Search (59 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Houston, R.D.; Harmon, E.G.: Re-envisioning the information concept : systematic definitions (2002) 0.07
    0.07198863 = product of:
      0.14397725 = sum of:
        0.14397725 = sum of:
          0.04608324 = weight(_text_:data in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04608324 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
          0.09789401 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09789401 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.536106 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper suggests a framework and systematic definitions for 6 words commonly used in dthe field of information science: data, information, knowledge, wisdom, inspiration, and intelligence. We intend these definitions to lead to a quantification of information science, a quantification that will enable their measurement, manipulastion, and prediction.
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    22. 2.2007 19:22:13
  2. Meadows, J.: Understanding information (2001) 0.04
    0.04488854 = product of:
      0.08977708 = sum of:
        0.08977708 = sum of:
          0.040322836 = weight(_text_:data in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040322836 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
          0.049454242 = weight(_text_:22 in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049454242 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die moderne Gesellschaft leidet an Reizüberflutung durch Fernsehen, Internet, Zeitschriften aller Art. Jack Meadows, Professor für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft setzt sich mit Definitionen zu Begriffen wie 'Data', 'Information', 'Communication' oder 'Knowledge' auseinander, die für uns alläglich geworden sind. wie verarbeiten wir den Fluss von wichtigen und unwichtigen Informationen, der täglich auf uns einströmt? Welche 'Daten' sind es für uns Wert, gespeichert zu werden, welche vergessen wir nach kurzer Zeit? Wann wird aus Information Wissen oder gar Weisheit? Das Buch ist eine grundlegende Einführung in das weitläufige Thema Information und Wissensmanagement
    Date
    15. 6.2002 19:22:01
  3. Westbrook, L.: Information myths and intimate partner violence : sources, contexts, and consequences (2009) 0.04
    0.04488854 = product of:
      0.08977708 = sum of:
        0.08977708 = sum of:
          0.040322836 = weight(_text_:data in 2790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040322836 = score(doc=2790,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 2790, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2790)
          0.049454242 = weight(_text_:22 in 2790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049454242 = score(doc=2790,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2790, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2790)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Survivors of intimate partner violence face more than information gaps; many face powerful barriers in the form of information myths. Triangulating data from in-depth interviews and community bulletin board postings, this study incorporates insights from survivors, police, and shelter staff to begin mapping the information landscape through which survivors move. An unanticipated feature of that landscape is a set of 28 compelling information myths that prevent some survivors from making effective use of the social, legal, economic, and support resources available to them. This analysis of the sources, contexts, and consequences of these information myths is the first step in devising strategies to counter their ill effects.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:16:44
  4. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.03
    0.03450819 = product of:
      0.06901638 = sum of:
        0.06901638 = product of:
          0.20704915 = sum of:
            0.20704915 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20704915 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.44208363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  5. dpa: Struktur des Denkorgans wird bald entschlüsselt sein (2000) 0.03
    0.029973798 = product of:
      0.059947595 = sum of:
        0.059947595 = product of:
          0.11989519 = sum of:
            0.11989519 = weight(_text_:22 in 3952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11989519 = score(doc=3952,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3952, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3952)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
    22. 7.2000 19:05:41
  6. Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006) 0.03
    0.028259566 = product of:
      0.056519132 = sum of:
        0.056519132 = product of:
          0.113038264 = sum of:
            0.113038264 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113038264 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:22:28
  7. San Segundo, R.: ¬A new conception of representation of knowledge (2004) 0.03
    0.025650594 = product of:
      0.05130119 = sum of:
        0.05130119 = sum of:
          0.02304162 = weight(_text_:data in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02304162 = score(doc=3077,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.1397442 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
          0.028259566 = weight(_text_:22 in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028259566 = score(doc=3077,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052144732 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The new term Representation of knowledge, applied to the framework of electronic segments of information, with comprehension of new material support for information, and a review and total conceptualisation of the terminology which is being applied, entails a review of all traditional documentary practices. Therefore, a definition of the concept of Representation of knowledge is indispensable. The term representation has been used in westere cultural and intellectual tradition to refer to the diverse ways that a subject comprehends an object. Representation is a process which requires the structure of natural language and human memory whereby it is interwoven in a subject and in conscience. However, at the present time, the term Representation of knowledge is applied to the processing of electronic information, combined with the aim of emulating the human mind in such a way that one has endeavoured to transfer, with great difficulty, the complex structurality of the conceptual representation of human knowledge to new digital information technologies. Thus, nowadays, representation of knowledge has taken an diverse meanings and it has focussed, for the moment, an certain structures and conceptual hierarchies which carry and transfer information, and has initially been based an the current representation of knowledge using artificial intelligence. The traditional languages of documentation, also referred to as languages of representation, offer a structured representation of conceptual fields, symbols and terms of natural and notational language, and they are the pillars for the necessary correspondence between the object or text and its representation. These correspondences, connections and symbolisations will be established within the electronic framework by means of different models and of the "goal" domain, which will give rise to organisations, structures, maps, networks and levels, as new electronic documents are not compact units but segments of information. Thus, the new representation of knowledge refers to data, images, figures and symbolised, treated, processed and structured ideas which replace or refer to documents within the framework of technical processing and the recuperation of electronic information.
    Date
    2. 1.2005 18:22:25
  8. afp: Gehirn von Taxifahrern passt sich an : Größerer Hippocampus (2000) 0.02
    0.024727121 = product of:
      0.049454242 = sum of:
        0.049454242 = product of:
          0.098908484 = sum of:
            0.098908484 = weight(_text_:22 in 4496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098908484 = score(doc=4496,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4496, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4496)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:05:18
  9. ap: Schlaganfall : Computer-Bild zeigt den Heilungsprozess im Gehirn (2000) 0.02
    0.021194674 = product of:
      0.04238935 = sum of:
        0.04238935 = product of:
          0.0847787 = sum of:
            0.0847787 = weight(_text_:22 in 4231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0847787 = score(doc=4231,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4231, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4231)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:05:31
  10. Nerlich, H.: Schlußveranstaltung des Kongresses 'Information und Öffentlichkeit' am 23. März 2000 in Leipzig : "Zukunft der Fachinformation" (2000) 0.02
    0.021194674 = product of:
      0.04238935 = sum of:
        0.04238935 = product of:
          0.0847787 = sum of:
            0.0847787 = weight(_text_:22 in 4401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0847787 = score(doc=4401,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4401, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4401)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2000 13:33:40
  11. kal: Hubert Markl zur Zukunft der Forschung (2000) 0.02
    0.021194674 = product of:
      0.04238935 = sum of:
        0.04238935 = product of:
          0.0847787 = sum of:
            0.0847787 = weight(_text_:22 in 4893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0847787 = score(doc=4893,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4893, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4893)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
  12. Logothetis, N.K.: ¬Das Sehen : ein Fenster zum Bewußtsein (2000) 0.02
    0.017662229 = product of:
      0.035324458 = sum of:
        0.035324458 = product of:
          0.070648916 = sum of:
            0.070648916 = weight(_text_:22 in 4225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070648916 = score(doc=4225,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4225, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4225)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:02:07
  13. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000) 0.02
    0.017662229 = product of:
      0.035324458 = sum of:
        0.035324458 = product of:
          0.070648916 = sum of:
            0.070648916 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070648916 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2001 20:22:57
  14. Hammwöhner, R.: Besuch bei alten Bekannten : zu den Sprachspielen mit dem Informationsbegriff (2004) 0.02
    0.017662229 = product of:
      0.035324458 = sum of:
        0.035324458 = product of:
          0.070648916 = sum of:
            0.070648916 = weight(_text_:22 in 4669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070648916 = score(doc=4669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4669)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27.11.2005 17:22:54
  15. Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006) 0.02
    0.017484715 = product of:
      0.03496943 = sum of:
        0.03496943 = product of:
          0.06993886 = sum of:
            0.06993886 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06993886 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:15:22
  16. Dervos, D.A.; Coleman, A.: ¬A common sense approach to defining data, information, and metadata (2006) 0.02
    0.017460302 = product of:
      0.034920603 = sum of:
        0.034920603 = product of:
          0.069841206 = sum of:
            0.069841206 = weight(_text_:data in 227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069841206 = score(doc=227,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.42357713 = fieldWeight in 227, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=227)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Many competing definitions for the terms data, information, metadata, and knowledge can be traced in the library and information science literature. The lack of a clear consensus in the way reference is made to the corresponding fundamental concepts is intensified if one considers additional disciplinary perspectives, e.g. database technology, data mining, etc. In the present paper, we use a common sense approach, to selectively survey the literature, and define these terms in a way that can advance the interdisciplinary development of information systems.
  17. Zins, C.: Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge (2007) 0.01
    0.014256276 = product of:
      0.028512552 = sum of:
        0.028512552 = product of:
          0.057025105 = sum of:
            0.057025105 = weight(_text_:data in 428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057025105 = score(doc=428,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.34584928 = fieldWeight in 428, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=428)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The field of Information Science is constantly changing. Therefore, information scientists are required to regularly review-and if necessary-redefine its fundamental building blocks. This article is one of a group of four articles, which resulted from a Critical Delphi study conducted in 2003-2005. The study, "Knowledge Map of Information Science," was aimed at exploring the foundations of information science. The international panel was composed of 57 leading scholars from 16 countries, who represent (almost) all the major subfields and important aspects of the field. This particular article documents 130 definitions of data, information, and knowledge formulated by 45 scholars, and maps the major conceptual approaches for defining these three key concepts.
  18. Calvin, W.H.: ¬Der Sprache des Gehirns : Wie in unserem Bewußtsein Gedanken entstehen (2002) 0.01
    0.014129783 = product of:
      0.028259566 = sum of:
        0.028259566 = product of:
          0.056519132 = sum of:
            0.056519132 = weight(_text_:22 in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056519132 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11.11.2002 14:30:22
  19. Wissenschaftler fordern 'Open Access' : Berliner Erklärung (2003) 0.01
    0.014129783 = product of:
      0.028259566 = sum of:
        0.028259566 = product of:
          0.056519132 = sum of:
            0.056519132 = weight(_text_:22 in 2013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056519132 = score(doc=2013,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2013, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2013)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Gemeinsam mit den Repräsentanten der großen deutschen und internationalen Wissenschaftsorganisationen hat Prof. Peter Gruss, der Präsident der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, am 22. Oktober die folgende »Berliner Erklärung über offenen Zugang zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen« (Berlin Declaration an Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities) unterzeichnet. Vorausgegangen war eine dreitägige Konferenz in Berlin. Dabei diskutierten international führende Experten über neue Zugangsmöglichkeiten zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen und kulturellem Erbe durch das Internet.
  20. "Berliner Erklärung über offenen Zugang zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen" unterzeichnet (2003) 0.01
    0.0123635605 = product of:
      0.024727121 = sum of:
        0.024727121 = product of:
          0.049454242 = sum of:
            0.049454242 = weight(_text_:22 in 2021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049454242 = score(doc=2021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052144732 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2021)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Gemeinsam mit den Repräsentanten der großen deutschen und internationalen Wissenschaftsorganisationen hat Prof. Peter Gruss, der Präsident der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, am Mittwoch, den 22. Oktober, die "Berliner Erklärung über offenen Zugang zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen" (Berlin Declaration an Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities) unterzeichnet. Vorausgegangen war eine dreitägige Konferenz im Berlin-Dahlemer Harnack-Haus der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. Dabei diskutierten international führende Experten über neue Zugangsmöglichkeiten zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen und kulturellem Erbe durch das Internet.

Languages

  • e 30
  • d 29

Types

  • a 51
  • m 8
  • s 3
  • el 2
  • More… Less…