Search (121 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Gateway"
  1. Cervone, F.: Library portals and gateways (2009) 0.14 
    0.13900244 = product of:
  0.27800488 = sum of:
    0.03909137 = weight(_text_:world in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03909137 = score(doc=3839,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
    0.051945105 = weight(_text_:wide in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051945105 = score(doc=3839,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
    0.039854147 = weight(_text_:web in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039854147 = score(doc=3839,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
    0.03909137 = weight(_text_:world in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03909137 = score(doc=3839,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
    0.051945105 = weight(_text_:wide in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051945105 = score(doc=3839,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
    0.039854147 = weight(_text_:web in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039854147 = score(doc=3839,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
    0.016223647 = product of:
      0.032447293 = sum of:
        0.032447293 = weight(_text_:22 in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032447293 = score(doc=3839,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11980651 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(7/14)
    Abstract
    Libraries have had web presences since the introduction of the World Wide Web. Providing access to information provided by the library has been attempted through various means throughout the years but no method has been as popular or pervasive as the uses of library gateways and portals. Development of gateways and portals in libraries has been affected by many factors many of which have been outside the direct control of libraries or librarians. Both the history of library practice in this area and these external factors have had a substantial impact on the state of library portal and gateway development today.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:27
  2. Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Milanesi, C.: Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus der Evaluierung des EU-Projektes EULER im Rahmen des an der FH Köln angesiedelten Projektes EJECT (Evaluation von Subject Gateways des World Wide Web (2001) 0.14 
    0.13666606 = product of:
  0.23916559 = sum of:
    0.027922407 = weight(_text_:world in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027922407 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
    0.037103646 = weight(_text_:wide in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037103646 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
    0.020129383 = weight(_text_:web in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020129383 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
    0.027922407 = weight(_text_:world in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027922407 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
    0.037103646 = weight(_text_:wide in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037103646 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
    0.020129383 = weight(_text_:web in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020129383 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
    0.05246636 = weight(_text_:analyse in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05246636 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18025847 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.29106182 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
    0.016388359 = product of:
      0.032776717 = sum of:
        0.032776717 = weight(_text_:22 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032776717 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11980651 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5714286 = coord(8/14)
    Abstract
    Der Umfang und die Heterogenität des Informationsangebotes erfordert immer differenzierte Methoden und Hilfsmittel für das gezielte und möglichst ballastfreie Auffinden von Informationsquellen im Kontext eines bestimmten Fachgebietes oder einer wissenschaftlichen Disziplin. Um dieses Ziel zu erreichen, wurden in der letzten Zeit eine Reihe sog. Subject Gateways entwickelt. Bislang liegen weder viele Untersuchungen zur Qualität derartiger Hilfsmittel vor noch ist eine differenzierte Methodik für solche Bewertungen entwickelt worden. Das Projekt Evaluation von Subject Gateways des Internet (EJECT) verfolgte daher die Ziele: durch Analyse bereits realisierter Subject Gateways die Verwendungsvielfalt des Begriffes aufzuzeigen und zu einer Präzisierung der Begriffsbildung beizutragen; einen methodischen Weg zur qualitativen Bewertung von Subject Gateways aufzuzeigen; diesen Weg anhand einer Evaluation des Subject Gateways EULER zu testen, das im Rahmen eines EU-Projektes für das Fachgebiet Mathematik entwickelt wurde. Die Resultate der Evaluation werden hier in verkürzter Form vorgestellt und es wird aufgezeigt, inwieweit eine Übertragung auf die Bewertung anderer Gateways möglich ist
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:22
  3. Lossau, N.: Search engine technology and digital libraries : libraries need to discover the academic internet (2004) 0.10 
    0.10218652 = product of:
  0.23843522 = sum of:
    0.03909137 = weight(_text_:world in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03909137 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
    0.051945105 = weight(_text_:wide in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051945105 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
    0.028181138 = weight(_text_:web in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028181138 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
    0.03909137 = weight(_text_:world in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03909137 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
    0.051945105 = weight(_text_:wide in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051945105 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
    0.028181138 = weight(_text_:web in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028181138 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
  0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
    Abstract
    With the development of the World Wide Web, the "information search" has grown to be a significant business sector of a global, competitive and commercial market. Powerful players have entered this market, such as commercial internet search engines, information portals, multinational publishers and online content integrators. Will Google, Yahoo or Microsoft be the only portals to global knowledge in 2010? If libraries do not want to become marginalized in a key area of their traditional services, they need to acknowledge the challenges that come with the globalisation of scholarly information, the existence and further growth of the academic internet
  4. Woldering, B.: 2nd European Library Seminar / 3rd Gabriel Workshop (2003) 0.09 
    0.087588444 = product of:
  0.20437303 = sum of:
    0.03350689 = weight(_text_:world in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03350689 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
    0.04452437 = weight(_text_:wide in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04452437 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
    0.02415526 = weight(_text_:web in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02415526 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
    0.03350689 = weight(_text_:world in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03350689 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
    0.04452437 = weight(_text_:wide in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04452437 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
    0.02415526 = weight(_text_:web in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02415526 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
  0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
    Abstract
    From 4 to 6 June 2003 the 2nd European Library Seminar / 3rd Gabriel Workshop was held at the Biblioteca Nacional in Lisbon, Portugal. 62 librarians and webmasters from 20 countries participated in the workshop, mainly Gabriel contacts but also quite a number of librarians from Portugal. Since its foundation in 1995 Gabriel, the world wide web service of the European national libraries, has established itself as the official network service of the Conference of European National Librarians (CENL) and has undergone a continuous development. The Gabriel website has been redesigned and restructured, and it was relaunched in summer 2002. At present, 41 libraries from 39 European countries are represented in Gabriel. Gabriel offers access to varied information sources and numerous online-catalogues and Services of the European national libraries. Gabriel is the only trans-European library service.
  5. Meißner, B.: ViFaArt: eine virtuelle Fachbibliothek zur Gegenwartskunst (2004) 0.08 
    0.08013712 = product of:
  0.18698661 = sum of:
    0.027922407 = weight(_text_:world in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027922407 = score(doc=2409,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
    0.037103646 = weight(_text_:wide in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037103646 = score(doc=2409,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
    0.028467247 = weight(_text_:web in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028467247 = score(doc=2409,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
    0.027922407 = weight(_text_:world in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027922407 = score(doc=2409,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
    0.037103646 = weight(_text_:wide in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037103646 = score(doc=2409,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
    0.028467247 = weight(_text_:web in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028467247 = score(doc=2409,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
  0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
    Abstract
    Virtuelle Quellen zur Kunst-Erschließung und Recherchewar das Thema eines Workshops, der am 16. Oktober 2003 in der Sächsischen Landesbibliothek - Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Dresden (SLUB) veranstaltet wurde. Anliegen war die Präsentation des DFG-geförderten Projektes ViFaArtVirtuelle Fachbibliothek Gegenwartskunst. Im Folgenden wird dieses Projekt näher vorgestellt. Schwerpunkt der Darstellung wird der hierbei entwickelte Katalog von Webseiten bzw. Internetquellen sein (Art-Guide). Die Auseinandersetzung mit Internetquellen und ihre Nutzung für die Informationsgewinnung ist auch für die Kunstwissenschaft zum aktuellen Thema geworden. Eine Hauptaufgabe des World Wide Web liegt neben dem schnellen und direkten Informationsaustausch in der Vermittlung von Information - einem Hauptanliegen wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken überhaupt. Somit rückt die Problematik auch immer näher an den Aufgabenkreis von Bibliotheken heran. Es stellen sich Fragen wie: Welche Art von Informationen liegen im Web bereit, sind sie vertrauenswürdig, wie kann man sie nutzen und vor allem: wie sind sie zu finden? Seit 2000 wird an der SLUB eine Virtuelle Fachbibliothek zur Gegenwartskunst projektiert: ViFaArt. Das Projekt ist Partner von Vascoda, dem interdisziplinären Internetportal für wissenschaftliche Information in Deutschland. Unter http:// www.vascoda.de/sind Online- und Print-Informationen von derzeit über 20 Virtuellen Fachbibliotheken, 4 Informationsverbünden und der Elektronischen Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB) abrufbar. Anfang des nächsten Jahres wird auch ViFaArt den Katalog der Internetquellen (Art-Guide, vgl. unten) als Datenbank dort einbringen. Eine Metasuche über Vascoda wird dann also immer auch alle ArtGuide-Katalogisate berücksichtigen.
  6. Zeitz, G.: Wissenschaftliche Informationen per Mausklick : Bibliotheken und Forschungsinstitute eröffnen fächerübergreifendes Internetportal - Hessische Einrichtungen sind beteiligt (2003) 0.08 
    0.07942997 = product of:
  0.15885994 = sum of:
    0.022337925 = weight(_text_:world in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022337925 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
    0.029682916 = weight(_text_:wide in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029682916 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
    0.022773797 = weight(_text_:web in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022773797 = score(doc=1800,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
    0.022337925 = weight(_text_:world in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022337925 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
    0.029682916 = weight(_text_:wide in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029682916 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
    0.022773797 = weight(_text_:web in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022773797 = score(doc=1800,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
    0.009270656 = product of:
      0.018541312 = sum of:
        0.018541312 = weight(_text_:22 in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018541312 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11980651 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(7/14)
    Content
    "Wissenschaftler brauchen fundierte Informationen aus Quellen, auf die man sich verlassen kann. Die Suche nach solchen Quellen, wissenschaftlichen Aufsätzen, Dissertationen, Büchern, Datenbanken und Linklisten gestaltete sich bislang schwierig: Bibliotheken oder Verlage von Fachzeitschriften mussten einzeln angesteuert werden, einen zentralen, einheitlichen und einfachen Zugang gab es bislang, nicht. Das soll sich jetzt ändern: Das vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) und von der Deutschen; Forschungsgemeinsehaft (DFG) geförderte Internetportal "vascoda", das nach dem Willen seiner Initiatoren auch Grundbaustein für die "Digitale Bibliothek Deutschland" sein soll, will Forschern Zugang zu wissenschaftlicher Information unterschiedlichster Fachrichtungen und unterschiedlichster Formate bieten. Das ist bundesweit in dieser Form ebenso einzigartig wie die Tatsache, dass die an vascoda angeschlossenen Datenbanken ausschließlich ;,geprüfte" Informationen liefern sollen: "Fachbibliothekare und Fachwissenschaftler der Anbieter, die sich unter dem vascoda-Dach zusammengeschlossen haben, prüfen, welche Texte vdrfügbar gemacht werden", sagt Christine Burblies von der vascoda-Geschäftsstelle in Hannover. "So können wir gewährleisten, dass die Informationen wissenschaftlichen Ansprüchen genügen." Das macht dann auch den wesentlichen Unterschied zu anderen Suchmaschinen aus: Die Suchmaske des Wissenschaftsportals ist zwar ähnlich einfach zu handhaben wie die Internet-Suchmaschine Google - vascoda verirrt sich aber nicht im World Wide Web. Und während andere Internet-Suchmaschinen nicht den Zugriff auf das so genannte "invisible web" bieten, also beispielsweise auf Bibliothekskataloge, ermöglicht vascoda auch den Zugriff auf dieses unsichtbare Netz. Das Wissenschaftsportal ist unentgeltlich nutzbar, und auch ein Großteil der Informationen ist kostenlos zu beziehen. Es sind aber auch kostenpflichtige Informationen verfügbar - zum Beispiel aus Verlagsangeboten und kommerziellen Datenbanken. Wer Informationen etwa zu soziologischen Fragen sucht, landet sicher auch auf den Internetseiten des Instituts für Soziologie in Darmstadt (www.ifs.tu-darmstadt.de/forsch.htm), das ebenso zu den vascoda-Anbietern gehört wie das Deutsche Institut für Internationale Pädagogik (DIPF) in Frankfurt (www.dipfde/index_1024.htm). In vascoda eingebunden sind zur Zeit 23 virtuelle Fachbibliotheken (ViFas), die vier großen Informationsverbünde EconDoc (Wirtschaft), GetInfo (Naturwissenschaften und Technik), infoconnex (Pädagogik, Sozialwissenschaften, Psychologie) und Medizin sowie die Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB), ein kooperativer Service von 209 Bibliotheken zur Bereitstellung von elektronischen Zeitschriften, -die im Internet publiziert werden. "Wir planen überdies die Erweiterung um das Fach Germanistik, und wenn es soweit ist, wird die Stadt- und Universitätsbibliothek Frankfurt diesen Service bereitstellen", sagt Burblies."
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
  7. Bayer, M.: Wikipedia - kein Einzelfall (2005) 0.06 
    0.0641097 = product of:
  0.14958929 = sum of:
    0.022337925 = weight(_text_:world in 3721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022337925 = score(doc=3721,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 3721, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3721)
    0.029682916 = weight(_text_:wide in 3721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029682916 = score(doc=3721,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 3721, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3721)
    0.022773797 = weight(_text_:web in 3721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022773797 = score(doc=3721,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 3721, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3721)
    0.022337925 = weight(_text_:world in 3721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022337925 = score(doc=3721,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 3721, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3721)
    0.029682916 = weight(_text_:wide in 3721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029682916 = score(doc=3721,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 3721, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3721)
    0.022773797 = weight(_text_:web in 3721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022773797 = score(doc=3721,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 3721, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3721)
  0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
    Content
    ""Das Ehrenamt", schreibt Wikipedia, "bezeichnet ein öffentliches unbezahltes Amt, das durch soziale Anerkennung vergolten wird." Später heißt es weiter in eigener Sache: "Wikipedia wird zum größten Teil ehrenamtlich geleistet und stellt so eine neue Form von bürgerschaftlichem Engagement dar." Neu und unerwartet klingt das zunächst in der Tat: Das erfolgreichste Onlineprojekt seiner Art lebt nicht von den Millionen eines internationalen Konzerns, sondern dank der unentgeltlichen Arbeit seiner Nutzer. Steht das Internet doch in den Augen vieler vor allem für Kommerz und windige Geschäfte. Doch Wikipedia ist kein Einzelfall. Es gibt weitere Projekte im Internet, die in ihrer Qualität rein kommerziell kaum realisierbar sein dürften. Da ist etwa das "Open Directory" - nicht weniger als der Versuch, dem Internet ein Inhaltsverzeichnis zu geben. Ähnliche Kataloge professioneller Anbieter sind oft veraltet; zunehmend nehmen sie Adressen gegen Bezahlung vorrangig auf - was die Listen-Unabhängigkeit in Frage stellt. Beim "Open Directory" fließt kein Geld. Um die Einträge kümmern sich etwa 68.000 ehrenamtliche Editoren - eine Redaktionsstärke, die sich selbst finanzstarke Unternehmen kaum werden leisten wollen. Mehr als 400 Webseiten übernehmen den Katalog - unter anderem die bekannteste aller Web-Suchmaschinen in der Rubrik "Google Verzeichnis". Gegenseitiger Austausch und Hilfe - das macht entgegen mancher Wahrnehmung schon immer den Reiz des internets aus. Denn das Medium bringt Interessierte selbst für ungewöhnliche Vorlieben zusammen. Das geschieht oft abseits des bunten World Wide Web, etwa in Mail-Verteilerlisten oder den kaum bekannten Foren des Usenet. Sie leben von Debatten, Fragen und Antworten. Und sammeln erstaunliches Fachwissen - mal auf nationaler, mal auf internationaler Ebene. Google bietet einen Einblick in diese Welt unter groups.google.de. Freiwillig zusammen an einer gemeinsamen Sache arbeiten - das ist auch das Prinzip von Open-Source-Software, als deren prominenteste Vertreterin das Betriebssystem Linux gilt. Derartige Programme stehen unter bestimmten Bedingungen frei zur Verfügung. Den Aktiven ist die soziale Anerkennung sicher, von der Wikipedia spricht. Und manchmal nicht nur die. Hier und da wird aus dem Ehrenamt ein bezahlter Job - beispielsweise wenn es darum geht, Computersysteme zu betreuen, die mit der freien Software laufen."
  8. Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000) 0.06 
    0.06302719 = product of:
  0.17647612 = sum of:
    0.051945105 = weight(_text_:wide in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051945105 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
    0.028181138 = weight(_text_:web in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028181138 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
    0.051945105 = weight(_text_:wide in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051945105 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
    0.028181138 = weight(_text_:web in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028181138 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
    0.016223647 = product of:
      0.032447293 = sum of:
        0.032447293 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032447293 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11980651 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
    Abstract
    Information subject gateways provide targeted discovery services for their users, giving access to Web resources selected according to quality and subject coverage criteria. Information gateways recognise that they must collaborate on a wide range of issues relating to content to ensure continued success. This report is informed by discussion of content activities at the 1999 Imesh Workshop. The author considers the implications for subject based gateways of co-operation regarding coverage policy, creation of metadata, and provision of searching and browsing across services. Other possibilities for co-operation include working more closely with information providers, and diclosure of information in joint metadata registries
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:54
  9. Peters, C.; Picchi, E.: Across languages, across cultures : issues in multilinguality and digital libraries (1997) 0.06 
    0.059452392 = product of:
  0.20808336 = sum of:
    0.04467585 = weight(_text_:world in 1233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04467585 = score(doc=1233,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.33973572 = fieldWeight in 1233, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1233)
    0.05936583 = weight(_text_:wide in 1233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05936583 = score(doc=1233,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 1233, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1233)
    0.04467585 = weight(_text_:world in 1233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04467585 = score(doc=1233,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.33973572 = fieldWeight in 1233, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1233)
    0.05936583 = weight(_text_:wide in 1233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05936583 = score(doc=1233,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 1233, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1233)
  0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    Abstract
    With the recent rapid diffusion over the international computer networks of world-wide distributed document bases, the question of multilingual access and multilingual information retrieval is becoming increasingly relevant. We briefly discuss just some of the issues that must be addressed in order to implement a multilingual interface for a Digital Library system and describe our own approach to this problem.
  10. Trapp, M.: cibera 2.0 : die Erweiterung der Virtuellen Fachbibliothek Ibero-Amerika / Spanien / Portugal um Web-2.0-Funktionen (2009) 0.05 
    0.047715496 = product of:
  0.22267231 = sum of:
    0.040258765 = weight(_text_:web in 2879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040258765 = score(doc=2879,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 2879, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2879)
    0.040258765 = weight(_text_:web in 2879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040258765 = score(doc=2879,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 2879, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2879)
    0.14215478 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14215478 = score(doc=2879,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.19842365 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.71642053 = fieldWeight in 2879, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2879)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    cibera als Fachinformationsportal zum spanischen und portugiesischen Sprach-und Kulturraum haben meine Kolleginnen und ich bereits in einem zweiteiligen Bibliotheksdienst-Artikel zur Jahreswende 2005/2006 ausführlich vorgestellt. Im vorliegenden Text geht es nun darum, wie die Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg durch die Entwicklung und Umsetzung von Konzepten, die die ViFa in Richtung Web 2.0 erweitern, das Fachportal für die Wissenschaft und die interessierte Öffentlichkeit noch attraktiver gestaltet. "Mitmachweb", "Nutzer dort abholen, wo sie sind" und "Vernetzung mit der Fachcommunity" sind dabei nicht nur theoretische Stichworte, sondern in die Praxis umgesetzte Ziele einer modernen bibliothekarischen Informationsarbeit. Was erwartet Sie in diesem Artikel? Einleitend eine kurze Vorstellung von cibera, gefolgt von allgemeinen Vorüberlegungen, warum es für Virtuelle Fachbibliotheken (und sicher auch für verwandte bibliothekarische Informationsdienste) sinnvoll ist, sich mit dem Thema einer Web-2.0-Implementierung zu beschäftigen. Im Zentrum des Artikels steht dann ein Erfahrungsbericht aus der Praxis. Ein Ausblick darauf, was im Rahmen unserer Zielsetzung, cibera noch stärker mit der Fachcommunity zu vernetzen, im Verlauf des Jahres 2009 noch umgesetzt werden soll, schließt den Artikel ab. Falls Sie Interesse an detaillierteren Informationen haben sollten, hier eine wichtige Bemerkung vorneweg: Ich werde dieses Jahr am Bibliothekartag in Erfurt teilnehmen, sprechen Sie mich also im Vorfeld oder gerne auch vor Ort an, wenn Sie Fragen zu dem Thema Web 2.0 als Chance für die Virtuellen Fachbibliotheken haben.
  11. LaBarre, K.: Adventures in faceted classification: a brave new world or a world of confusion? (2004) 0.05 
    0.047694106 = product of:
  0.16692936 = sum of:
    0.055283546 = weight(_text_:world in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055283546 = score(doc=2634,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.4204015 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
    0.028181138 = weight(_text_:web in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028181138 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
    0.055283546 = weight(_text_:world in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055283546 = score(doc=2634,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.4204015 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
    0.028181138 = weight(_text_:web in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028181138 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
  0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    Abstract
    A preliminary, purposive survey of definitions and current applications of facet analytical theory (FA) is used to develop a framework for the analysis of Websites. This set of guidelines may well serve to highlight commonalities and differences among FA applications an the Web. Rather than identifying FA as the terrain of a particular interest group, the goal is to explore current practices, uncover common misconceptions, extend understanding, and highlight developments that augment the traditional practice of FA and faceted classification (FC).
  12. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.05 
    0.045265544 = product of:
  0.1584294 = sum of:
    0.028467247 = weight(_text_:web in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028467247 = score(doc=2754,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.028467247 = weight(_text_:web in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028467247 = score(doc=2754,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.08990658 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08990658 = score(doc=2754,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19842365 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.45310414 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.01158832 = product of:
      0.02317664 = sum of:
        0.02317664 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02317664 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11980651 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
  13. Chung, W.; Chen, H.: Browsing the underdeveloped Web : an experiment on the Arabic Medical Web Directory (2009) 0.04 
    0.04030544 = product of:
  0.18809205 = sum of:
    0.08709303 = weight(_text_:web in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08709303 = score(doc=2733,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.780033 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
    0.08709303 = weight(_text_:web in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08709303 = score(doc=2733,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.780033 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
    0.013905983 = product of:
      0.027811967 = sum of:
        0.027811967 = weight(_text_:22 in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027811967 = score(doc=2733,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11980651 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    While the Web has grown significantly in recent years, some portions of the Web remain largely underdeveloped, as shown in a lack of high-quality content and functionality. An example is the Arabic Web, in which a lack of well-structured Web directories limits users' ability to browse for Arabic resources. In this research, we proposed an approach to building Web directories for the underdeveloped Web and developed a proof-of-concept prototype called the Arabic Medical Web Directory (AMedDir) that supports browsing of over 5,000 Arabic medical Web sites and pages organized in a hierarchical structure. We conducted an experiment involving Arab participants and found that the AMedDir significantly outperformed two benchmark Arabic Web directories in terms of browsing effectiveness, efficiency, information quality, and user satisfaction. Participants expressed strong preference for the AMedDir and provided many positive comments. This research thus contributes to developing a useful Web directory for organizing the information in the Arabic medical domain and to a better understanding of how to support browsing on the underdeveloped Web.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:57:50
  14. Lee, H.-L.; Carlyle, A.: Academic library gateways to online information : a taxonomy of organizational structures (2003) 0.03 
    0.0329498 = product of:
  0.115324296 = sum of:
    0.03350689 = weight(_text_:world in 2698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03350689 = score(doc=2698,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 2698, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2698)
    0.02415526 = weight(_text_:web in 2698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02415526 = score(doc=2698,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2698, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2698)
    0.03350689 = weight(_text_:world in 2698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03350689 = score(doc=2698,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 2698, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2698)
    0.02415526 = weight(_text_:web in 2698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02415526 = score(doc=2698,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2698, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2698)
  0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    Abstract
    Reports a preliminary analysis of organizational schemes applied by academic libraries worldwide to arrange their electronic resources an their Web-based information gateways. The unsystematic sample consists of 41 academic libraries in 10 countries representing 4 languages, Chinese, English, German, and Spanish. The study reveals a widely accepted practice in applying 6 simplistic methods to organizing online information: by resource type, alphabetical by title, alphabetical by subject (mostly discipline and genre), by vendor/publisher, by broad classification, and random. In addition, it notes a marked difference between libraries in the English-speaking world and those in other countries in that the former present significantly more systematic characteristics.
  15. Doerr, M.; Gradmann, S.; Hennicke, S.; Isaac, A.; Meghini, C.; Van de Sompel, H.: ¬The Europeana Data Model (EDM) (2010) 0.03 
    0.0329498 = product of:
  0.115324296 = sum of:
    0.03350689 = weight(_text_:world in 3967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03350689 = score(doc=3967,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 3967, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3967)
    0.02415526 = weight(_text_:web in 3967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02415526 = score(doc=3967,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3967, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3967)
    0.03350689 = weight(_text_:world in 3967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03350689 = score(doc=3967,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 3967, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3967)
    0.02415526 = weight(_text_:web in 3967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02415526 = score(doc=3967,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3967, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3967)
  0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    Abstract
    The Europeana Data Model (EDM) is a new approach towards structuring and representing data delivered to Europeana by the various contributing cultural heritage institutions. The model aims at greater expressivity and flexibility in comparison to the current Europeana Semantic Elements (ESE), which it is destined to replace. The design principles underlying the EDM are based on the core principles and best practices of the Semantic Web and Linked Data efforts to which Europeana wants to contribute. The model itself builds upon established standards like RDF(S), OAI-ORE, SKOS, and Dublin Core. It acts as a common top-level ontology which retains original data models and information perspectives while at the same time enabling interoperability. The paper elaborates on the aforementioned aspects and the design principles which drove the development of the EDM.
    Content
    Vortrag im Rahmen der Session 93. Cataloguing der WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 76TH IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND ASSEMBLY, 10-15 August 2010, Gothenburg, Sweden - 149. Information Technology, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing with Knowledge Management
  16. Kübler, S.; Ratzek, W.; Wursthorn, L.; Ziltz, N.: Content is King : Projekt B.I.T.Wiki geht online! (2007) 0.03 
    0.031149695 = product of:
  0.14536524 = sum of:
    0.028181138 = weight(_text_:web in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028181138 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
    0.028181138 = weight(_text_:web in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028181138 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
    0.08900297 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08900297 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19842365 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    Zwölf Studierende des Studiengangs Bibliotheks- und Informationsmanagement der Hochschule der Medien in Stuttgart entwickelten ein Online-Wissens-Portal mit dem Schwerpunkt Informationswesen. Ziel des Projekts ist es, eine ausbaufähige Online-Plattform aufzubauen, die Informationsspezialisten einen kommunikativen Ort der Informationsbeschaffung und fachlichen Diskussion bietet. Bezugnehmend auf die aktuelle Thematik des Web 2.0 und der kollektiven Intelligenz, stellt das B.I.T.Wiki so eine zeitgemäße Möglichkeit dar, Beiträge rund um das Informationswesen der Fachöffentlichkeit zugänglich zu machen. Alle Spezialisten aus dem Informationssektor sind aufgerufen, andere an ihrem Wissen teilhaben zu lassen und am Aufbau des Portals aktiv mitzuarbeiten.
  17. Rusch-Feja, D.; Becker, H.J.: Global Info : the German digital libraries project (1999) 0.03 
    0.029726196 = product of:
  0.10404168 = sum of:
    0.022337925 = weight(_text_:world in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022337925 = score(doc=1242,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
    0.029682916 = weight(_text_:wide in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029682916 = score(doc=1242,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
    0.022337925 = weight(_text_:world in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022337925 = score(doc=1242,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
    0.029682916 = weight(_text_:wide in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029682916 = score(doc=1242,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
  0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    Abstract
    The concept for the German Digital Libraries Program is imbedded in the Information Infrastructure Program of the German Federal Government for the years 1996-2000 which has been explicated in the Program Paper entitled "Information as Raw Material for Innovation".3 The Program Paper was published 1996 by the Federal Ministry for Education, Research, and Technology. The actual grants program "Global Info" was initiated by the Information and Communication Commission of the Joint Learned Societies to further technological advancement in enabling all researchers in Germany direct access to literature, research results, and other relevant information. This Commission was founded by four of the learned societies in 1995, and it has sponsored a series of workshops to increase awareness of leading edge technology and innovations in accessing electronic information sources. Now, nine of the leading research-level learned societies -- often those with umbrella responsibilities for other learned societies in their field -- are members of the Information and Communication Commission and represent the mathematicians, physicists, computer scientists, chemists, educational researchers, sociologists, psychologists, biologists and information technologists in the German Association of Engineers. (The German professional librarian societies are not members, as such, of this Commission, but are represented through delegates from libraries in the learned societies and in the future, hopefully, also by the German Association of Documentalists or through the cooperation between the documentalist and librarian professional societies.) The Federal Ministry earmarked 60 Million German Marks for projects within the framework of the German Digital Libraries Program in two phases over the next six years. The scope for the German Digital Libraries Program was announced in a press release in April 1997,4 and the first call for preliminary projects and expressions of interest in participation ended in July 1997. The Consortium members were suggested by the Information and Communication Commission of the Learned Societies (IuK Kommission), by key scientific research funding agencies in the German government, and by the publishers themselves. The first official meeting of the participants took place on December 1, 1997, at the Deutsche Bibliothek, located in the renowned center of German book trade, Frankfurt, thus documenting the active role and participation of libraries and publishers. In contrast to the Digital Libraries Project of the National Science Foundation in the United States, the German Digital Libraries project is based on furthering cooperation with universities, scientific publishing houses (including various international publishers), book dealers, and special subject information centers, as well as academic and research libraries. The goals of the German Digital Libraries Project are to achieve: 1) efficient access to world wide information; 2) directly from the scientist's desktop; 3) while providing the organization for and stimulating fundamental structural changes in the information and communication process of the scientific community.
  18. Neubauer, W.: ¬The Knowledge portal or the vision of easy access to information (2009) 0.03 
    0.026163671 = product of:
  0.09157284 = sum of:
    0.029682916 = weight(_text_:wide in 2812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029682916 = score(doc=2812,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 2812, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2812)
    0.016103506 = weight(_text_:web in 2812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016103506 = score(doc=2812,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 2812, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2812)
    0.029682916 = weight(_text_:wide in 2812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029682916 = score(doc=2812,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 2812, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2812)
    0.016103506 = weight(_text_:web in 2812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016103506 = score(doc=2812,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 2812, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2812)
  0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    Abstract
    From a quantitative and qualitative point of view the ETH Library is offering its users an extensive choice of information services. In this respect all researchers, all scientists and also all students have access to nearly all relevant information. This is one side of the coin. On the other hand, this broad, but also heterogeneous bundle of information sources has disadvantages, which should not be underestimated: The more information services and information channels you have, the more complex is it to find what you want to get for your scientific work. A portal-like integration of all the different information resources is still missing. The vision, the main goal of the project "Knowledge Portal" is, to develop a central access system in terms of a "single-point-of-access" for all electronic information services. This means, that all these sources - from the library's catalogue and the fulltext inhouse applications to external, licensed sources - should be accessible via one central Web service. Although the primary target group for this vision is the science community of the ETH Zurich, the interested public should also be taken into account, for the library has also a nation-wide responsibility.The general idea to launch a complex project like that comes from a survey the library did one and a half years ago. We asked a defined sample of scientists what they expected to get from their library and one constant answer was, that they wanted to have one point of access to all the electronic library services and besides this, the search processes should be as simple as possible. We accepted this demand as an order to develop a "single-point-of-access" to all electronic services the library provides. The presentation gives an overview about the general idea of the project and describes the current status.
  19. Severiens, T.: ¬A distributed portal for physics (2002) 0.03 
    0.025778126 = product of:
  0.09022344 = sum of:
    0.022337925 = weight(_text_:world in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022337925 = score(doc=3620,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
    0.022773797 = weight(_text_:web in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022773797 = score(doc=3620,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
    0.022337925 = weight(_text_:world in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022337925 = score(doc=3620,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
    0.022773797 = weight(_text_:web in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022773797 = score(doc=3620,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
  0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    Abstract
    Many subject specific portals were built during the last year. Most of these are simple user-interfaces to databases of subject specific information added with several lists of links. This centralised type of portal often looks fine with its consistent facing but is hard to keep up to date and high priced to maintain. Users expect a service be malntained and available 24 hours, 365 days for at least 10 years and this all free of charge. On the one hand, it seams to be impossible to set up a service matching all this demands, an the other hand, many institutions offer information and services which could be parts of a portal, which are maintained frequently and paid by public via these institutions. The idea is, to collect the existing information and present it in a structured and consistent way. This idea matches in an excellent way with the way knowledge is produced in Physics. Physicists work all over the world often an different continents an the same topic, knowing each others work only from their publications, conferences and online-communication. Information in Physics is published in quite different ways, by journal articles, which can be reviewed, sometimes by peer, or pre-prints. Many information is available in non-textual genres like software sources or datasets or mathematical formula. Distributed Portals make use of the existing information an the web. In the early days of the web, the very popular link-lists where a kind of portal, linking to (all) pages with information an the specific topic. Indeed, these link lists had many properties of modern portals, offering information in a structured and selected way. But they did not offer the information under a common layout (desktop) and did not offer user-specific views onto the information. Modern distributed portals combine the advantages of centralised portals (high information structure, common layout, easy navigation through all the information) with the possibilities of distributed portals (up to date information, low budget implementation, good knowledge coverage).
  20. Price, A.: NOVAGate : a Nordic gateway to electronic resources in the forestry, veterinary and agricultural sciences (2000) 0.03 
    0.025738684 = product of:
  0.12011386 = sum of:
    0.051945105 = weight(_text_:wide in 4874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051945105 = score(doc=4874,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 4874, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4874)
    0.051945105 = weight(_text_:wide in 4874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051945105 = score(doc=4874,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03421255 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 4874, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4874)
    0.016223647 = product of:
      0.032447293 = sum of:
        0.032447293 = weight(_text_:22 in 4874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032447293 = score(doc=4874,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11980651 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03421255 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4874, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4874)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    NOVAGate is a subject-based information gateway covering electronic resources in the agricultural, veterinary and related fields. The service, which opened in July 1998, is produced by the veterinary and agricultural libraries of the 5 Nordic countries - Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden - which serve the NOVA University. The gateway covers Nordic and European resources as well as the resources of international organizations, but being planned is a network of subject gateways which will give access to a wide range of international quality resources within the agricultural, veterinary and related fields. The service uses the ROADS software
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:00

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 77
  • d 44

Types

  • a 106
  • el 21
  • m 5
  • s 4
  • x 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications