0.042905286 = product of:
          0.08581057 = sum of:
            0.08581057 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08581057 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2004 9:42:33
    22. 4.2017 11:58:05
  2. Kuhlen, R.: Wissensökologie : Wissen und Information als Commons (Gemeingüter) (2013) 0.01
    0.014095521 = product of:
      0.028191041 = sum of:
        0.028191041 = product of:
          0.056382082 = sum of:
            0.056382082 = weight(_text_:z in 2559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056382082 = score(doc=2559,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23903055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.23587814 = fieldWeight in 2559, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2559)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Wissensökologie (knowledge ecology) ist ein noch ungewöhnlicher Begriff bzw. eine in der Kombination von Wissen und Ökologie für problematisch gehaltene Benennung Der dem Begriff zu Grunde liegende Anspruch dürfte unumstritten sein. Es geht um eine vernünftige, individuelle, soziale und kulturelle Entwicklung sowie politische Mitbestimmung und ökonomisches Wohlergehen sichernden und nachhaltigen Umgang mit den Ressourcen Wissen und Information. Umstritten allerdings sind die Wege, wie dieses Entwicklungsziel erreicht werden kann, und, weniger wichtig, umstritten, wie die Hinweisschilder auf diese Wege bezeichnet werden sollen, z. B. mit Wissensökologie oder Informationsökologie; auch Wissensallmende ist dafür ins Spiel gebracht worden. Es gibt keinen Konsens über eine Definition von Wissensökologie. Einige in die Nähe des Wissensmanagements gerückte Beispiele werden in den Beiträgen zu dem Band Knowledge Ecology Studies gegeben: "Knowledge ecology is an interdisciplinary field of management theory and practice .". Malhotra stellt Information ecology ebenfalls in den Zusammenhang von Knowledge management, andere zum Begriff der Innovation. Auf diesen Strang der Wissensökologie gehen wir im Weiteren nicht ein. Knowledge ecology wird auch im Zusammenhang mit Open Source-Software verwendet.
  3. Swigon, M.: Information limits : definition, typology and types (2011) 0.01
    0.012135447 = product of:
      0.024270894 = sum of:
        0.024270894 = product of:
          0.048541788 = sum of:
            0.048541788 = weight(_text_:22 in 300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048541788 = score(doc=300,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 300, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=300)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 7.2011 18:22:52
  4. Badia, A.: Data, information, knowledge : an information science analysis (2014) 0.01
    0.010618516 = product of:
      0.021237032 = sum of:
        0.021237032 = product of:
          0.042474065 = sum of:
            0.042474065 = weight(_text_:22 in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042474065 = score(doc=1296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 6.2014 19:22:57
  5. Malsburg, C. von der: Concerning the neuronal code (2018) 0.01
    0.0091015855 = product of:
      0.018203171 = sum of:
        0.018203171 = product of:
          0.036406342 = sum of:
            0.036406342 = weight(_text_:22 in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036406342 = score(doc=73,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27.12.2020 16:56:22
  6. Zhang, P.; Soergel, D.: Towards a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking (2014) 0.01
    0.0075846547 = product of:
      0.015169309 = sum of:
        0.015169309 = product of:
          0.030338619 = sum of:
            0.030338619 = weight(_text_:22 in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030338619 = score(doc=1344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:55:39
  7. Leydesdorff, L.; Johnson, M.W.; Ivanova, I.: Toward a calculus of redundancy : signification, codification, and anticipation in cultural evolution (2018) 0.01
    0.0075846547 = product of:
      0.015169309 = sum of:
        0.015169309 = product of:
          0.030338619 = sum of:
            0.030338619 = weight(_text_:22 in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030338619 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2018 11:22:09
  8. Albright, K.: Multidisciplinarity in information behavior : expanding boundaries or fragmentation of the field? (2010) 0.01
    0.0075846547 = product of:
      0.015169309 = sum of:
        0.015169309 = product of:
          0.030338619 = sum of:
            0.030338619 = weight(_text_:22 in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030338619 = score(doc=5077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 3.2019 17:32:22
  9. Kaeser, E.: ¬Das postfaktische Zeitalter (2016) 0.01
    0.006435793 = product of:
      0.012871586 = sum of:
        0.012871586 = product of:
          0.025743172 = sum of:
            0.025743172 = weight(_text_:22 in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025743172 = score(doc=3080,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.16414827 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Es gibt Daten, Informationen und Fakten. Wenn man mir eine Zahlenreihe vorsetzt, dann handelt es sich um Daten: unterscheidbare Einheiten, im Fachjargon: Items. Wenn man mir sagt, dass diese Items stündliche Temperaturangaben der Aare im Berner Marzilibad bedeuten, dann verfüge ich über Information - über interpretierte Daten. Wenn man mir sagt, dies seien die gemessenen Aaretemperaturen am 22. August 2016 im Marzili, dann ist das ein Faktum: empirisch geprüfte interpretierte Daten. Dieser Dreischritt - Unterscheiden, Interpretieren, Prüfen - bildet quasi das Bindemittel des Faktischen, «the matter of fact». Wir alle führen den Dreischritt ständig aus und gelangen so zu einem relativ verlässlichen Wissen und Urteilsvermögen betreffend die Dinge des Alltags. Aber wie schon die Kurzcharakterisierung durchblicken lässt, bilden Fakten nicht den Felsengrund der Realität. Sie sind kritikanfällig, sowohl von der Interpretation wie auch von der Prüfung her gesehen. Um bei unserem Beispiel zu bleiben: Es kann durchaus sein, dass man uns zwei unterschiedliche «faktische» Temperaturverläufe der Aare am 22. August 2016 vorsetzt.
  10. Huvila, I.: Situational appropriation of information (2015) 0.01
    0.0060677235 = product of:
      0.012135447 = sum of:
        0.012135447 = product of:
          0.024270894 = sum of:
            0.024270894 = weight(_text_:22 in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024270894 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  11. Freyberg, L.: ¬Die Lesbarkeit der Welt : Rezension zu 'The Concept of Information in Library and Information Science. A Field in Search of Its Boundaries: 8 Short Comments Concerning Information'. In: Cybernetics and Human Knowing. Vol. 22 (2015), 1, 57-80. Kurzartikel von Luciano Floridi, Søren Brier, Torkild Thellefsen, Martin Thellefsen, Bent Sørensen, Birger Hjørland, Brenda Dervin, Ken Herold, Per Hasle und Michael Buckland (2016) 0.01
    0.0060677235 = product of:
      0.012135447 = sum of:
        0.012135447 = product of:
          0.024270894 = sum of:
            0.024270894 = weight(_text_:22 in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024270894 = score(doc=3335,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15682878 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04478481 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)