Search (132 results, page 7 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Kaeser, E.: ¬Das postfaktische Zeitalter (2016) 0.01
    0.006478389 = product of:
      0.012956778 = sum of:
        0.012956778 = product of:
          0.025913555 = sum of:
            0.025913555 = weight(_text_:22 in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025913555 = score(doc=3080,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.16414827 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Es gibt Daten, Informationen und Fakten. Wenn man mir eine Zahlenreihe vorsetzt, dann handelt es sich um Daten: unterscheidbare Einheiten, im Fachjargon: Items. Wenn man mir sagt, dass diese Items stündliche Temperaturangaben der Aare im Berner Marzilibad bedeuten, dann verfüge ich über Information - über interpretierte Daten. Wenn man mir sagt, dies seien die gemessenen Aaretemperaturen am 22. August 2016 im Marzili, dann ist das ein Faktum: empirisch geprüfte interpretierte Daten. Dieser Dreischritt - Unterscheiden, Interpretieren, Prüfen - bildet quasi das Bindemittel des Faktischen, «the matter of fact». Wir alle führen den Dreischritt ständig aus und gelangen so zu einem relativ verlässlichen Wissen und Urteilsvermögen betreffend die Dinge des Alltags. Aber wie schon die Kurzcharakterisierung durchblicken lässt, bilden Fakten nicht den Felsengrund der Realität. Sie sind kritikanfällig, sowohl von der Interpretation wie auch von der Prüfung her gesehen. Um bei unserem Beispiel zu bleiben: Es kann durchaus sein, dass man uns zwei unterschiedliche «faktische» Temperaturverläufe der Aare am 22. August 2016 vorsetzt.
  2. Stoyan, H.: Information in der Informatik (2004) 0.01
    0.0061078835 = product of:
      0.012215767 = sum of:
        0.012215767 = product of:
          0.024431534 = sum of:
            0.024431534 = weight(_text_:22 in 2959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024431534 = score(doc=2959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2959)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 4.2013 10:22:48
  3. San Segundo, R.: ¬A new conception of representation of knowledge (2004) 0.01
    0.0061078835 = product of:
      0.012215767 = sum of:
        0.012215767 = product of:
          0.024431534 = sum of:
            0.024431534 = weight(_text_:22 in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024431534 = score(doc=3077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 1.2005 18:22:25
  4. Michel, S.: ¬Der Erfolg der Entfesselungskünstler : Gelungene Kooperation: "Vom Boten zum Bit" im Museum für Kommunikation (2003) 0.01
    0.0061078835 = product of:
      0.012215767 = sum of:
        0.012215767 = product of:
          0.024431534 = sum of:
            0.024431534 = weight(_text_:22 in 5112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024431534 = score(doc=5112,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5112, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5112)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 2.1996 22:34:46
  5. Huvila, I.: Situational appropriation of information (2015) 0.01
    0.0061078835 = product of:
      0.012215767 = sum of:
        0.012215767 = product of:
          0.024431534 = sum of:
            0.024431534 = weight(_text_:22 in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024431534 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  6. Freyberg, L.: ¬Die Lesbarkeit der Welt : Rezension zu 'The Concept of Information in Library and Information Science. A Field in Search of Its Boundaries: 8 Short Comments Concerning Information'. In: Cybernetics and Human Knowing. Vol. 22 (2015), 1, 57-80. Kurzartikel von Luciano Floridi, Søren Brier, Torkild Thellefsen, Martin Thellefsen, Bent Sørensen, Birger Hjørland, Brenda Dervin, Ken Herold, Per Hasle und Michael Buckland (2016) 0.01
    0.0061078835 = product of:
      0.012215767 = sum of:
        0.012215767 = product of:
          0.024431534 = sum of:
            0.024431534 = weight(_text_:22 in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024431534 = score(doc=3335,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Yu, L.; Fan, Z.; Li, A.: ¬A hierarchical typology of scholarly information units : based on a deduction-verification study (2020) 0.01
    0.0061078835 = product of:
      0.012215767 = sum of:
        0.012215767 = product of:
          0.024431534 = sum of:
            0.024431534 = weight(_text_:22 in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024431534 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 1.2020 11:15:22
  8. Simonitsch, P.: Kontrolle ist besser - aber für wen? : In Genf wurde der Weltinformationsgipfel eröffnet - China gibt Widerstand gegen Pressefreiheit auf (2003) 0.01
    0.005344398 = product of:
      0.010688796 = sum of:
        0.010688796 = product of:
          0.021377591 = sum of:
            0.021377591 = weight(_text_:22 in 1985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021377591 = score(doc=1985,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1985, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1985)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.289 vom 11.12.2003, S.22
  9. Ostermann, D.: US-Terrorfahnder verheddern sich im Daten-Dickicht (2004) 0.01
    0.005344398 = product of:
      0.010688796 = sum of:
        0.010688796 = product of:
          0.021377591 = sum of:
            0.021377591 = weight(_text_:22 in 2124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021377591 = score(doc=2124,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2124, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2124)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 1.1997 9:39:22
  10. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The special competency of information specialists (2002) 0.00
    0.004928487 = product of:
      0.009856974 = sum of:
        0.009856974 = product of:
          0.019713948 = sum of:
            0.019713948 = weight(_text_:1997 in 1265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019713948 = score(doc=1265,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.12039325 = fieldWeight in 1265, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1265)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "In a new article published in Journal of Documentation, 2002, I claim that the special competency of information specialists and information scientists are related to "domain analysis." Information science grew out of special librarianship and documentation (cf. Williams, 1997), and implicit in its tradition has in my opinion been a focus an subject knowledge. Although domain analysis has earlier been introduced in JASIST (Hjoerland & Albrechtsen, 1995), the new article introduces 11 Specific approaches to domain analysis, which I Claim together define the Specific competencies of information specialists. The approaches are (I) Producing and evaluating literature guides and subject gateways, (2) Producing and evaluating special classifications and thesauri, (3) Research an and competencies in indexing and retrieving information specialties, (4) Knowledge about empirical user studies in subject areas, (5) Producing and interpreting bibliometrical studies, (6) Historical studies of information structures and Services in domains, (7) Studies of documents and genres in knowledge domains, (8) Epistemological and critical studies of different paradigms, assumptions, and interests in domains, (9) Knowledge about terminological studies, LSP (Languages for Special Purposes), and discourse analysis in knowledge fields, (10) Knowledge about and studies of structures and institutions in scientific and professional communication in a domain, (11) Knowledge about methods and results from domain analytic studies about professional cognition, knowledge representation in computer science and artificial intelligence. By bringing these approaches together, the paper advocates a view which may have been implicit in previous literature but which has not before been Set out systematically. The approaches presented here are neither exhaustive nor mutually exhaustve, but an attempt is made to present the state of the art. Specific examples and selective reviews of literature are provided, and the strength and drawback of each of these approaches are being discussed. It is my Claim that the information specialist who has worked with these 1 1 approaches in a given domain (e.g., music, sociology, or chemistry) has a special expertise that should not be mixed up with the kind of expertise taught at universities in corresponding subjects. Some of these 11 approaches are today well-known in schools of LIS. Bibliometrics is an example, Other approaches are new and represent a view of what should be introduced in the training of information professionals. First and foremost does the article advocates the view that these 1 1 approaches should be seen as supplementary. That the Professional identity is best maintained if Chose methods are applied to the same examples (same domain). Somebody would perhaps feel that this would make the education of information professionals too narrow. The Counter argument is that you can only understand and use these methods properly in a new domain, if you already have a deep knowledge of the Specific information problems in at least orte domain. It is a dangerous illusion to believe that one becomes more competent to work in any field if orte does not know anything about any domain. The special challenge in our science is to provide general background for use in Specific fields. This is what domain analysis is developed for. Study programs that allow the students to specialize and to work independent in the selected field (such as, for example, the Curriculum at the Royal School of LIS in Denmark) should fit well with the intentions in domain analysis. In this connection it should be emphasized that the 11 approaches are presented as general approaches that may be used in about any domain whatsoever. They should, however, be seen in connection. If this is not the case, then their relative strengths and weaknesses cannot be evaluated. The approaches do not have the same status. Some (e.g., empirical user studies) are dependent an others (e.g., epistemological studies).
  11. Weizenbaum, J.: Wir gegen die Gier (2008) 0.00
    0.004580912 = product of:
      0.009161824 = sum of:
        0.009161824 = product of:
          0.018323649 = sum of:
            0.018323649 = weight(_text_:22 in 6983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018323649 = score(doc=6983,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 6983, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6983)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 3.2008 12:22:08
  12. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The controversy over the concept of information : a rejoinder to Professor Bates (2009) 0.00
    0.0038174272 = product of:
      0.0076348544 = sum of:
        0.0076348544 = product of:
          0.015269709 = sum of:
            0.015269709 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015269709 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:13:27

Years

Languages