Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsdienstleistungen"
  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002) 0.01
    0.00697805 = product of:
      0.0418683 = sum of:
        0.0418683 = product of:
          0.06280245 = sum of:
            0.0315431 = weight(_text_:29 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0315431 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
            0.03125935 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03125935 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    2. 7.2005 12:22:50
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
  2. Baruchson-Arbib, S.; Bronstein, J.: Humanists as information users in the digital age : the case of Jewish studies scholars in Israel (2007) 0.01
    0.00641361 = product of:
      0.03848166 = sum of:
        0.03848166 = weight(_text_:internet in 1320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03848166 = score(doc=1320,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.33897567 = fieldWeight in 1320, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1320)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    User studies provide libraries with invaluable insight into their users' information needs and behaviors, allowing them to develop services that correspond to these needs. This insight has become even more important for libraries since the advent of the Internet. The Internet has brought about a development of information technologies and electronic information sources that have had a great impact on both the ways users search for information and the ways libraries manage information. Although humanists represent an important group of users for academic libraries, research studies into their information-seeking behavior since the advent of the Internet have been quite scarce (Ellis & Oldman, 2005) in the past decade. This study presents updated research on a group of humanists, Jewish studies scholars living in Israel, as information users in the digital age based on two categories: (a) the use of formal and informal information channels, and (b) the use of information technologies and their impact on humanistic research.
  3. Savolainen, R.: Source preferences in the context of seeking problem-specific information (2008) 0.00
    0.0043639094 = product of:
      0.026183454 = sum of:
        0.026183454 = weight(_text_:internet in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026183454 = score(doc=2034,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.23064373 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The study focuses on the ways in which people define their source preferences in the context of seeking problem-specific information for non-work purposes. The conceptual framework draws on two major concepts, that is, information source horizon and information pathways. The former denotes the ways information sources are mapped in preference order in an imaginary field, while information pathways refers to the sequences in which sources placed on the information source horizon are actually used. The empirical part of the study draws on semi-structured interviews with 18 individuals active in environmental issues. Human sources and the Internet were preferred most strongly in seeking for problem-based information. The major source preferences were content of information, and availability and accessibility. Usability of information sources and user characteristics were mentioned less frequently as preference criteria. Typically, information pathways consisted of the use of 3-4 sources. On average, human and networked sources were favored in the early phases of information seeking. Printed media such as magazines and organizational sources were often used to complement information received from human sources and the Internet. However, the source preferences varied considerably, depending on the requirements of the problem at hand.
  4. Stefl-Mabry, J.: ¬A social judgment analysis of information source preference profiles : An exploratory study to empirically represent media selection patterns (2003) 0.00
    0.00308575 = product of:
      0.018514499 = sum of:
        0.018514499 = weight(_text_:internet in 4577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018514499 = score(doc=4577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.16308975 = fieldWeight in 4577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4577)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    To better understand how individuals and groups derive satisfaction from information, it is important to identify the information source preferences they apply in information seeking and decision making. Four informal propositions drove the structure and underlying logic of this study, forming a preliminary outline of a theory of information source preference profiles and their influence an information satisfaction. This study employed Social Judgment Analysis (SJA) to identify the information judgment preferences held by professional groups for six selected information sources: word of mouth, expert oral advice, Internet, print news, nonfiction books, and radio/television news. The research was designed as an hypotheses-generating exploratory study employing a purposive sample (n = 90) and generated four empirically supported, testable hypotheses about user satisfaction with information sources. The SJA judgment functions revealed the influences of volume and polarity (i.e., positive versus negative information) an information satisfaction. By advancing the understanding of how information source preferences can be identified empirically and their influence an information satisfaction, this research reflects a first, small step toward understanding "satisficing." Satisficing behaviors result in early termination of information search processes when individuals, facing incomplete information, are sufficiently satisfied to assume risks and execute decisions.
  5. Heinström, J.: Broad exploration or precise specificity : two basic information seeking patterns among students (2006) 0.00
    0.0020444603 = product of:
      0.012266762 = sum of:
        0.012266762 = product of:
          0.036800284 = sum of:
            0.036800284 = weight(_text_:29 in 6004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036800284 = score(doc=6004,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 6004, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6004)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    2.10.2006 13:29:01
  6. Lin, S.-j.; Belkin, N.: Validation of a model of information seeking over multiple search sessions (2005) 0.00
    0.0017366307 = product of:
      0.010419784 = sum of:
        0.010419784 = product of:
          0.03125935 = sum of:
            0.03125935 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03125935 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    10. 4.2005 14:52:22