Search (394 results, page 1 of 20)

0.1391748 = product of:
  0.2783496 = sum of:
    0.0467477 = weight(_text_:world in 4080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0467477 = score(doc=4080,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.30028677 = fieldWeight in 4080, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4080)
    0.062118948 = weight(_text_:wide in 4080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062118948 = score(doc=4080,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.34615302 = fieldWeight in 4080, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4080)
    0.063048095 = weight(_text_:web in 4080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.063048095 = score(doc=4080,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.47698978 = fieldWeight in 4080, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4080)
    0.10643487 = product of:
      0.21286973 = sum of:
        0.21286973 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21286973 = score(doc=4080,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.23490155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04050213 = queryNorm
            0.9062083 = fieldWeight in 4080, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4080)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(4/8)

Abstract

Das Web 2.0 hat einen Paradigmenwechsel im Umgang mit Informationen und damit eng verbunden im Wissenserwerb eingeleitet. Theoretisch gesehen hat jeder offenen Zugang zu vielfältigen Informationen und kann gleichzeitig selbst Inhalte beisteuern - z.B. in Sozialen Netzwerken, in Weblogs oder Wikis - und Websites oder andere Dokumente (Videos, Slideshows o.ä.) veröffentlichen und mit anderen Nutzern teilen. Dieser Demokratisierungsprozess von Wissensproduktion, -kommunikation und -erwerb ist allerdings nicht frei von Kontroversen. Das verstärkte Nebeneinander von sachlich richtiger und relevanter Information einerseits und Belanglosigkeiten andererseits ruft auch Gegner auf den Plan. Sie sprechen von einem Information Overkill und befürchten den Niedergang der klassischen Bildung. Führen freie Wissenszugänge im Netz tatsächlich zu weniger Bildung? Was macht eine Website zu einer zuverlässigen und vertrauenswürdigen Quelle? Wie können aus der Fülle von Webressourcen die qualitativ hochwertigen herausgefiltert werden? Welchen Beitrag kann dabei Social Software leisten? Welches sind die Konstituenten einer Informationskompetenz 2.0, über die User verfügen sollten, um mit vorgefundenen Ressourcen adäquat umgehen zu können? Und inwiefern sind Bibliotheken - die sich ja zunehmend als Teaching Libraries verstehen - hier gefordert? Auf diese Fragen versucht das vorliegende Buch Antworten zu geben. Der Fokus liegt auf dem Umgang mit Wissensressourcen im Web 2.0, wobei ebenso theoretische wie praktische Implikationen berücksichtigt und ausgewählte Evaluierungsansätze hinsichtlich ihrer praktischen Anwendbarkeit für die User diskutiert werden.

Object

Web 2.0

RSWK

World Wide Web 2.0 / Information Retrieval / Informationskompetenz

Series

Web 2.0

Subject

World Wide Web 2.0 / Information Retrieval / Informationskompetenz

0.13743478 = product of:
  0.27486956 = sum of:
    0.07933348 = weight(_text_:world in 4596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07933348 = score(doc=4596,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.50960356 = fieldWeight in 4596, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4596)
    0.10541934 = weight(_text_:wide in 4596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10541934 = score(doc=4596,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.5874411 = fieldWeight in 4596, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4596)
    0.05719185 = weight(_text_:web in 4596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05719185 = score(doc=4596,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 4596, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4596)
    0.032924876 = product of:
      0.06584975 = sum of:
        0.06584975 = weight(_text_:22 in 4596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06584975 = score(doc=4596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14183156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04050213 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4596)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(4/8)

Date

21. 9.1996 16:03:22

0.12097234 = product of:
  0.3225929 = sum of:
    0.10577798 = weight(_text_:world in 3049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10577798 = score(doc=3049,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.67947143 = fieldWeight in 3049, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3049)
    0.14055912 = weight(_text_:wide in 3049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14055912 = score(doc=3049,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.7832548 = fieldWeight in 3049, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3049)
    0.0762558 = weight(_text_:web in 3049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0762558 = score(doc=3049,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 3049, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3049)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

0.1058508 = product of:
  0.2822688 = sum of:
    0.09255573 = weight(_text_:world in 2578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09255573 = score(doc=2578,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.5945375 = fieldWeight in 2578, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2578)
    0.12298923 = weight(_text_:wide in 2578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12298923 = score(doc=2578,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.685348 = fieldWeight in 2578, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2578)
    0.06672383 = weight(_text_:web in 2578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06672383 = score(doc=2578,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 2578, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2578)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

0.09951973 = product of:
  0.19903946 = sum of:
    0.05288899 = weight(_text_:world in 4367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05288899 = score(doc=4367,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.33973572 = fieldWeight in 4367, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4367)
    0.07027956 = weight(_text_:wide in 4367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07027956 = score(doc=4367,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 4367, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4367)
    0.053920995 = weight(_text_:web in 4367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053920995 = score(doc=4367,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 4367, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4367)
    0.021949919 = product of:
      0.043899838 = sum of:
        0.043899838 = weight(_text_:22 in 4367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043899838 = score(doc=4367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14183156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04050213 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4367)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(4/8)

Abstract

Reports results of an e-mail questionnaire survey of 161 UK local authorities to determine their use of the WWW for the dissemination of information. Identifies the resons for its adoption, the benefits and disadvantages and the types of information being disseminated by this means. All the Web sites were observed and assessed for relevance and quality and 4 local authorities were used as case studies

Date

10. 1.1999 17:22:49

0.09072925 = product of:
  0.24194467 = sum of:
    0.07933348 = weight(_text_:world in 4682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07933348 = score(doc=4682,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.50960356 = fieldWeight in 4682, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4682)
    0.10541934 = weight(_text_:wide in 4682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10541934 = score(doc=4682,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.5874411 = fieldWeight in 4682, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4682)
    0.05719185 = weight(_text_:web in 4682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05719185 = score(doc=4682,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 4682, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4682)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

0.065041065 = product of:
  0.13008213 = sum of:
    0.03305562 = weight(_text_:world in 3972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03305562 = score(doc=3972,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 3972, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3972)
    0.043924723 = weight(_text_:wide in 3972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043924723 = score(doc=3972,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 3972, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3972)
    0.033700623 = weight(_text_:web in 3972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033700623 = score(doc=3972,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 3972, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3972)
    0.01940117 = product of:
      0.03880234 = sum of:
        0.03880234 = weight(_text_:22 in 3972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03880234 = score(doc=3972,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14183156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04050213 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 3972, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3972)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(4/8)

Footnote

Vgl. zur Titelformulierung: "Das Göttinger PDF (vermutlich 1998) schrieb ebenfalls Arbeit. [http://web.archive.org/web/20000615025325/http://webdoc.gwdg.de:80/edoc/aw/bfp/1998_1/106-110.pdf]. Eine alte Zusammenstellung [http://www2.bui.haw-hamburg.de/pers/ulrike.spree/BFLit.html] machte das, was geboten gewesen wäre: "Spribille, Ingeborg: Die Wahrscheinlichkeit, in einer Bibliothek eine nuetzliche bzw. zufriedenstellende Arbeit [! Antwort] zu bekommen, ist "fifty-fifty" : Ergebnisse einer Evaluation des Auskunftsdienstes. Auch als Computerdatei. - Zugang: Internet und World Wide Web. - Systemvoraussetzungen: Acrobat reader. - Adresse: http://webdoc.gwdg.de/edoc/aw/bfp/1998_1/106-110.pdf. // In: Bibliothek. - Muenchen. - 22 (1998),1, S. 106 - 110". Aber die meisten AutorInnen zitieren stillschweigend Antwort. Eventuell ist der Titel im Jahresinhaltsverzeichnis der Zeitschrift oder anderweitig berichtigt worden." [Quelle: Klaus Graf in einer Mail an Inetbib vom 18.11.2017]

Source

Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.1, S.106-110

0.062083878 = product of:
  0.16555701 = sum of:
    0.046277866 = weight(_text_:world in 1518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046277866 = score(doc=1518,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 1518, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1518)
    0.061494615 = weight(_text_:wide in 1518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061494615 = score(doc=1518,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 1518, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1518)
    0.05778453 = weight(_text_:web in 1518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05778453 = score(doc=1518,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 1518, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1518)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

Abstract

Librarians at Arizona University Library and the Prima Community College Library are using the WWW as a vehicle for promoting a heightened sense of community through their exhibit: Through Our Parent Eyes: Tuscon's Diverse Community. Its purpose is to acknowledge the community's multicultural heritage through digital histories that combine historical images and text with stories of Tuscon told by some of Tuscon's founding members. Describes the experience of the 2 libraries in building the Web site exhibits featuring Tuscon's traditionally underrepresented groups and points to ways in which the Web site may be developed by highlighting key elements, developmental considerations, goal setting, costs, benefits, and rights and permissions

0.062083878 = product of:
  0.16555701 = sum of:
    0.046277866 = weight(_text_:world in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046277866 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
    0.061494615 = weight(_text_:wide in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061494615 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
    0.05778453 = weight(_text_:web in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05778453 = score(doc=694,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

Abstract

Two studies are presented that investigate information seeking behaviour on the Internet. In study one, soccer fans' information seeking on the World Wide Web is investigated. In study two, access rates to a cancer information Web site are analysed. It is tentatively argued that there is a tendency for people to access information more commonly avoided in "real life", although in the case of football fans, the tendency to "bask in reflected glory" remains when online, while cutting off reflected failure is minimised. Implications for understanding and researching psychological processes of Web browsing behaviour are discussed.

0.06048617 = product of:
  0.16129646 = sum of:
    0.05288899 = weight(_text_:world in 5052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05288899 = score(doc=5052,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.33973572 = fieldWeight in 5052, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5052)
    0.07027956 = weight(_text_:wide in 5052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07027956 = score(doc=5052,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 5052, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5052)
    0.0381279 = weight(_text_:web in 5052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0381279 = score(doc=5052,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 5052, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5052)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

0.06048617 = product of:
  0.16129646 = sum of:
    0.05288899 = weight(_text_:world in 200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05288899 = score(doc=200,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.33973572 = fieldWeight in 200, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=200)
    0.07027956 = weight(_text_:wide in 200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07027956 = score(doc=200,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 200, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=200)
    0.0381279 = weight(_text_:web in 200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0381279 = score(doc=200,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 200, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=200)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

0.06048617 = product of:
  0.16129646 = sum of:
    0.05288899 = weight(_text_:world in 1755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05288899 = score(doc=1755,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.33973572 = fieldWeight in 1755, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1755)
    0.07027956 = weight(_text_:wide in 1755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07027956 = score(doc=1755,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 1755, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1755)
    0.0381279 = weight(_text_:web in 1755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0381279 = score(doc=1755,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 1755, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1755)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

0.05810751 = product of:
  0.15495336 = sum of:
    0.046277866 = weight(_text_:world in 550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046277866 = score(doc=550,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 550, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=550)
    0.061494615 = weight(_text_:wide in 550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061494615 = score(doc=550,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 550, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=550)
    0.047180872 = weight(_text_:web in 550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047180872 = score(doc=550,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 550, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=550)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

Abstract

Although at first sight the WWW appears to have the potential for making printed reference sources obsolete, a systematic study of 104 reference questions, at the West Virginia Library Commission, demonstrated that, although the WWW is a powerful source of information, at the present time it is not a source that will answer a majority of reference questions. The WWW is strong in some categories of referenc equestions and weak in others. Time spent searching the WWW is another factor that must be taken into consideration by reference librarians. Concludes that it is not a wise decision to discard a reference book that will answer a question in 5 minutes when it will take 20 minutes to find the answer on the Web

0.05810751 = product of:
  0.15495336 = sum of:
    0.046277866 = weight(_text_:world in 4757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046277866 = score(doc=4757,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 4757, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4757)
    0.061494615 = weight(_text_:wide in 4757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061494615 = score(doc=4757,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 4757, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4757)
    0.047180872 = weight(_text_:web in 4757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047180872 = score(doc=4757,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 4757, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4757)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

Abstract

It has become increasingly common for libraries to provide a reference service which operates via e-mail or through online forms. This paper compares the performance of three digital reference services available on the World Wide Web, namely, AllExperts, Ask a Librarian, and Internet Public Library (a fourth service, Ask Bob, was included initially but eventually excluded). The online digital reference/"expert" services are generally very effective; most provide an answer within three days, and include suggestions for sources of further information. Although the general response rate from all the services was good, library-based services were found to be more trustworthy since they provided the answers together with the sources.

0.057809066 = product of:
  0.23123626 = sum of:
    0.18405539 = weight(_text_:recherche in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18405539 = score(doc=348,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.21953142 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.83840114 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
    0.047180872 = weight(_text_:web in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047180872 = score(doc=348,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Eine Recherche im Web kann für die journalistische Recherche zielführend sein. Es müssen jedoch einige Dinge beachtet werden. So eignet sich etwa die Wikipedia mehr als Rechercheeinstieg denn als Allheilmittel. Auch sollten über die Universalsuchmaschinen hinaus die erweiterte Suche und Spezialsuchmaschinen genutzt werden. Es empfiehlt sich das Anlegen eines Rechercheprotokolls zur Unterstützung einer systematischen Recherche. Auch das Verifizieren von Quellen ist notwendig. Dieser Text bietet nach einigen - negativen wie positiven - Beispielen zu den genannten Punkten Empfehlungen für den journalistischen Umgang mit Suchmaschinen, anderen Suchwerkzeugen sowie Hinweise für strukturierte Internet-Recherchen.

Source

Handbuch Internet-Suchmaschinen, 2: Neue Entwicklungen in der Web-Suche. Hrsg.: D. Lewandowski

0.05398815 = product of:
  0.1439684 = sum of:
    0.03966674 = weight(_text_:world in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03966674 = score(doc=702,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
    0.040440746 = weight(_text_:web in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040440746 = score(doc=702,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
    0.06386092 = product of:
      0.12772185 = sum of:
        0.12772185 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12772185 = score(doc=702,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23490155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04050213 = queryNorm
            0.543725 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

Abstract

In 2006 the University of Manitoba's (UM) Libraries and Learning Technologies Centre collaborated to create an online tutorial to support the development of international students' information literacy skills. The International Student project addressed the unique needs of foreign students by using a broad spectrum definition of information literacy, which includes supporting development of social and cultural skills as well as information-seeking ones. In addition to informational content, the developers incorporated Web 2.0 functionality to enable students to interact outside of the classroom. The final product was placed in the university's new Virtual Learning Commons, a webspace designed to be a central location for online learning and discussion.

Content

Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 133 - Academic and Research Libraries with Information Literacy

Object

Web 2.0

0.0529254 = product of:
  0.1411344 = sum of:
    0.046277866 = weight(_text_:world in 7560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046277866 = score(doc=7560,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 7560, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7560)
    0.061494615 = weight(_text_:wide in 7560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061494615 = score(doc=7560,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 7560, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7560)
    0.033361915 = weight(_text_:web in 7560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033361915 = score(doc=7560,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 7560, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7560)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

Abstract

Online database searching was done solely by librarians 25 years ago. That changed with the advances in telecommunications, the development of faster and more powerful computers, and the improvements in user-friendly software. First CD-ROMs, then dial-in networks, and now the World Wide Web have made online database searching by the library users themselves the norm in academic libraries. Along with all these technological changes, library instruction itself has become more complex. Not only do library users need to know how to search, but they also need to learn critical thinking skills for database and keyword selection.

0.052924506 = product of:
  0.10584901 = sum of:
    0.039440442 = weight(_text_:recherche in 5730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039440442 = score(doc=5730,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21953142 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.17965738 = fieldWeight in 5730, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4202437 = idf(docFreq=531, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5730)
    0.01983337 = weight(_text_:world in 5730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01983337 = score(doc=5730,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.12740089 = fieldWeight in 5730, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5730)
    0.026354834 = weight(_text_:wide in 5730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026354834 = score(doc=5730,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.14686027 = fieldWeight in 5730, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5730)
    0.020220373 = weight(_text_:web in 5730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020220373 = score(doc=5730,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.15297705 = fieldWeight in 5730, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5730)
  0.5 = coord(4/8)

Abstract

Wer Verona Feldbuschs Kultspruch "Hier werden Sie geholfen" in die Internet Suchmaschine www.google.de eingibt, bekommt innerhalb von 1,69 Sekunden 1.800 Web-Seiten angezeigt, auf denen dieser populäre Satz steht - zu viel um den Überblick nicht zu verlieren. Das Dilemma von Suchmaschinen wird dabei offensichtlich: Ausgerechnet der Name des Werbesponsors, für den Verona ihr Sprüchlein aufsagen darf, ist unter den Verweisen nicht zu entdecken: Telegate AG. Dabei bietet der Münchner Telekom-Konkurrent mit dem Handelsgiganten Metro Holding und Ex-Postminister Christian Schwarz-Schilling als Kapitalgeber mehr als nur Auskunft über Telefonnummern: Anrufer können unter der Nummer 11880 zum Beispiel auch Adressen, Postleitzahlen, Börsenkurse, Konzerttermine oder Wetterprognosen erfragen. Dauert die Antwort länger als zwei Minuten - bis dahin sind 2,904 Mark fällig - verspricht Telegate kostenlose Offline-Recherche mit, Rückruf. Als Beispiel nennt die Telegate-Werbung die Suche nach der Adresse eines alten Schulfreunds, den man aus den Augen verloren hat. Quelle für solche Auskünfte ist das Internet. Neben Telegate entdecken jetzt auch andere Anbieter das Geschäft mit Ratsuchenden für alle Lebenslagen. Seit Januar 2001 sind zum Beispiel die Erfurter Talking.net AG und die Clarity AG (Bad Homburg) neu im Markt. - Internet für alle - Die Geschäftskonzepte dieser Unternehmen gründen auf zwei Überlegungen: Sie wollen den gewaltigen Informationspool Internet auch Leuten erschließen, denen aus der Zugang zum Internet bislang verwehrt ist. Etwa weil sie keinen Anschluss haben oder weil sie gerade unterwegs sind. Zum anderen wird das Internet durch die explosionsartig wachsende Informationsfülle zum Datendschungel, in dem sich normale Benutzer immer schwieriger zurechtfinden. Hier bieten Auskunftsdienste ihre Hilfe an.
Das allerdings zu höchst unterschiedlichen Preisen. So kassiert Talking.net 1,94 Mark pro Minute Auskunftszeit über das Festnetz, während Clarity für Handy-Dienste 3,63 Mark verlangt. Angesichts von gegenwärtig vier Milliarden Internet-Seiten mit einem Zuwachs von sieben Millionen Seiten pro Tag, so die Schätzung des Internet-Forschungsinstituts Cyveillance, sind Orientierungsprobleme im Netz vorprogrammiert. Suchmaschinen werfen auf Schlagworteingabe oft eine Unzahl von Verweisen aus - und lassen den Suchenden ratlos. - Exotische Fragen - Das stellten auch die Marktforscher Fittkau & Maaß bei einer Online-Umfrage fest: 57 Prozent der Internetsurfer finden es schwierig, Informationen aufzuspüren, 36 Prozent haben Probleme, vorhandene Seiten im World Wide Web zu finden und über ein Fünftel konnte nicht einmal bereits besuchte Websites wiederfinden. Dabei hat die Info-Sintflut erst begonnen. Die School of Information und Management Systems der University of California in Berkeley hat herausgefunden, dass allein 1999 1,5 Exabyte (1,5 Millionen Terabyte) neuer Daten erzeugt wurden - das sind 1.500.000.000.000.000 Bücher im Umfang von rund 300 Seiten. Derzeit taxieren die Autoren Hal Varian und Peter Lyman das Volumen aller weltweit verfügbaren Informationen auf zwölf Exabyte (= zwölf Millionen Terabyte), bis 2003 werden noch mehr Informationen erzeugt werden. Das bedeutet: In etwas mehr als zwei Jahren entstehen mehr Informationen als in den letzten 300 000 Jahren zusammen. Angesichts solcher Zahlen dürften Auskunftsdiensten goldene Zeiten bevorstehen. Vor allem wenn komplizierte Fragen zum Geschäftskonzept gehören, wie es bei der Talking.net AG der Fall ist. Der Service ist erreichbar unter der Nummer 11821 und nennt sich ausdrücklich "Alles-Auskunft".

0.045405727 = product of:
  0.18162291 = sum of:
    0.023829939 = weight(_text_:web in 1279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023829939 = score(doc=1279,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 1279, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1279)
    0.15779297 = sum of:
      0.13035557 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13035557 = score(doc=1279,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.23490155 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04050213 = queryNorm
          0.554937 = fieldWeight in 1279, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1279)
      0.027437398 = weight(_text_:22 in 1279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027437398 = score(doc=1279,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14183156 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04050213 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1279, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1279)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Die Literatur- und Informationsbeschaffung der aktuellen Studierendengeneration erfolgt heute auf anderen Wegen als noch vor 10 Jahren. Ob im privaten Umfeld MyTube für Videoangebote im Internet, Google Earth für geographische Orientierungen, oder Wikipedia anstelle des Brockhaus, der Informationseinstieg läuft nicht mehr in Form der Konsultation eines Lehrbuchs oder Nachschlagewerkes aus der Bibliothek: "Benutzer warten heute nicht mehr darauf, die Grundsätze des Umgangs mit Informationen in der Bibliothek neu erklärt zu bekommen; hier sind neue, weniger "verschulte" Kommunikationswege gefragt." Unaufhaltsam ergreift der Web 2.0-Hype auch vom Studienalltag Besitz und führt zum Umbau etablierter Informations- und Kommunikationswege. Die neue Internetgemeinde setzt anstelle von medialer Berieselung auf aktives Mitmachen. Zum "Social Networking" gehört, dass "Siegfried Sorglos" seine Urlaubsfotos, seine Handy-Nummer, seine Hobbies für Freunde ins Netz stellt. Der Datenschutz zur Wahrung der Privatsphäre hat ausgedient. Informationen, auch über Persönliches, sind Public Domain. Man gruschelt Freunde und kommuniziert über SMS, ICQ oder Skype Termine und Verabredungen.
700000 Studierende aus knapp 2000 Hochschulen in Deutschland zählte die 2005 gegründete Internetplattform StudiVZ im Oktober 2006, eine Nachnutzung des amerikanischen Facebook. StudiVZ lebt von der Vernetzung, man verlinkt auf der eigenen Homepage alle Freunde mit ebenfalls eigenem Auftritt in StudiVZ. Wer eine Reise ins Ausland plant, ermittelt in der Gemeinde die zu besuchenden In-Kneipen, sucht Mitfahrgelegenheiten, tauscht sich über den Impact-Faktor eigener Hochschulprofessoren aus. Zu unterschiedlichsten Themen gibt es derzeit 50.000 Foren. Die "Bibliothekare 2.0" waren bereits aktiv, zur Themengruppe "Bibliothek" gibt es im StudiVZ allein 15 Chatgruppen mit animierenden Titeln wie "Zweitwohnsitz Uni-Bibliothek", 52 Mitglieder, "Bibliotheksconnection Jena", 7 Mitglieder sowie die bibliothekarische Unterwelt: "Manager der leisesten Clubs der Welt: die Bibliothekare, 214 Mitglieder."

Source

Bibliotheksdienst. 41(2007) H.1, S.22-33

0.045042396 = product of:
  0.12011306 = sum of:
    0.037398163 = weight(_text_:world in 5960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037398163 = score(doc=5960,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15567686 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.24022943 = fieldWeight in 5960, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5960)
    0.049695157 = weight(_text_:wide in 5960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049695157 = score(doc=5960,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17945516 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.2769224 = fieldWeight in 5960, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5960)
    0.033019733 = weight(_text_:web in 5960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033019733 = score(doc=5960,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13217913 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04050213 = queryNorm
        0.24981049 = fieldWeight in 5960, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5960)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

Abstract

Die Frage der Zuverlässigkeit und Vertrauenswürdigkeit von Webressourcen ist nicht gerade ein neues Thema - seit das World Wide Web breite Anwendung findet, ist eine Fülle an Literatur zur Bewertung von Internetquellen erschienen, die zumeist mehr oderweniger umfassende Checklisten beinhalten (vgl. z.B. Skov 1998: 40; eine sehr gute Zusammenstellung bietet Tyburski 2006). In diesem Aufsatz wird der Schwerpunkt auf Aspekte der Identität, Aktualität und inhaltlichen Qualität gelegt- dies sind die wesentlichsten Einflussfaktoren für die Bewertung der Vertrauenswürdigkeit und Seriosität von Webressourcen. Andere Kriterien wie z.B. Webdesign werden nur behandelt, sofern sie Rückschlüsse auf die oben genannten Aspekte geben können. Nach wie vor ist es so, dass gedruckte Quellen im wissenschaftlichen bzw. bildungsbezogenen Kontext als tendenziell seriöser und zuverlässiger angesehen werden als freie Webressourcen - diesen haftet der Geruch des Oberflächlichen, Beliebigen und Schnelllebigen an. Die traditionelle Bevorzugung der gedruckten bzw. lizenzierten elektronischen Ressourcen im akademischen Umfeld mag nun zwar dem traditionellen Selbstverständnis der Bibliothekarinnen durchaus gelegen kommen - allerdings besteht die Gefahr, dass Bibliotheken und ihre Informationsexpertinnen an Glaubwürdigkeit verlieren, wenn sie das World Wide Web als Ressource für hochqualitative Informationen ignorieren, ist es doch für viele Informationsbedarfe unbestritten die bessere Quelle. Grundvoraussetzung ist allerdings, durch effektive Evaluierungstechniken die Spreu vom Weizen zu trennen (vgl. Notess 2006: 45). Bibliothekarinnen haben die Expertise, mit unterschiedlichsten (gedruckten) Quellen umzugehen, für die Benutzung aufzubereiten und zugänglich zu machen. Die damit verbundene Auswahl nach Qualitätskriterien und die richtige und einheitliche Beschreibung mit Metadaten sind Kernkompetenzen des Bibliothekswesens. Wenn nun die Informationsumim Web befinden, so liegt es auf der Hand, dass ein zeitgemäßes Bibliothekswesen mit dieser Entwicklung Schritt halten muss: die Ansprüche an das Berufsbild sind deshalb starken Veränderungen unterworfen. Die organisch gewachsene, tendenziell unstrukturierte und chaotische Struktur des Webs erhöht dabei die Anforderung an eine inhaltliche Evaluation von Webressourcen. Gleichzeitig zeigt sich im bibliothekarischen Alltag, dass Leserinnen bei ihrer Webrecherche vielfach Probleme haben, diese Bewertungsleistung zu erbringen. Es gibt also einen großen Bedarf nach Vermittlung von Informations- und Internetkompetenz in Bibliotheken (vgl. Fritch und Cromwell 2002: 242f.). Schließlich weisen auch die "klassischen" bibliothekarischen Tätigkeitsbereiche immer mehr Verbindungen mit Webanwendungen auf. Hier sind beispielsweise die Katalogisierung von elektronischen Fachinformationen oder Links auf elektronische Äquivalente zu gedruckten Quellen in Katalogen zu nennen. Auch da ergeben sich fallweise Notwendigkeiten, die Aktualität und Identität von Webressourcen zu bewerten, vor allem als Grundlage für die Entscheidung, sie in den Katalog oder in eine Linksammlung überhaupt aufzunehmen.