Search (48 results, page 3 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsdienstleistungen"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Lercher, A.: Efficiency of scientific communication : a survey of world science (2010) 0.00
    0.0031356532 = product of:
      0.015678266 = sum of:
        0.015678266 = product of:
          0.031356532 = sum of:
            0.031356532 = weight(_text_:22 in 3997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031356532 = score(doc=3997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3997)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this study was to measure the efficiency of the system by which scientists worldwide communicate results to each other, providing one measure of the degree to which the system, including all media, functions well. A randomly selected and representative sample of 246 active research scientists worldwide was surveyed. The main measure was the reported rate of "late finds": scientific literature that would have been useful to scientists' projects if it had been found at the beginning of these projects. The main result was that 46% of the sample reported late finds (±6.25%, p0.05). Among respondents from European Union countries or other countries classified as "high income" by the World Bank, 42% reported late finds. Among respondents from low- and middle-income countries, 56% reported late finds. The 42% rate in high-income countries in 2009 can be compared with results of earlier surveys by Martyn (1964a, b, 1987). These earlier surveys found a rate of 22% late finds in 1963-1964 and a rate of 27% in 1985-1986. Respondents were also queried about search habits, but this study failed to support any explanations for this increase in the rate of late finds. This study also permits a crude estimate of the cost in time and money of the increase in late finds.
  2. Cole, C.; Behesthi, J.; Large, A.; Lamoureux, I.; Abuhimed, D.; AlGhamdi, M.: Seeking information for a middle school history project : the concept of implicit knowledge in the students' transition from Kuhlthau's Stage 3 to Stage 4 (2013) 0.00
    0.0031356532 = product of:
      0.015678266 = sum of:
        0.015678266 = product of:
          0.031356532 = sum of:
            0.031356532 = weight(_text_:22 in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031356532 = score(doc=667,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:41:17
  3. Bodoff, D.; Raban, D.: Question types and intermediary elicitations (2016) 0.00
    0.0031356532 = product of:
      0.015678266 = sum of:
        0.015678266 = product of:
          0.031356532 = sum of:
            0.031356532 = weight(_text_:22 in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031356532 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 11:58:25
  4. Pontis, S.; Blandford, A.; Greifeneder, E.; Attalla, H.; Neal, D.: Keeping up to date : an academic researcher's information journey (2017) 0.00
    0.0031356532 = product of:
      0.015678266 = sum of:
        0.015678266 = product of:
          0.031356532 = sum of:
            0.031356532 = weight(_text_:22 in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031356532 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.1, S.22-35
  5. Jaskolla, L.; Rugel, M.: Smart questions : steps towards an ontology of questions and answers (2014) 0.00
    0.0031356532 = product of:
      0.015678266 = sum of:
        0.015678266 = product of:
          0.031356532 = sum of:
            0.031356532 = weight(_text_:22 in 3404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031356532 = score(doc=3404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9. 2.2017 19:22:59
  6. Hughes, B.; Wareham, J.; Joshi, I.: Doctors' online information needs, cognitive search strategies, and judgments of information quality and cognitive authority : how predictive judgments introduce bias into cognitive search models (2010) 0.00
    0.0027233788 = product of:
      0.013616893 = sum of:
        0.013616893 = product of:
          0.027233787 = sum of:
            0.027233787 = weight(_text_:web in 3417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027233787 = score(doc=3417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 3417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Literature examining information judgments and Internet search behaviors notes a number of major research gaps, including how users actually make these judgments outside of experiments or researcher-defined tasks, and how search behavior is impacted by a user's judgment of online information. Using the medical setting, where doctors face real consequences in applying the information found, we examine how information judgments employed by doctors to mitigate risk impact their cognitive search. Diaries encompassing 444 real clinical information search incidents, combined with semistructured interviews across 35 doctors, were analyzed via thematic analysis. Results show that doctors, though aware of the need for information quality and cognitive authority, rarely make evaluative judgments. This is explained by navigational bias in information searches and via predictive judgments that favor known sites where doctors perceive levels of information quality and cognitive authority. Doctors' mental models of the Internet sites and Web experience relevant to the task type enable these predictive judgments. These results suggest a model connecting online cognitive search and information judgment literatures. Moreover, this implies a need to understand cognitive search through longitudinal- or learning-based views for repeated search tasks, and adaptations to medical practitioner training and tools for online search.
  7. Makri, S.; Warwick, C.: Information for inspiration : understanding architects' information seeking and use behaviors to inform design (2010) 0.00
    0.0027233788 = product of:
      0.013616893 = sum of:
        0.013616893 = product of:
          0.027233787 = sum of:
            0.027233787 = weight(_text_:web in 3979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027233787 = score(doc=3979,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 3979, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3979)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Architectural design projects are heavily reliant on electronic information seeking. However, there have been few studies on how architects look for and use information on the Web. We examined the electronic information behavior of 9 postgraduate architectural design and urban design students. We observed them undertake a self-chosen, naturalistic information task related to one of their design projects and found that although the architectural students performed many similar interactive information behaviors to academics and practitioners in other disciplines, they also performed behaviors reflective of the nature of their domain. The included exploring and encountering information (in addition to searching and browsing for it) and visualizing/appropriating information. The observations also highlighted the importance of information use behaviors (such as editing and recording) and communication behaviors (such as sharing and distributing) as well as the importance of multimedia materials, particularly images, for architectural design projects. A key overarching theme was that inspiration was found to be both an important driver for and potential outcome of information work in the architecture domain, suggesting the need to design electronic information tools for architects that encourage and foster creativity. We make suggestions for the design of such tools based on our findings.
  8. Pinto, M.: Assessing disciplinary differences in faculty perceptions of information literacy competencies (2016) 0.00
    0.0025085227 = product of:
      0.012542613 = sum of:
        0.012542613 = product of:
          0.025085226 = sum of:
            0.025085226 = weight(_text_:22 in 2963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025085226 = score(doc=2963,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2963, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2963)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Languages

  • e 35
  • d 12

Types

  • a 40
  • m 7
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…