Search (63 results, page 1 of 4)

0.091777444 = sum of:
  0.07107968 = product of:
    0.21323903 = sum of:
      0.21323903 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21323903 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.3247862 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06110665 = queryNorm
          0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.020697769 = product of:
    0.041395538 = sum of:
      0.041395538 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041395538 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21398507 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06110665 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.

Date

22. 3.2009 18:52:32

0.06509817 = product of:
  0.13019633 = sum of:
    0.13019633 = sum of:
      0.08880079 = weight(_text_:wissen in 511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08880079 = score(doc=511,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.26354674 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06110665 = queryNorm
          0.33694512 = fieldWeight in 511, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=511)
      0.041395538 = weight(_text_:22 in 511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041395538 = score(doc=511,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21398507 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06110665 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 511, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=511)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Nun ist es heraus: Unter dem Namen "GOPORTIS" wird zukünftig die Kooperation der drei Deutschen Zentralen Fachbibliotheken (ZFB), zu denen die Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB), die Zentralbibliothek für Medizin (ZB MED) sowie die Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften (ZBW) gehören, vorangetrieben. GOPORTIS löst somit den bisherigen Arbeitstitel "Esplanade" ab. Der Name GOPORTIS wurde von einer Namensagentur kreiert. Er lässt verschiedene Assoziationen zu - Port wie Tür, Portal oder Hafen. "Das Go am Anfang suggeriert Aktivität und hat Aufforderungscharakter: Geh' zum Portal und hol' Dir Wissen", so Ulrich Korwitz, Direktor der ZB MED. Betont wird der Wortbeginn auch graphisch. Das Design zum Schriftzug schlägt einen Bogen von den Schmuckelementen, die die drei Institutionen symbolisieren, über das GO. "Das von einer Werbeagentur erarbeitete Coporate Design zeigt eine gelungene Farbkomposition, die sehr harmonisch wirkt und sich von den bestehenden Farbgebungen der Partner bewusst abhebt", erklärt Horst Thomsen, Direktor der ZBW. Und Uwe Rosemann ergänzt (TIB): "Wir sind sehr zufrieden. Der Name samt Claim "Eine Quelle. Alles Wissen" im Rahmen der gefundenen Corporate Identity hat das Potential, unsere gemeinsamen Strategien und Ziele für die Zukunft zu verwirklichen." Und die Ziele sind ambitioniert: Noch in diesem Jahr soll ein neues gemeinsames Portal für die Bestellung wissenschaftlicher Dokumente online gehen - ein viel geäußerter Wunsch der Kunden. Zukünftig können dann die Fachgebiete Technik, Naturwissenschaften, Medizin, Ernährung, Umwelt, Agrarwissenschaften und Wirtschaft aus einer Hand bedient werden. An der Implementierung des Portals wird bereits unter Hochdruck gearbeitet. Jede Bibliothek bringt Ihre Stärken und Kompetenzen mit vorhandenen Systemen wie TIBORDER, MedPilot und ECONIS ein. Das GOPORTIS-Portal soll erstmals auf der Online Information Conference im Dezember in London vorgestellt werden. In 2008 werden dann neben dem operativen Betrieb des Portals und des Bestelldienstes die Weiterentwicklung der gemeinsamen Dienstleistungen und das weitere Zusammenwachsen der Partner im Vordergrund stehen.

Date

22. 8.2007 11:53:36

0.031787798 = product of:
  0.063575596 = sum of:
    0.063575596 = product of:
      0.19072677 = sum of:
        0.19072677 = weight(_text_:objects in 1994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19072677 = score(doc=1994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3247862 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06110665 = queryNorm
            0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 1994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1994)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Examines the nuts-and-bolts practical matters of making this cataloging system work in the Internet environment, where information objects are electronic, transient, and numerous.

0.031468313 = product of:
  0.06293663 = sum of:
    0.06293663 = product of:
      0.18880987 = sum of:
        0.18880987 = weight(_text_:objects in 1260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18880987 = score(doc=1260,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.3247862 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06110665 = queryNorm
            0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 1260, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1260)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Flexible organization of information is one of the key design challenges in any digital library. For the past year, we have been working with members of the National Digital Library Project (NDLP) at the Library of Congress to build an experimental system to organize and store library collections. This is a report on the work. In particular, we describe how a few technical building blocks are used to organize the material in collections, such as the NDLP's, and how these methods fit into a general distributed computing framework. The technical building blocks are part of a framework that evolved as part of the Computer Science Technical Reports Project (CSTR). This framework is described in the paper, "A Framework for Distributed Digital Object Services", by Robert Kahn and Robert Wilensky (1995). The main building blocks are: "digital objects", which are used to manage digital material in a networked environment; "handles", which identify digital objects and other network resources; and "repositories", in which digital objects are stored. These concepts are amplified in "Key Concepts in the Architecture of the Digital Library", by William Y. Arms (1995). In summer 1995, after earlier experimental development, work began on the implementation of a full digital library system based on this framework. In addition to Kahn/Wilensky and Arms, several working papers further elaborate on the design concepts. A paper by Carl Lagoze and David Ely, "Implementation Issues in an Open Architectural Framework for Digital Object Services", delves into some of the repository concepts. The initial repository implementation was based on a paper by Carl Lagoze, Robert McGrath, Ed Overly and Nancy Yeager, "A Design for Inter-Operable Secure Object Stores (ISOS)". Work on the handle system, which began in 1992, is described in a series of papers that can be found on the Handle Home Page. The National Digital Library Program (NDLP) at the Library of Congress is a large scale project to convert historic collections to digital form and make them widely available over the Internet. The program is described in two articles by Caroline R. Arms, "Historical Collections for the National Digital Library". The NDLP itself draws on experience gained through the earlier American Memory Program. Based on this work, we have built a pilot system that demonstrates how digital objects can be used to organize complex materials, such as those found in the NDLP. The pilot was demonstrated to members of the library in July 1996. The pilot system includes the handle system for identifying digital objects, a pilot repository to store them, and two user interfaces: one designed for librarians to manage digital objects in the repository, the other for library patrons to access the materials stored in the repository. Materials from the NDLP's Coolidge Consumerism compilation have been deposited into the pilot repository. They include a variety of photographs and texts, converted to digital form. The pilot demonstrates the use of handles for identifying such material, the use of meta-objects for managing sets of digital objects, and the choice of metadata. We are now implementing an enhanced prototype system for completion in early 1997.

0.029271064 = product of:
  0.05854213 = sum of:
    0.05854213 = product of:
      0.11708426 = sum of:
        0.11708426 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11708426 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21398507 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06110665 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2002 19:40:22

0.028976874 = product of:
  0.05795375 = sum of:
    0.05795375 = product of:
      0.1159075 = sum of:
        0.1159075 = weight(_text_:22 in 6483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1159075 = score(doc=6483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21398507 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06110665 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2002 19:43:01

0.027189579 = product of:
  0.054379158 = sum of:
    0.054379158 = product of:
      0.108758315 = sum of:
        0.108758315 = weight(_text_:wissen in 5166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.108758315 = score(doc=5166,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.26354674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06110665 = queryNorm
            0.41267183 = fieldWeight in 5166, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5166)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

»Ich weiß, dass ich nichts weiß«, sagte der griechische Philosoph Sokrates. Heute, über 2 400 Jahre später, ist das Wissen der Menschheit fast grenzenlos, und täglich kommen unzählige neue Daten und Fakten hinzu. Das Fischen in dieser Informationsflut ist deshalb meist mühsam und zeitintensiv, die Qualität des Fangs oft unsicher. Dies gilt besonders für das Internet. »bibnetz« (www.bibnetz.de) ist die Lösung.

Content

"Das Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg (BSZ) bietet mit den Portalen für Öffentliche Bibliotheken unter dem Namen »bibnetz« einen schnellen und einfachen Zugang zu einem umfassenden Informationsangebot für die Bibliotheksbenutzer. Welche Vorteile bietet bibnetz? - bibnetz liefert schnelle und qualifizierte Suchergebnisse aus einer Vielzahl von Datenbanken, die parallel und mit nur einer einzigen Suchmaske durchsucht werden. - Medien-Recherche: Zugriff auf Bestandskataloge lokaler, regionaler und nationaler Bibliotheken mit direkter OnlineBestellmöglichkeit. - Faktensuche: Parallele Suche (so genannte »Metasuche«) in ausgewählten Datenbanken wie zum Beispiel wissen. de und wikipedia. de. - Fachrecherche: Zugang zu speziellen Datenbanken, zum Beispiel aus den Bereichen Personen, Geografie, Sport, Recht, Wirtschaft und Kultur. Wie funktioniert bibnetz? - Suche starten: Die bibnetz-Suchmaske bietet zwei Suchvarianten: die »einfache Suche« mit Suchbegriffen in Form von Stichwörtern, und die »Profi-Suche« für die Eingabe genauerer Suchkriterien, zum Beispiel bei Medienrecherchen den Autorennamen, den Titel, das Erscheinungsjahr oder die ISBN. Dann kann der Nutzer in der angezeigten Liste die Datenbanken aussuchen, in denen die Suche ausgeführt werden soll. - Suchergebnis auf einen Blick: Das Suchergebnis wird nach Datenbanken sortiert angezeigt und liefert bereits erste Kurzinformationen zu den Treffern. Nähere Details gibt es durch einen Klick auf den gewünschten Treffer. Der Button »Quelle« führt direkt zur jeweiligen Datenbank. Die Suchergebnisse können als Merkliste bearbeitet, gespeichert, ausgedruckt oder per Mail verschickt werden."

0.026640236 = product of:
  0.053280473 = sum of:
    0.053280473 = product of:
      0.106560946 = sum of:
        0.106560946 = weight(_text_:wissen in 904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.106560946 = score(doc=904,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26354674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06110665 = queryNorm
            0.40433416 = fieldWeight in 904, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=904)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Im Artikel werden laufende Arbeiten und Ergebnisse der Forschergruppe Wissensmanagement beschrieben. Diese entstanden vor allem durch die am Lehrstuhl Wissensmanagement angesiedelten Projekte Europeana v2.0, Digitised Manuscripts to Europeana (DM2E) sowie von Teilprojekten des vor kurzem gestarteten DFG-Exzellenzclusters Bild Wissen Gestaltung. Die Projekte befassen sich mit Spezialisierungen des Europeana Data Model, der Umwandlung von Metadaten in RDF und der automatisierten und nutzerbasierten semantischen Anreicherung dieser Daten auf Basis eigens entwickelter oder modifizierter Anwendungen sowie der Modellierung von Forschungsaktivitäten, welche derzeit auf die digitale Geisteswissenschaft zugeschnitten ist. Allen Projekten gemeinsam ist die konzeptionelle oder technische Modellierung von Informationsentitäten oder Nutzeraktivitäten, welche am Ende im Linked Data Web repräsentiert werden.

0.025116654 = product of:
  0.05023331 = sum of:
    0.05023331 = product of:
      0.10046662 = sum of:
        0.10046662 = weight(_text_:wissen in 204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10046662 = score(doc=204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26354674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06110665 = queryNorm
            0.38120988 = fieldWeight in 204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.02483732 = product of:
  0.04967464 = sum of:
    0.04967464 = product of:
      0.09934928 = sum of:
        0.09934928 = weight(_text_:22 in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09934928 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21398507 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06110665 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2002 19:41:59

0.02483732 = product of:
  0.04967464 = sum of:
    0.04967464 = product of:
      0.09934928 = sum of:
        0.09934928 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09934928 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21398507 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06110665 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2002 19:42:47

0.022477366 = product of:
  0.044954732 = sum of:
    0.044954732 = product of:
      0.1348642 = sum of:
        0.1348642 = weight(_text_:objects in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1348642 = score(doc=4132,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3247862 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06110665 = queryNorm
            0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

For most museums, online access to their collections is still a challenge. In museum databases, descriptions include descriptive metadata, along with other information that is often irrelevant to the public. Information that would help users to navigate from an object to one sharing similar characteristics is often absent. The conceptual model developed by the International Committee for Documentation, CIDOC-CRM, which provides a formal structure for linking museum objects, is still not widely adopted by institutions, due to its complexity. This project aims to provide a simpler model that could be more easily adopted. For this phase of the project, a sample of 266 Canadian museums with humanities collections (archaeology, ethnology, history, fine and decorative arts) was identified. It is composed of every museum that, during the fall of 2016, was offering to the public at least a part of its collection online. From each museum, a minimum of ten objects was selected, ensuring that the variety of the collections was represented, and extracted the metadata used in the object descriptions. This inventory, which aimed to provide a comprehensive picture of what museums already offer in terms of metadata associated to their online collections, exposed a lack of standardization and interoperability.

0.022251455 = product of:
  0.04450291 = sum of:
    0.04450291 = product of:
      0.13350873 = sum of:
        0.13350873 = weight(_text_:objects in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13350873 = score(doc=1153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3247862 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06110665 = queryNorm
            0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) was established in the late 1990s as a response to several perceived problems of traditional map libraries, notably access and organization. By 1999 it had evolved into an operational digital library, offering a well-defined set of services to a broad user community, based on an extensive collection of georeferenced information objects. The vision of ADL continues to evolve, as technology makes new services possible, as its users become more sophisticated and demanding, and as the broader field of geographic information science (GIScience) identifies new avenues for research and application.

0.021977073 = product of:
  0.043954145 = sum of:
    0.043954145 = product of:
      0.08790829 = sum of:
        0.08790829 = weight(_text_:wissen in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08790829 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26354674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06110665 = queryNorm
            0.33355865 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Zwölf Studierende des Studiengangs Bibliotheks- und Informationsmanagement der Hochschule der Medien in Stuttgart entwickelten ein Online-Wissens-Portal mit dem Schwerpunkt Informationswesen. Ziel des Projekts ist es, eine ausbaufähige Online-Plattform aufzubauen, die Informationsspezialisten einen kommunikativen Ort der Informationsbeschaffung und fachlichen Diskussion bietet. Bezugnehmend auf die aktuelle Thematik des Web 2.0 und der kollektiven Intelligenz, stellt das B.I.T.Wiki so eine zeitgemäße Möglichkeit dar, Beiträge rund um das Informationswesen der Fachöffentlichkeit zugänglich zu machen. Alle Spezialisten aus dem Informationssektor sind aufgerufen, andere an ihrem Wissen teilhaben zu lassen und am Aufbau des Portals aktiv mitzuarbeiten.

0.020697769 = product of:
  0.041395538 = sum of:
    0.041395538 = product of:
      0.082791075 = sum of:
        0.082791075 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082791075 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21398507 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06110665 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2002 19:41:31

0.019072678 = product of:
  0.038145356 = sum of:
    0.038145356 = product of:
      0.11443606 = sum of:
        0.11443606 = weight(_text_:objects in 2641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11443606 = score(doc=2641,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3247862 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06110665 = queryNorm
            0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2641, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2641)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The German Internet Clearinghouse SocioGuide has changed to a database management system. Accordingly the metadata description scheme has become more detailed. The main information types are: institutions, persons, literature, tools, data sets, objects, topics, processes and services. Some of the description elements, such as title, resource identifier, and creator are universal, whereas others, such as primary/secondary information, and availability are specific to information type and cannot be generalized by referring to Dublin Core elements. The quality of Internet sources is indicated implicitly by characteristics, such as extent, restriction, or status. The SocioGuide is managed in DBClear, a generic system that can be adapted to different source types. It makes distributed input possible and contains workflow components.

0.018837491 = product of:
  0.037674982 = sum of:
    0.037674982 = product of:
      0.075349964 = sum of:
        0.075349964 = weight(_text_:wissen in 242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075349964 = score(doc=242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26354674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06110665 = queryNorm
            0.28590742 = fieldWeight in 242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=242)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Werden Google, Yahoo und Microsoft die einzigen Zugänge zum weltweiten Wissen im Jahre 2010 darstellen? Der Autor setzt sich für eine konzertierte Aktion der Bibliotheken ein, um mittels »State-of-the-Art«- Suchmaschinentechnologie verlässliche, qualitativ hochwertige Suchdienste für wissenschaftliche Informationen in Forschung und Lehre aufzubauen. Die Notwendigkeit ergibt sich aus dem explosionsartigen Anwachsen wissenschaftlich relevanter Dokumente, die nicht selten ausschließlich über das Internet zugänglich sind und über derzeit verfügbare Informationsportale von Bibliotheken nicht oder nur sehr unzulänglich recherchiert werden können. Der Artikel beschreibt mögliche Wege der Kooperationen von Bibliotheken und anderen Informationsanbietern im nationalen und internationalen Kontext beim Aufbau eines offenen, verteilten wissenschaftlichen Internet-Indexes, der modular angelegt in beliebigen lokalen Umgebungen genutzt werden kann. Für die nutzerfreundliche Gestaltung des neuen Suchservices wird auf die Notwendigkeit der Berücksichtigung von etablierten, allgemeinen Internet-Suchdiensten eingegangen, die innerhalb kurzer Zeit eine hohe Popularität und Nutzerakzeptanz gewonnen haben.

0.018837491 = product of:
  0.037674982 = sum of:
    0.037674982 = product of:
      0.075349964 = sum of:
        0.075349964 = weight(_text_:wissen in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075349964 = score(doc=3153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26354674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06110665 = queryNorm
            0.28590742 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Wissensorganisation und Edutainment: Wissen im Spannungsfeld von Gesellschaft, Gestaltung und Industrie. Proceedings der 7. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Berlin, 21.-23.3.2001. Hrsg.: C. Lehner, H.P. Ohly u. G. Rahmstorf

0.018837491 = product of:
  0.037674982 = sum of:
    0.037674982 = product of:
      0.075349964 = sum of:
        0.075349964 = weight(_text_:wissen in 209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075349964 = score(doc=209,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26354674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06110665 = queryNorm
            0.28590742 = fieldWeight in 209, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=209)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Die Visionen von einer »Weltbibliothek« sind so alt wie die Institution der Bibliothek selbst. So lag beispielsweise der Gründung der Bibliothek im ägyptischen Alexandria im 3. Jahrhundert vor Christus das Konzept einer »Universalbibliothek« zugrunde. In dieser Bibliothek standen nach Angaben antiker Autoren zwischen 400 000 und 700 000 Papyrus-Rollen zur Verfügung. Der Auftrag der Bibliothek bestand ausdrücklich in der Sammlung »aller Bücher des gesamten Erdkreises«. Es ging also darum, das »Wissen der Welt« an einem Ort verfügbar zu machen. Die Möglichkeit, Bücher in Bits und Bytes zu überführen und sie in dieser digitalen Form dann über das Internet zugänglich zu machen, hat dieser Utopie eine neue Richtung gegeben. Die »digitale Weltbibliothek« wird nicht an einem Ort errichtet, sondern ist potenziell von jedem Ort aus - und zu jeder Zeit - zugänglich.

0.016558215 = product of:
  0.03311643 = sum of:
    0.03311643 = product of:
      0.06623286 = sum of:
        0.06623286 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06623286 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21398507 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06110665 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2002 19:38:24