-
Smith, C.L.; Matteson, M.L.: Information literacy in the age of machines that learn : desiderata for machines that teach (2018)
0.02
0.021857034 = product of:
0.04371407 = sum of:
0.04371407 = sum of:
0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 4954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006302999 = score(doc=4954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4954)
0.03741107 = weight(_text_:22 in 4954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03741107 = score(doc=4954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4954)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 3.2019 14:33:22
- Language
- e
-
Plieninger, J.: Informationskompetenz online vermitteln : eTeaching für OPLs (2011)
0.02
0.01973675 = product of:
0.0394735 = sum of:
0.0394735 = sum of:
0.0042019994 = weight(_text_:e in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0042019994 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.0352715 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0352715 = score(doc=166,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 5.2012 14:20:22
- Source
- ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
-
Pontis, S.; Blandford, A.; Greifeneder, E.; Attalla, H.; Neal, D.: Keeping up to date : an academic researcher's information journey (2017)
0.02
0.019302025 = product of:
0.03860405 = sum of:
0.03860405 = sum of:
0.0074281557 = weight(_text_:e in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0074281557 = score(doc=3340,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
0.031175895 = weight(_text_:22 in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031175895 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.1, S.22-35
-
Lercher, A.: Efficiency of scientific communication : a survey of world science (2010)
0.02
0.018214198 = product of:
0.036428396 = sum of:
0.036428396 = sum of:
0.0052524996 = weight(_text_:e in 3997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052524996 = score(doc=3997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 3997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3997)
0.031175895 = weight(_text_:22 in 3997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031175895 = score(doc=3997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3997)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The aim of this study was to measure the efficiency of the system by which scientists worldwide communicate results to each other, providing one measure of the degree to which the system, including all media, functions well. A randomly selected and representative sample of 246 active research scientists worldwide was surveyed. The main measure was the reported rate of "late finds": scientific literature that would have been useful to scientists' projects if it had been found at the beginning of these projects. The main result was that 46% of the sample reported late finds (±6.25%, p0.05). Among respondents from European Union countries or other countries classified as "high income" by the World Bank, 42% reported late finds. Among respondents from low- and middle-income countries, 56% reported late finds. The 42% rate in high-income countries in 2009 can be compared with results of earlier surveys by Martyn (1964a, b, 1987). These earlier surveys found a rate of 22% late finds in 1963-1964 and a rate of 27% in 1985-1986. Respondents were also queried about search habits, but this study failed to support any explanations for this increase in the rate of late finds. This study also permits a crude estimate of the cost in time and money of the increase in late finds.
- Language
- e
-
Cole, C.; Behesthi, J.; Large, A.; Lamoureux, I.; Abuhimed, D.; AlGhamdi, M.: Seeking information for a middle school history project : the concept of implicit knowledge in the students' transition from Kuhlthau's Stage 3 to Stage 4 (2013)
0.02
0.018214198 = product of:
0.036428396 = sum of:
0.036428396 = sum of:
0.0052524996 = weight(_text_:e in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052524996 = score(doc=667,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
0.031175895 = weight(_text_:22 in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031175895 = score(doc=667,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:41:17
- Language
- e
-
Bodoff, D.; Raban, D.: Question types and intermediary elicitations (2016)
0.02
0.018214198 = product of:
0.036428396 = sum of:
0.036428396 = sum of:
0.0052524996 = weight(_text_:e in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052524996 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
0.031175895 = weight(_text_:22 in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031175895 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 11:58:25
- Language
- e
-
Chew, S.W.; Khoo, K.S.G.: Comparison of drug information on consumer drug review sites versus authoritative health information websites (2016)
0.02
0.018214198 = product of:
0.036428396 = sum of:
0.036428396 = sum of:
0.0052524996 = weight(_text_:e in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052524996 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
0.031175895 = weight(_text_:22 in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031175895 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 12:24:05
- Language
- e
-
Jaskolla, L.; Rugel, M.: Smart questions : steps towards an ontology of questions and answers (2014)
0.02
0.018214198 = product of:
0.036428396 = sum of:
0.036428396 = sum of:
0.0052524996 = weight(_text_:e in 3404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052524996 = score(doc=3404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 3404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3404)
0.031175895 = weight(_text_:22 in 3404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031175895 = score(doc=3404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 2.2017 19:22:59
- Language
- e
-
Pinto, M.: Assessing disciplinary differences in faculty perceptions of information literacy competencies (2016)
0.01
0.0145713575 = product of:
0.029142715 = sum of:
0.029142715 = sum of:
0.0042019994 = weight(_text_:e in 2963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0042019994 = score(doc=2963,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 2963, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2963)
0.024940716 = weight(_text_:22 in 2963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024940716 = score(doc=2963,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2963, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2963)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Language
- e
-
Bertram, J.: Stand der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2013)
0.01
0.013226813 = product of:
0.026453625 = sum of:
0.026453625 = product of:
0.05290725 = sum of:
0.05290725 = weight(_text_:22 in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05290725 = score(doc=2658,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Dass eine erfolgreiche Suche nach im Unternehmen vorhandenen Informationen oftmals schwieriger zu bewerkstelligen ist als eine Suche im Internet, wird in der Privatwirtschaft zunehmend als Problem gesehen. Enterprise Search ist eine Strategie, diesem Problem zu begegnen. In einer Studie mit explorativem Charakter wurde der Frage nachgegangen, wie es um den Stand unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Unternehmen bestellt ist. m Rahmen einer Onlinebefragung wurden dazu im März / April 2009 469 Unternehmen befragt. Es beteiligten sich 104 Unternehmen. Das entspricht einem Rücklauf von 22 %. Dieser Beitrag gibt Auskunft über Status quo der unternehmensweiten Informationsorganisation und -suche in Österreich und benennt unternehmens- bzw. personengebundene Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Im einzelnen werden Ergebnisse zu folgenden Aspekten präsentiert: Regelung der Informationsorganisation; Anreicherung unstrukturierter Informationen mit Metadaten; Probleme bei der Suche nach unternehmensinternen Informationen; täglicher Zeitaufwand für die Suche; vorhandene, wünschenswerte und benötigte Suchfunktionalitäten; Zufriedenheit mit der Suche und der Informationsorganisation Unternehmen.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 19:00:02
-
Meier, F.: Informationsverhalten in Social Media (2015)
0.01
0.012470358 = product of:
0.024940716 = sum of:
0.024940716 = product of:
0.049881432 = sum of:
0.049881432 = weight(_text_:22 in 1739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049881432 = score(doc=1739,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1739, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1739)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.1, S.22-28
-
Vlaeminck, S.; Wagner, G.G.: Ergebnisse einer Befragung von wissenschaftlichen Infrastrukturdienstleistern im Bereich der Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften : Zur Rolle von Forschungsdatenzentren beim Management von publikationsbezogenen Forschungsdaten (2014)
0.01
0.010911563 = product of:
0.021823127 = sum of:
0.021823127 = product of:
0.043646254 = sum of:
0.043646254 = weight(_text_:22 in 2543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043646254 = score(doc=2543,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2543, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2543)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden die Ergebnisse einer Analyse zusammengefasst, in der untersucht wurde, ob, und wenn ja welche Services für das Management von publikationsbezogenen Forschungsdaten gegenwärtig bei wissenschaftlichen Infrastrukturdienstleistern in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften bestehen. Die Analyse wurde Mithilfe von Desktop-Research sowie einer Online-Befragung, an der sich 22 von 46 angeschriebenen Institutionen beteiligten, durchgeführt. Untersucht wurden vor allem deutsche und europäische Forschungsdatenzentren, Bibliotheken und Archive. Insbesondere wurde untersucht, ob diese Organisationen extern erzeugte Forschungsdaten, den dazugehörigen Berechnungscode (Syntax) und ggf. genutzte (selbstgeschriebene) Software grundsätzlich speichern und hosten. Weitere Themenfelder waren Metadatenstandards, Persistente Identifikatoren, Verfügbarkeit von Schnittstellen (APIs) und Unterstützung von semantischen Technologien.
-
Knoll, A.: Kompetenzprofil von Information Professionals in Unternehmen (2016)
0.01
0.009352768 = product of:
0.018705536 = sum of:
0.018705536 = product of:
0.03741107 = sum of:
0.03741107 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03741107 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 7.2016 16:22:54
-
Brown, C.: Communication in the sciences (2010)
0.00
0.0042019994 = product of:
0.008403999 = sum of:
0.008403999 = product of:
0.016807998 = sum of:
0.016807998 = weight(_text_:e in 4205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016807998 = score(doc=4205,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 4205, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4205)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Caidi, N.; Allard, D.; Quirke, L.: Information practices of information (2010)
0.00
0.0036767495 = product of:
0.007353499 = sum of:
0.007353499 = product of:
0.014706998 = sum of:
0.014706998 = weight(_text_:e in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014706998 = score(doc=4204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Bornmann, L.: Scientific peer review (2011)
0.00
0.0036767495 = product of:
0.007353499 = sum of:
0.007353499 = product of:
0.014706998 = sum of:
0.014706998 = weight(_text_:e in 1600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014706998 = score(doc=1600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 1600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Lemke, M.: Wie lernwirksam sind Online-Tutorials? : Lernerfolgskontrolle und Evaluation bibliothekarischer E-Learningangebote (2014)
0.00
0.002274399 = product of:
0.004548798 = sum of:
0.004548798 = product of:
0.009097596 = sum of:
0.009097596 = weight(_text_:e in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009097596 = score(doc=2464,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.13753214 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Immer mehr wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken, insbesondere Hochschulbibliotheken, erweitern ihre E-Learningangebote um sogenannte Online-Tutorials. Solche interaktiven, multi-medialen Lernprogramme bieten den Nutzern die Möglichkeit, sich zeit- und ortsunabhängig selbständig grundlegende Themen der Bibliotheks- und Informationskompetenz anzueignen. In der bibliothekarischen Fachliteratur finden sich aber keine Aussagen darüber, in welchem Umfang und wie lerneffektiv diese - meist mit hohem Aufwand erstellte - Angebote tatsächlich genutzt werden. Um die Lernwirksamkeit überprüfen zu können, bedarf es Online-Tutorials, die über einen automatisierten elektronischen Test verfügen, anhand dessen Nutzer eigenständig den Erwerb der Lerninhalte kontrollieren können. Die vorliegende Arbeit versteht sich als ein Beitrag zur Konzeption evaluierbarer Online-Tutorials. Skizziert wird eine strukturierte Vorgehensweise zur Umsetzung von Tutorials, die statistisch auswertbare Daten zur Lerneffektivität generieren. Im Fokus stehen hierbei didaktische Bedingungen automatisierter Lernerfolgskontrollen und deren Umsetzung anhand sogenannter geschlossener Aufgaben. Da sich mit diesem Aufgabentypus nur bestimmte kognitive Leistungsbereiche messen lassen, ist im Vorfeld zu prüfen, dass ein Tutorial nur Lerninhalte vermittelt, deren Erwerb anschließend auch mit geschlossenen Aufgaben überprüft werden kann. Unter Rückgriff auf eine spezifische E-Learning-Taxonomie wird offensichtlich, dass mindestens Reproduktions-, Verständnis- und Anwendungsleistungen umsetzbar sind. Wie entsprechende Aufgabenstellungen in bibliothekarischen Online-Tutorials aussehen können, wird an Beispielfragen zur Überprüfung von Fakten-, Konzept- und Prozedurenwissen demonstriert.
-
Barry, E.; Bedoya, J.K.; Groom, C.; Patterson, L.: Virtual reference in UK academic libraries : the virtual enquiry project 2008-2009 (2010)
0.00
0.0022284468 = product of:
0.0044568935 = sum of:
0.0044568935 = product of:
0.008913787 = sum of:
0.008913787 = weight(_text_:e in 2966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008913787 = score(doc=2966,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 2966, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2966)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Sheeja, N.K.: Science vs social science : a study of information-seeking behavior and user perceptions of academic researchers (2010)
0.00
0.0018570389 = product of:
0.0037140779 = sum of:
0.0037140779 = product of:
0.0074281557 = sum of:
0.0074281557 = weight(_text_:e in 4060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0074281557 = score(doc=4060,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 4060, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4060)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the information-seeking behavior of science and social science research scholars, including service effectiveness, satisfaction level on different type of sources and various methods adopted by the scholars for keeping up to date. Design/methodology/approach - Data were gathered using a questionnaire survey of 200, randomly selected, PhD students of science and social science departments of four universities in Kerala, India. Findings - Although similarities exist between social science and science PhD students with regard to information-seeking behavior, there are significant differences as well. There is a significant difference between science and social science scholars on the perception of the adequacy of print journals and database collection which are very relevant to the research purposes. There is no significant difference between science and social science scholars on the perception of the adequacy of e-journals, the most used source for keeping up to date. The study proved that scholars of both the fields are dissatisfied with the effectiveness of the library in keeping them up to date with latest developments. Originality/value - The study is based on actual situation and the result can be used for library service redesign for different types of users.
- Language
- e
-
Pluye, P.; Grad, R.; Repchinsky, C.; Jovaisas, B.; Johnson-Lafleur, J.; Carrier, M.-E.; Granikov, V.; Farrell, B.; Rodriguez, C.; Bartlett, G.; Loiselle, C.; Légaré, F.: Four levels of outcomes of information-seeking : a mixed methods study in primary health care (2013)
0.00
0.0018570389 = product of:
0.0037140779 = sum of:
0.0037140779 = product of:
0.0074281557 = sum of:
0.0074281557 = weight(_text_:e in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0074281557 = score(doc=534,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
