Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.17
    0.17383508 = product of:
      0.34767017 = sum of:
        0.08691754 = product of:
          0.26075262 = sum of:
            0.26075262 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26075262 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39767802 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.26075262 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26075262 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39767802 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  2. Huvila, I.: Situational appropriation of information (2015) 0.02
    0.020777594 = product of:
      0.08311038 = sum of:
        0.08311038 = sum of:
          0.057689376 = weight(_text_:management in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057689376 = score(doc=2596,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.3648795 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
          0.025421001 = weight(_text_:22 in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025421001 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose In contrast to the interest of describing and managing the social processes of knowing, information science and information and knowledge management research have put less emphasis on discussing how particular information becomes usable and how it is used in different contexts and situations. The purpose of this paper is to address this major gap, and introduce and discuss the applicability of the notion of situational appropriation of information for shedding light on this particular process in the context of daily information work practices of professionals. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on the analysis of 25 qualitative interviews of archives, library and museum professionals conducted in two Nordic countries. Findings The study presents examples of how individuals appropriate different tangible and intangible assets as information on the basis of the situation in hand. Research limitations/implications The study proposes a new conceptual tool for articulating and conducting research on the process how information becomes useful in the situation in hand. Practical implications The situational appropriation of information perspective redefines the role of information management to incorporate a comprehensive awareness of the situations when information is useful and is being used. A better understanding how information becomes useful in diverse situations helps to discern the active role of contextual and situational effects and to exploit and take them into account as a part of the management of information and knowledge processes. Originality/value In contrast to orthodoxies of information science and information and knowledge management research, the notion of situational appropriation of information represents an alternative approach to the conceptualisation of information utilisation. It helps to frame particular types of instances of information use that are not necessarily addressed within the objectivistic, information seeker or learning oriented paradigms of information and knowledge management.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.5, S.492-504
  3. Schöne neue Welt? : Fragen und Antworten: Wie Facebook menschliche Gedanken auslesen will (2017) 0.01
    0.011234601 = product of:
      0.044938404 = sum of:
        0.044938404 = product of:
          0.08987681 = sum of:
            0.08987681 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08987681 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2004 9:42:33
    22. 4.2017 11:58:05
  4. Chowdhury, S.; Gibb, F.; Landoni, M.: ¬A model of uncertainty and its relation to information seeking and retrieval (IS&R) (2014) 0.01
    0.006985526 = product of:
      0.027942104 = sum of:
        0.027942104 = weight(_text_:services in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027942104 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.1622532 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Originality/value - The general consensus is that uncertainty is a mental state of users reflecting a gap in knowledge which triggers an IS&R process, and that the gap is reduced as relevant information is found, and thus that the uncertainty disappears as the search process concludes. However, in the present study it is argued that some form of uncertainty is always associated with some part of the IS&R process and that it also fluctuates throughout the IS&R process. Users may therefore feel uncertain at any stage of the IS&R process and this may be related to: the initial information need and expression of that need, the search process itself, including identification of relevant systems, services and resources; and the assessment of, and reaction to, the results produced by the search process. Uncertainty may be unresolved, or even increase, as the user progresses, often iteratively, through the IS&R process and may remain even after its completion, resulting in what may be called a persistent uncertainty. In other words, this research hypothesises that, in addition to the uncertainty that triggers the information search process (Wilson et al., 2000), users suffer from varying degrees of uncertainty at every stage of the information search and retrieval process, and that in turn, triggers different information-seeking behaviours.
  5. Swigon, M.: Information limits : definition, typology and types (2011) 0.01
    0.0063552503 = product of:
      0.025421001 = sum of:
        0.025421001 = product of:
          0.050842002 = sum of:
            0.050842002 = weight(_text_:22 in 300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050842002 = score(doc=300,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 300, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=300)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    12. 7.2011 18:22:52
  6. Hale, K.: How information matters : networks and public policy innovation (2011) 0.01
    0.005887897 = product of:
      0.023551589 = sum of:
        0.023551589 = product of:
          0.047103178 = sum of:
            0.047103178 = weight(_text_:management in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047103178 = score(doc=692,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    How Information Matters examines the ways a network of state and local governments and nonprofit organizations can enhance the capacity for successful policy change by public administrators. Hale examines drug courts, programs that typify the highly networked, collaborative environment of public administrators today. These "special dockets" implement justice but also drug treatment, case management, drug testing, and incentive programs for non-violent offenders in lieu of jail time. In a study that spans more than two decades, Hale shows ways organizations within the network act to champion, challenge, and support policy innovations over time. Her description of interactions between courts, administrative agencies, and national organizations highlight the evolution of collaborative governance in the state and local arena, with vignettes that share specific experiences across six states (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Missouri, and Tennessee) and ways that they acquired knowledge from the network to make decisions. How Information Matters offers valuable insight into successful ways for collaboration and capacity building. It will be of special interest to public administrators or policymakers who wish to identify ways to improve their own programs' performance.
    BK
    88.20 (Organisation staatlicher Einrichtungen / Management staatlicher Einrichtungen)
    Classification
    88.20 (Organisation staatlicher Einrichtungen / Management staatlicher Einrichtungen)
    Series
    Public management and change series
  7. Badia, A.: Data, information, knowledge : an information science analysis (2014) 0.01
    0.0055608437 = product of:
      0.022243375 = sum of:
        0.022243375 = product of:
          0.04448675 = sum of:
            0.04448675 = weight(_text_:22 in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04448675 = score(doc=1296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    16. 6.2014 19:22:57
  8. Feustel, R: "Am Anfang war die Information" : Digitalisierung als Religion (2018) 0.01
    0.0055608437 = product of:
      0.022243375 = sum of:
        0.022243375 = product of:
          0.04448675 = sum of:
            0.04448675 = weight(_text_:22 in 4522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04448675 = score(doc=4522,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4522, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4522)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 1.2019 11:22:34
  9. Frické, M.: ¬The knowledge pyramid : the DIKW hierarchy (2019) 0.01
    0.00515191 = product of:
      0.02060764 = sum of:
        0.02060764 = product of:
          0.04121528 = sum of:
            0.04121528 = weight(_text_:management in 4639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04121528 = score(doc=4639,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 4639, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4639)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The data-information-knowledge-wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy or pyramid is a model or construct that has been used widely within information science and knowledge management. The nature of the pyramid is explained, and its historical origin is described. The conceptual components of the pyramid-i.e. data, information, knowledge, and wisdom-are given brief explication. Some modern developments, criticisms, and rebuttals of the DIKW Pyramid are described. Nowadays, the DIKW Pyramid would generally be considered to be unsatisfactory. The arguments and reasoning behind this conclusion are sketched. It is claimed that two more concepts, document and sign, are necessary to provide a fruitful theoretical frame for knowledge organization.
  10. Kuhlen, R.: Wissensökologie : Wissen und Information als Commons (Gemeingüter) (2013) 0.01
    0.005099069 = product of:
      0.020396275 = sum of:
        0.020396275 = product of:
          0.04079255 = sum of:
            0.04079255 = weight(_text_:management in 2559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04079255 = score(doc=2559,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.25800878 = fieldWeight in 2559, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2559)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Wissensökologie (knowledge ecology) ist ein noch ungewöhnlicher Begriff bzw. eine in der Kombination von Wissen und Ökologie für problematisch gehaltene Benennung Der dem Begriff zu Grunde liegende Anspruch dürfte unumstritten sein. Es geht um eine vernünftige, individuelle, soziale und kulturelle Entwicklung sowie politische Mitbestimmung und ökonomisches Wohlergehen sichernden und nachhaltigen Umgang mit den Ressourcen Wissen und Information. Umstritten allerdings sind die Wege, wie dieses Entwicklungsziel erreicht werden kann, und, weniger wichtig, umstritten, wie die Hinweisschilder auf diese Wege bezeichnet werden sollen, z. B. mit Wissensökologie oder Informationsökologie; auch Wissensallmende ist dafür ins Spiel gebracht worden. Es gibt keinen Konsens über eine Definition von Wissensökologie. Einige in die Nähe des Wissensmanagements gerückte Beispiele werden in den Beiträgen zu dem Band Knowledge Ecology Studies gegeben: "Knowledge ecology is an interdisciplinary field of management theory and practice .". Malhotra stellt Information ecology ebenfalls in den Zusammenhang von Knowledge management, andere zum Begriff der Innovation. Auf diesen Strang der Wissensökologie gehen wir im Weiteren nicht ein. Knowledge ecology wird auch im Zusammenhang mit Open Source-Software verwendet.
    Die breiteste Definition stammt von Knowledge Ecology International: Dazu gehören "the social aspects of the creation, management and control of and access to knowledge resources", auch im Zusammenhang von intellectual "property rules" und "mechanisms to enhance access to knowledge, incentives and systems for the transfer of technology to developed countries", "efforts to protect privacy" und sogar "discourage nuclear proliferation", vor allem aber "issues as diverse as freedom of speech, authors' rights, access to public sector information, new models for publishing, organizing and sharing information", etc. etc. So breit angelegt, verschwimmt ein Begriff leicht ins Unverbindliche. Wissensökologie ist verwandt mit dem Begriff der Kommunikationsökologie, der schon Ende der 80er Jahre im Zusammenhang der Technikfolgenabschätzung entstanden ist. Angesichts weitgehender Eingriffe technisierter Kommunikation in alle individuellen und gesellschaftlichen Lebensbereiche/Umwelten sollen deren Auswirkungen auf Mensch, Natur und Gesellschaft untersucht und Vorschläge zur Entwicklung eines nachhaltigen und humanen Austauschs von technologieabhängiger Information entwickelt werden. Eine kommunikationsökologische Übertragung von Umweltverschmutzung in natürlichen Umgebungen auf solche in elektronischen Räumen (Spam, Datenmissbrauch, Orientierungslosigkeit, Verletzung von Privatheit) liegt nahe.
  11. Blair, A: Too much to know : managing scholarly information before the modern age (2011) 0.01
    0.005099069 = product of:
      0.020396275 = sum of:
        0.020396275 = product of:
          0.04079255 = sum of:
            0.04079255 = weight(_text_:management in 4474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04079255 = score(doc=4474,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.25800878 = fieldWeight in 4474, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4474)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The flood of information brought to us by advancing technology is often accompanied by a distressing sense of "information overload," yet this experience is not unique to modern times. In fact, says Ann M. Blair in this intriguing book, the invention of the printing press and the ensuing abundance of books provoked sixteenth- and seventeenth-century European scholars to register complaints very similar to our own. Blair examines methods of information management in ancient and medieval Europe as well as the Islamic world and China, then focuses particular attention on the organization, composition, and reception of Latin reference books in print in early modern Europe. She explores in detail the sophisticated and sometimes idiosyncratic techniques that scholars and readers developed in an era of new technology and exploding information.
    Content
    Information management in comparative perspective -- Note-taking as information management -- Reference genres and their finding devices -- Compilers, their motivations and methods -- The impact of early printed reference books.
  12. Malsburg, C. von der: Concerning the neuronal code (2018) 0.00
    0.004766437 = product of:
      0.019065749 = sum of:
        0.019065749 = product of:
          0.038131498 = sum of:
            0.038131498 = weight(_text_:22 in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038131498 = score(doc=73,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27.12.2020 16:56:22
  13. Frické, M.: ¬The knowledge pyramid : a critique of the DIKW hierarchy (2019) 0.00
    0.004415923 = product of:
      0.017663691 = sum of:
        0.017663691 = product of:
          0.035327382 = sum of:
            0.035327382 = weight(_text_:management in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035327382 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The paper evaluates the data-information-knowledge-wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy. This hierarchy, also known as the `knowledge hierarchy', is part of the canon of information science and management. Arguments are offered that the hierarchy is unsound and methodologically undesirable. The paper identifies a central logical error that DIKW makes. The paper also identifies the dated and unsatisfactory philosophical positions of operationalism and inductivism as the philosophical backdrop to the hierarchy. The paper concludes with a sketch of some positive theories, of value to information science, on the nature of the components of the hierarchy: that data is anything recordable in a semantically and pragmatically sound way, that information is what is known in other literature as `weak knowledge', that knowledge also is `weak knowledge' and that wisdom is the possession and use, if required, of wide practical knowledge, by an agent who appreciates the fallible nature of that knowledge.
  14. Neuser, W.: Wissen begreifen : zur Selbstorganisation von Erfahrung, Handlung und Begriff (2013) 0.00
    0.004163372 = product of:
      0.016653487 = sum of:
        0.016653487 = product of:
          0.033306975 = sum of:
            0.033306975 = weight(_text_:management in 3973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033306975 = score(doc=3973,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.21066327 = fieldWeight in 3973, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    LCSH
    Knowledge management
    Subject
    Knowledge management
  15. Curcio, R.: ¬Das virtuelle Reich : die Kolonialisierung der Phantasie und die soziale Kontrolle (2017) 0.00
    0.003972031 = product of:
      0.015888125 = sum of:
        0.015888125 = product of:
          0.03177625 = sum of:
            0.03177625 = weight(_text_:22 in 5306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03177625 = score(doc=5306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5306)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    18. 9.2018 12:57:22
  16. Zhang, P.; Soergel, D.: Towards a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking (2014) 0.00
    0.003972031 = product of:
      0.015888125 = sum of:
        0.015888125 = product of:
          0.03177625 = sum of:
            0.03177625 = weight(_text_:22 in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03177625 = score(doc=1344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:55:39
  17. Leydesdorff, L.; Johnson, M.W.; Ivanova, I.: Toward a calculus of redundancy : signification, codification, and anticipation in cultural evolution (2018) 0.00
    0.003972031 = product of:
      0.015888125 = sum of:
        0.015888125 = product of:
          0.03177625 = sum of:
            0.03177625 = weight(_text_:22 in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03177625 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2018 11:22:09
  18. Albright, K.: Multidisciplinarity in information behavior : expanding boundaries or fragmentation of the field? (2010) 0.00
    0.003972031 = product of:
      0.015888125 = sum of:
        0.015888125 = product of:
          0.03177625 = sum of:
            0.03177625 = weight(_text_:22 in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03177625 = score(doc=5077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    16. 3.2019 17:32:22
  19. Gnoli, C.; Ridi, C.R.: Unified Theory of Information, hypertextuality and levels of reality : without, within, and withal knowledge management (2014) 0.00
    0.0036799356 = product of:
      0.014719742 = sum of:
        0.014719742 = product of:
          0.029439485 = sum of:
            0.029439485 = weight(_text_:management in 1796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029439485 = score(doc=1796,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 1796, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1796)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  20. Rodrigo, A.; Peñas, A.; Miyao, Y.; Kando, N.: Do systems pass university entrance exams? (2018) 0.00
    0.0036799356 = product of:
      0.014719742 = sum of:
        0.014719742 = product of:
          0.029439485 = sum of:
            0.029439485 = weight(_text_:management in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029439485 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 54(2018) no.4, S.564-575

Languages

  • e 15
  • d 8

Types

Themes