-
Knoll, A.: Kompetenzprofil von Information Professionals in Unternehmen (2016)
0.07
0.07443855 = product of:
0.11165782 = sum of:
0.09099667 = weight(_text_:index in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09099667 = score(doc=3069,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.40966535 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
0.020661155 = product of:
0.04132231 = sum of:
0.04132231 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04132231 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://yis.univie.ac.at/index.php/yis/article/view/1324/1234. Diesem Beitrag liegt folgende Abschlussarbeit zugrunde: Lamparter, Anna: Kompetenzprofil für Information Professionals in Unternehmen. Masterarbeit (M.A.), Hochschule Hannover, 2015. Volltext: https://serwiss.bib.hs-hannover.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/528 Vgl. auch: (geb. Lamparter): Kompetenzprofil von Information Professionals in Unternehmen. In:
- Date
- 28. 7.2016 16:22:54
-
Bertram, J.: Stand der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2013)
0.01
0.009739763 = product of:
0.029219288 = sum of:
0.029219288 = product of:
0.058438577 = sum of:
0.058438577 = weight(_text_:22 in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058438577 = score(doc=2658,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Dass eine erfolgreiche Suche nach im Unternehmen vorhandenen Informationen oftmals schwieriger zu bewerkstelligen ist als eine Suche im Internet, wird in der Privatwirtschaft zunehmend als Problem gesehen. Enterprise Search ist eine Strategie, diesem Problem zu begegnen. In einer Studie mit explorativem Charakter wurde der Frage nachgegangen, wie es um den Stand unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Unternehmen bestellt ist. m Rahmen einer Onlinebefragung wurden dazu im März / April 2009 469 Unternehmen befragt. Es beteiligten sich 104 Unternehmen. Das entspricht einem Rücklauf von 22 %. Dieser Beitrag gibt Auskunft über Status quo der unternehmensweiten Informationsorganisation und -suche in Österreich und benennt unternehmens- bzw. personengebundene Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Im einzelnen werden Ergebnisse zu folgenden Aspekten präsentiert: Regelung der Informationsorganisation; Anreicherung unstrukturierter Informationen mit Metadaten; Probleme bei der Suche nach unternehmensinternen Informationen; täglicher Zeitaufwand für die Suche; vorhandene, wünschenswerte und benötigte Suchfunktionalitäten; Zufriedenheit mit der Suche und der Informationsorganisation Unternehmen.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 19:00:02
-
Meier, F.: Informationsverhalten in Social Media (2015)
0.01
0.009182736 = product of:
0.027548207 = sum of:
0.027548207 = product of:
0.055096414 = sum of:
0.055096414 = weight(_text_:22 in 1739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055096414 = score(doc=1739,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1739, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1739)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.1, S.22-28
-
Makri, S.; Blandford, A.: Coming across information serendipitously : Part 2: A classification framework (2012)
0.01
0.0082217 = product of:
0.024665099 = sum of:
0.024665099 = product of:
0.049330197 = sum of:
0.049330197 = weight(_text_:classification in 396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049330197 = score(doc=396,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.3047229 = fieldWeight in 396, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=396)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - In "Coming across information serendipitously - Part 1: a process model" the authors identified common elements of researchers' experiences of "coming across information serendipitously". These experiences involve a mix of unexpectedness and insight and lead to a valuable, unanticipated outcome. In this article, the authors aim to show how the elements of unexpectedness, insight and value form a framework for subjectively classifying whether a particular experience might be considered serendipitous and, if so, just how serendipitous. Design/methodology/approach - The classification framework was constructed by analysing 46 experiences of coming across information serendipitously provided by 28 interdisciplinary researchers during critical incident interviews. "Serendipity stories" were written to summarise each experience and to facilitate their comparison. The common elements of unexpectedness, insight and value were identified in almost all the experiences. Findings - The presence of different mixes of unexpectedness, insight and value in the interviewees' experiences define a multi-dimensional conceptual space (which the authors call the "serendipity space"). In this space, different "strengths" of serendipity exist. The classification framework can be used to reason about whether an experience falls within the serendipity space and, if so, how "pure" or "dilute" it is. Originality/value - The framework provides researchers from various disciplines with a structured means of reasoning about and classifying potentially serendipitous experiences.
-
Vlaeminck, S.; Wagner, G.G.: Ergebnisse einer Befragung von wissenschaftlichen Infrastrukturdienstleistern im Bereich der Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften : Zur Rolle von Forschungsdatenzentren beim Management von publikationsbezogenen Forschungsdaten (2014)
0.01
0.008034894 = product of:
0.02410468 = sum of:
0.02410468 = product of:
0.04820936 = sum of:
0.04820936 = weight(_text_:22 in 2543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04820936 = score(doc=2543,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2543, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2543)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden die Ergebnisse einer Analyse zusammengefasst, in der untersucht wurde, ob, und wenn ja welche Services für das Management von publikationsbezogenen Forschungsdaten gegenwärtig bei wissenschaftlichen Infrastrukturdienstleistern in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften bestehen. Die Analyse wurde Mithilfe von Desktop-Research sowie einer Online-Befragung, an der sich 22 von 46 angeschriebenen Institutionen beteiligten, durchgeführt. Untersucht wurden vor allem deutsche und europäische Forschungsdatenzentren, Bibliotheken und Archive. Insbesondere wurde untersucht, ob diese Organisationen extern erzeugte Forschungsdaten, den dazugehörigen Berechnungscode (Syntax) und ggf. genutzte (selbstgeschriebene) Software grundsätzlich speichern und hosten. Weitere Themenfelder waren Metadatenstandards, Persistente Identifikatoren, Verfügbarkeit von Schnittstellen (APIs) und Unterstützung von semantischen Technologien.
-
Smith, C.L.; Matteson, M.L.: Information literacy in the age of machines that learn : desiderata for machines that teach (2018)
0.01
0.0068870517 = product of:
0.020661155 = sum of:
0.020661155 = product of:
0.04132231 = sum of:
0.04132231 = weight(_text_:22 in 4954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04132231 = score(doc=4954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4954)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 16. 3.2019 14:33:22
-
Plieninger, J.: Informationskompetenz online vermitteln : eTeaching für OPLs (2011)
0.01
0.006493175 = product of:
0.019479524 = sum of:
0.019479524 = product of:
0.03895905 = sum of:
0.03895905 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03895905 = score(doc=166,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 5.2012 14:20:22
- Source
- ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
-
Lercher, A.: Efficiency of scientific communication : a survey of world science (2010)
0.01
0.00573921 = product of:
0.01721763 = sum of:
0.01721763 = product of:
0.03443526 = sum of:
0.03443526 = weight(_text_:22 in 3997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03443526 = score(doc=3997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3997)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The aim of this study was to measure the efficiency of the system by which scientists worldwide communicate results to each other, providing one measure of the degree to which the system, including all media, functions well. A randomly selected and representative sample of 246 active research scientists worldwide was surveyed. The main measure was the reported rate of "late finds": scientific literature that would have been useful to scientists' projects if it had been found at the beginning of these projects. The main result was that 46% of the sample reported late finds (±6.25%, p0.05). Among respondents from European Union countries or other countries classified as "high income" by the World Bank, 42% reported late finds. Among respondents from low- and middle-income countries, 56% reported late finds. The 42% rate in high-income countries in 2009 can be compared with results of earlier surveys by Martyn (1964a, b, 1987). These earlier surveys found a rate of 22% late finds in 1963-1964 and a rate of 27% in 1985-1986. Respondents were also queried about search habits, but this study failed to support any explanations for this increase in the rate of late finds. This study also permits a crude estimate of the cost in time and money of the increase in late finds.
-
Cole, C.; Behesthi, J.; Large, A.; Lamoureux, I.; Abuhimed, D.; AlGhamdi, M.: Seeking information for a middle school history project : the concept of implicit knowledge in the students' transition from Kuhlthau's Stage 3 to Stage 4 (2013)
0.01
0.00573921 = product of:
0.01721763 = sum of:
0.01721763 = product of:
0.03443526 = sum of:
0.03443526 = weight(_text_:22 in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03443526 = score(doc=667,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:41:17
-
Bodoff, D.; Raban, D.: Question types and intermediary elicitations (2016)
0.01
0.00573921 = product of:
0.01721763 = sum of:
0.01721763 = product of:
0.03443526 = sum of:
0.03443526 = weight(_text_:22 in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03443526 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 11:58:25
-
Chew, S.W.; Khoo, K.S.G.: Comparison of drug information on consumer drug review sites versus authoritative health information websites (2016)
0.01
0.00573921 = product of:
0.01721763 = sum of:
0.01721763 = product of:
0.03443526 = sum of:
0.03443526 = weight(_text_:22 in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03443526 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 12:24:05
-
Pontis, S.; Blandford, A.; Greifeneder, E.; Attalla, H.; Neal, D.: Keeping up to date : an academic researcher's information journey (2017)
0.01
0.00573921 = product of:
0.01721763 = sum of:
0.01721763 = product of:
0.03443526 = sum of:
0.03443526 = weight(_text_:22 in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03443526 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.1, S.22-35
-
Jaskolla, L.; Rugel, M.: Smart questions : steps towards an ontology of questions and answers (2014)
0.01
0.00573921 = product of:
0.01721763 = sum of:
0.01721763 = product of:
0.03443526 = sum of:
0.03443526 = weight(_text_:22 in 3404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03443526 = score(doc=3404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 9. 2.2017 19:22:59
-
Li, Y.; Belkin, N.J.: ¬An exploration of the relationships between work task and interactive information search behavior (2010)
0.00
0.0047468003 = product of:
0.014240401 = sum of:
0.014240401 = product of:
0.028480802 = sum of:
0.028480802 = weight(_text_:classification in 3980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028480802 = score(doc=3980,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 3980, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3980)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This study explores the relationships between work task and interactive information search behavior. Work task was conceptualized based on a faceted classification of task. An experiment was conducted with six work-task types and simulated work-task situations assigned to 24 participants. The results indicate that users present different behavior patterns to approach useful information for different work tasks: They select information systems to search based on the work tasks at hand, different work tasks motivate different types of search tasks, and different facets controlled in the study play different roles in shaping users' interactive information search behavior. The results provide empirical evidence to support the view that work tasks and search tasks play different roles in a user's interaction with information systems and that work task should be considered as a multifaceted variable. The findings provide a possibility to make predictions of a user's information search behavior from his or her work task, and vice versa. Thus, this study sheds light on task-based information seeking and search, and has implications in adaptive information retrieval (IR) and personalization of IR.
-
Ruthven, I.: ¬The language of information need : differentiating conscious and formalized information needs (2019)
0.00
0.0047468003 = product of:
0.014240401 = sum of:
0.014240401 = product of:
0.028480802 = sum of:
0.028480802 = weight(_text_:classification in 5035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028480802 = score(doc=5035,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 5035, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5035)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Information need is a fundamental concept within Information Science. Robert Taylor's seminal contribution in 1968 was to propose a division of information needs into four levels: the visceral, conscious, formalized and compromised levels of information need. Taylor's contribution has provided much inspiration to Information Science research but this has largely remained at the discursive and conceptual level. In this paper, we present a novel empirical investigation of Taylor's information need classification. We analyse the linguistic differences between conscious and formalized needs using several hundred postings to four major Internet discussion groups. We show that descriptions of conscious needs are more emotional in tone, involve more sensory perception and contain different temporal dimensions than descriptions of formalized needs. We show that it is possible to differentiate levels of information need based on linguistic patterns and that the language used to express information needs can reflect an individual's understanding of their information problem. This has implications for the theory of information needs and practical implications for supporting moderators of online news groups in responding to information needs and for developing automated support for classifying information needs.
-
Pinto, M.: Assessing disciplinary differences in faculty perceptions of information literacy competencies (2016)
0.00
0.004591368 = product of:
0.0137741035 = sum of:
0.0137741035 = product of:
0.027548207 = sum of:
0.027548207 = weight(_text_:22 in 2963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027548207 = score(doc=2963,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2963, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2963)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
