Search (217 results, page 1 of 11)

0.117127985 = sum of:
  0.07256258 = product of:
    0.29025033 = sum of:
      0.29025033 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.29025033 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4426655 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.044565402 = product of:
    0.089130804 = sum of:
      0.089130804 = weight(_text_:k in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.089130804 = score(doc=5955,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.4781949 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Classification

OKH (FH K)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

GHBS

OKH (FH K)

0.07212787 = product of:
  0.14425574 = sum of:
    0.14425574 = sum of:
      0.07351384 = weight(_text_:k in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07351384 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
      0.0707419 = weight(_text_:22 in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0707419 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

17. 7.2002 19:22:51

0.057702295 = product of:
  0.11540459 = sum of:
    0.11540459 = sum of:
      0.058811072 = weight(_text_:k in 3901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.058811072 = score(doc=3901,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 3901, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3901)
      0.05659352 = weight(_text_:22 in 3901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05659352 = score(doc=3901,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3901, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3901)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Adopted and formatted in 1994 and reprinted with the permission of the American Association of School Librarians. Information literacy is the term being applied to the skills of information problem solving. Identifies the key elements of information literacy and presents a rationale for integrating information literacy into all aspects of the K-12 and post secondary curriculum

Date

11. 4.1996 14:22:40

0.05304825 = product of:
  0.1060965 = sum of:
    0.1060965 = sum of:
      0.07779974 = weight(_text_:k in 2317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07779974 = score(doc=2317,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.4174027 = fieldWeight in 2317, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2317)
      0.02829676 = weight(_text_:22 in 2317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02829676 = score(doc=2317,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2317, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2317)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: (0): SCHMIDT, S.J.: Medien, Kommunikation und das 18. Kamel; WEISCHENBERG, S.: Die Realität des John F. Kennedy; MERTEN, K.: Wirken sie wirklich, die Wirkungen der Massenkommunikation?; (1): WEISCHENBERG, S.: Der Kampf um die Köpfe: Affären und die Spielregeln der 'Mediengesellschaft'; SCHMIDT, S.J.: Wir verstehen uns doch? Von der Unwahrscheinlicjkeit gelingender Kommunikation; MERTEN, K.: Inszenierung von Alltag: Kommunikation, Massenkommunikation, Medien; (2): KRUSE, P. u. M. STADLER: Wahrnehmen, Verstehen, Erinnern: der Aufbau des psychischen Apparates; SCHEFFER, B.: Wie wir erkennen: die soziale Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit im Individuum; (3): KRIPPENDORFF, K.: Der verschwundene Bote: Metaphern und Modelle der Kommunikation; GRABOWSKI, J., T. HERRMANN u. R. POBEL: Sprechen, Handeln, Regulieren: vom Zeichentausch zum zielgerichteten Sprechen; (4): RUSCH, G.: Verstehen verstehen: kognitive Autonomie und soziale Regulation; MEUTSCH, D.: Ein Bild sagt mehr als tausend Worte? Befunde zum Bildverstehen; (5): MERTEN, K.: Unsere tägliche Wirklichkeit heute: wie Medien die Kommunikation entfalten; ASSMANN, A. u, J. ASSMANN: Das Gestern im Heute: Medien und soziales Gedächtnis; ELSNER, M., H.U. GUMBRECHT, T. MÜLLER u. P.M. SPANGENBERG: Von Revolution zu Revolution: zur Kulturgeschichte der Medien; (6) SCHMIDT, S.J.: Die Münzen der Kommunikation: Gattungen, Berichterstattungsmuster, Darstellungsformen; RUHRMANN, G.: Zeitgeschichte à la carte: Ereignis, Nachricht und Rezipient; (7) NEVERLA, I.: Männerwelten - Frauenwelten: Wirklichkeitsmodelle, Geschlechterrollen, Chancenverteilung; FAULSTICH, W.: Stars: Idole, Werbeträger, Helden: sozialer Wandel durch Medien; (8): SCHMIDT, S.J.: Das 'Wahre, Schöne, Gute'? Literatur als soziales System; WEISCHENBERG, S. u. U. HIENZSCH: Neuigkeiten vom Fließband: Journalismus als soziales System; WEISCHENBERG, S, u. U. HIENZSCH: Von der Tontafel zum Chip: technische Grundlagen der Medienkommunikation; PROTT, J.: Kommunikation als Dienst und Handel: Organisation und Ökonomie der Medien; (9): RÜHL, M.: Zwischen Information und Unterhaltung: Funktionen der Medienkommunikation; MERTEN, K.: Allmacht oder Ohnmacht der Medien? Erklärungsmuster der Medienwirkungsforschung; PETERS, H.P.: Warner oder Angstmacher? Thema Risikokommunikation; (10): KREBS, D.: Verführung oder Therapie? Pornographie und Gewalt in den Medien; HURRELMANN, B.: Sozialisation vor dem Bildschirm: Kinder und Medien; LANG; K. u. G.E. Lang: Spiegel der Gesellschaft: Medien und öffentliche Meinung; (11): RÖPER, H.: Märkte, Mächte, Monopole: das Mediensystem der Bundesrepublik Deutschland; KLEINSTEUBER, H.J.: Das globale Netz: nationale und internationale Mediensysteme; (12): BAACKE, D. u. H.-D. Kübler: Lernen und Erziehen in der Medienumwelt: Konzepte der Medienpädagogik; LÖFFELHOLZ, M. u. K.-D. ALTMEPPEN: Kommunikation morgen: Perspektiven der 'Informationsgesellschaft'

Date

15.10.1995 11:44:22

0.047487102 = sum of:
  0.025432948 = product of:
    0.10173179 = sum of:
      0.10173179 = weight(_text_:authors in 1365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10173179 = score(doc=1365,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1365, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1365)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.022054153 = product of:
    0.044108305 = sum of:
      0.044108305 = weight(_text_:k in 1365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.044108305 = score(doc=1365,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 1365, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1365)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Trust in information is developing into a vitally important topic as the Internet becomes increasingly ubiquitous within society. Although many discussions of trust in this environment focus on issues like security, technical reliability, or e-commerce, few address the problem of trust in the information obtained from the Internet. The authors assert that there is a strong need for theoretical and empirical research on trust within the field of information science. As an initial step, the present study develops a model of trust in digital information by integrating the research on trust from the behavioral and social sciences with the research on information quality and human- computer interaction. The model positions trust as a key mediating variable between information quality and information usage, with important consequences for both the producers and consumers of digital information. The authors close by outlining important directions for future research on trust in information science and technology.

0.045740776 = sum of:
  0.02098111 = product of:
    0.08392444 = sum of:
      0.08392444 = weight(_text_:authors in 6964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08392444 = score(doc=6964,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 6964, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6964)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024759663 = product of:
    0.049519327 = sum of:
      0.049519327 = weight(_text_:22 in 6964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049519327 = score(doc=6964,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6964, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6964)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Within dynamic organizations, information systems often fail to adapt to changing requirements and structures. The book presents a different view of IS provision, based on end-user information systems construction, as a means of avoiding many of the recognized problems. Adopting a philosophy of constructivism, emphasizing psychological and social factors in information construction, the authors examine different types of systems across natural and social sciences

Date

25.12.2001 13:22:30

0.040037964 = sum of:
  0.017983811 = product of:
    0.071935244 = sum of:
      0.071935244 = weight(_text_:authors in 1004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.071935244 = score(doc=1004,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1004, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1004)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.022054153 = product of:
    0.044108305 = sum of:
      0.044108305 = weight(_text_:k in 1004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.044108305 = score(doc=1004,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 1004, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1004)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The cognitive approach in the retrieval and communication of informatio, as well as in librarianship and information science gained importance in the 1970's. Today it is present in subject fields, as well as in studies of users, and aspects of information work. It has generated the formation of the cognitve paradigm, in many scientific disciplines. In the framework of Kuhn's concept of paradigm, it is evident that librarianship and information science are on the pre-paradigmatic level. However, some authors mention the existence of at least 2 paradigms in library and information science, the physical and the cognitive. Presents a historical overview of the cognitive oriented research works of Brookes, De Mey, Belkin, Ingwersen and others to provide an insight into the development of library and information science thought

0.04001766 = product of:
  0.08003532 = sum of:
    0.08003532 = product of:
      0.16007064 = sum of:
        0.16007064 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16007064 = score(doc=4042,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052213363 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2000 19:01:22

0.03920638 = sum of:
  0.017983811 = product of:
    0.071935244 = sum of:
      0.071935244 = weight(_text_:authors in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.071935244 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.021222569 = product of:
    0.042445138 = sum of:
      0.042445138 = weight(_text_:22 in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042445138 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

While there are calls for new paradigms within the profession, there are also existing subgenres that fit this bill if they would be fully acknowledged. This essay argues that underrepresented and otherwise marginalized scholars have already produced significant work within social, cultural, and community-oriented paradigms; social justice and advocacy; and, diversity, equity, and inclusion. This work has not been sufficiently valued or promoted. Furthermore, the surrounding structural conditions have resulted in the dismissal, violently reviewed and rejected, and erased work of underrepresented scholars, and the stigmatization and delegitimization of their work. These scholars are "outsiders-within-LIS." By identifying the outsiders-within-LIS through the frame of standpoint theories, the authors are suggesting that a new paradigm does not need to be created; rather, an existing paradigm needs to be recognized and reprioritized. This reprioritized paradigm of critical sociocultural work has and will continue to creatively enrich and expand the field and decolonize LIS curricula.

Date

18. 9.2021 13:22:27

0.0388796 = sum of:
  0.021194125 = product of:
    0.0847765 = sum of:
      0.0847765 = weight(_text_:authors in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0847765 = score(doc=950,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.017685475 = product of:
    0.03537095 = sum of:
      0.03537095 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03537095 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose With the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of "information overload". In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed. Design/methodology/approach A concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for "information overload", which is "cognitive overload" was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Findings The themes identified from the authors' concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload. Originality/value Through the authors' concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.

Date

22. 4.2023 19:27:56

0.036387496 = product of:
  0.07277499 = sum of:
    0.07277499 = product of:
      0.14554998 = sum of:
        0.14554998 = weight(_text_:k in 1330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14554998 = score(doc=1330,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052213363 = queryNorm
            0.7808889 = fieldWeight in 1330, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1330)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information: new questions to a multidisciplinary concept. Ed.: K. Kornwachs u. K. Jacoby

0.036387496 = product of:
  0.07277499 = sum of:
    0.07277499 = product of:
      0.14554998 = sum of:
        0.14554998 = weight(_text_:k in 1338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14554998 = score(doc=1338,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052213363 = queryNorm
            0.7808889 = fieldWeight in 1338, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1338)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information: new questions to a multidisciplinary concept. Ed.: K. Kornwachs u. K. Jacoby

0.036387496 = product of:
  0.07277499 = sum of:
    0.07277499 = product of:
      0.14554998 = sum of:
        0.14554998 = weight(_text_:k in 1340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14554998 = score(doc=1340,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052213363 = queryNorm
            0.7808889 = fieldWeight in 1340, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1340)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information: new questions to a multidisciplinary concept. Ed.: K. Kornwachs u. K. Jacoby

0.036387496 = product of:
  0.07277499 = sum of:
    0.07277499 = product of:
      0.14554998 = sum of:
        0.14554998 = weight(_text_:k in 1362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14554998 = score(doc=1362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052213363 = queryNorm
            0.7808889 = fieldWeight in 1362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information: new questions to a multidisciplinary concept. Ed.: K. Kornwachs u. K. Jacoby

0.036063936 = product of:
  0.07212787 = sum of:
    0.07212787 = sum of:
      0.03675692 = weight(_text_:k in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03675692 = score(doc=5077,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
      0.03537095 = weight(_text_:22 in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03537095 = score(doc=5077,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

16. 3.2019 17:32:22

0.03336497 = sum of:
  0.0149865085 = product of:
    0.059946034 = sum of:
      0.059946034 = weight(_text_:authors in 3003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059946034 = score(doc=3003,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 3003, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3003)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.01837846 = product of:
    0.03675692 = sum of:
      0.03675692 = weight(_text_:k in 3003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03675692 = score(doc=3003,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3003, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3003)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The article discusses the relationship between the concepts of information and IT literacy, both being labeled as «the ultimate literacy in the information society». While IT literacy is mainly defined as a skill-based literacy, information literacy embraces a whole conglomerate of values, attitudes, skills, knowledge and perspectives directed towards enabling critical thinking, self-directed learning and the responsible consume of information, necessary for intelligent existence in the information age. Through a survey, the authors will explore personal meanings and perceptions of information literacy among graduate LIS students. For this population, information literacy is a central issue since it is a prerequisite for academic success, but also because information literacy will be a pervasive aspect of every day work in their future professions. A comparison with an earlier study showed how the information literacy conception has developed, from a more technological, tool-based approach to a concept based approach. The structure of the earlier study, as well as the result of the actual study, will be analyzed in the light of the contemporary features of Croatia's information policy, which is mainly directed towards the technical information infrastructure but not sufficient to let citizens use the benefits of information society.

0.03282082 = sum of:
  0.019825287 = product of:
    0.07930115 = sum of:
      0.07930115 = weight(_text_:authors in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07930115 = score(doc=3686,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.33315468 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.012995535 = product of:
    0.02599107 = sum of:
      0.02599107 = weight(_text_:k in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02599107 = score(doc=3686,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.13944446 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 56(2005) no.9, S.1008-1009 (D.E. Agosto): "This second edition of Information Literacy: Essential Skills for the Information Age remains true to the first edition (published in 1998). The main changes involved the updating of educational standards discussed in the text, as well as the updating of the term history. Overall, this book serves as a detailed definition of the concept of information literacy and focuses heavily an presenting and discussing related state and national educational standards and policies. It is divided into 10 chapters, many of which contain examples of U.S. and international information literacy programs in a variety of educational settings. Chapter one offers a detailed definition of information literacy, as well as tracing the deviation of the term. The term was first introduced in 1974 by Paul Zurkowski in a proposal to the national Commission an Libraries and Information Science. Fifteen years later a special ALA committee derived the now generally accepted definition: "To be information literate requires a new set of skills. These include how to locate and use information needed for problem-solving and decision-making efficiently and effectively" (American Library Association, 1989, p. 11). Definitions for a number of related concepts are also offered, including definitions for visual literacy, media literacy, computer literacy, digital literacy, and network literacy. Although the authors do define these different subtypes of information literacy, they sidestep the argument over the definition of the more general term literacy, consequently avoiding the controversy over national and world illiteracy rates. Regardless of the actual rate of U.S. literacy (which varies radically with each different definition of "literacy"), basic literacy, i.e., basic reading and writing skills, still presents a formidable educational goal in the U.S. In fact, More than 5 million high-schoolers do not read well enough to understand their textbooks or other material written for their grade level. According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress, 26% of these students cannot read material many of us world deem essential for daily living, such as road signs, newspapers, and bus schedules. (Hock & Deshler, 2003, p. 27)
Chapter two delves more deeply into the historical evolution of the concept of information literacy, and chapter three summarizes selected information literacy research. Researchers generally agree that information literacy is a process, rather than a set of skills to be learned (despite the unfortunate use of the word "skills" in the ALA definition). Researchers also generally agree that information literacy should be taught across the curriculum, as opposed to limiting it to the library or any other single educational context or discipline. Chapter four discusses economic ties to information literacy, suggesting that countries with information literate populations will better succeed economically in the current and future information-based world economy. A recent report issued by the Basic Education Coalition, an umbrella group of 19 private and nongovernmental development and relief organizations, supports this claim based an meta-analysis of large bodies of data collected by the World Bank, the United Nations, and other international organizations. Teach a Child, Transform a Nation (Basic Education Coalition, 2004) concluded that no modern nation has achieved sustained economic growth without providing near universal basic education for its citizens. It also concluded that countries that improve their literacy rates by 20 to 30% sec subsequent GDP increases of 8 to 16%. In light of the Coalition's finding that one fourth of adults in the world's developing countries are unable to read or write, the goal of worldwide information literacy seems sadly unattainable for the present, a present in which even universal basic literacy is still a pipedream. Chapter live discusses information literacy across the curriculum as an interpretation of national standards. The many examples of school and university information literacy programs, standards, and policies detailed throughout the volume world be very useful to educators and administrators engaging in program planning and review. For example, the authors explain that economics standards included in the Goals 2000: Educate America Act are comprised of 20 benchmark content standards. They quote a two-pronged grade 12 benchmark that first entails students being able to discuss how a high school senior's working 20 hours a week while attending school might result in a reduced overall lifetime income, and second requires students to be able to describe how increasing the federal minimum wage might result in reduced income for some workers. The authors tie this benchmark to information literacy as follows: "Economic decision making requires complex thinking skills because the variables involved are interdependent.
Students need to use the whole range of information literacy skills to identify needed information, evaluate and analyze information, and use information for critical thinking and problem solving" (p. 81). Chapters six and seven address K-12 education and information literacy. The authors outline the restructuring necessary to make information literacy a basic part of the curriculum and emphasize resourcebased learning as crucial in teaching information literacy. The authors also discuss the implications of the 2001 No Child Left Behind Act to the teaching of information literacy in primary and secondary schools. Again they avoid controversy, this time by omitting analysis of the success or failure of the Act in promoting the teaching and learning of information literacy. Instead, these chapters provide a number of examples of information literacy programs in K-12 educational settings within the US. Examples range from information literacy guidelines developed by the California Technology Assistance Project to a discussion of home schoolers and information literacy. Throughout the 1990s, the information literacy movement began to filter up to higher education. Chapter eight discusses related standards and presents a number of examples of college-level information literacy programs, including programs at the University of Massachusetts, Kent State University, and Washington State University. Chapter nine deals with technology and information literacy. It tocuses an the teaching of technology use as process teaching and an the importance of context in technology education.
Lastly, chapter 10 considers possible future directions of the information literacy movement. The authors conclude "Our ability to be information literate depends an our willingness to be lifelong learners as we are challenged to master new, and as yet unknown, technologies that will surely alter the landscape of information in the future" (p. 177). Following the book's 10 chapters are a number of appendices that present information literacy standards and definitions, a timeline of the evolution of the information literacy movement, and a number of related bibliographies. Lead author Eisenberg is perhaps best known as the co-creator, with Bob Berkowitz, of the Big 6, an information literacy model. The model includes six components: Task Definition, Information Seeking Strategies, Location and Access, Use of Information, Synthesis, and Evaluation (Eisenberg, 2003). Throughout the book, Eisenberg and his co-authors show how the Big 6 model can be used to teach information literacy. For example, in chapter nine, "Technology and Information Literacy," they lay out each of the six model components, providing specific technological skills benchmarks for each, such as "Know the roles and computer expertise of the people working in the school library media center and elsewhere who might provide information or assistance" under step 3, "Location and Access" (p. 160). The many detailed descriptions of information literacy policies and programs that appear throughout the book make it most useful for educators, administrators, and policy makers involved in the teaching, planning, and development of information literacy programs, standards, and policies. Overall, this newly revised volume stands as one of the most comprehensive single available sources from which to begin a detailed investigation of the concept of information literacy."

0.032782063 = sum of:
  0.011989206 = product of:
    0.047956824 = sum of:
      0.047956824 = weight(_text_:authors in 11) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047956824 = score(doc=11,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 11, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=11)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.020792855 = product of:
    0.04158571 = sum of:
      0.04158571 = weight(_text_:k in 11) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04158571 = score(doc=11,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052213363 = queryNorm
          0.22311112 = fieldWeight in 11, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=11)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Luciano Floridi's 1999 monograph, Philosophy and Computing: An Introduction, provided the impetus for the theme of this issue, more for what it did not say about librarianship and information studies (LIS) than otherwise. Following the pioneering works of Wilson, Nitecki, Buckland, and Capurro (plus many of the authors of this issue), researchers in LIS have increasingly turned to the efficacy of philosophical discourse in probing the more fundamental aspects of our theories, including those involving the information concept. A foundational approach to the nature of information, however, has not been realized, either in partial or accomplished steps, nor even as an agreed, theoretical research objective. It is puzzling that while librarianship, in the most expansive sense of all LIS-related professions, past and present, at its best sustains a climate of thought, both comprehensive and nonexclusive, information itself as the subject of study has defied our abilities to generalize and synthesize effectively. Perhaps during periods of reassessment and justification for library services, as well as in times of curricular review and continuing scholarly evaluation of perceived information demand, the necessity for every single stated position to be clarified appears to be exaggerated. Despite this, the important question does keep surfacing as to how information relates to who we are and what we do in LIS.

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: Information and Its Philosophy (Ian Cornelius) - Documentation Redux: Prolegomenon to (Another) Philosophy of Information (Bernd Frohmann) - Community as Event (Ronald E. Day) - Information Studies Without Information (Jonathan Furner) - Relevance: Language, Semantics, Philosophy (John M. Budd) - On Verifying the Accuracy of Information: Philosophical Perspectives (Don Fallis) - Arguments for Philosophical Realism in Library and Information Science (Birger Hjørland) - Knowledge Profiling: The Basis for Knowledge Organization (Torkild Thellefsen) - Classification and Categorization: A Difference that Makes a Difference (Elin K. Jacob) - Faceted Classification and Logical Division in Information Retrieval (Jack Mills) - The Epistemological Foundations of Knowledge Representations (Elaine Svenonius) - Classification, Rhetoric, and the Classificatory Horizon (Stephen Paling) - The Ubiquitous Hierarchy: An Army to Overcome the Threat of a Mob (Hope A. Olson) - A Human Information Behavior Approach to a Philosophy of Information (Amanda Spink and Charles Cole) - Cybersemiotics and the Problems of the Information-Processing Paradigm as a Candidate for a Unified Science of Information Behind Library Information Science (Søren Brier)

Editor

Herold, K.

0.03118928 = product of:
  0.06237856 = sum of:
    0.06237856 = product of:
      0.12475712 = sum of:
        0.12475712 = weight(_text_:k in 6864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12475712 = score(doc=6864,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052213363 = queryNorm
            0.66933334 = fieldWeight in 6864, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6864)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Editor

Kornwachs, K. u. K. Jacoby

0.03118928 = product of:
  0.06237856 = sum of:
    0.06237856 = product of:
      0.12475712 = sum of:
        0.12475712 = weight(_text_:k in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12475712 = score(doc=1339,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052213363 = queryNorm
            0.66933334 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information: new questions to a multidisciplinary concept. Ed.: K. Kornwachs u. K. Jacoby