Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.01
    0.006170121 = product of:
      0.039077435 = sum of:
        0.0151716275 = weight(_text_:web in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0151716275 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
        0.0151716275 = weight(_text_:web in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0151716275 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
        0.008734181 = product of:
          0.017468361 = sum of:
            0.017468361 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017468361 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Abstract
    The conflict between librarians' ethics and their responsibilities in the process of progressive collection management, which applies the principles of cost accounting to libraries, to call attention to the "bad books" in their collections that are compromised by age, error, abridgement, expurgation, plagiarism, copyright violation, libel, or fraud, is discussed. According to Charles Cutter, notes in catalog records should call attention to the best books but ignore the bad ones. Libraries that can afford to keep their "bad books," however, which often have a valuable second life, must call attention to their intellectual contexts in notes in the catalog records. Michael Bellesiles's Arming America, the most famous case of academic fraud at the turn of the twenty-first century, is used as a test case. Given the bias of content enhancement that automatically pulls content from the Web into library catalogs, catalog notes for "bad books" may be the only way for librarians to uphold their ethical principles regarding collection management while fulfilling their professional responsibilities to their users in calling attention to their "bad books."
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
  2. San Segundo, R.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Frías Montoya, J.A.: Ethical issues in control by algorithms : the user is the content (2023) 0.01
    0.005420443 = product of:
      0.05149421 = sum of:
        0.025747105 = weight(_text_:web in 1132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025747105 = score(doc=1132,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 1132, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1132)
        0.025747105 = weight(_text_:web in 1132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025747105 = score(doc=1132,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 1132, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1132)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper we discuss some ethical issues and challenges of the use of algorithms on the web from the perspective of knowledge organization. We review some of the problems that these algorithms and the filter bubbles pose for the users. We contextualize these issues within the user-based approaches to knowledge organization in a larger sense. We review some of the technologies that have been developed to counter these problems as well as initiatives from the knowledge organization field. We conclude with the necessity of adopting a critical and ethical stance towards the use of algorithms on the web and the need for an education in knowledge organization that addresses these issues.
  3. Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993) 0.01
    0.0052887825 = product of:
      0.050243434 = sum of:
        0.03801558 = weight(_text_:services in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03801558 = score(doc=2453,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
        0.012227853 = product of:
          0.024455706 = sum of:
            0.024455706 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024455706 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
    Abstract
    An awareness exists among Italian librarians of the need for an established code of ethics for library reference services. Considers the principles that such a code should incorporate; the US Commitment to Information services, for example, affirms users' rights of access to library books and resources, regardless of content and opinions expressed. Censoship is opposed and people are not barred from library use for ethnis, social or religious reasons. An ethical code would require library staff to be impartial, give attention and respect to users, allocate time properly, and avoid prejudice. Discusses the problems of library ethics which arise when user requests relate to sensitive topics e.g. euthansia, cocaine refining
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  4. Brody, R.: ¬The problem of information naïveté (2008) 0.01
    0.0051104426 = product of:
      0.048549205 = sum of:
        0.024274603 = weight(_text_:web in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024274603 = score(doc=1865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
        0.024274603 = weight(_text_:web in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024274603 = score(doc=1865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
    Abstract
    With the rapidly changing Web-enabled world, the already existing dichotomy between knowing of and knowing about, or information naïveté, widens daily. This article explores the ethical dilemmas that can result from the lack of information literacy. The article also discusses conditions and consequences of information naïveté, media bias, possessive memory, and limited contexts and abilities. To help avoid information failure, the author recommends producers, contributors, disseminators, and aggregators of information be less information naïve.
  5. Nagenborg, M.: Privatheit - Menschenrecht oder eine Frage des Anstandes? (2008) 0.00
    0.004471638 = product of:
      0.04248056 = sum of:
        0.02124028 = weight(_text_:web in 1698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02124028 = score(doc=1698,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 1698, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1698)
        0.02124028 = weight(_text_:web in 1698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02124028 = score(doc=1698,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 1698, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1698)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
    Abstract
    Im ersten Teil des Beitrages wird eine kurze Zusammenfassung der Diskussion um den Schutz der Privatheit in Recht und Ethik gegeben. Der Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf der Informationsethik. Im zweiten Teil werden einige für die Wissensorganisation relevante Beispiele für den Umgang mit personenbezogenen Daten diskutiert: u. a. Web Information Retrieval, Data Mining sowie FOAF als Beispiel für die Standardisierung von personenbezogenen Informationen.
  6. Zhang, J.: Archival context, digital content, and the ethics of digital archival representation : the ethics of identification in digital library metadata (2012) 0.00
    0.0031940269 = product of:
      0.030343255 = sum of:
        0.0151716275 = weight(_text_:web in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0151716275 = score(doc=419,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
        0.0151716275 = weight(_text_:web in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0151716275 = score(doc=419,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
    Abstract
    The findings of a recent study on digital archival representation raise some ethical concerns about how digital archival materials are organized, described, and made available for use on the Web. Archivists have a fundamental obligation to preserve and protect the authenticity and integrity of records in their holdings and, at the same time, have the responsibility to promote the use of records as a fundamental purpose of the keeping of archives (SAA 2005 Code of Ethics for Archivists V & VI). Is it an ethical practice that digital content in digital archives is deeply embedded in its contextual structure and generally underrepresented in digital archival systems? Similarly, is it ethical for archivists to detach digital items from their archival context in order to make them more "digital friendly" and more accessible to meet needs of some users? Do archivists have an obligation to bring the two representation systems together so that the context and content of digital archives can be better represented and archival materials "can be located and used by anyone, for any purpose, while still remaining authentic evidence of the work and life of the creator"? (Millar 2010, 157) This paper discusses the findings of the study and their ethical implications relating to digital archival description and representation.
  7. Bagatini, J.A.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.: Algorithmic discriminations and their ethical impacts on knowledge organization : a thematic domain-analysis (2023) 0.00
    0.0031940269 = product of:
      0.030343255 = sum of:
        0.0151716275 = weight(_text_:web in 1134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0151716275 = score(doc=1134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 1134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1134)
        0.0151716275 = weight(_text_:web in 1134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0151716275 = score(doc=1134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 1134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1134)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
    Abstract
    Personal data play a fundamental role in contemporary socioeconomic dynamics, with one of its primary aspects being the potential to facilitate discriminatory situations. This situation impacts the knowledge organization field especially because it considers personal data as elements (facets) to categorize persons under an economic and sometimes discriminatory perspective. The research corpus was collected at Scopus and Web of Science until the end of 2021, under the terms "data discrimination", "algorithmic bias", "algorithmic discrimination" and "fair algorithms". The obtained results allowed to infer that the analyzed knowledge domain predominantly incorporates personal data, whether in its behavioral dimension or in the scope of the so-called sensitive data. These data are susceptible to the action of algorithms of different orders, such as relevance, filtering, predictive, social ranking, content recommendation and random classification. Such algorithms can have discriminatory biases in their programming related to gender, sexual orientation, race, nationality, religion, age, social class, socioeconomic profile, physical appearance, and political positioning.
  8. EIIA; EUSIDIC; EIRENE: Code of practice for information brokers (1994) 0.00
    0.0022866516 = product of:
      0.04344638 = sum of:
        0.04344638 = weight(_text_:services in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04344638 = score(doc=1441,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.45892134 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Footnote
    The views in this document are those of the compiling parties and do not engage the Commission of the EC. - EIIA = The European Information Industray Association / EUSIDIC = The European Association of Information Services / EIRENE = The European Information Researchers Network
    Source
    Information services and use. 14(1994) no.2, S.115-121
  9. Danielson, E.S.: Ethics and reference services (1997) 0.00
    0.0022866516 = product of:
      0.04344638 = sum of:
        0.04344638 = weight(_text_:services in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04344638 = score(doc=482,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.45892134 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Footnote
    Contribution to an issue devoted to reference services for archives and manuscripts
  10. Hodson, S.S.: Ethical and legal aspects of archival services (2009) 0.00
    0.0022866516 = product of:
      0.04344638 = sum of:
        0.04344638 = weight(_text_:services in 3774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04344638 = score(doc=3774,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.45892134 = fieldWeight in 3774, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3774)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Abstract
    Archivists deal with legal and ethical issues every day in the course of administering collections of personal papers. This entry will discuss legal and ethical aspects of archival services in three areas: acquisitions, access, and terms of use, in the context of research libraries and manuscript repositories. It will not deal with government, corporate, or institutional archives.
  11. Behar, J.E.: Computer ethics : moral philosophy or professional propaganda? (1993) 0.00
    0.0020211334 = product of:
      0.038401537 = sum of:
        0.038401537 = weight(_text_:services in 8700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038401537 = score(doc=8700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.405633 = fieldWeight in 8700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8700)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Source
    Computers in human services. 9(1993) nos.3/4, S.441-453
  12. Jones, D.A.: Plays well with others, or the importance of collegiality within a reference unit (1998) 0.00
    0.0014147937 = product of:
      0.026881078 = sum of:
        0.026881078 = weight(_text_:services in 2446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026881078 = score(doc=2446,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2446, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2446)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Footnote
    Part of an issue devoted to the philosophical ideas underlying reference services
  13. Buchanan, E.A.: Ethical transformations in a global information age (1996) 0.00
    0.0014147937 = product of:
      0.026881078 = sum of:
        0.026881078 = weight(_text_:services in 2449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026881078 = score(doc=2449,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2449, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2449)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Source
    Technical services quarterly. 13(1996) nos.3/4, S.23-38
  14. Brown, Y.: From the reference desk to the jail house : unauthorized practice of law and librarians (1994) 0.00
    0.0014147937 = product of:
      0.026881078 = sum of:
        0.026881078 = weight(_text_:services in 2459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026881078 = score(doc=2459,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2459, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2459)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Source
    Legal reference services quarterly. 13(1994) no.4, S.31-45
  15. Beghtol, C.: ¬A proposed ethical warrant for global knowledge representation and organization systems (2002) 0.00
    0.0012126801 = product of:
      0.023040922 = sum of:
        0.023040922 = weight(_text_:services in 4462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023040922 = score(doc=4462,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 4462, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4462)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Abstract
    New technologies have made the increased globalization of information resources and services possible. In this situation, it is ethically and intellectually beneficial to protect cultural and information diversity. This paper analyzes the problems of creating ethically based globally accessible and culturally acceptable knowledge representation and organization systems, and foundation principles for the ethical treatment of different cultures are established on the basis of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). The concept of "cultural hospitality", which can act as a theoretical framework for the ethical warrant of knowledge representation and organization systems, is described. This broad discussion is grounded with an extended example of one cultural universal, the concept of time and its expression in calendars. Methods of achieving cultural and user hospitality in information systems are discussed for their potential for creating ethically based systems. It is concluded that cultural hospitality is a promising concept for assessing the ethical foundations of new knowledge representation and organization systems and for planning revisions to existing systems.
  16. Rubin, R.; Froehlich, T.J.: Ethical aspects of library and information science (2009) 0.00
    0.0012126801 = product of:
      0.023040922 = sum of:
        0.023040922 = weight(_text_:services in 3778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023040922 = score(doc=3778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 3778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3778)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Abstract
    This entry discusses many of the ethical considerations in the library and information science professions: collection development, censorship, privacy, reference services, copyright, administrative concerns, information access, technology-related issues, and problems with conflicting loyalties. It surveys the factors that affect ethical deliberations in the information professions: social utility, survival, social responsibility, and respect for individuality. It also looks at professional factors in ethical deliberations, such as professional codes of ethics, and the values that support ethical principles of professional conduct: truth, tolerance, individual liberty, justice and beauty. In the final section, it indicates the kinds of actions to promote ethical conduct at the organizational, professional and individual levels. As a final caveat, it indicates that ethical decisions require deliberation and reflection. While one can articulate values, factors, codes, and actions, they inform ethical reflection that must often confront and negotiate dilemmas and tensions.
  17. Garcia Gutíerrez, A.L.: Knowledge organization from a "culture of the border" : towards a transcultural ethics of mediation (2003) 0.00
    0.0010105667 = product of:
      0.019200768 = sum of:
        0.019200768 = weight(_text_:services in 2771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019200768 = score(doc=2771,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 2771, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2771)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Abstract
    The social construction of the digital memory, let us call it "exomemory", has traditionally been a task related to aseptical procedures and tools but, in fact, it is an activity crossed by complexity and mediation. The positivist model claims for objectivity as the frame and goal in and for which electronic and extemal memory workers and thinkers have to fight and strive. The theoretical concept of multiculturalism is a dangerous slogan and not sufficiently critical as to tackle the rights of diversity and singularity even within a given (but not real) "monocultural society". Exomemory mediators as librarians, archivists, documentalists or virtual curators are not capable of addressing their tasks from a holistic approach compatible with every culture without determining their products and services of symbolic value from an hegemonic position, should it be at local, national or global level. So, these professionals and scholars have to practice reflexivity and include other metatheoretical concepts in their ordinary actions so that users may know who is behind the analysis, "whose are the tracks". To achieve this aim, the field of research called "Knowledge organization" must be opened to a new paradigm in which Critical Theory and Hermeneutics go together. Several theoretical and metaphorical terms commonly used are reviewed and forced to their paradoxical limits. The essay stands for a "culture of the border" as the best imaginary place to depict and accept those contradictions denied by dogmatic and hermetic intelligence.
  18. Frohmann, B.: Subjectivity and information ethics (2008) 0.00
    8.084534E-4 = product of:
      0.015360615 = sum of:
        0.015360615 = weight(_text_:services in 1360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015360615 = score(doc=1360,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.1622532 = fieldWeight in 1360, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1360)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Abstract
    In A Brief History of Information Ethics, Thomas Froehlich (2004) quickly surveyed under several broad categories some of the many issues that constitute information ethics: under the category of librarianship - censorship, privacy, access, balance in collections, copyright, fair use, and codes of ethics; under information science, which Froehlich sees as closely related to librarianship - confidentiality, bias, and quality of information; under computer ethics - intellectual property, privacy, fair representation, nonmaleficence, computer crime, software reliability, artificial intelligence, and e-commerce; under cyberethics (issues related to the Internet, or cyberspace) - expert systems, artificial intelligence (again), and robotics; under media ethics - news, impartiality, journalistic ethics, deceit, lies, sexuality, censorship (again), and violence in the press; and under intercultural information ethics - digital divide, and the ethical role of the Internet for social, political, cultural, and economic development. Many of the debates in information ethics, on these and other issues, have to do with specific kinds of relationships between subjects. The most important subject and a familiar figure in information ethics is the ethical subject engaged in moral deliberation, whether appearing as the bearer of moral rights and obligations to other subjects, or as an agent whose actions are judged, whether by others or by oneself, according to the standards of various moral codes and ethical principles. Many debates in information ethics revolve around conflicts between those acting according to principles of unfettered access to information and those finding some information offensive or harmful. Subjectivity is at the heart of information ethics. But how is subjectivity understood? Can it be understood in ways that broaden ethical reflection to include problems that remain invisible when subjectivity is taken for granted and when how it is created remains unquestioned? This article proposes some answers by investigating the meaning and role of subjectivity in information ethics.[In an article on cyberethics (2000), I asserted that there was no information ethics in any special sense beyond the application of general ethical principles to information services. Here, I take a more expansive view.]
  19. Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998) 0.00
    7.3550997E-4 = product of:
      0.013974689 = sum of:
        0.013974689 = product of:
          0.027949378 = sum of:
            0.027949378 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027949378 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:57:43
  20. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.00
    7.3550997E-4 = product of:
      0.013974689 = sum of:
        0.013974689 = product of:
          0.027949378 = sum of:
            0.027949378 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027949378 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110